Re: Problem when making index in /usr/ports
bsd wrote: I no longer have the Japanese error, I have the arabic error no !! Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..kde-i18n-3.4.2: /usr/ports/ arabic/kde3-i18n non-existent -- dependency list incomplete === misc/kde3-i18n failed *** Error code 1 yup, it *isn't* a 'japanese' port issue (or arabic) - something in your system is telling it not to download certain ports, but the dependencies tell the system it needs them. Before reporting this error, verify that you are running a supported version of FreeBSD (see http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/) and that you have a complete and up-to-date ports collection. (INDEX builds are not supported with partial or out-of-date ports collections -- in particular, if you are using cvsup, you must cvsup the ports-all collection, and have no refuse files.) You most probably have a refuse file in place. every time I encountered this problem, it was that. You can either try removing the language (actually, the section of the ports tree) in question from the refuse file, but you'll have this problem again sooner or later. You can simply get rid of the refuse file altogether (it isnt that much of a bandwidth saver really), or: Note: the latest pre-generated version of INDEX may be fetched automatically with make fetchindex. run 'make fetchindex' after you update with cvsup. (which means you'll download the binary index from the cvsup server...so whatever you save by not downloading the language specific ports, you are probably using it here... Which steps do you think I should take to get rid of this error... ?? as above. Beto ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem when making index in /usr/ports
Hello, Since this morning I have problem generating my index whith the traditional make index executed in/usr/ports I have already make fetchindex but this didn't solve the issue. Any help will be apreciated. root:newmail 12:16 /usr/ports # make index Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..p5-Unicode-MapUTF8-1.09: /usr/ ports/japanese/p5-Jcode non-existent -- dependency list incomplete === converters/p5-Unicode-MapUTF8 failed *** Error code 1 1 error Before reporting this error, verify that you are running a supported version of FreeBSD (see http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/) and that you have a complete and up-to-date ports collection. (INDEX builds are not supported with partial or out-of-date ports collections -- in particular, if you are using cvsup, you must cvsup the ports-all collection, and have no refuse files.) If that is the case, then report the failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] together with relevant details of your ports configuration (including FreeBSD version, your architecture, your environment, and your /etc/make.conf settings, especially compiler flags and WITH/WITHOUT settings). Note: the latest pre-generated version of INDEX may be fetched automatically with make fetchindex. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports. root:newmail 12:17 /usr/ports # uname -a FreeBSD newmail.rmm.fr 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov 5 04:19:18 UTC 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/ src/sys/GENERIC i386 «?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§ Gregober --- PGP ID -- 0x1BA3C2FD bsd @at@ todoo.biz «?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem when making index in /usr/ports
bsd wrote: Hello, root:newmail 12:16 /usr/ports # make index Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..p5-Unicode-MapUTF8-1.09: /usr/ ports/japanese/p5-Jcode non-existent -- dependency list incomplete === converters/p5-Unicode-MapUTF8 failed *** Error code 1 1 error Before reporting this error, verify that you are running a supported version of FreeBSD (see http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/) and that you have a complete and up-to-date ports collection. (INDEX builds are not supported with partial or out-of-date ports collections -- in particular, if you are using cvsup, you must cvsup the ports-all collection, and have no refuse files.) If that is the case, then report the failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] together with relevant details of your ports configuration (including FreeBSD version, your architecture, your environment, and your /etc/make.conf settings, especially compiler flags and WITH/WITHOUT settings). make sure you dont' have the japanese tree excluded via /usr/local/sup/refuse. these dependencies are the main reason I gave up on refuse files and started using pkgtools.conf and the port* tools. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
INDEX* in /usr/ports
What different in this files?! I see the different package versions, but what naything else? For FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x different package organization? Why? Best regards, Tarc ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: INDEX* in /usr/ports
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 06:38:57PM +, Tarc wrote: What different in this files?! I see the different package versions, but what naything else? For FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x different package organization? Why? The dependencies for many ports are different between 4.x and 5.x, which is why there are two different INDEX files generated. The different depencies are mostly due to: - the standard system compiler being gcc-3.4.x in FreeBSD-5.x and gcc-2.95.4 under FreeBSD-4.x: gcc-3.4.x is much stricter about C++ syntax and not entirely code compatible with gcc-2.95.4, so there's quite a few ports that depend on installing one of the gcc ports in order to compile under 4.x - changes in the threading support between 4.x and 5.x - various ports that only work under 5.x or that only work under 4.x, usually related to one or both of the previous points Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK pgpzdRwA3ZJ7N.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: INDEX* in /usr/ports
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 04:29:35PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 06:38:57PM +, Tarc wrote: What different in this files?! I see the different package versions, but what naything else? For FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x different package organization? Why? The dependencies for many ports are different between 4.x and 5.x, which is why there are two different INDEX files generated. The different depencies are mostly due to: - the standard system compiler being gcc-3.4.x in FreeBSD-5.x and gcc-2.95.4 under FreeBSD-4.x: gcc-3.4.x is much stricter about C++ syntax and not entirely code compatible with gcc-2.95.4, so there's quite a few ports that depend on installing one of the gcc ports in order to compile under 4.x Note, that standart system compiller in FreeBSD RELENG_5_2 is gcc-3.3.3 - changes in the threading support between 4.x and 5.x - various ports that only work under 5.x or that only work under 4.x, usually related to one or both of the previous points Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK But why many ports differ between together only by version or revision number? and in dependenses of them stay different versions. How make(1) check this difference? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
