Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question
Ok, Sorry by the late but yesterday when i went home, 2 of my 3 modems stopped working. One of them, provider problem, the other so strange, i can get connected in my xp box but no in FreeBSD, lookup deeper i realized that enumeration of the usb port number has changed. I change my ppp.conf according to new usr port number but i was not able to establish de connection, i get NO CARRIER. It was the time i decided go to sleep. Well when i get back to my home i will still probing, and let you know how things are going. Thank for all your support, Regards, Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/9 Leonardo Santagostini lsantagost...@gmail.com Ok, Here it comes my ppp.conf default: set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command set timeout 180 enable dns accept dns allow users mjl add default HISADDR set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 disable ipv6cp disable mppe disable vjcomp disable acfcomp disable deflate disable pred1 disable protocomp disable lqr deny chap claro: set device /dev/cuaU6.2 set phone *99# set authname clarogprs set authkey clarogprs999 set dial ABORT BUSY TIMEOUT 5 \ \\ \ ATZ OK-AT-OK \ ATZ OK-AT-OK \ AT+CFUN=1 OK-AT-OK \ AT+CSQ OK \ AT+CGDCONT=1,\\\IP\\\,\\\igprs.claro.com.ar\\\ OK \ AT+CGACT? OK-AT-OK \ AT+CGATT? OK \ AT+COPS? OK \ ATDT*99# CONNECT set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 add! default HISADDR movistar: set device /dev/cuaU2.0 set phone *99# set authname internet set authkey internet set dial ABORT BUSY TIMEOUT 5 \ \\ \ ATZ OK-AT-OK \ ATZ OK-AT-OK \ AT+CFUN=1 OK-AT-OK \ AT+CSQ OK \ AT+CGDCONT=1,\\\IP\\\,\\\internet.gprs.unifon.com.ar\\\ OK \ AT+CGACT? OK-AT-OK \ AT+CGATT? OK \ AT+COPS? OK \ ATDT*99# CONNECT set ifaddr 10.0.0.11/0 10.0.0.12/0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 add! default HISADDR personal: set device /dev/cuaU0.1 set phone *99# set authname gprs set authkey gprs set dial ABORT BUSY TIMEOUT 5 \ \\ \ ATZ OK-AT-OK \ ATZ OK-AT-OK \ ATZ OK-AT-OK \ AT+CFUN=1 OK-AT-OK \ AT+CSQ OK \ AT+CGDCONT=1,\\\IP\\\,\\\gprs.personal.com\\\ OK \ AT+CGACT? OK-AT-OK \ AT+CGATT? OK \ AT+COPS? OK \ ATDT*99# CONNECT set ifaddr 10.0.0.21/0 10.0.0.22/0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 add! default HISADDR First of all i will try with PF It seems to me easier than other clues :-) C-ya Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/10 Leonardo Santagostini lsantagost...@gmail.com Hello All, in a few moments i will start making some test with the suggestions you give me. I will tell you how things are going. Thanks all for reply! Yours, Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/9 Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com Seems out of scope to OP, but cool info nonetheless. I'd like to get my web team to ditch a couple ISA servers for this, but sadly I doubt they will... -Original Message- From: bluethundr [mailto:bluethu...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 5:42 PM To: Gary Gatten Cc: Leonardo Santagostini; Nathan Vidican; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question This might be worth looking into as well! It's an open source load balancer that was originally developed by yahoo and released into the open source community. It is now a part of the Apache project: http://trafficserver.apache.org/ On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote: If three different providers, then to my knowledge you are SOL - mlppp is not an option - unless someone here knows something I don't - which is 100% likely :) Now, that said you can configure your routing to split the traffic amongst different connections - so traffic to/from certain hosts use connection A, other hosts use B, etc. You can even get fancy and route based on application and host if you wish. Ci$co calls this Policy Based Routing. I'm not sure if FBSD or another package such as pf allows similar functionality. My guess would be yes - but I don't know anything about that. As for bonding or aggregating your connections to appear as a single one - not an option AFAIK. G From: Leonardo Santagostini [mailto:lsantagost...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 2:52 PM To: Gary Gatten Cc: Chuck Swiger; Nathan Vidican; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question Hello all, Im using 3 different providers all from Argentina, Clora, Movistar and Personal. Thank you Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/9 Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.commailto:ggat...@waddell.com snip Also, may be obvious to point out, but all (3) connections must be from
Multiple tun loadbalancing question
Hello all, I have one freebsd 8.1 box with 3 3G mobile broadband connection. All connections works fine, but i want to do loadbalancing / fault tolerant with this 3 connections. I was reading about lagg interfaces, but i think is not the proper direction. Someone can point me to the rigth one? Thank you very much. Leonardo Santagostini ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Leonardo Santagostini lsantagost...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I have one freebsd 8.1 box with 3 3G mobile broadband connection. All connections works fine, but i want to do loadbalancing / fault tolerant with this 3 connections. I was reading about lagg interfaces, but i think is not the proper direction. Someone can point me to the rigth one? Thank you very much. Leonardo Santagostini ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I think lagg will not do the job, you have to set up PF(packet Filter) to do some kind of Round-Robin. -- Still Going Strong!!! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question
Might I suggest you look into MultiLink PPP, or MLPPP - standard FreeBSD ppp does support it. It allows for round-robin, or packet-splitting accross multiple PPP connections to pool bandwidth. I am currently using MLPPP on FreeBSD 8 with multiple DSL connections to the internet and thus far it works great. On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Leonardo Santagostini lsantagost...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I have one freebsd 8.1 box with 3 3G mobile broadband connection. All connections works fine, but i want to do loadbalancing / fault tolerant with this 3 connections. I was reading about lagg interfaces, but i think is not the proper direction. Someone can point me to the rigth one? Thank you very much. Leonardo Santagostini ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Nathan Vidican nat...@vidican.com (519) 962-9987 (Canada) (313) 586-1982 (USA) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question
WOW Excellent !! I'll give it a try at night, later i will reply my result. Thank you Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/9 Nathan Vidican nat...@vidican.com Might I suggest you look into MultiLink PPP, or MLPPP - standard FreeBSD ppp does support it. It allows for round-robin, or packet-splitting accross multiple PPP connections to pool bandwidth. I am currently using MLPPP on FreeBSD 8 with multiple DSL connections to the internet and thus far it works great. On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Leonardo Santagostini lsantagost...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I have one freebsd 8.1 box with 3 3G mobile broadband connection. All connections works fine, but i want to do loadbalancing / fault tolerant with this 3 connections. I was reading about lagg interfaces, but i think is not the proper direction. Someone can point me to the rigth one? Thank you very much. Leonardo Santagostini ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Nathan Vidican nat...@vidican.com (519) 962-9987 (Canada) (313) 586-1982 (USA) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question
I will also probe PF !!! Kind regards Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/9 Diego Arias dak@gmail.com On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Leonardo Santagostini lsantagost...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I have one freebsd 8.1 box with 3 3G mobile broadband connection. All connections works fine, but i want to do loadbalancing / fault tolerant with this 3 connections. I was reading about lagg interfaces, but i think is not the proper direction. Someone can point me to the rigth one? Thank you very much. Leonardo Santagostini ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I think lagg will not do the job, you have to set up PF(packet Filter) to do some kind of Round-Robin. -- Still Going Strong!!! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question
I was looking for mlppp and as far as i could see, mlppp works only on dsl connections. In my case im working with 3 3G usb dongles, so its no pppoe, just ppp Do you have some working config? Thanks in advance, Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/9 Leonardo Santagostini lsantagost...@gmail.com WOW Excellent !! I'll give it a try at night, later i will reply my result. Thank you Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/9 Nathan Vidican nat...@vidican.com Might I suggest you look into MultiLink PPP, or MLPPP - standard FreeBSD ppp does support it. It allows for round-robin, or packet-splitting accross multiple PPP connections to pool bandwidth. I am currently using MLPPP on FreeBSD 8 with multiple DSL connections to the internet and thus far it works great. On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Leonardo Santagostini lsantagost...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I have one freebsd 8.1 box with 3 3G mobile broadband connection. All connections works fine, but i want to do loadbalancing / fault tolerant with this 3 connections. I was reading about lagg interfaces, but i think is not the proper direction. Someone can point me to the rigth one? Thank you very much. Leonardo Santagostini ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Nathan Vidican nat...@vidican.com (519) 962-9987 (Canada) (313) 586-1982 (USA) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question
On Nov 9, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Leonardo Santagostini wrote: I was looking for mlppp and as far as i could see, mlppp works only on dsl connections. No, it applies to anything supporting PPP; DSL lines using PPPoE, T1/PRI lines using PPP encapsulation for the data side, and even modem dialups using PPP can all be used with MLPPP. In my case im working with 3 3G usb dongles, so its no pppoe, just ppp Do you have some working config? The main issue you might face is that your provider also needs to provide MLPPP support. They might not be willing to do so with wireless equipment. Regards, -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: Multiple tun loadbalancing question
snip Also, may be obvious to point out, but all (3) connections must be from the same provider. In the lab you could MAYBE get a stable/usable connection from multiple providers (with just ppp or 'x' encap) by splitting the requests on the egress side - but it's highly unlikely in the real world. In most cases the traffic load is asymmetrical and heavily biased towards ingress traffic, so even if you could get it to work - it wouldn't provide much benefit. Just curious, what provider are you using? font size=1 div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in' /div This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. /font ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question
Hello all, Im using 3 different providers all from Argentina, Clora, Movistar and Personal. Thank you Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/9 Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com snip Also, may be obvious to point out, but all (3) connections must be from the same provider. In the lab you could MAYBE get a stable/usable connection from multiple providers (with just ppp or 'x' encap) by splitting the requests on the egress side - but it's highly unlikely in the real world. In most cases the traffic load is asymmetrical and heavily biased towards ingress traffic, so even if you could get it to work - it wouldn't provide much benefit. Just curious, what provider are you using? font size=1 div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in' /div This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. /font ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question
On Nov 9, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Leonardo Santagostini wrote: Do you have some working config? To answer this part more specifically, from man ppp: Multi-link capabilities are enabled using the ``set mrru'' command (set maximum reconstructed receive unit). Once multi-link is enabled, ppp will attempt to negotiate a multi-link connection with the peer. [ ... ] Armed with this information, the following configuration might be used: mp: set timeout 0 set log phase chat set device /dev/cuad0 /dev/cuad1 /dev/cuad2 set phone 123456789 set dial ABORT BUSY ABORT NO\sCARRIER TIMEOUT 5 \\ ATZ \ OK-AT-OK \\dATDT\\T TIMEOUT 45 CONNECT set login set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 set authname ppp set authkey assword set mrru 1500 clone 1,2,3# Create 3 new links - duplicates of the default link deflink remove# Delete the default link (called ``deflink'') Note how all cloning is done at the end of the configuration. Usually, the link will be configured first, then cloned. If you wish all links to be up all the time, you can add the following line to the end of your configuration. link 1,2,3 set mode ddial If you want the links to dial on demand, this command could be used: link * set mode auto Links may be tied to specific names by removing the ``set device'' line above, and specifying the following after the ``clone'' command: link 1 set device /dev/cuad0 link 2 set device /dev/cuad1 link 3 set device /dev/cuad2 Use the ``help'' command to see which commands require context (using the ``link'' command), which have optional context and which should not have any context. You might also check the fine FreeBSD Handbook for examples, also... Regards, -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: Multiple tun loadbalancing question
If three different providers, then to my knowledge you are SOL - mlppp is not an option - unless someone here knows something I don't - which is 100% likely :) Now, that said you can configure your routing to split the traffic amongst different connections - so traffic to/from certain hosts use connection A, other hosts use B, etc. You can even get fancy and route based on application and host if you wish. Ci$co calls this Policy Based Routing. I'm not sure if FBSD or another package such as pf allows similar functionality. My guess would be yes - but I don't know anything about that. As for bonding or aggregating your connections to appear as a single one - not an option AFAIK. G From: Leonardo Santagostini [mailto:lsantagost...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 2:52 PM To: Gary Gatten Cc: Chuck Swiger; Nathan Vidican; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question Hello all, Im using 3 different providers all from Argentina, Clora, Movistar and Personal. Thank you Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/9 Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.commailto:ggat...@waddell.com snip Also, may be obvious to point out, but all (3) connections must be from the same provider. In the lab you could MAYBE get a stable/usable connection from multiple providers (with just ppp or 'x' encap) by splitting the requests on the egress side - but it's highly unlikely in the real world. In most cases the traffic load is asymmetrical and heavily biased towards ingress traffic, so even if you could get it to work - it wouldn't provide much benefit. Just curious, what provider are you using? font size=1 div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in' /div This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. /font ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question
This might be worth looking into as well! It's an open source load balancer that was originally developed by yahoo and released into the open source community. It is now a part of the Apache project: http://trafficserver.apache.org/ On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote: If three different providers, then to my knowledge you are SOL - mlppp is not an option - unless someone here knows something I don't - which is 100% likely :) Now, that said you can configure your routing to split the traffic amongst different connections - so traffic to/from certain hosts use connection A, other hosts use B, etc. You can even get fancy and route based on application and host if you wish. Ci$co calls this Policy Based Routing. I'm not sure if FBSD or another package such as pf allows similar functionality. My guess would be yes - but I don't know anything about that. As for bonding or aggregating your connections to appear as a single one - not an option AFAIK. G From: Leonardo Santagostini [mailto:lsantagost...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 2:52 PM To: Gary Gatten Cc: Chuck Swiger; Nathan Vidican; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question Hello all, Im using 3 different providers all from Argentina, Clora, Movistar and Personal. Thank you Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/9 Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.commailto:ggat...@waddell.com snip Also, may be obvious to point out, but all (3) connections must be from the same provider. In the lab you could MAYBE get a stable/usable connection from multiple providers (with just ppp or 'x' encap) by splitting the requests on the egress side - but it's highly unlikely in the real world. In most cases the traffic load is asymmetrical and heavily biased towards ingress traffic, so even if you could get it to work - it wouldn't provide much benefit. Just curious, what provider are you using? font size=1 div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in' /div This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. /font ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5A4873A9 Share and enjoy!! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: Multiple tun loadbalancing question
Seems out of scope to OP, but cool info nonetheless. I'd like to get my web team to ditch a couple ISA servers for this, but sadly I doubt they will... -Original Message- From: bluethundr [mailto:bluethu...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 5:42 PM To: Gary Gatten Cc: Leonardo Santagostini; Nathan Vidican; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question This might be worth looking into as well! It's an open source load balancer that was originally developed by yahoo and released into the open source community. It is now a part of the Apache project: http://trafficserver.apache.org/ On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote: If three different providers, then to my knowledge you are SOL - mlppp is not an option - unless someone here knows something I don't - which is 100% likely :) Now, that said you can configure your routing to split the traffic amongst different connections - so traffic to/from certain hosts use connection A, other hosts use B, etc. You can even get fancy and route based on application and host if you wish. Ci$co calls this Policy Based Routing. I'm not sure if FBSD or another package such as pf allows similar functionality. My guess would be yes - but I don't know anything about that. As for bonding or aggregating your connections to appear as a single one - not an option AFAIK. G From: Leonardo Santagostini [mailto:lsantagost...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 2:52 PM To: Gary Gatten Cc: Chuck Swiger; Nathan Vidican; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question Hello all, Im using 3 different providers all from Argentina, Clora, Movistar and Personal. Thank you Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/9 Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.commailto:ggat...@waddell.com snip Also, may be obvious to point out, but all (3) connections must be from the same provider. In the lab you could MAYBE get a stable/usable connection from multiple providers (with just ppp or 'x' encap) by splitting the requests on the egress side - but it's highly unlikely in the real world. In most cases the traffic load is asymmetrical and heavily biased towards ingress traffic, so even if you could get it to work - it wouldn't provide much benefit. Just curious, what provider are you using? font size=1 div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in' /div This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. /font ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5A4873A9 Share and enjoy!! font size=1 div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in' /div This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. /font ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question
Hello All, in a few moments i will start making some test with the suggestions you give me. I will tell you how things are going. Thanks all for reply! Yours, Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/9 Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com Seems out of scope to OP, but cool info nonetheless. I'd like to get my web team to ditch a couple ISA servers for this, but sadly I doubt they will... -Original Message- From: bluethundr [mailto:bluethu...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 5:42 PM To: Gary Gatten Cc: Leonardo Santagostini; Nathan Vidican; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question This might be worth looking into as well! It's an open source load balancer that was originally developed by yahoo and released into the open source community. It is now a part of the Apache project: http://trafficserver.apache.org/ On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote: If three different providers, then to my knowledge you are SOL - mlppp is not an option - unless someone here knows something I don't - which is 100% likely :) Now, that said you can configure your routing to split the traffic amongst different connections - so traffic to/from certain hosts use connection A, other hosts use B, etc. You can even get fancy and route based on application and host if you wish. Ci$co calls this Policy Based Routing. I'm not sure if FBSD or another package such as pf allows similar functionality. My guess would be yes - but I don't know anything about that. As for bonding or aggregating your connections to appear as a single one - not an option AFAIK. G From: Leonardo Santagostini [mailto:lsantagost...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 2:52 PM To: Gary Gatten Cc: Chuck Swiger; Nathan Vidican; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question Hello all, Im using 3 different providers all from Argentina, Clora, Movistar and Personal. Thank you Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/9 Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.commailto:ggat...@waddell.com snip Also, may be obvious to point out, but all (3) connections must be from the same provider. In the lab you could MAYBE get a stable/usable connection from multiple providers (with just ppp or 'x' encap) by splitting the requests on the egress side - but it's highly unlikely in the real world. In most cases the traffic load is asymmetrical and heavily biased towards ingress traffic, so even if you could get it to work - it wouldn't provide much benefit. Just curious, what provider are you using? font size=1 div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in' /div This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. /font ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5A4873A9 Share and enjoy!! font size=1 div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in' /div This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. /font ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question
Ok, Here it comes my ppp.conf default: set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command set timeout 180 enable dns accept dns allow users mjl add default HISADDR set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 disable ipv6cp disable mppe disable vjcomp disable acfcomp disable deflate disable pred1 disable protocomp disable lqr deny chap claro: set device /dev/cuaU6.2 set phone *99# set authname clarogprs set authkey clarogprs999 set dial ABORT BUSY TIMEOUT 5 \ \\ \ ATZ OK-AT-OK \ ATZ OK-AT-OK \ AT+CFUN=1 OK-AT-OK \ AT+CSQ OK \ AT+CGDCONT=1,\\\IP\\\,\\\igprs.claro.com.ar\\\ OK \ AT+CGACT? OK-AT-OK \ AT+CGATT? OK \ AT+COPS? OK \ ATDT*99# CONNECT set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 add! default HISADDR movistar: set device /dev/cuaU2.0 set phone *99# set authname internet set authkey internet set dial ABORT BUSY TIMEOUT 5 \ \\ \ ATZ OK-AT-OK \ ATZ OK-AT-OK \ AT+CFUN=1 OK-AT-OK \ AT+CSQ OK \ AT+CGDCONT=1,\\\IP\\\,\\\internet.gprs.unifon.com.ar\\\ OK \ AT+CGACT? OK-AT-OK \ AT+CGATT? OK \ AT+COPS? OK \ ATDT*99# CONNECT set ifaddr 10.0.0.11/0 10.0.0.12/0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 add! default HISADDR personal: set device /dev/cuaU0.1 set phone *99# set authname gprs set authkey gprs set dial ABORT BUSY TIMEOUT 5 \ \\ \ ATZ OK-AT-OK \ ATZ OK-AT-OK \ ATZ OK-AT-OK \ AT+CFUN=1 OK-AT-OK \ AT+CSQ OK \ AT+CGDCONT=1,\\\IP\\\,\\\gprs.personal.com\\\ OK \ AT+CGACT? OK-AT-OK \ AT+CGATT? OK \ AT+COPS? OK \ ATDT*99# CONNECT set ifaddr 10.0.0.21/0 10.0.0.22/0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 add! default HISADDR First of all i will try with PF It seems to me easier than other clues :-) C-ya Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/10 Leonardo Santagostini lsantagost...@gmail.com Hello All, in a few moments i will start making some test with the suggestions you give me. I will tell you how things are going. Thanks all for reply! Yours, Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/9 Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com Seems out of scope to OP, but cool info nonetheless. I'd like to get my web team to ditch a couple ISA servers for this, but sadly I doubt they will... -Original Message- From: bluethundr [mailto:bluethu...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 5:42 PM To: Gary Gatten Cc: Leonardo Santagostini; Nathan Vidican; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question This might be worth looking into as well! It's an open source load balancer that was originally developed by yahoo and released into the open source community. It is now a part of the Apache project: http://trafficserver.apache.org/ On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote: If three different providers, then to my knowledge you are SOL - mlppp is not an option - unless someone here knows something I don't - which is 100% likely :) Now, that said you can configure your routing to split the traffic amongst different connections - so traffic to/from certain hosts use connection A, other hosts use B, etc. You can even get fancy and route based on application and host if you wish. Ci$co calls this Policy Based Routing. I'm not sure if FBSD or another package such as pf allows similar functionality. My guess would be yes - but I don't know anything about that. As for bonding or aggregating your connections to appear as a single one - not an option AFAIK. G From: Leonardo Santagostini [mailto:lsantagost...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 2:52 PM To: Gary Gatten Cc: Chuck Swiger; Nathan Vidican; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question Hello all, Im using 3 different providers all from Argentina, Clora, Movistar and Personal. Thank you Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/9 Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.commailto:ggat...@waddell.com snip Also, may be obvious to point out, but all (3) connections must be from the same provider. In the lab you could MAYBE get a stable/usable connection from multiple providers (with just ppp or 'x' encap) by splitting the requests on the egress side - but it's highly unlikely in the real world. In most cases the traffic load is asymmetrical and heavily biased towards ingress traffic, so even if you could get it to work - it wouldn't provide much benefit. Just curious, what provider are you using? font size=1 div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in' /div This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended
