Re: Ports tree is already up to date.
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: Coincidence or the portsnap server is wrong? ./port.sh Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.FreeBSD.org... done. Latest snapshot on server matches what we already have. No updates needed. Ports tree is already up to date. Portsnap builds were offline over the weekend due to a hardware failure, but this is now fixed and portsnap should now be able to update again. Colin Percival ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ports tree is already up to date.
Hello, I have a habit to download latest ports from FreeBSD farily regularly (a couple of times a week). I use portsnap for that. For the first time today I came accross a message that my ports tree is completely up to date. Hard to believe that as I have not fetched the updates for the last 2 (or 3) days and there are always a few new or updated ones. Coincidence or the portsnap server is wrong? ./port.sh Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.FreeBSD.org... done. Latest snapshot on server matches what we already have. No updates needed. Ports tree is already up to date. Thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ports tree is already up to date.
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:07:50 +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: Hard to believe that as I have not fetched the updates for the last 2 (or 3) days and there are always a few new or updated ones. Coincidence or the portsnap server is wrong? You're not the only one. I just hopped on here to check to see if there was any mention of a ports freeze that I missed. Figure 6.3 is just around the corner...maybe? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ports tree is already up to date.
On Oct 1, 2007, at 11:43 AMOct 1, 2007, Scott I. Remick wrote: On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:07:50 +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: Hard to believe that as I have not fetched the updates for the last 2 (or 3) days and there are always a few new or updated ones. Coincidence or the portsnap server is wrong? You're not the only one. I just hopped on here to check to see if there was any mention of a ports freeze that I missed. Figure 6.3 is just around the corner...maybe? IIRC, 7.0 will probably be released first. We could be looking at that. - Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ports tree is already up to date.
Scott I. Remick wrote: On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:07:50 +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: Hard to believe that as I have not fetched the updates for the last 2 (or 3) days and there are always a few new or updated ones. Coincidence or the portsnap server is wrong? You're not the only one. I just hopped on here to check to see if there was any mention of a ports freeze that I missed. Figure 6.3 is just around the corner...maybe? I suppose it's possible, or 7.0 as Eric suggests, but refer to recent ports@ posts regarding autoconf failures; just speculation on my part, but it could have something to do with the effect you have noticed. 'Tis a puzzlement! Kevin Kinsey -- The trouble with computers is that they do what you tell them, not what you want. -- D. Cohen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
