Re: Portsupgrade -uU

2002-11-21 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 11:44:10PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:

> Mmm..the dependency list warnings hit with me with complaints about
> things not found in "japanese". Since I have a refuse file that excludes
> all the non-English languages, and the ports directory for them do not
> exist I am a bit puzzled. I get the odd one for chinese, but none for 
> any of the other languages I don't install. Co-incidentally I have
> literally just run make index, afre a cvsup a few hours ago, and it
> still whines about missing japanese dependencies.

If you do not have the entire ports collection installed then 'make
index' is not supported or likely to work correctly.

Kris



msg09691/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Portsupgrade -uU

2002-11-21 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:21:30AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:28:45PM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote:
> > At 02:04 AM 11/21/02, you wrote:
> > >On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:21:07AM -0600, Scott Gerhardt wrote:
> > >>
> > >> When running "portsupgrade -uU" I get the output below.  How can I fix 
> > >these
> > >> malformed entries, non-existent entries and incomplete dependencies?
> > >> Running "pkgdb -F" shows everything to be fine.
> > >
> > >If you're running "portsdb -Uu", you *don't*. It's up to port
> > >maintainers to fix the problem with the port entries. Most of the
> > >output are just warnings (intended for maintainers).
> 
> INDEX builds shouldn't have any warnings if you perform them in a
> clean environment.  Either your ports collection is out of date
> (i.e. in an inconsistent state) or the index build is picking up
> things from the host environment like installed ports,
> WITH_*/WITHOUT_* variables, etc.  If the latter, it's a bug in
> portupgrade..someone should investigate and report it to the author.
> 
Mmm..the dependency list warnings hit with me with complaints about
things not found in "japanese". Since I have a refuse file that excludes
all the non-English languages, and the ports directory for them do not
exist I am a bit puzzled. I get the odd one for chinese, but none for 
any of the other languages I don't install. Co-incidentally I have
literally just run make index, afre a cvsup a few hours ago, and it
still whines about missing japanese dependencies.


-- 
Regards
   Cliff Sarginson 
   The Netherlands

[ This mail has been checked as virus-free ]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Re: Portsupgrade -uU

2002-11-21 Thread Kent Stewart


Kris Kennaway wrote:

On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:58:44PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote:



I use the /usr/ports/Tools/portbuild/scripts/makeindex script on bento
that takes care of everything to generate a clean INDEX..I probably
should fold this back into 'make index' itself.


I changed my uports script to use "make index" for the time being.





Something is seriously wrong with the INDEX that portsdb -U generates.



Yes, it appears so.  I've CC'ed knu@



I fwd'ed what I had sent previously after I figured out that I had 
picked on jesper. What has me concerned at this point is what I 
produced with my

"portupgrade -pufa"

It was based on the bad INDEX produced by portsdb -uU and the 
resulting packages were upgraded on my slower machines.

Kent

--
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message


Re: Portsupgrade -uU

2002-11-21 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:58:44PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote:

> >>INDEX builds shouldn't have any warnings if you perform them in a
> >>clean environment.  Either your ports collection is out of date
> >>(i.e. in an inconsistent state) or the index build is picking up
> >>things from the host environment like installed ports,
> >>WITH_*/WITHOUT_* variables, etc.  If the latter, it's a bug in
> >>portupgrade..someone should investigate and report it to the author.
> >
> >
> >I thought that I have a clean environment. There are no WITH_*/WITHOU_* 
> >variables in my /etc/make.conf. I just finished doing a "portupgrade 
> >-aufp" and still get them.
> >
> >About the only time I don't see them, is right before a release and you 
> >are building iso's. The messages are real. For example, I see messages like
> >
> >p5-Net-SSH-Perl-1.23:"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
> >p5-Net-SSH-Perl-1.23:"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
> >
> >and the INDEX that is built has no r-deps. The Makefile sets r-deps to
> >RUN_DEPENDS=${BUILD_DEPENDS}
> >but I have a b-deps with entries and a "R-deps:" with no entry.
> >
> >One thing I have noticed is that most of them have a "PKGNAMEPREFIX= 
> >p5-" syntax.
> >
> >I have thought about hiding them but considered that similar to 
> >redirecting my "buildworld to > /dev/null" and then doing an installworld.
> 
> I have done some experimenting and what I see using net-ssh-perl for 
> the test is the following:
> 
> portsdb -uU
> make search name=Net-SSH-Perl
> Port:   p5-Net-SSH-Perl-1.23
> Path:   /usr/ports/net/p5-Net-SSH-Perl
> Info:   Perl5 module implements both the SSH1 and SSH2 protocols
> Maint:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Index:  net perl5
> B-deps: p5-Convert-PEM-0.06 p5-Crypt-DH-0.03 p5-Crypt-DSA-0.12 
> p5-Crypt-Random-1.11 p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 p5-Digest-MD5-2.20 
> p5-Digest-SHA1-2.01 p5-MIME-Base64-2.12 p5-Math-Pari-2.010201
> R-deps:
> 
> make index & portsdb -u
> make search name=Net-SSH-Perl
> Port:   p5-Net-SSH-Perl-1.23
> Path:   /usr/ports/net/p5-Net-SSH-Perl
> Info:   Perl5 module implements both the SSH1 and SSH2 protocols
> Maint:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Index:  net perl5
> B-deps: p5-Convert-PEM-0.06 p5-Crypt-DH-0.03 p5-Crypt-DSA-0.12 
> p5-Crypt-IDEA-1.01 p5-Crypt-RSA-1.48 p5-Crypt-Random-1.11 
> p5-Digest-BubbleBabble-0.01 p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 p5-Digest-MD5-2.20 
> p5-Digest-SHA1-2.01 p5-IO-1.20 p5-MIME-Base64-2.12 p5-Math-GMP-1.07 
> p5-Math-Pari-2.010201 p5-String-CRC32-1.2
> R-deps: p5-Convert-PEM-0.06 p5-Crypt-DH-0.03 p5-Crypt-DSA-0.12 
> p5-Crypt-IDEA-1.01 p5-Crypt-RSA-1.48 p5-Crypt-Random-1.11 
> p5-Digest-BubbleBabble-0.01 p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 p5-Digest-MD5-2.20 
> p5-Digest-SHA1-2.01 p5-IO-1.20 p5-MIME-Base64-2.12 p5-Math-GMP-1.07 
> p5-Math-Pari-2.010201 p5-String-CRC32-1.2
> 
> The only thing "make index" complained about was
> Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-imlib-1.13.0

This one is because you have imlib installed, and freeciv auto-detects
this (unless you set WITHOUT_IMLIB or change PREFIX/X11BASE/LOCALBASE
to something bogus) and changes its package name (and configure
behaviour).  The duplicate comes because the freeciv-gtk port does the
same thing.

I use the /usr/ports/Tools/portbuild/scripts/makeindex script on bento
that takes care of everything to generate a clean INDEX..I probably
should fold this back into 'make index' itself.

> Something is seriously wrong with the INDEX that portsdb -U generates.

Yes, it appears so.  I've CC'ed knu@

Kris



msg09658/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Portsupgrade -uU

2002-11-21 Thread Kent Stewart


Kent Stewart wrote:



Kris Kennaway wrote:


On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:28:45PM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote:


At 02:04 AM 11/21/02, you wrote:


On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:21:07AM -0600, Scott Gerhardt wrote:


When running "portsupgrade -uU" I get the output below.  How can I fix 


these


malformed entries, non-existent entries and incomplete dependencies?
Running "pkgdb -F" shows everything to be fine.



If you're running "portsdb -Uu", you *don't*. It's up to port
maintainers to fix the problem with the port entries. Most of the
output are just warnings (intended for maintainers).





INDEX builds shouldn't have any warnings if you perform them in a
clean environment.  Either your ports collection is out of date
(i.e. in an inconsistent state) or the index build is picking up
things from the host environment like installed ports,
WITH_*/WITHOUT_* variables, etc.  If the latter, it's a bug in
portupgrade..someone should investigate and report it to the author.



I thought that I have a clean environment. There are no WITH_*/WITHOU_* 
variables in my /etc/make.conf. I just finished doing a "portupgrade 
-aufp" and still get them.

About the only time I don't see them, is right before a release and you 
are building iso's. The messages are real. For example, I see messages like

p5-Net-SSH-Perl-1.23:"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
p5-Net-SSH-Perl-1.23:"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete

and the INDEX that is built has no r-deps. The Makefile sets r-deps to
RUN_DEPENDS=${BUILD_DEPENDS}
but I have a b-deps with entries and a "R-deps:" with no entry.

One thing I have noticed is that most of them have a "PKGNAMEPREFIX= 
p5-" syntax.

I have thought about hiding them but considered that similar to 
redirecting my "buildworld to > /dev/null" and then doing an installworld.

I have done some experimenting and what I see using net-ssh-perl for 
the test is the following:

portsdb -uU
make search name=Net-SSH-Perl
Port:   p5-Net-SSH-Perl-1.23
Path:   /usr/ports/net/p5-Net-SSH-Perl
Info:   Perl5 module implements both the SSH1 and SSH2 protocols
Maint:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index:  net perl5
B-deps: p5-Convert-PEM-0.06 p5-Crypt-DH-0.03 p5-Crypt-DSA-0.12 
p5-Crypt-Random-1.11 p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 p5-Digest-MD5-2.20 
p5-Digest-SHA1-2.01 p5-MIME-Base64-2.12 p5-Math-Pari-2.010201
R-deps:

make index & portsdb -u
make search name=Net-SSH-Perl
Port:   p5-Net-SSH-Perl-1.23
Path:   /usr/ports/net/p5-Net-SSH-Perl
Info:   Perl5 module implements both the SSH1 and SSH2 protocols
Maint:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index:  net perl5
B-deps: p5-Convert-PEM-0.06 p5-Crypt-DH-0.03 p5-Crypt-DSA-0.12 
p5-Crypt-IDEA-1.01 p5-Crypt-RSA-1.48 p5-Crypt-Random-1.11 
p5-Digest-BubbleBabble-0.01 p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 p5-Digest-MD5-2.20 
p5-Digest-SHA1-2.01 p5-IO-1.20 p5-MIME-Base64-2.12 p5-Math-GMP-1.07 
p5-Math-Pari-2.010201 p5-String-CRC32-1.2
R-deps: p5-Convert-PEM-0.06 p5-Crypt-DH-0.03 p5-Crypt-DSA-0.12 
p5-Crypt-IDEA-1.01 p5-Crypt-RSA-1.48 p5-Crypt-Random-1.11 
p5-Digest-BubbleBabble-0.01 p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 p5-Digest-MD5-2.20 
p5-Digest-SHA1-2.01 p5-IO-1.20 p5-MIME-Base64-2.12 p5-Math-GMP-1.07 
p5-Math-Pari-2.010201 p5-String-CRC32-1.2

The only thing "make index" complained about was
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-imlib-1.13.0

Something is seriously wrong with the INDEX that portsdb -U generates.

Kent

--
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message


Re: Portsupgrade -uU

2002-11-21 Thread Kent Stewart


Kris Kennaway wrote:

On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:28:45PM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote:


At 02:04 AM 11/21/02, you wrote:


On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:21:07AM -0600, Scott Gerhardt wrote:


When running "portsupgrade -uU" I get the output below.  How can I fix 

these


malformed entries, non-existent entries and incomplete dependencies?
Running "pkgdb -F" shows everything to be fine.


If you're running "portsdb -Uu", you *don't*. It's up to port
maintainers to fix the problem with the port entries. Most of the
output are just warnings (intended for maintainers).




INDEX builds shouldn't have any warnings if you perform them in a
clean environment.  Either your ports collection is out of date
(i.e. in an inconsistent state) or the index build is picking up
things from the host environment like installed ports,
WITH_*/WITHOUT_* variables, etc.  If the latter, it's a bug in
portupgrade..someone should investigate and report it to the author.


I thought that I have a clean environment. There are no 
WITH_*/WITHOU_* variables in my /etc/make.conf. I just finished doing 
a "portupgrade -aufp" and still get them.

About the only time I don't see them, is right before a release and 
you are building iso's. The messages are real. For example, I see 
messages like

p5-Net-SSH-Perl-1.23:"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
p5-Net-SSH-Perl-1.23:"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete

and the INDEX that is built has no r-deps. The Makefile sets r-deps to
RUN_DEPENDS=${BUILD_DEPENDS}
but I have a b-deps with entries and a "R-deps:" with no entry.

One thing I have noticed is that most of them have a "PKGNAMEPREFIX= 
p5-" syntax.

I have thought about hiding them but considered that similar to 
redirecting my "buildworld to > /dev/null" and then doing an installworld.

Kent

--
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message


Re: Portsupgrade -uU

2002-11-21 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 05:12 PM 11.21.2002 +1030, Tim Peters wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:28:45PM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote:
>> At 02:04 AM 11/21/02, you wrote:
>> >On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:21:07AM -0600, Scott Gerhardt wrote:
>> >>
>> >> When running "portsupgrade -uU" I get the output below.  How can I fix 
>> >these
>> >> malformed entries, non-existent entries and incomplete dependencies?
>> >> Running "pkgdb -F" shows everything to be fine.
>> >
>> >If you're running "portsdb -Uu", you *don't*. It's up to port
>> >maintainers to fix the problem with the port entries. Most of the
>> >output are just warnings (intended for maintainers).
>> 
>> 
>> Well, then, is there some way to turn off these error messages? I'm
awfully 
>> tired of 'can't find **: dependency list incomplete".
>
>How about:
>
># portsdb -uU 2>&1 | grep -v "dependency list incomplete"
>
>(not tested).
>
>-tim
>
or maybe, portsdb -uU > /dev/null (to vaporville)

Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator

SageOne Net
http://www.sage-one.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Re: Portsupgrade -uU

2002-11-21 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:28:45PM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote:
> At 02:04 AM 11/21/02, you wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:21:07AM -0600, Scott Gerhardt wrote:
> >>
> >> When running "portsupgrade -uU" I get the output below.  How can I fix 
> >these
> >> malformed entries, non-existent entries and incomplete dependencies?
> >> Running "pkgdb -F" shows everything to be fine.
> >
> >If you're running "portsdb -Uu", you *don't*. It's up to port
> >maintainers to fix the problem with the port entries. Most of the
> >output are just warnings (intended for maintainers).

INDEX builds shouldn't have any warnings if you perform them in a
clean environment.  Either your ports collection is out of date
(i.e. in an inconsistent state) or the index build is picking up
things from the host environment like installed ports,
WITH_*/WITHOUT_* variables, etc.  If the latter, it's a bug in
portupgrade..someone should investigate and report it to the author.

Kris



msg09576/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Portsupgrade -uU

2002-11-20 Thread Tim Peters
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:28:45PM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote:
> At 02:04 AM 11/21/02, you wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:21:07AM -0600, Scott Gerhardt wrote:
> >>
> >> When running "portsupgrade -uU" I get the output below.  How can I fix 
> >these
> >> malformed entries, non-existent entries and incomplete dependencies?
> >> Running "pkgdb -F" shows everything to be fine.
> >
> >If you're running "portsdb -Uu", you *don't*. It's up to port
> >maintainers to fix the problem with the port entries. Most of the
> >output are just warnings (intended for maintainers).
> 
> 
> Well, then, is there some way to turn off these error messages? I'm awfully 
> tired of 'can't find **: dependency list incomplete".

How about:

# portsdb -uU 2>&1 | grep -v "dependency list incomplete"

(not tested).

-tim

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Re: Portsupgrade -uU

2002-11-20 Thread Roger Merritt
At 02:04 AM 11/21/02, you wrote:

On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:21:07AM -0600, Scott Gerhardt wrote:
>
> When running "portsupgrade -uU" I get the output below.  How can I fix 
these
> malformed entries, non-existent entries and incomplete dependencies?
> Running "pkgdb -F" shows everything to be fine.

If you're running "portsdb -Uu", you *don't*. It's up to port
maintainers to fix the problem with the port entries. Most of the
output are just warnings (intended for maintainers).


Well, then, is there some way to turn off these error messages? I'm awfully 
tired of 'can't find **: dependency list incomplete".


--
Roger


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message


Re: Portsupgrade -uU

2002-11-20 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:21:07AM -0600, Scott Gerhardt wrote:
> 
> When running "portsupgrade -uU" I get the output below.  How can I fix these
> malformed entries, non-existent entries and incomplete dependencies?
> Running "pkgdb -F" shows everything to be fine.

If you're running "portsdb -Uu", you *don't*. It's up to port
maintainers to fix the problem with the port entries. Most of the
output are just warnings (intended for maintainers).
-- 
Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily
a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it
could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead." -- RFC 1925

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Re: Portsupgrade -uU

2002-11-20 Thread Stacey Roberts
Hi Scott,
   "Usually" warinings and errors of this nature are the result of some
changes being made throughout various bits of the ports tree.

For those of us in userland (mostly with ports-all installed), it often
appears quite daunting and (rightly?) would need reassureance that all
is still well on our systems (I myself am [repeatedly] guilty of this).

At the moment, there *are* some changes happening, an example of which
is the creation a new /usr/ports/finance ports dir into which there are
plans to move other ports currently existing under /usr/ports/misc &
/usr/ports/deskutils. For a few days, this leaves the ports tree in less
than spectacular states, but should come right sooner or later.,

Hope this helps.

Stacey

On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 16:21, Scott Gerhardt wrote:
> When running "portsupgrade -uU" I get the output below.  How can I fix these
> malformed entries, non-existent entries and incomplete dependencies?
> Running "pkgdb -F" shows everything to be fine.
> 
> 
> 
> Updating the ports index ... gdrdao-0.4.1:"/usr/ports/audio/cdrdao"
> non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
> make: don't know how to make .portinfo(continuing): malformed entry: make:
> don't know how to make .portinfo(continuing)
> balsa-1.4.1_1:"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
> balsa-1.4.1_1:"/usr/ports/devel/bbalsa2-2.0.3" non-existent -- dependency
> list incomplete
> onobo gda-client.0:/usr/ports/databases/libgda
> gnomedb.0:/usr/ports/databases/gnomedb glade.4:/usr/ports/devel/libglade
> gal.21:/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gal glibwww.1:/usr/ports/www/glibwww
> gtkhtml-1.1.3:/usr/ports/www/gtkhtml: malformed entry: onobo
> gda-client.0:/usr/ports/databases/libgda
> gnomedb.0:/usr/ports/databases/gnomedb glade.4:/usr/ports/devel/libglade
> gal.21:/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gal glibwww.1:/usr/ports/www/glibwww
> gtkhtml-1.1.3:/usr/ports/www/gtkhtml|/usr/local/bin/ispell:/usr/ports/textpr
> oc/ispell   /usr/X11R6/share/gnome/.keep_me:/usr/ports/misc/gnomehier
> /usr/X11R6/libdata/pkgconfig/gnome-mime-data-2.0.pc:/usr/ports/misc/gnomemim
> edata   |
> make: don't know how to make .portinfo(continuing): malformed entry: make:
> don't know how to make .portinfo(continuing)
> gnomepilot-conduits-0.9:"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
> gnomepilot-conduits-0.9:"/usr/ports/databases/gnomehdconv-2.01f"
> non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
> db glade.4:/usr/ports/devel/libglade: malformed entry: db
> glade.4:/usr/ports/devel/libglade|
> /usr/X11R6/share/gnome/.keep_me:/usr/ports/misc/gnomehier
> /usr/X11R6/libdata/pkgconfig/gnome-mime-data-2.0.pc:/usr/ports/misc/gnomemim
> edata   |
> make: don't know how to make .portinfo(continuing): malformed entry: make:
> don't know how to make .portinfo(continuing)
> gnome-1.4.1b2_2:"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
> mmConf.sh:/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/panel--
> nautilus:/usr/ports/x11-fm/nautilus
> screensaver-properties-capplet:/usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver-gnome
> /usr/local/bin/python2.2:/usr/ports/lang/python: malformed entry:
> mmConf.sh:/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/panel--
> nautilus:/usr/ports/x11-fm/nautilus
> screensaver-properties-capplet:/usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver-gnome
> /usr/local/bin/python2.2:/usr/ports/lang/python|
> make_index: no entry for: /usr/X11R6
> make_index: no entry for: /usr/X11R6
> make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/mail/balsa2
> make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11/gnome-fifth-toe
> make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11/gnome-fifth-toe
> make_index: no entry for: /usr/local
> make_index: no entry for: /usr/local
> Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: nethack-nox11-3.3.1_1
> Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: nethack-nox11-3.4.0
> Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: cvsup-without-gui-16.1f
> Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript-afpl-nox11-7.04_7
> Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript-gnu-nox11-7.05_3
> done
-- 
Stacey Roberts
B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science

Web: www.vickiandstacey.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Re: Portsupgrade -uU

2002-11-20 Thread Scott Gerhardt
On 11/20/02 11:08 AM, "Andreas Ntaflos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:21:07AM -0600, Scott Gerhardt wrote:
>> 
>> When running "portsupgrade -uU" I get the output below.  How can I fix these
>> malformed entries, non-existent entries and incomplete dependencies?
>> Running "pkgdb -F" shows everything to be fine.
>> 
> 
> Shouldn't this be `portsdb -uU`? portupgrade has no -U option and -u means "Do
> not preserve old shared libraries". What is it you are trying to do anyway?
> 
> HTH
> regards


Correction:  I meant "portsdb -uU"



-- 
Scott Gerhardt, P.Geo.
Gerhardt Information Technologies [G-IT]



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Re: Portsupgrade -uU

2002-11-20 Thread Andreas Ntaflos
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:21:07AM -0600, Scott Gerhardt wrote:
> 
> When running "portsupgrade -uU" I get the output below.  How can I fix these
> malformed entries, non-existent entries and incomplete dependencies?
> Running "pkgdb -F" shows everything to be fine.
> 

Shouldn't this be `portsdb -uU`? portupgrade has no -U option and -u means "Do
not preserve old shared libraries". What is it you are trying to do anyway?

HTH
regards
-- 
Andreas "ant" Ntaflos | "A cynic is a man who knows the price of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | everything, and the value of nothing."
Vienna, AUSTRIA   |  Oscar Wilde


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Portsupgrade -uU

2002-11-20 Thread Scott Gerhardt

When running "portsupgrade -uU" I get the output below.  How can I fix these
malformed entries, non-existent entries and incomplete dependencies?
Running "pkgdb -F" shows everything to be fine.



Updating the ports index ... gdrdao-0.4.1:"/usr/ports/audio/cdrdao"
non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
make: don't know how to make .portinfo(continuing): malformed entry: make:
don't know how to make .portinfo(continuing)
balsa-1.4.1_1:"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
balsa-1.4.1_1:"/usr/ports/devel/bbalsa2-2.0.3" non-existent -- dependency
list incomplete
onobo gda-client.0:/usr/ports/databases/libgda
gnomedb.0:/usr/ports/databases/gnomedb glade.4:/usr/ports/devel/libglade
gal.21:/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gal glibwww.1:/usr/ports/www/glibwww
gtkhtml-1.1.3:/usr/ports/www/gtkhtml: malformed entry: onobo
gda-client.0:/usr/ports/databases/libgda
gnomedb.0:/usr/ports/databases/gnomedb glade.4:/usr/ports/devel/libglade
gal.21:/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gal glibwww.1:/usr/ports/www/glibwww
gtkhtml-1.1.3:/usr/ports/www/gtkhtml|/usr/local/bin/ispell:/usr/ports/textpr
oc/ispell   /usr/X11R6/share/gnome/.keep_me:/usr/ports/misc/gnomehier
/usr/X11R6/libdata/pkgconfig/gnome-mime-data-2.0.pc:/usr/ports/misc/gnomemim
edata   |
make: don't know how to make .portinfo(continuing): malformed entry: make:
don't know how to make .portinfo(continuing)
gnomepilot-conduits-0.9:"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
gnomepilot-conduits-0.9:"/usr/ports/databases/gnomehdconv-2.01f"
non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
db glade.4:/usr/ports/devel/libglade: malformed entry: db
glade.4:/usr/ports/devel/libglade|
/usr/X11R6/share/gnome/.keep_me:/usr/ports/misc/gnomehier
/usr/X11R6/libdata/pkgconfig/gnome-mime-data-2.0.pc:/usr/ports/misc/gnomemim
edata   |
make: don't know how to make .portinfo(continuing): malformed entry: make:
don't know how to make .portinfo(continuing)
gnome-1.4.1b2_2:"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
mmConf.sh:/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/panel--
nautilus:/usr/ports/x11-fm/nautilus
screensaver-properties-capplet:/usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver-gnome
/usr/local/bin/python2.2:/usr/ports/lang/python: malformed entry:
mmConf.sh:/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/panel--
nautilus:/usr/ports/x11-fm/nautilus
screensaver-properties-capplet:/usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver-gnome
/usr/local/bin/python2.2:/usr/ports/lang/python|
make_index: no entry for: /usr/X11R6
make_index: no entry for: /usr/X11R6
make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/mail/balsa2
make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11/gnome-fifth-toe
make_index: no entry for: /usr/ports/x11/gnome-fifth-toe
make_index: no entry for: /usr/local
make_index: no entry for: /usr/local
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: nethack-nox11-3.3.1_1
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: nethack-nox11-3.4.0
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: cvsup-without-gui-16.1f
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript-afpl-nox11-7.04_7
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript-gnu-nox11-7.05_3
done


-- 
Scott Gerhardt, P.Geo.
Gerhardt Information Technologies [G-IT]



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message