RE: Is the Intel X520-SR2 (82599ES) supported by the ixbe driver?

2013-03-15 Thread Teske, Devin
I suspect you're running out of mbuf clusters.

Try:

echo kern.ipc.nmbclusters=524288  /etc/sysctl.conf
echo kern.ipc.nmbjumbop=524288  /etc/sysctl.conf
reboot

-- 
Devin


From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] 
on behalf of Dennis Glatting [d...@pki2.com]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 10:17 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Is the Intel X520-SR2 (82599ES) supported by the ixbe driver?

I have a new Intel X520-SR2 that I plopped into my Supermicro H8QGL-6F
with the hope I could connect 10GbE to a Cisco 3560. The links come but
but there is much wierdness. Looking through the driver I see the 82599EB
is supported but no mention of the ES.

Should this work?

I have:

Keystone# uname -a
FreeBSD Keystone 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r248293: Thu Mar 14
19:31:29 PDT 2013 root@Keystone:/usr/obj/disk-3/src/sys/SECRACK  amd64


Keystone# dmesg | egrep 'ix[01]'
ix0: Intel(R) PRO/10GbE PCI-Express Network Driver, Version - 2.5.7 -
STABLE/9 port 0x8400-0x841f mem
0xdce8-0xdcef,0xdce7c000-0xdce7 irq 32 at device 0.0 on pci3
ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors
ix0: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:2f:5f:9c
ix0: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0Gb/s Width x8
ix1: Intel(R) PRO/10GbE PCI-Express Network Driver, Version - 2.5.7 -
STABLE/9 port 0x8800-0x881f mem
0xdcf8-0xdcff,0xdcf7c000-0xdcf7 irq 33 at device 0.1 on pci3
ix1: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors
ix1: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:2f:5f:9d
ix1: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0Gb/s Width x8
ix0: link state changed to UP


Keystone# ifconfig ix0
ix0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 8192

options=407bbRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,VLAN_HWTSO
 ether 90:e2:ba:2f:5f:9c
 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
 media: Ethernet autoselect (10Gbase-SR full-duplex)
 status: active


Here's an interesting point. If I set the address for the interface, it is
accepted but an ifconfig of the interface is shown above. Specifically, I
previously executed this command:

Keystone# ifconfig ix0 inet 192.168.3.2/24 mtu 8192 up


Executing that command a second time yields:

Keystone# ifconfig ix0 inet 192.168.3.2/24 mtu 8192 up
ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists


A truss of that command yields more interesting things, specifically:

kldload(if_ix) ERR#2 'No such file or 
directory'


There is no driver named if_ix. It is also weird that the interface is
named ix0 rather than ixgbe0.


Also, an arp shows:

Keystone# arp -an
? (192.168.17.1) at 2c:21:72:cb:f5:0c on vlan17 expires in 166 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.13.33) at 78:e7:d1:ea:7a:4e on vlan13 expires in 760 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.13.1) at 2c:21:72:cb:f5:0c on vlan13 expires in 97 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.13.3) at 00:21:d8:0b:57:98 on vlan13 expires in 232 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.6) at dc:7b:94:9a:52:41 on vlan7 expires in 268 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.4) at e0:2f:6d:30:39:41 on vlan7 expires in 290 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.3) at 00:21:d8:0b:57:98 on vlan7 expires in 210 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.66) at 28:92:4a:2e:e0:a0 on vlan7 expires in 1199 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.33) at 78:e7:d1:ea:7a:4e on vlan7 expires in 143 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.65) at 28:92:4a:2e:eb:22 on vlan7 expires in 615 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.3.2) at 90:e2:ba:2f:5f:9c on ix0 permanent [ethernet]


So clearly there is a MAC/IP association however I cannot ping the IP:


Keystone# ping 192.168.3.2
PING 192.168.3.2 (192.168.3.2): 56 data bytes
(nothing)


Can someone clue me in?




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

_
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all 
copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and 
(iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any 
message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons 
other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: Is the Intel X520-SR2 (82599ES) supported by the ixbe driver?

2013-03-15 Thread Dennis Glatting



On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, Teske, Devin wrote:


I suspect you're running out of mbuf clusters.

Try:

echo kern.ipc.nmbclusters=524288  /etc/sysctl.conf
echo kern.ipc.nmbjumbop=524288  /etc/sysctl.conf
reboot


These were my settings:

Keystone sysctl -a kern.ipc.nmbclusters
kern.ipc.nmbclusters: 1048576

Keystone sysctl -a kern.ipc.nmbjumbop
kern.ipc.nmbjumbop: 524288




--
Devin


From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] 
on behalf of Dennis Glatting [d...@pki2.com]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 10:17 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Is the Intel X520-SR2 (82599ES) supported by the ixbe driver?

I have a new Intel X520-SR2 that I plopped into my Supermicro H8QGL-6F
with the hope I could connect 10GbE to a Cisco 3560. The links come but
but there is much wierdness. Looking through the driver I see the 82599EB
is supported but no mention of the ES.

Should this work?

I have:

Keystone# uname -a
FreeBSD Keystone 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r248293: Thu Mar 14
19:31:29 PDT 2013 root@Keystone:/usr/obj/disk-3/src/sys/SECRACK  amd64


Keystone# dmesg | egrep 'ix[01]'
ix0: Intel(R) PRO/10GbE PCI-Express Network Driver, Version - 2.5.7 -
STABLE/9 port 0x8400-0x841f mem
0xdce8-0xdcef,0xdce7c000-0xdce7 irq 32 at device 0.0 on pci3
ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors
ix0: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:2f:5f:9c
ix0: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0Gb/s Width x8
ix1: Intel(R) PRO/10GbE PCI-Express Network Driver, Version - 2.5.7 -
STABLE/9 port 0x8800-0x881f mem
0xdcf8-0xdcff,0xdcf7c000-0xdcf7 irq 33 at device 0.1 on pci3
ix1: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors
ix1: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:2f:5f:9d
ix1: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0Gb/s Width x8
ix0: link state changed to UP


Keystone# ifconfig ix0
ix0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 8192

options=407bbRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,VLAN_HWTSO
ether 90:e2:ba:2f:5f:9c
nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
media: Ethernet autoselect (10Gbase-SR full-duplex)
status: active


Here's an interesting point. If I set the address for the interface, it is
accepted but an ifconfig of the interface is shown above. Specifically, I
previously executed this command:

Keystone# ifconfig ix0 inet 192.168.3.2/24 mtu 8192 up


Executing that command a second time yields:

Keystone# ifconfig ix0 inet 192.168.3.2/24 mtu 8192 up
ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists


A truss of that command yields more interesting things, specifically:

kldload(if_ix) ERR#2 'No such file or 
directory'


There is no driver named if_ix. It is also weird that the interface is
named ix0 rather than ixgbe0.


Also, an arp shows:

Keystone# arp -an
? (192.168.17.1) at 2c:21:72:cb:f5:0c on vlan17 expires in 166 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.13.33) at 78:e7:d1:ea:7a:4e on vlan13 expires in 760 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.13.1) at 2c:21:72:cb:f5:0c on vlan13 expires in 97 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.13.3) at 00:21:d8:0b:57:98 on vlan13 expires in 232 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.6) at dc:7b:94:9a:52:41 on vlan7 expires in 268 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.4) at e0:2f:6d:30:39:41 on vlan7 expires in 290 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.3) at 00:21:d8:0b:57:98 on vlan7 expires in 210 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.66) at 28:92:4a:2e:e0:a0 on vlan7 expires in 1199 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.33) at 78:e7:d1:ea:7a:4e on vlan7 expires in 143 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.65) at 28:92:4a:2e:eb:22 on vlan7 expires in 615 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.3.2) at 90:e2:ba:2f:5f:9c on ix0 permanent [ethernet]


So clearly there is a MAC/IP association however I cannot ping the IP:


Keystone# ping 192.168.3.2
PING 192.168.3.2 (192.168.3.2): 56 data bytes
(nothing)


Can someone clue me in?




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

_
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all 
copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and 
(iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any 
message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons 
other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 

RE: Is the Intel X520-SR2 (82599ES) supported by the ixbe driver?

2013-03-15 Thread Dennis Glatting


Sorry for the noise. The problem was old sysctls.


On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, Dennis Glatting wrote:




On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, Teske, Devin wrote:


I suspect you're running out of mbuf clusters.

Try:

echo kern.ipc.nmbclusters=524288  /etc/sysctl.conf
echo kern.ipc.nmbjumbop=524288  /etc/sysctl.conf
reboot


These were my settings:

Keystone sysctl -a kern.ipc.nmbclusters
kern.ipc.nmbclusters: 1048576

Keystone sysctl -a kern.ipc.nmbjumbop
kern.ipc.nmbjumbop: 524288




--
Devin


From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org 
[owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] on behalf of Dennis Glatting 
[d...@pki2.com]

Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 10:17 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Is the Intel X520-SR2 (82599ES) supported by the ixbe driver?

I have a new Intel X520-SR2 that I plopped into my Supermicro H8QGL-6F
with the hope I could connect 10GbE to a Cisco 3560. The links come but
but there is much wierdness. Looking through the driver I see the 82599EB
is supported but no mention of the ES.

Should this work?

I have:

Keystone# uname -a
FreeBSD Keystone 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r248293: Thu Mar 14
19:31:29 PDT 2013 root@Keystone:/usr/obj/disk-3/src/sys/SECRACK  amd64


Keystone# dmesg | egrep 'ix[01]'
ix0: Intel(R) PRO/10GbE PCI-Express Network Driver, Version - 2.5.7 -
STABLE/9 port 0x8400-0x841f mem
0xdce8-0xdcef,0xdce7c000-0xdce7 irq 32 at device 0.0 on pci3
ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors
ix0: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:2f:5f:9c
ix0: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0Gb/s Width x8
ix1: Intel(R) PRO/10GbE PCI-Express Network Driver, Version - 2.5.7 -
STABLE/9 port 0x8800-0x881f mem
0xdcf8-0xdcff,0xdcf7c000-0xdcf7 irq 33 at device 0.1 on pci3
ix1: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors
ix1: Ethernet address: 90:e2:ba:2f:5f:9d
ix1: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0Gb/s Width x8
ix0: link state changed to UP


Keystone# ifconfig ix0
ix0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 8192

options=407bbRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,VLAN_HWTSO
ether 90:e2:ba:2f:5f:9c
nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL
media: Ethernet autoselect (10Gbase-SR full-duplex)
status: active


Here's an interesting point. If I set the address for the interface, it is
accepted but an ifconfig of the interface is shown above. Specifically, I
previously executed this command:

Keystone# ifconfig ix0 inet 192.168.3.2/24 mtu 8192 up


Executing that command a second time yields:

Keystone# ifconfig ix0 inet 192.168.3.2/24 mtu 8192 up
ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists


A truss of that command yields more interesting things, specifically:

kldload(if_ix) ERR#2 'No such file or 
directory'



There is no driver named if_ix. It is also weird that the interface is
named ix0 rather than ixgbe0.


Also, an arp shows:

Keystone# arp -an
? (192.168.17.1) at 2c:21:72:cb:f5:0c on vlan17 expires in 166 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.13.33) at 78:e7:d1:ea:7a:4e on vlan13 expires in 760 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.13.1) at 2c:21:72:cb:f5:0c on vlan13 expires in 97 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.13.3) at 00:21:d8:0b:57:98 on vlan13 expires in 232 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.6) at dc:7b:94:9a:52:41 on vlan7 expires in 268 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.4) at e0:2f:6d:30:39:41 on vlan7 expires in 290 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.3) at 00:21:d8:0b:57:98 on vlan7 expires in 210 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.66) at 28:92:4a:2e:e0:a0 on vlan7 expires in 1199 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.33) at 78:e7:d1:ea:7a:4e on vlan7 expires in 143 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.7.65) at 28:92:4a:2e:eb:22 on vlan7 expires in 615 seconds
[vlan]
? (192.168.3.2) at 90:e2:ba:2f:5f:9c on ix0 permanent [ethernet]


So clearly there is a MAC/IP association however I cannot ping the IP:


Keystone# ping 192.168.3.2
PING 192.168.3.2 (192.168.3.2): 56 data bytes
(nothing)


Can someone clue me in?




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


_
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or 
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the 
message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message 
in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please 
be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving 
and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing