Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
Karl Vogel wrote: On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:03:06 +0200, Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: R On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Joe in MPLS wrote: J I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw horde for J mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird PDAs) for J primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV J scanning would be a plus too. R I've been using bogofilter for some years now, and it works very well once R you've trained it properly. I started collecting spam a few years ago, and I use a Bayesian filter called ifile to handle junk. I trained it using just over 117,000 crapmail messages, and I don't get a lot of spam these days... http://www.dnaco.net/~vogelke/Software/Internet/Servers/Mail/Spam/Ifile/ I highly recommend ASSP. It's by far the best spam filter I've ever used and my clients are constantly raving about it's effectiveness. It's also extremely easy to configure and maintain. Check it out at http://assp.sourceforge.net/ . Regards, Elvar ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:03:06 +0200, Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: R On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Joe in MPLS wrote: J I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw horde for J mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird PDAs) for J primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV J scanning would be a plus too. R I've been using bogofilter for some years now, and it works very well once R you've trained it properly. I started collecting spam a few years ago, and I use a Bayesian filter called ifile to handle junk. I trained it using just over 117,000 crapmail messages, and I don't get a lot of spam these days... http://www.dnaco.net/~vogelke/Software/Internet/Servers/Mail/Spam/Ifile/ -- Karl Vogel I don't speak for the USAF or my company I will not charge admission to the bathroom. --written on blackboard by Bart Simpson ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 15:20 -0500, Joe in MPLS wrote: I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw horde for mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird PDAs) for primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV scanning would be a plus too. I'd like to recommend to use SpamAssassin(mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin). That's enough. FYI, here is my local.cf: http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~bh/stuff/izb-spamassassin-local.cf.example Byung-Hee ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
On 9/30/07, Joe in MPLS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw horde for mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird PDAs) for primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV scanning would be a plus too. ...jgm Maia Mailguard. It's a fork (sorta) of amavisd-new, and integrates SpamAssassin and ClamAV. It can be set to quarantine emails that are suspected to be spam, and also those with attachments that you consider to be suspicious, and presents end-users with reminder emails and a good web interface for managing their emails. It Rocks. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
--On Monday, October 01, 2007 06:21:48 +0100 Martin Hepworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mailscanner and postfix is perfect combination...no problems with the correct installation type. http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:configuration:mta: postfix:politics By far the best anti-spam tool I've used with Postfix is policyd-weight. mail/postfix-policyd-weight -- Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
By far the best anti-spam tool I've used with Postfix is policyd-weight. mail/postfix-policyd-weight Agreed. +1. Me too. :) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Philip Hallstrom wrote: By far the best anti-spam tool I've used with Postfix is policyd- weight. mail/postfix-policyd-weight Agreed. +1. Me too. Seconded (or thirded :). policyd-weight is much smaller than amavisd-new or SpamAssassin (it tends to run a couple of ~7 MB RSIZE processes, rather than a bunch of 45 - 80MB RSIZE), and it's caching of RBL/DNSBL lookups means it can handle and offload a bunch of queries that the others would do. -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
On Monday 01 October 2007 22:18:00 Chuck Swiger wrote: On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Philip Hallstrom wrote: By far the best anti-spam tool I've used with Postfix is policyd- weight. mail/postfix-policyd-weight Agreed. +1. Me too. Seconded (or thirded :). policyd-weight is much smaller than amavisd-new or SpamAssassin (it tends to run a couple of ~7 MB RSIZE processes, rather than a bunch of 45 - 80MB RSIZE), and it's caching of RBL/DNSBL lookups means it can handle and offload a bunch of queries that the others would do. I didn't know about this one. Is the installation and use documented somewhere? (In case I can't find anything on Google). ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
On Monday 01 October 2007 22:48:09 Pollywog wrote: On Monday 01 October 2007 22:18:00 Chuck Swiger wrote: On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Philip Hallstrom wrote: By far the best anti-spam tool I've used with Postfix is policyd- weight. mail/postfix-policyd-weight Agreed. +1. Me too. Seconded (or thirded :). policyd-weight is much smaller than amavisd-new or SpamAssassin (it tends to run a couple of ~7 MB RSIZE processes, rather than a bunch of 45 - 80MB RSIZE), and it's caching of RBL/DNSBL lookups means it can handle and offload a bunch of queries that the others would do. I didn't know about this one. Is the installation and use documented somewhere? (In case I can't find anything on Google). Found it: http://www.policyd-weight.org/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
I am using postfix+amavis (doing spamassassin)+postgrey and I rarely get any spam come through. I run a fairly light weight email server only doing a coulple of thousand emails a day. Mailgraph is a great port to integrate as well as it graphs how many emails have been blocked due to spam/virus etc. Cheers, Terry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pollywog Sent: Tuesday, 2 October 2007 8:48 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix? On Monday 01 October 2007 22:18:00 Chuck Swiger wrote: On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Philip Hallstrom wrote: By far the best anti-spam tool I've used with Postfix is policyd- weight. mail/postfix-policyd-weight Agreed. +1. Me too. Seconded (or thirded :). policyd-weight is much smaller than amavisd-new or SpamAssassin (it tends to run a couple of ~7 MB RSIZE processes, rather than a bunch of 45 - 80MB RSIZE), and it's caching of RBL/DNSBL lookups means it can handle and offload a bunch of queries that the others would do. I didn't know about this one. Is the installation and use documented somewhere? (In case I can't find anything on Google). ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
At 03:20 PM 9/30/2007, Joe in MPLS wrote: I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw horde for mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird PDAs) for primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV scanning would be a plus too. ...jgm I use mailscanner with sendmail which uses spamassasin with clamav. All from the ports. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
On Sunday 30 September 2007 20:28:23 Derek Ragona wrote: At 03:20 PM 9/30/2007, Joe in MPLS wrote: I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw horde for mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird PDAs) for primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV scanning would be a plus too. ...jgm I use mailscanner with sendmail which uses spamassasin with clamav. All from the ports. I used Mailscanner at one time, but it is not recommended for use with Postfix because mail can be lost. It never happened to me, but it has happened to others. I believe the Postfix website mentions these problems. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Joe in MPLS wrote: I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw horde for mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird PDAs) for primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV scanning would be a plus too. I've been using bogofilter for some years now, and it works very well once you've trained it properly. I'm calling it from procmail just before the mail is delivered, but that's because my desktop has just a single local user. Bogofilter comes with a 'integrating-with-postfix' document that shows you how to call it from postfix directly. Roland -- R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) pgp9up46A8KoQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
On Sunday 30 September 2007 21:03:06 Roland Smith wrote: On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Joe in MPLS wrote: I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw horde for mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird PDAs) for primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV scanning would be a plus too. I've been using bogofilter for some years now, and it works very well once you've trained it properly. I'm calling it from procmail just before the mail is delivered, but that's because my desktop has just a single local user. Bogofilter comes with a 'integrating-with-postfix' document that shows you how to call it from postfix directly. I call Bogofilter from Procmail and I did not know it could be called directly from Postfix. I use Bogofilter and Spamassassin and very little spam gets through undetected. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix?
Mailscanner and postfix is perfect combination...no problems with the correct installation type. http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:configuration:mta:postfix:politics -- Martin On 9/30/07, Pollywog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 30 September 2007 20:28:23 Derek Ragona wrote: At 03:20 PM 9/30/2007, Joe in MPLS wrote: I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw horde for mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird PDAs) for primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV scanning would be a plus too. ...jgm I use mailscanner with sendmail which uses spamassasin with clamav. All from the ports. I used Mailscanner at one time, but it is not recommended for use with Postfix because mail can be lost. It never happened to me, but it has happened to others. I believe the Postfix website mentions these problems. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
