Re: [?? Probable Spam] Re: Network card Intel and 802.1P tag
У Ср, 2009-08-05 у 20:41 +0300, Nikos Vassiliadis пише: Is the vlan hardware processing enabled? How I can enable this processing? ifconfig em0 vlanhwtag enables vlan processing in hw ifconfig em0 -vlanhwtag disables vlan processing in hw Maybe one these will work correctly without the zeroing effect. I tried both variant on both NIC - fxp and em The result doesn't change ;( Perhaps off topic, but why are you interested in priority tags, since FreeBSD will silently ignore them? I developing QoS-model for big network. I have casualy found out this problem, when I analyzed the traffic with different COS-value from various devices. -- ***AOS224-RIPE*** mailto:arc...@alkar.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [?? Probable Spam] Re: Network card Intel and 802.1P tag
Andrey O.Sokolov wrote: I tried both variant on both NIC - fxp and em The result doesn't change ;( You should post to net@ and maybe the maintainer will help you. Include pciconf. Perhaps off topic, but why are you interested in priority tags, since FreeBSD will silently ignore them? I developing QoS-model for big network. I have casualy found out this problem, when I analyzed the traffic with different COS-value from various devices. Yes, but at the end of the day FreeBSD will ignore the priority tag. It would be just cosmetic. But, I agree that you should see the correct priority tag. Nikos ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
