Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote: lang/ghc is still marked IGNORE, unless I'm missing something. Yes, if your system is older than 6.0 on i386 and older then 7.0 on amd64, it is still ignored, since we do not support those platforms. Otherwise it must be okay. Cheers, g. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Apr 22 2010 10:24, Gabor PALI wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote: lang/ghc is still marked IGNORE, unless I'm missing something. Yes, if your system is older than 6.0 on i386 and older then 7.0 on amd64, it is still ignored, since we do not support those platforms. Otherwise it must be okay. Cheers, g. I'm on 8.0-RELEASE, amd64. But it's working today. I use portsnap to get the updates -- is there a delay in that process? Yesterday it didn't get it, today it did. -- Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
But it's working today. I use portsnap to get the updates -- is there a delay in that process? Yes - there is. I've found it takes a couple of hours to get the newest updates but once in a while it takes longer. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Apr 22 2010 18:11, Gabor PALI wrote: On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote: I'm on 8.0-RELEASE amd64 With a recently updated ports tree? What is the $FreeBSD$ Id in the Makefile? :g # $FreeBSD: ports/lang/ghc/Makefile,v 1.85 2010/04/21 19:53:03 pgj Exp $ Now I'm having another problem. I was able to do portupgrade for everything, but when I try to startx, xmonad complains about not haveing limgmp.so.8, which is what the old math/libgmp4 port created. I've done a make clean/deinstall/reinstall of ghc and xmonad, but that didn't help. -- Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Apr 22 2010 12:07, Chip Camden wrote: On Apr 22 2010 18:11, Gabor PALI wrote: On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote: I'm on 8.0-RELEASE amd64 With a recently updated ports tree? What is the $FreeBSD$ Id in the Makefile? :g # $FreeBSD: ports/lang/ghc/Makefile,v 1.85 2010/04/21 19:53:03 pgj Exp $ Now I'm having another problem. I was able to do portupgrade for everything, but when I try to startx, xmonad complains about not haveing limgmp.so.8, which is what the old math/libgmp4 port created. I've done a make clean/deinstall/reinstall of ghc and xmonad, but that didn't help. I solved this by deinstalling math/gmp, reinstalling math/libgmp4, copying libgmp.so.8 to another directory, deinstalling math/libgmp4, reinstalling math/gmp, then copying my saved libgmp.so.8 back to /usr/local/lib. I think maybe my package database has become corrupted somehow. Is there a good way to rebuild that from scratch, or fix it? The Handbook didn't seem to say anything on the subject. -- Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
Hi-- On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Chip Camden wrote: I think maybe my package database has become corrupted somehow. Is there a good way to rebuild that from scratch, or fix it? The Handbook didn't seem to say anything on the subject. Try this sequence: portsdb -Fu pkgdb -aF (Additional runs of pkgdb -F with manual intervention might be needed if all cannot be auto-repaired. :-) Regards, -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Apr 22 2010 16:08, Chuck Swiger wrote: Hi-- On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Chip Camden wrote: I think maybe my package database has become corrupted somehow. Is there a good way to rebuild that from scratch, or fix it? The Handbook didn't seem to say anything on the subject. Try this sequence: portsdb -Fu pkgdb -aF (Additional runs of pkgdb -F with manual intervention might be needed if all cannot be auto-repaired. :-) Regards, -- -Chuck Thanks much! -- Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:14:20 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote: A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. Unfortunately lang/ghc and dependent ports (and possibly lang/gnat-gcc44) were broken by this. The brokenness wasn't detected in our -exp run because of being masked by other issues. A fix has been committed :) -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect FreeBSD committer - ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:07:46PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:14:20 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote: A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. Unfortunately lang/ghc and dependent ports (and possibly lang/gnat-gcc44) were broken by this. The brokenness wasn't detected in our -exp run because of being masked by other issues. A fix has been committed :) -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect FreeBSD committer - ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B lang/ghc is still marked IGNORE, unless I'm missing something. -- Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:40:35 -0700 Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:38 PM, freebsd-po...@coreland.ath.cx wrote: On 2010-04-20 02:14:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44. As far as I know, the gnat-gcc44 bootstrap binaries will be fine as they're bundled with the libgmp library that was used to build them. Whether gcc builds with the newer libgmp remains to be seen... As discussed in the QAT emails, it might be related to ccache use on the build cluster graciously donated by ixSystems, and the fact that the cached data is inconsistently distributed across the cluster. ATM no, the new cluster is in works, not yet used, QAT is running on a single machine, with ccache. I've provided some tips for itetcu to work around this on IRC (basically disable ccache), but it kind of sucks when you run into periodic issues with toolchain variance like this, s.t. building with NO_CACHE=yes is a necessary evil to work through end-to-end build functional issues. Problem is I need an automated solution. I'm testing it now on QAT with ccache disabled. Someone else who knows more about ccache could provide a better explanation of what's going on because my ranting about this would only be me talking out of my rear :). Yes, please. More info about ccache with FreeBSD can be found here: http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-174.html Thanks. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect FreeBSD committer - ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:14:28 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote: I've provided some tips for itetcu to work around this on IRC (basically disable ccache), but it kind of sucks when you run into periodic issues with toolchain variance like this, s.t. building with NO_CACHE=yes is a necessary evil to work through end-to-end build functional issues. Problem is I need an automated solution. I'm testing it now on QAT with ccache disabled. Same error. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect FreeBSD committer - ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now? Thanks /Leslie ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu wrote: It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now? http://ragingred.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/simpsons_are-we-there-yet.jpg In short, sorry... nope (there's still some ways to go on updating packages -- porters have hit some snags with updating graphics/png, zlib in base and lang/php5, mostly -- there's still xorg, gnome, and kde to go...). Honestly, apart from the zlib and png upgrades, there's been little churn though for me (XFCE4 user), and I still update without much issue on a periodic basis every week. HTH, -Garrett ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:25:06 +0200 Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu wrote: It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now? As written in my previous two or three mails on the subject, for now yes. Xorg is in the second phase of testing, and the rest are waitgin for it. I can't give a firm ETA yet. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect FreeBSD committer - ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
Garrett Cooper skrev 2010-04-19 09:28: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Leslie Jensenles...@eskk.nu wrote: It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now? http://ragingred.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/simpsons_are-we-there-yet.jpg In short, sorry... nope (there's still some ways to go on updating packages -- porters have hit some snags with updating graphics/png, zlib in base and lang/php5, mostly -- there's still xorg, gnome, and kde to go...). Honestly, apart from the zlib and png upgrades, there's been little churn though for me (XFCE4 user), and I still update without much issue on a periodic basis every week. HTH, -Garrett ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Ok! Thank you. I'll keep on waiting then. I'm also using XFCE and it's running fine. After having been through a lot of rebuilding of ports and the problems that might turn up, I feel it's safer to wait until someone gives the go ahead :-) /Leslie ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. Unfortunately lang/ghc and dependent ports (and possibly lang/gnat-gcc44) were broken by this. The brokenness wasn't detected in our -exp run because of being masked by other issues. It will take a few days to fix lang/ghc. I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44. As a workaround, keep your old gmp library in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg; both portmaster and portupdate have an option for this. X11 is still in work, the other are waiting for it. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect FreeBSD committer - ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On 2010-04-20 02:14:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44. As far as I know, the gnat-gcc44 bootstrap binaries will be fine as they're bundled with the libgmp library that was used to build them. Whether gcc builds with the newer libgmp remains to be seen... M ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:38 PM, freebsd-po...@coreland.ath.cx wrote: On 2010-04-20 02:14:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44. As far as I know, the gnat-gcc44 bootstrap binaries will be fine as they're bundled with the libgmp library that was used to build them. Whether gcc builds with the newer libgmp remains to be seen... As discussed in the QAT emails, it might be related to ccache use on the build cluster graciously donated by ixSystems, and the fact that the cached data is inconsistently distributed across the cluster. I've provided some tips for itetcu to work around this on IRC (basically disable ccache), but it kind of sucks when you run into periodic issues with toolchain variance like this, s.t. building with NO_CACHE=yes is a necessary evil to work through end-to-end build functional issues. Someone else who knows more about ccache could provide a better explanation of what's going on because my ranting about this would only be me talking out of my rear :). More info about ccache with FreeBSD can be found here: http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-174.html Cheers, -Garrett ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:03:22 -0700 Ted Faber fa...@isi.edu wrote: On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 04:38:28PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: Hi, As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 April. I didn't see any mial, but figured I'd check. Are ports still unstable? ATM no, as it's apparent from the message bellow. Update to that message: - Gnome and KDE are ready - Xorg is believed to be ready, an -exp run on pointy is beginning today. On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:23:08 -0700 Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net wrote: On Sun 28 Mar 2010 at 06:38:28 PDT Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: Hi, As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 April. The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing. Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildportssort=last_built to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even fixed. We also have two incremental builds on Pointy to catch the problems. Thank you, With hat:portmgr@ Sorry if this seems like nagging, but since we're now past the original ETA can we get a current status report? Is the portstree considered stable again, and if not, what's the revised ETA? From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org Cc: sta...@freebsd.org, questi...@freebsd.org, freebsd-po...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 21:31:33 +0300 Just a status update: PNG and cURL are in, and png fall-outs are believed to be fixed. Xorg update has gone through an -exp run on Pointy and our xorg team is working on fixing the approx. 60 ports with problems. still work to do I will begin -exp runs for Gnome and KDE updates tonight or tomorrow morning. Gnome -exp done, there's a showstopper on amd64 that we weren't aware of. about 40 fixesso far. An other -exp needed. KDE in progress. Packages status: - i386: - 6 after png and curl - 7 after png and curl - an 8 incremental build is in progress and should be shortly finished finished - 9 pacakges are from middle March from 9 Apr. - amd64: - 6 packages are post png and curl - 7 build is in progress and will be finished tomorrow - 8 last build was done in the middle of the png update/fixes; we won't run an other before Xorg, KDE and Gnome go in (for lack of resources). in progress, with ports from yesterday - 9 build in progress (with sources that are believed to fix the zlib problem). nope, still old packages. In other words, if you wish to update without waiting for Xorg, Gnome and KDE now it's a good moment. So no clear ETA yet, a few days more. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect FreeBSD committer - ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 04:38:28PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: Hi, As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 April. I didn't see any mial, but figured I'd check. Are ports still unstable? -- Ted Faber http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG pgp3xtbXIGKg8.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:20:47 -0500 Antonio Olivares olivares14...@gmail.com wrote: [ .. ] === Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod === This port is marked IGNORE === requires the userland sources to be installed. Set SRC_BASE if it is not in /usr/src === If you are sure you can build it, remove the IGNORE line in the Makefile and try again. === Update for sysutils/fusefs-kmod failed === Aborting update [ .. ] What should I do in this case? First, please don't top post. Second, you don't seem to have the base sources installed and that port, being a kernel module, needs them. See: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect FreeBSD committer - ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B Dear Ion-Mihai, I have installed cvsup, but I don't really understand the page that I was refered to === SECURITY REPORT: This port has installed the following files which may act as network servers and may therefore pose a remote security risk to the system. /usr/local/sbin/cvsupd /usr/local/bin/cvsup /usr/local/bin/cvpasswd If there are vulnerabilities in these programs there may be a security risk to the system. FreeBSD makes no guarantee about the security of ports included in the Ports Collection. Please type 'make deinstall' to deinstall the port if this is a concern. For more information, and contact details about the security status of this software, see the following webpage: http://www.cvsup.org/ === Cleaning for ezm3-1.1_2 === Cleaning for cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 I have installed it using ports system, but still get same error as above. I try to use cvsup the file, I get nothing, I try to go to the port that refuses to update and make install clean and it says source not available or refused? I have used ports before and had no problems, I don't know what to do. Thank you and others who have provided help. *Sorry for top posting Regards, Antonio ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 07:42:06AM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote: On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:20:47 -0500 Antonio Olivares olivares14...@gmail.com wrote: [ .. ] === Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod === This port is marked IGNORE === requires the userland sources to be installed. Set SRC_BASE if it is not in /usr/src === If you are sure you can build it, remove the IGNORE line in the Makefile and try again. === Update for sysutils/fusefs-kmod failed === Aborting update [ .. ] What should I do in this case? First, please don't top post. Second, you don't seem to have the base sources installed and that port, being a kernel module, needs them. See: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect FreeBSD committer - ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B Dear Ion-Mihai, I have installed cvsup, but I don't really understand the page that I was refered to === SECURITY REPORT: This port has installed the following files which may act as network servers and may therefore pose a remote security risk to the system. /usr/local/sbin/cvsupd /usr/local/bin/cvsup /usr/local/bin/cvpasswd If there are vulnerabilities in these programs there may be a security risk to the system. FreeBSD makes no guarantee about the security of ports included in the Ports Collection. Please type 'make deinstall' to deinstall the port if this is a concern. For more information, and contact details about the security status of this software, see the following webpage: http://www.cvsup.org/ === Cleaning for ezm3-1.1_2 === Cleaning for cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 I have installed it using ports system, but still get same error as above. I try to use cvsup the file, I get nothing, I try to go to the port that refuses to update and make install clean and it says source not available or refused? I have used ports before and had no problems, I don't know what to do. Thank you and others who have provided help. *Sorry for top posting You didn't need to install cvsup from ports. csup in the base system will work just fine; it's the official replacement for cvsup. itetcu@ was pointing you to the documentation describing the procedure for using cvsup/csup. Based on the thread so far, my understanding is that you need to download the FreeBSD source repository (kernel, base system, etc.), because the port you're trying to build (which is a kernel module) requires it. There are two cvsup files associated with the source repo: /usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile Which you should use depends on if you're running -RELEASE or -STABLE. The most important part in those files is the *default release=cvs tag=XXX. Specifically the tag=XXX part. 8.0-RELEASE's tag is RELENG_8_0, while 8.0-STABLE's tag is RELENG_8. So which tag you use should be based on what version you wish to run. So at this point, you should: 1) pkg_delete ezm3-1.1_2 2) pkg_delete cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 3) csup -h some cvsup server -L 2 /usr/share/example/cvsup/stable-supfile or csup -h some cvsup server -L 2 /usr/share/example/cvsup/standard-supfile This will populate /usr/src on your system. From there, you should be able to build ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod as normal without any problem. Does this help explain things better? -- | Jeremy Chadwick j...@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
Garret, I have tried the command out, but it apparently does not do the job: === Continuing 'make config' dependency check for graphics/graphviz === Launching child to update libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 jpeg-8_1 arts-1.5.10_2,1 jackit-0.116.2_2 devel/doxygen graphics/graphviz libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 === Port directory: /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/libgnomeui === Launching 'make checksum' for x11-toolkits/libgnomeui in background === Gathering dependency list for x11-toolkits/libgnomeui from ports === Starting recursive 'make config' check === Launching child to update gvfs-1.2.3_2 jpeg-8_1 arts-1.5.10_2,1 jackit-0.116.2_2 devel/doxygen graphics/graphviz libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 gvfs-1.2.3_2 === Port directory: /usr/ports/devel/gvfs === Launching 'make checksum' for devel/gvfs in background === Gathering dependency list for devel/gvfs from ports === Starting recursive 'make config' check === Launching child to update libsoup-2.26.3_2 jpeg-8_1 arts-1.5.10_2,1 jackit-0.116.2_2 devel/doxygen graphics/graphviz libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 gvfs-1.2.3_2 libsoup-2.26.3_2 === Port directory: /usr/ports/devel/libsoup === Launching 'make checksum' for devel/libsoup in background === Gathering dependency list for devel/libsoup from ports === Starting recursive 'make config' check === Launching child to update sqlite3-3.6.14.2 to sqlite3-3.6.19 jpeg-8_1 arts-1.5.10_2,1 jackit-0.116.2_2 devel/doxygen graphics/graphviz libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 gvfs-1.2.3_2 libsoup-2.26.3_2 sqlite3-3.6.14.2 === Port directory: /usr/ports/databases/sqlite3 === Launching 'make checksum' for databases/sqlite3 in background === Gathering dependency list for databases/sqlite3 from ports === Starting recursive 'make config' check === Recursive 'make config' check complete for databases/sqlite3 jpeg-8_1 arts-1.5.10_2,1 jackit-0.116.2_2 devel/doxygen graphics/graphviz libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 gvfs-1.2.3_2 libsoup-2.26.3_2 sqlite3-3.6.14.2 === Continuing 'make config' dependency check for devel/libsoup === Launching child to update gnome-keyring-2.26.3_1 jpeg-8_1 arts-1.5.10_2,1 jackit-0.116.2_2 devel/doxygen graphics/graphviz libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 gvfs-1.2.3_2 libsoup-2.26.3_2 gnome-keyring-2.26.3_1 === Port directory: /usr/ports/security/gnome-keyring === Launching 'make checksum' for security/gnome-keyring in background === Gathering dependency list for security/gnome-keyring from ports === Starting recursive 'make config' check === Launching child to update libgcrypt-1.4.4 to libgcrypt-1.4.5 jpeg-8_1 arts-1.5.10_2,1 jackit-0.116.2_2 devel/doxygen graphics/graphviz libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 gvfs-1.2.3_2 libsoup-2.26.3_2 gnome-keyring-2.26.3_1 libgcrypt-1.4.4 === Port directory: /usr/ports/security/libgcrypt === Gathering dependency list for security/libgcrypt from ports === Starting recursive 'make config' check === Recursive 'make config' check complete for security/libgcrypt jpeg-8_1 arts-1.5.10_2,1 jackit-0.116.2_2 devel/doxygen graphics/graphviz libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 gvfs-1.2.3_2 libsoup-2.26.3_2 gnome-keyring-2.26.3_1 libgcrypt-1.4.4 === Continuing 'make config' dependency check for security/gnome-keyring === Launching child to update libtasn1-2.3 to libtasn1-2.4 jpeg-8_1 arts-1.5.10_2,1 jackit-0.116.2_2 devel/doxygen graphics/graphviz libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 gvfs-1.2.3_2 libsoup-2.26.3_2 gnome-keyring-2.26.3_1 libtasn1-2.3 === Port directory: /usr/ports/security/libtasn1 === Gathering dependency list for security/libtasn1 from ports === Starting recursive 'make config' check === Recursive 'make config' check complete for security/libtasn1 jpeg-8_1 arts-1.5.10_2,1 jackit-0.116.2_2 devel/doxygen graphics/graphviz libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 gvfs-1.2.3_2 libsoup-2.26.3_2 gnome-keyring-2.26.3_1 libtasn1-2.3 === Continuing 'make config' dependency check for security/gnome-keyring === Recursive 'make config' check complete for security/gnome-keyring jpeg-8_1 arts-1.5.10_2,1 jackit-0.116.2_2 devel/doxygen graphics/graphviz libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 gvfs-1.2.3_2 libsoup-2.26.3_2 gnome-keyring-2.26.3_1 === Continuing 'make config' dependency check for devel/libsoup === Recursive 'make config' check complete for devel/libsoup jpeg-8_1 arts-1.5.10_2,1 jackit-0.116.2_2 devel/doxygen graphics/graphviz libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 gvfs-1.2.3_2 libsoup-2.26.3_2 === Continuing 'make config' dependency check for devel/gvfs === Launching child to update sysutils/fusefs-kmod jpeg-8_1 arts-1.5.10_2,1 jackit-0.116.2_2 devel/doxygen graphics/graphviz libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 gvfs-1.2.3_2 sysutils/fusefs-kmod === Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod === This port is marked IGNORE === requires the userland sources to be installed. Set SRC_BASE if it is not in /usr/src === If you are sure you can build it, remove the IGNORE line in the Makefile and try again. === Update for
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:20:47 -0500 Antonio Olivares olivares14...@gmail.com wrote: [ .. ] === Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod === This port is marked IGNORE === requires the userland sources to be installed. Set SRC_BASE if it is not in /usr/src === If you are sure you can build it, remove the IGNORE line in the Makefile and try again. === Update for sysutils/fusefs-kmod failed === Aborting update [ .. ] What should I do in this case? First, please don't top post. Second, you don't seem to have the base sources installed and that port, being a kernel module, needs them. See: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect FreeBSD committer - ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
Just a status update: PNG and cURL are in, and png fall-outs are believed to be fixed. Xorg update has gone through an -exp run on Pointy and our xorg team is working on fixing the approx. 60 ports with problems. I will begin -exp runs for Gnome and KDE updates tonight or tomorrow morning. Packages status: - i386: - 6 after png and curl - 7 after png and curl - an 8 incremental build is in progress and should be shortly finished - 9 pacakges are from middle March - amd64: - 6 packages are post png and curl - 7 build is in progress and will be finished tomorrow - 8 last build was done in the middle of the png update/fixes; we won't run an other before Xorg, KDE and Gnome go in (for lack of resources). - 9 build in progress (with sources that are believed to fix the zlib problem). In other words, if you wish to update without waiting for Xorg, Gnome and KDE now it's a good moment. HTH, -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect FreeBSD committer - ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
Ion-Mihai, Does this fix the following issue? I have installed FreeBSD 8.0 and updated it to current p2 I try to use konqueror and I get There was an error loading the module About-Page for Konqueror. The diagnostics is: Cannot load library /usr/local/kde4/lib/kde4/konq_aboutpage.so: (Shared object libjpeg.so.10 not found, required by libkhtml.so.7) Other programs like kile and k3b don't work because of the same message or others. I did not know about this, otherwise I would not have tried to install these programs in the first place, till the coast was clear :( Thanks though, I saw the message a little bit late :( Regards, Antonio On 4/5/10, Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote: Just a status update: PNG and cURL are in, and png fall-outs are believed to be fixed. Xorg update has gone through an -exp run on Pointy and our xorg team is working on fixing the approx. 60 ports with problems. I will begin -exp runs for Gnome and KDE updates tonight or tomorrow morning. Packages status: - i386: - 6 after png and curl - 7 after png and curl - an 8 incremental build is in progress and should be shortly finished - 9 pacakges are from middle March - amd64: - 6 packages are post png and curl - 7 build is in progress and will be finished tomorrow - 8 last build was done in the middle of the png update/fixes; we won't run an other before Xorg, KDE and Gnome go in (for lack of resources). - 9 build in progress (with sources that are believed to fix the zlib problem). In other words, if you wish to update without waiting for Xorg, Gnome and KDE now it's a good moment. HTH, -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect FreeBSD committer - ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Antonio Olivares olivares14...@gmail.com wrote: Ion-Mihai, Does this fix the following issue? I have installed FreeBSD 8.0 and updated it to current p2 I try to use konqueror and I get There was an error loading the module About-Page for Konqueror. The diagnostics is: Cannot load library /usr/local/kde4/lib/kde4/konq_aboutpage.so: (Shared object libjpeg.so.10 not found, required by libkhtml.so.7) Other programs like kile and k3b don't work because of the same message or others. I did not know about this, otherwise I would not have tried to install these programs in the first place, till the coast was clear :( Thanks though, I saw the message a little bit late :( Nope. You need to update all of jpeg. See UPDATING for more details (but substitute this for the portmaster directions: portmaster -r 'jpeg-*' . HTH, -Garrett ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On 29/03/10 7:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote: portmaster -r graphics/png That won't work, the man page clearly says that it has to be a port directory or glob pattern from /var/db/pkg. The glob pattern bit of that was (unfortunately) broken up till version 2.20, which I just committed. I'm confused. The manual actually says: [-R] -r name/glob of port in /var/db/pkg When I try your suggestion I get this: # portmaster -r png- === No valid installed port, or port directory given === Try portmaster --help And this doesn't work either: # portmaster -r graphics/png === No valid installed port, or port directory given === Try portmaster --help So, as you say the pkg pattern is broken, but also 'port directory' doesn't work either unlike your suggestions above. It would be nice for both pkg and directory patterns to be more consistently available, but in the meantime readers of UPDATING are going to be confused. Ari Maniatis -- -- Aristedes Maniatis ish http://www.ish.com.au Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001 GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Aristedes Maniatis a...@ish.com.au wrote: On 29/03/10 7:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote: portmaster -r graphics/png That won't work, the man page clearly says that it has to be a port directory or glob pattern from /var/db/pkg. The glob pattern bit of that was (unfortunately) broken up till version 2.20, which I just committed. I'm confused. The manual actually says: [-R] -r name/glob of port in /var/db/pkg When I try your suggestion I get this: # portmaster -r png- === No valid installed port, or port directory given === Try portmaster --help And this doesn't work either: # portmaster -r graphics/png === No valid installed port, or port directory given === Try portmaster --help So, as you say the pkg pattern is broken, but also 'port directory' doesn't work either unlike your suggestions above. It would be nice for both pkg and directory patterns to be more consistently available, but in the meantime readers of UPDATING are going to be confused. Besides, when I read `glob' I don't think `regular expression'. A glob is a simplified extension of regular expressions, made available via fnmatch(3) and glob(3) ... The previous method I described works, and works well: portmaster -r 'png-*' Not sure why graphics/png doesn't work though; hrrm... Thanks, -Garrett ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Rene Ladan r.c.la...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/3/29 Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com: On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis a...@ish.com.au wrote: On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: portmaster -r png- Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just have missed it in the docs). I would have used portmaster -r graphics/png And yes, the directions are still wrong; it should be: portmaster -r 'png-*' Similarly since this was just a copy-paste of the jpeg instructions, those ones are wrong as well. Given that the PORTREVISION of all dependent ports are bumped, a simple 'portupgrade -a' or 'portmaster -a' should suffice. Or am I missing something? You're absolutely correct, but I think that these directions were written with the intent that they would be simple one-off directions for upgrading just graphics/png dependent libs. HTH, -Garrett ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On 03/28/10 19:34, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis a...@ish.com.au wrote: On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: portmaster -r png- Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just have missed it in the docs). I would have used portmaster -r graphics/png That won't work, the man page clearly says that it has to be a port directory or glob pattern from /var/db/pkg. The glob pattern bit of that was (unfortunately) broken up till version 2.20, which I just committed. And yes, the directions are still wrong; it should be: portmaster -r 'png-*' The * at the end of that is not necessary. In fact, portmaster strips it off before creating the actual pattern to feed to find. The current version of the instructions are correct. The - at the end of png is not strictly necessary, but it will serve to disambiguate the port name if there exists a pngfoo-1.23. hth, Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
2010/3/29 Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com: On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis a...@ish.com.au wrote: On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: portmaster -r png- Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just have missed it in the docs). I would have used portmaster -r graphics/png And yes, the directions are still wrong; it should be: portmaster -r 'png-*' Similarly since this was just a copy-paste of the jpeg instructions, those ones are wrong as well. Given that the PORTREVISION of all dependent ports are bumped, a simple 'portupgrade -a' or 'portmaster -a' should suffice. Or am I missing something? Rene ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On 03/29/10 02:27, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: On 29/03/10 7:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote: portmaster -r graphics/png That won't work, the man page clearly says that it has to be a port directory or glob pattern from /var/db/pkg. The glob pattern bit of that was (unfortunately) broken up till version 2.20, which I just committed. I'm confused. The manual actually says: [-R] -r name/glob of port in /var/db/pkg When I try your suggestion I get this: # portmaster -r png- === No valid installed port, or port directory given === Try portmaster --help Are you using portmaster version 2.20? -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On 03/29/10 02:53, Garrett Cooper wrote: Besides, when I read `glob' I don't think `regular expression'. A glob is a simplified extension of regular expressions, I wasn't going for a rigorous definition here. :) However, simplified is the correct idea. The previous method I described works, and works well: portmaster -r 'png-*' Right, that will work, but the * isn't necessary. Portmaster will strip it internally in any case. Not sure why graphics/png doesn't work though; hrrm... The -r option is only relevant to an installed port. Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: Right, that will work, but the * isn't necessary. Portmaster will strip it internally in any case. Those type of examples in the man pages and UPDATING have never worked for me in tcsh, I've always had to glob it like Garret stated. pkg_info |grep png linux-f10-png-1.2.37 RPM of the PNG lib (Linux Fedora 10) png-1.2.42 Library for manipulating PNG images scr2png-1.2_3 Converts the output of vidcontrol -p to PNG portmaster -r png- === No valid installed port, or port directory given === Try portmaster --help portmaster -r 'png-*' === Currently installed version: png-1.2.42 === Port directory: /usr/ports/graphics/png === Gathering distinfo list for installed ports === Launching 'make checksum' for graphics/png in background === Gathering dependency list for graphics/png from ports === No dependencies for graphics/png === Checking ports that depend on png-1.2.42 === Launching child to update akonadi-1.2.1_1 ^C === Build/Install for graphics/png exiting due to signal -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On 03/29/10 12:21, Adam Vande More wrote: On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org mailto:do...@freebsd.org wrote: Right, that will work, but the * isn't necessary. Portmaster will strip it internally in any case. Those type of examples in the man pages and UPDATING have never worked for me in tcsh, I've always had to glob it like Garret stated. I'm sorry to repeat myself, but what you're describing is a result of the fact that in the past the glob code for the -r option was broken. As of version 2.20 it is no longer broken, and the * is not necessary (although it won't hurt anything). hope this helps, Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: Hi, As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 April. The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing. Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildportssort=last_built to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even fixed. We also have two incremental builds on Pointy to catch the problems. Thank you, With hat: portmgr@ Thank you very much for this notification. It surely is nice to know this. -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On 29/03/10 12:38 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. The UPDATING entry for the png update looks very wrong. Wrong date, wrong text, wrong instructions for portmaster. 20090328: AFFECTS: users of graphics/png AUTHOR: din...@freebsd.org The png library has been updated to version 1.4.1. Please rebuild all ports that depend on it. If you use portmaster: portmaster -r jpeg- If you use portupgrade: portupgrade -fr graphics/jpeg -- -- Aristedes Maniatis ish http://www.ish.com.au Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001 GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: portmaster -r png- Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just have missed it in the docs). I would have used portmaster -r graphics/png Ari -- -- Aristedes Maniatis ish http://www.ish.com.au Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001 GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis a...@ish.com.au wrote: On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: portmaster -r png- Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just have missed it in the docs). I would have used portmaster -r graphics/png And yes, the directions are still wrong; it should be: portmaster -r 'png-*' Similarly since this was just a copy-paste of the jpeg instructions, those ones are wrong as well. Thanks, -Garrett ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Aristedes Maniatis a...@ish.com.au wrote: On 29/03/10 12:38 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. The UPDATING entry for the png update looks very wrong. Wrong date, wrong text, wrong instructions for portmaster. 20090328: AFFECTS: users of graphics/png AUTHOR: din...@freebsd.org The png library has been updated to version 1.4.1. Please rebuild all ports that depend on it. If you use portmaster: portmaster -r jpeg- If you use portupgrade: portupgrade -fr graphics/jpeg The text has been updated: 20100328: AFFECTS: users of graphics/png AUTHOR: din...@freebsd.org The png library has been updated to version 1.4.1. Please rebuild all ports that depend on it. If you use portmaster: portmaster -r png- If you use portupgrade: portupgrade -fr graphics/png Thanks, -Garrett ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
