Re: Poll: What's the best audio player

2007-02-15 Thread Lars Stokholm

On 2/13/07, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

What is the best audio (MP3/OGG/Etc) to use under Gnome?


Well, I'm a Fluxbox user, but I'd vote for MPD (http://musicpd.org/)
and Sonata (http://sonata.berlios.de/) as a pretty GTK+ client. Both
are in ports.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Poll: What's the best audio player

2007-02-15 Thread Michael Johnson

On 2/13/07, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


What is the best audio (MP3/OGG/Etc) to use under Gnome?




Rhythmbox is a pretty good choice IMHO as it supports anything gstreamer
supports.

--

Best regards,
Chris

Nothing is ever accomplished by a reasonable man.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Poll: What's the best audio player

2007-02-14 Thread Christian Walther

On 13/02/07, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

What is the best audio (MP3/OGG/Etc) to use under Gnome?


I was one of those Gnome-supporters and -lovers, too. Until I recently
came to the conclusion that there isn't this one particularly good
desktop environment. On the contrary, some Apps are good in KDE, while
others just rock in Gnome.
So i compiled KDE from ports.

To answer your question:
- Quod Libet and Rythmbox both had problems with my setup: Older
machine, audio library being mounted via NFS. Both didn't manage to
scan the library fast enough. This is not to say, that both needed
more than 2,5 hours or crashed. Python based players aren't an option
for me, especially when they rescan the entire library on startup.
- xmms and bmp(x) don't behave correctly. They have a window
management on their own. This is just bad, especially when you're on a
tiled WM just as ion3, wmii...
- I like cmus one the command line. Needs a bit to get used to it, but
you'll love it if you love vi.
- Right know I'm using Amarok (yes, the KDE audio player). I like
listening to Podcasts and Internet radio streams, and both are handled
quite nicely.

Christian
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Poll: What's the best audio player

2007-02-14 Thread Simon Phoenix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Chris said the following on 13.02.2007 21:33:
 What is the best audio (MP3/OGG/Etc) to use under Gnome?

Audacious is a best for me.

- --
Best regards,
Simon Phoenix (Phoenix Lab.)
- ---
KeyID: 0x2569D30B
Fingerprint: 78FC 5C40 07CC D331 148E CC79 84B8 D514 2569 D30B
- ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF0zL9hLjVFCVp0wsRCqHsAJ9l2IaoFVxyUv/QYOT2uQv2s7Ta3gCfYnBj
xqZ6Fb98UKl45VYrAZG5NbI=
=/EqK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Poll: What's the best audio player

2007-02-14 Thread Peter A. Giessel
On 2007/02/13 10:33, Chris seems to have typed:
 What is the best audio (MP3/OGG/Etc) to use under Gnome?


I use KDE and XFCE, but between MPlayer and XMMS, I much prefer XMMS
for purely audio files.  MPlayer is great for multimedia, but XMMS is
better for purely audio in my opinion.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Poll: What's the best audio player

2007-02-13 Thread Andy Greenwood

On 2/13/07, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

What is the best audio (MP3/OGG/Etc) to use under Gnome?


I've always liked Pink Floyd, Mark Knopfler, and am currently
listening to some Journey. Format isn't so important as long as the
quality is good. ;-)

As for audio players, I've always used xmms and have never seen any
reason to use another.





--
Best regards,
Chris

Nothing is ever accomplished by a reasonable man.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
--
I'm nerdy in the extreme and whiter than sour cream
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Poll: What's the best audio player

2007-02-13 Thread Benjamin A'Lee
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 01:33:25PM -0600, Chris wrote:
 What is the best audio (MP3/OGG/Etc) to use under Gnome?

Banshee is quite good, but I don't think it's in ports.  I use Quod
Libet nowadays, though, since it handles my music collection than
Banshee does (or used to, anyway).  Rhythmbox has apparently improved a
lot, though I haven't used it in a while.

I'd recommend Quod Libet, though.

bma


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Poll: What's the best audio player

2007-02-13 Thread Dak Ghatikachalam

On 2/13/07, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


What is the best audio (MP3/OGG/Etc) to use under Gnome?




I felt that the mplayer is best it has so much of options, that works in
KDE, may be GNOME too, and command line for sure.

Regards
Dak


--

Best regards,
Chris





Nothing is ever accomplished by a reasonable man.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Poll: What's the best audio player

2007-02-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 13/02/07, Dak Ghatikachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 2/13/07, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 What is the best audio (MP3/OGG/Etc) to use under Gnome?



I felt that the mplayer is best it has so much of options, that works in
KDE, may be GNOME too, and command line for sure.


mp3blaster tends to barf occasionally and does
not support some formats, xmms is buggy but
does work, mplayer is problem-free bloatware.

But for th' Best Possible Sound get drunk and
catch one of Eric Ambel's bands (the Yayhoos
are touring Yourope right now).

--
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Poll: What's the best audio player

2007-02-13 Thread RW
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:40:02 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 13/02/07, Dak Ghatikachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 2/13/07, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   What is the best audio (MP3/OGG/Etc) to use under Gnome?
 
 
 
  I felt that the mplayer is best it has so much of options, that
  works in KDE, may be GNOME too, and command line for sure.
 

 xmms is buggy 

I've never had a single problem with xmms
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Poll: What's the best audio player

2007-02-13 Thread Garrett Cooper

Andy Greenwood wrote:

On 2/13/07, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

What is the best audio (MP3/OGG/Etc) to use under Gnome?


I've always liked Pink Floyd, Mark Knopfler, and am currently
listening to some Journey. Format isn't so important as long as the
quality is good. ;-)

As for audio players, I've always used xmms and have never seen any
reason to use another.


FreeBSD is a bit behind the times in this regard, considering that xmms 
(1.x branch) hasn't seen much development action in quite a few months.


Audacious, a port of the 1.x tree BMP source is a good, solid player. 
It's based on xmms, so if simplicity is a must, this player has it in 
spades.


Plus, one of the nicer features of audacious over xmms is that it uses 
gstreamer for its plugin system, which means the number of plugins 
available for use with audacious is higher than xmms. Besides, faad2 
(m4a, aac) support is better with the non-xmms plugin, so I will happily 
take audacious over xmms since I prefer mp4 formatted files over mp3.


BMP-2 is pretty ghetto right now (still highly under development and is 
buggy), and BMP-1 isn't that great. I was pleased though when I found 
out about audacious.


-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]