Re: Protecting Windows

2006-02-11 Thread Norberto Meijome
Brian Astill wrote:
 On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:19 am, Romana Branden wrote: Brian Astill 
 wrote:
 Interesting.  The spiel on the Nuance website gave me that
 impression, too.  However the Royal Society for the Blind in
 Adelaide tried v 7 (current is 8) and were VERY unimpressed.
 anything they recommend that we could test on crossover or wine?
 
 Yes - they use ZoomText 9 and Jaws 7.  These aren't the same as DSN 
 but do a somewhat similar job.
 

FWIW, I did some localisation work for a product that supported the
Jaws* reader for windows (cant remember the version). The Jaws software
loaded in memory and it would get the handle for each object that had
focus (a handle in Windows world is like a pointer to the object in the
session...or something like that). Jaws would search a particular
resource in that object and read it aloud. If that label didnt exist
it'd fallback for the text in the object (which wasn't always ideal).

Anyway, I'm pretty certain there are text-to-voice software for  *BSD
and GNU/Linux (avoiding flames from RMS ;) ). Maybe a similar approach
could be taken under X? Not sure at all how you'd go about text based
software that is not ncurses based (maybe a similar approach to lynx /
links ? ).

Voice to text is another BEAST altogether, and a lot harder than text to
voice. Training of the software to your particular voice is the first
part of the process, of course, but I doubt it ends there...

(on the side... does Asterix support for voice-based menu selections?
The technology for that (not voip itself, but the recognition bit) would
be quite similar to what an end user would need, i would say)

I'm sure there is a group somewhere doing something about this.
anyway, http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Accessibility-HOWTO/index.html is an
(old) start, i guess ;)

Regards,
Beto
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Protecting Windows

2006-02-09 Thread David Newall

Brian Astill wrote:
program runs on Windows 2000/XP only.  Why would anyone in their  
right mind NOT port a program as sensible as this to a SECURE OS?
I should say that Windows XP is not intrinsically insecure.  You can 
secure it, and I don't mean trivially by removing the network 
connection, but by shutting down unneeded services, replacing 
iexplorer.exe with firefox where possible, and so on.  I have heard that 
Dragon Naturally Speaking is very good, and that seems like a good 
reason to run Windows.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Protecting Windows

2006-02-09 Thread Brian Astill
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 08:10 pm, David Newall wrote:
 Brian Astill wrote:
  program runs on Windows 2000/XP only.  Why would anyone in their
  right mind NOT port a program as sensible as this to a SECURE OS?

 I should say that Windows XP is not intrinsically insecure.  You
 can secure it, and I don't mean trivially by removing the network
 connection, but by shutting down unneeded services, replacing
 iexplorer.exe with firefox where possible, and so on.  

Yes - that does seem to be a useful possibility.

 I have heard 
 that Dragon Naturally Speaking is very good, and that seems like a
 good reason to run Windows.

Interesting.  The spiel on the Nuance website gave me that 
impression, too.  However the Royal Society for the Blind in Adelaide 
tried v 7 (current is 8) and were VERY unimpressed.


-- 
Regards,
Brian
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Protecting Windows

2006-02-09 Thread Bart Silverstrim


On Feb 8, 2006, at 11:02 PM, Brian Astill wrote:


Greetings, all.
Can anyone help with this issue?

Person with deteriorating vision has discovered Dragon
Naturally Speaking which not only allows the construction of text
from speech but can also speak from received text.  ie letter writing
and email conversing etc become possible for the visually impaired.

All of which is wonderful except - you guessed it - the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
program runs on Windows 2000/XP only.  Why would anyone in their
right mind NOT port a program as sensible as this to a SECURE OS?


Not being a wise-ass here, but...
1) discourage saying your passwords out loud?
2) Unix is traditionally a server operating system, not targeted to end 
users, so applications like Dragon Naturally Speaking isn't top 
priority?
3) Most applications in Linux/FBSD are created to scratch an itch; 
the reason people now face usability problems is because most apps are 
written by and for people who are technically minded and/or 
programmers.  I would guess that there aren't too many visually 
impaired programmers active in the field, or that the current crop of 
speech translators have trouble with translating programming language 
to text.
4) You can't port a program you don't have the source to.  Dragon 
sounds proprietary, and the algorithms they use for transforming sound 
to text are probably considered proprietary.  To make a clone would 
mean working from scratch.  We're lucky sound OUTPUT is getting to a 
level where it almost works among applications without a ton of 
fiddling...let alone getting input translated properly to text.


Those are just my ideas of why someone in their right mind wouldn't 
bother with the port off the top of my head.  If the visually impaired 
are a minority and there aren't many programmers in that minority, it 
may take a long time to scratch that itch unless you are willing to 
offer some kind of open-source bounty and pay for said program to be 
developed.  Windows programs are more often than not proprietary and 
profit driven as an incentive to get a product like Dragon to market.  
Linux/FBSD is driven by whims and itches of programmers and techies...


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Protecting Windows

2006-02-09 Thread Robert Huff

Brian Astill writes:

  Interesting.  The spiel on the Nuance website gave me that
  impression, too.  However the Royal Society for the Blind in
  Adelaide tried v 7 (current is 8) and were VERY unimpressed.

While the OP seems stuck with Dragon, I'll point out that
I.B.M. has (or had at one point) a Linux-native version of
ViaVoice.


Robert Huff

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Protecting Windows

2006-02-09 Thread andrew clarke
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 02:32:44PM +1030, Brian Astill wrote:

 Person with deteriorating vision has discovered Dragon 
 Naturally Speaking which not only allows the construction of text 
 from speech but can also speak from received text.  ie letter writing 
 and email conversing etc become possible for the visually impaired.
 
 All of which is wonderful except - you guessed it - the [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 program runs on Windows 2000/XP only.  Why would anyone in their  
 right mind NOT port a program as sensible as this to a SECURE OS?

I don't know of any such software for Linux or BSD.

Does similar software exist for Mac OS X?  It might.  There is a bigger
market for it.

To me, the usual routine of securing Windows seems to be the wisest
choice in this instance, eg. not allowing end-users to have Admin
rights, and where possible, using open source software (Firefox,
Thunderbird, OpenOffice, Abiword, ...) that's written and updated
regularly by security-conscious people, etc.  Some simple words of
advice (beware of email attachments, etc) may also help.

Running a simple standalone FreeBSD/Linux firewall in front of the
Windows may also help security somewhat, preventing attackers connecting
directly to the Windows machine.  Note that many broadband cable/DSL
routers perform the same task when working in Internet sharing mode
(sometimes known as NAT).

Regards
Andrew
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Protecting Windows

2006-02-09 Thread Romana Branden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Brian Astill wrote:

 Interesting.  The spiel on the Nuance website gave me that 
 impression, too.  However the Royal Society for the Blind in Adelaide 
 tried v 7 (current is 8) and were VERY unimpressed.

anything they recommend that we could test on crossover or wine?

r:)
- --
Romana Branden
Forget not that the earth delights to feel your bare feet
and the winds long to play with your hair. - Kahlil Gibran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD65zYdXQlYmpAnCIRAnL2AKCJF8Wu/7u8eqJgwz+ozusK7YpKUwCghHIu
34pHjdkn7hFLhL2BUdcLW/c=
=t/ba
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Protecting Windows

2006-02-09 Thread Brian Astill
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:19 am, Romana Branden wrote: Brian Astill 
wrote:
  Interesting.  The spiel on the Nuance website gave me that
  impression, too.  However the Royal Society for the Blind in
  Adelaide tried v 7 (current is 8) and were VERY unimpressed.

 anything they recommend that we could test on crossover or wine?

Yes - they use ZoomText 9 and Jaws 7.  These aren't the same as DSN 
but do a somewhat similar job.

-- 
Regards,
Brian
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Protecting Windows

2006-02-09 Thread Malcolm Fitzgerald


On 10/02/2006, at 4:44 AM, andrew clarke wrote:


On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 02:32:44PM +1030, Brian Astill wrote:


Person with deteriorating vision has discovered Dragon
Naturally Speaking which not only allows the construction of text
from speech but can also speak from received text.  ie letter writing
and email conversing etc become possible for the visually impaired.

All of which is wonderful except - you guessed it - the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
program runs on Windows 2000/XP only.  Why would anyone in their
right mind NOT port a program as sensible as this to a SECURE OS?


I don't know of any such software for Linux or BSD.

Does similar software exist for Mac OS X?  It might.  There is a bigger
market for it.


Yes, iListen does that http://www.macspeech.com/

malcolm

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Protecting Windows

2006-02-08 Thread Lee Revell
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 14:32 +1030, Brian Astill wrote:
 Greetings, all.
 Can anyone help with this issue?
 
 Person with deteriorating vision has discovered Dragon 
 Naturally Speaking which not only allows the construction of text 
 from speech but can also speak from received text.  ie letter writing 
 and email conversing etc become possible for the visually impaired. 

AIUI many of these apps actually hook into the video driver, so they can
see exactly what is being output to the screen regardless of the API
used.  Extremely clever but very difficult to port, and I would not be
surprised if it won't work with VMWare either.

Lee

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Protecting Windows

2006-02-08 Thread Lee Revell
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 14:32 +1030, Brian Astill wrote:
 Greetings, all.
 Can anyone help with this issue?
 

Please don't cc: moderated lists when posting to public lists.

You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message has
been automatically rejected.  If you think that your messages are
being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Protecting Windows

2006-02-08 Thread Romana Branden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

codeweavers has mixed success:)
http://www.codeweavers.com/site/compatibility/browse/name/?cw=2f920008479e84a8f09e53169236c080;app_id=1229
- --
Romana Branden
Forget not that the earth delights to feel your bare feet
and the winds long to play with your hair. - Kahlil Gibran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD6t74dXQlYmpAnCIRAhEPAJ9yybK3OTZKzefpUaADuZn/T8PqVwCfWUmd
uz1T0kZteVrC4DfT/nbPnP8=
=xuaT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]