Re: Snapshots

2009-05-08 Thread Derek Ragona

At 04:00 AM 5/5/2009, Johan Hendriks wrote:

Are there no more snapshots of current?
The last is from 02-2009


Regards,
Johan


I downloaded one from this month a couple days ago.  You should see a May 
snapshot available.


-Derek


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Snapshots

2009-05-08 Thread Vincent Hoffman
On 8/5/09 12:36, Derek Ragona wrote:
 At 04:00 AM 5/5/2009, Johan Hendriks wrote:
 Are there no more snapshots of current?
 The last is from 02-2009


 Regards,
 Johan

 I downloaded one from this month a couple days ago.  You should see a
 May snapshot available.

 -Derek


Also see http://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/ 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Snapshots fail on busy filesystem

2007-08-22 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:01:35AM -0400, Chris Morris wrote:
 Greetings to all,
 
 I'm trying to set up an automated system wherein snapshots of the file 
 system are taken prior to a backup run.  The problem I'm running into 
 can best be described by the following bug report:
 
 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=100365cat=
 
 I get this same problem completely at random, and thus is most likely 
 caused by the busy file system, I just don't have anything in place to 
 prove it as the bug submitter does.
 
 Has this bug ever been *really* fixed?  The bug report seems to try to 
 call it fixed.  I even contacted the bug reporter about this and he 
 admitted that the bug had never been fixed, but that he'd moved on and 
 never found a way around this.

Sounds like you both need to talk to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Of course as long as he
thinks the problem is fixed he is not going to work on fixing it :)

Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Snapshots - can we use is for cloning disk(full restore to a newhard disk)

2006-03-01 Thread Iantcho Vassilev
On 2/28/06, Gayn Winters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
  Iantcho Vassilev
  Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 2:46 AM
  To: FreeBSD Questions
  Subject: Snapshots - can we use is for cloning disk(full
  restore to a newhard disk)

  Guys, i searched the web and the mailing lists about this
  topic,but i really didn`t find any interesting thing..
  Can i use the snapshots for full restore and if yes how can
  we do that?
 
  The part that everyone is referring to the snapshots is the
  fcsk you can run
  on it while the filesystem is working also..

 You ought to be able to clone a partition from a snapshot via backup
 (from the snapshot) | restore (to another disk).  Doing this for every
 partition should clone the FreeBSD system as of the snapshot.  I've
 never tried it, however, and I'd be interested in hearing from someone
 who has done it successfully.


...
Yea..
That`s the idea...
Maybe dd copy from the snapshot and then growfs if the hard disk is
bigger...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Snapshots - can we use is for cloning disk(full restore to a newhard disk)

2006-02-28 Thread Gayn Winters
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Iantcho Vassilev
 Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 2:46 AM
 To: FreeBSD Questions
 Subject: Snapshots - can we use is for cloning disk(full 
 restore to a newhard disk)

 Guys, i searched the web and the mailing lists about this 
 topic,but i really didn`t find any interesting thing..
 Can i use the snapshots for full restore and if yes how can 
 we do that?
 
 The part that everyone is referring to the snapshots is the 
 fcsk you can run
 on it while the filesystem is working also..

You ought to be able to clone a partition from a snapshot via backup
(from the snapshot) | restore (to another disk).  Doing this for every
partition should clone the FreeBSD system as of the snapshot.  I've
never tried it, however, and I'd be interested in hearing from someone
who has done it successfully.

-gayn

Bristol Systems Inc.
714/532-6776
www.bristolsystems.com 


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: snapshots on large filesystems

2005-11-04 Thread Nathan Vidican
Not enough info to be entirely informative in my reply, but I'd look to rsync or 
something similar... copy data/snapshot to another machine. We're running a 
similar setup here using 250GB S-ATA RAID Edition drives and 3Ware Escalade 
9000-series controllers, a second machine simply rsync's the data from the first 
nightly... was cheaper to have whole second raid setup and dedicated gigabit 
ethernet from one machine to the other than was to invest in tape backup 
devices/media. In addition we do a bi-monthly snapshot on an external USB drive 
(via tar direct to device... not reccomend cause' it's slow, looking for a 
faster way myself to do that).


With the cost of 200+GB drives, and applicable decent performing raid cards... 
it's just cheaper in most cases to mirror the data on another machine. - but 
that's just my two cents ;)



--
Nathan Vidican
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windsor Match Plate  Tool Ltd.
http://www.wmptl.com/

user wrote:

Hello,

Considering a PC server running FreeBSD with 4 400 GB hard drives attached
to a hardware raid controller doing raid-5.

So this will present itself to the OS as a 1.2TB filesystem.

Any comments on taking one or multiple snapshots of a filesystem of this
size ?

Given current disk capacities, I would not exactly consider this 1.2TB
filesystem a large one ... any comments on say ... a 6-8 TB filesystem
and making one or more snapshots of it ?

Assume they are marginally busy - perhaps a 5-10% data turnover per day...

Thanks.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Snapshots

2005-08-30 Thread Bob Johnson
On 8/30/05, Brian McCann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi all...I'm having a problem using snapshots...which I discovered
 when I tried a system backup using dump.  I've got a 283Gb partition,
 and the system was trying to create the snapshot for  12 hours.  I'm
 on 5.4-RELEASE.  Should this be taking this long?  My gut tells me
 no...cause it'd be foolish if it did.  Any ideas/suggestions?
 

No, it shouldn't.  It appears that there is some problem with the
snapshot process on large filesystems in 5.4-RELEASE and perhaps
others, but I don't know how aggressively it is being investigated, or
whether a solution has already been found.

There have been several posts about this in the past month or two, if
you search the archives you might find better information about it.  I
remember there was conjecture about the possible cause (e.g.
insufficient temporary storage space for the inode list), but I don't
remember if this led to a workable solution.

- Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Snapshots in Freebsd 5.x

2005-04-15 Thread Alec Berryman
jlkjlk 64654654ut on 2005-04-14 16:07:18 -0700:

 I have been able to mount the snapshot and retrieve the data while
 the system is running as mentioned on the article but ultimately I
 would like to restore entire partitions (from a system crash, for
 example).  Is it possible?  How can it be acomplished? On
 single-user-mode maybe?

I assume you mean by 'system crash' hard drive failure?  Snapshots
will not do you any good except perhaps as a tool to make backups
easier.


pgpEemgM5i3PD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Snapshots in Freebsd 5.x

2005-04-14 Thread Alec Berryman
jlkjlk 64654654ut on 2005-04-14 11:08:46 -0700:

 How do you restore an entire partition from a snapshot file in
 Freebsd5.3?  I want to be able to be able to replace the entire
 data, let's say on /var, with the data on the snapshot file. Could
 you please let me know if this is possible? How can I acomplish it?
 Your help is much appreciated.

http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/snapshot/

Not a direct answer to your question, but you'll want to read it if
you're doing snapshots.


pgpWtAcPndVOR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Snapshots in Freebsd 5.x

2005-04-14 Thread jlkjlk 64654654ut
Thanks Alec,
Very interesting; thanks for the info.
I have been able to mount the snapshot and retrieve the data while the 
system is running as mentioned on the article but ultimately I would like to 
restore entire partitions (from a system crash, for example).
Is it possible?  How can it be acomplished? On single-user-mode maybe?

Your help is much appreciated.

From: Alec Berryman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Snapshots in Freebsd 5.x
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:50:18 -0400
jlkjlk 64654654ut on 2005-04-14 11:08:46 -0700:
 How do you restore an entire partition from a snapshot file in
 Freebsd5.3?  I want to be able to be able to replace the entire
 data, let's say on /var, with the data on the snapshot file. Could
 you please let me know if this is possible? How can I acomplish it?
 Your help is much appreciated.
http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/snapshot/
Not a direct answer to your question, but you'll want to read it if
you're doing snapshots.
 attach3 
_
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® 
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: snapshots, soft update inconsistency

2005-01-21 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I've got some filesystem problems on my /usr partition.
 Cause:  power failures caused by TWO exploding transformers
 
 I restarted in single-user mode and fsck'd all of my partitions.
 Everything looked fine.  
 
 I've got a handful of zero-length files that I can't fix.  Bad file
 descriptor.  I've tried `ls -i` to get the inode number so I can delete
 the files via find.  ls doesn't work -- it just returns Bad file
 descriptor.
 
 I then had the bright idea of making a snapshot and running fsck against
 it.  I got a few hundred lines of unexpected soft update
 inconsistency. I didn't have fsck repair anything against the snapshot;
 I just wanted to see what the output was.
 
 Should I:
   a) run fsck against the snapshot and let it fix things
   b) go back to single-user mode and run fsck
   c) do something else
 
 I'm sure that booting into single-user mode is the best idea, however,
 I'd prefer not to do that if possible -- the machine is up and running
 and doing it's thing fairly well at the moment.

I thought you said you had already done that, and that it seemed fine.
Doing it again will only help if new problems have arisen since then.

If the machine is working okay as it is, and the data on its disks is
completely expendable, then feel free to leave it alone and wait for
problems to get worse.  
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]