Re: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1

2009-08-21 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Lowell Gilbert  writes:

> Howard Goldstein  writes:
>
>> It's like the cat dragged in firefox2 despite use of 3.5 for actual
>> browsing :(  Is there a good way to resolve these dependencies through
>> firefox3 or 3.5 short of ditching gnome?
>
> Yeah, it's really from the gecko handling.  According to
> Mk/bsd.gecko.mk, I think you could add something like the following to
> make.conf to do what you need:
>
> USE_GECKO= firefox3<->firefox

But it doesn't work, and neither does the formulat actually given in the
makefile.  From checkin comments a few months back, I think this
capability is on hold waiting for xulrunner 1.9.  Don't quote me on
that, though; I don't quite understand some of the mechanisms in use.

-- 
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1

2009-08-20 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Howard Goldstein  writes:

> It's like the cat dragged in firefox2 despite use of 3.5 for actual
> browsing :(  Is there a good way to resolve these dependencies through
> firefox3 or 3.5 short of ditching gnome?

Yeah, it's really from the gecko handling.  According to
Mk/bsd.gecko.mk, I think you could add something like the following to
make.conf to do what you need:

USE_GECKO= firefox3<->firefox

-- 
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1

2009-08-20 Thread Howard Goldstein
ajtiM wrote:
> firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1
> Paul Schmehl pschmehl_lists at tx.rr.com 
>  Thu Aug 13 02:16:24 UTC 2009 
> Previous message: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1 
> Next message: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1 
> Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 
> --On August 12, 2009 8:18:55 PM -0500 ajtiM  wrote:
> 
>> Hi!
>> When I run
>>
>>
>> ;
>> portaudit -a
>> Affected package: firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1
>> Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities.
>> Reference:
>> 
>>
>> but when I check above site I found:
>> Affects:
>> firefox <3.*,1
>> firefox >3.*,1 <3.0.13,1
>> firefox >3.5.*,1 <3.5.2,1
>> linux-firefox <3.*,1
>> linux-firefox >3.*,1 <3.0.13,1
>> linux-firefox >3.5.*,1 <3.5.2,1
>> linux-firefox-devel <3.5.2
>> seamonkey >0
>> linux-seamonkey >0
>> linux-seamonkey-devel >0
>> thunderbird >0
>> linux-thunderbird >0
>>
>> Are problem with  firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1 or not, please.
> 
> That port should probably be removed.  It's ancient.
> 
> Use /usr/ports/www/firefox3 or /usr/ports/www/firefox3.5

It's like the cat dragged in firefox2 despite use of 3.5 for actual
browsing :(  Is there a good way to resolve these dependencies through
firefox3 or 3.5 short of ditching gnome?

cally:/usr/home/hg$ pkg_info -R firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1
Information for firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1:

Required by:
epiphany-2.26.3_3
epiphany-extensions-2.26.1_1
galeon-2.0.7_1
gdesklets-0.35.4_6
gnome2-2.26.3
gnome2-fifth-toe-2.26.3
gnome2-power-tools-2.26.3
py26-gnome-extras-2.25.3_3
seahorse-plugins-2.26.2_2
straw-0.27_4
yelp-2.26.0_1






signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1

2009-08-12 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On August 12, 2009 9:48:04 PM -0500 Mel Flynn 
 wrote:


Given the above, it should be affected. Reading the original documents it
doesn't show. And I can't find anywhere that firefox 2 is End of Life.



Firefox was EOL in December 2008.  No security updates or fixes will be 
released for it.


http://www.linuxjournal.com/print/1007661

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Firefox

It should be removed from the ports tree.

Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already
obvious, my opinions are my own
and not those of my employer.
**
WARNING: Check the headers before replying

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1

2009-08-12 Thread Mel Flynn
On Wednesday 12 August 2009 18:16:20 Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On August 12, 2009 8:18:55 PM -0500 ajtiM  wrote:
> > Hi!
> > When I run
> >
> >
> > ;
> > portaudit -a
> > Affected package: firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1
> > Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities.
> > Reference:
> > 
> >
> > but when I check above site I found:
> > Affects:
> > firefox <3.*,1

Given the above, it should be affected. Reading the original documents it 
doesn't show. And I can't find anywhere that firefox 2 is End of Life.

> > firefox >3.*,1 <3.0.13,1
> > firefox >3.5.*,1 <3.5.2,1
> > linux-firefox <3.*,1
> > linux-firefox >3.*,1 <3.0.13,1
> > linux-firefox >3.5.*,1 <3.5.2,1
> > linux-firefox-devel <3.5.2
> > seamonkey >0
> > linux-seamonkey >0
> > linux-seamonkey-devel >0
> > thunderbird >0
> > linux-thunderbird >0
> >
> > Are problem with  firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1 or not, please.
>
> That port should probably be removed.  It's ancient.

If that's ancient, you should do a find /usr/ports -name Makefile -exec ident 
{} +|grep ' 200[67]/'.

-- 
Mel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1

2009-08-12 Thread Paul Schmehl

--On August 12, 2009 8:18:55 PM -0500 ajtiM  wrote:



Hi!
When I run


;
portaudit -a
Affected package: firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1
Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities.
Reference:


but when I check above site I found:
Affects:
firefox <3.*,1
firefox >3.*,1 <3.0.13,1
firefox >3.5.*,1 <3.5.2,1
linux-firefox <3.*,1
linux-firefox >3.*,1 <3.0.13,1
linux-firefox >3.5.*,1 <3.5.2,1
linux-firefox-devel <3.5.2
seamonkey >0
linux-seamonkey >0
linux-seamonkey-devel >0
thunderbird >0
linux-thunderbird >0

Are problem with  firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1 or not, please.


That port should probably be removed.  It's ancient.

Use /usr/ports/www/firefox3 or /usr/ports/www/firefox3.5

Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already
obvious, my opinions are my own
and not those of my employer.
**
WARNING: Check the headers before replying

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"