Re: new filesystem improvements in 6.0-RELEASE, require newfs?
On 11/4/05, Nathan Vidican [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most notably amongst the improvements/additions to 6.0-RELEASE, are those in the filesystem area. In performing a system upgrade, does one need to newfs/format a given partition with a new file system to make use of these optimizations, or is the bonus simply in the kernel/filesystem support and sticking with the current UFS2 partition (5.3-RELEASE/amd64) will step-up to it? As you nicely put it: the bonus is simply in the kernel :) -- Joao Barros ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: new filesystem improvements in 6.0-RELEASE, require newfs?
On 2005-11-04 11:50, Nathan Vidican [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most notably amongst the improvements/additions to 6.0-RELEASE, are those in the filesystem area. In performing a system upgrade, does one need to newfs/format a given partition with a new file system to make use of these optimizations, or is the bonus simply in the kernel/filesystem support and sticking with the current UFS2 partition (5.3-RELEASE/amd64) will step-up to it? The VFS optimizations and improvements in the SMP locking don't really depend on having a particular file system type, AFAIK, so you shouldn't need to newfs for the performance gains they implement. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: new filesystem improvements in 6.0-RELEASE, require newfs?
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:50:34AM -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote: Most notably amongst the improvements/additions to 6.0-RELEASE, are those in the filesystem area. In performing a system upgrade, does one need to newfs/format a given partition with a new file system to make use of these optimizations, or is the bonus simply in the kernel/filesystem support and sticking with the current UFS2 partition (5.3-RELEASE/amd64) will step-up to it? The latter. Kris pgp8956fjJXih.pgp Description: PGP signature