Здравствуйте, Ruben.
If not ... how do I figure out what's wrong?
What is your ipfw rules?
Вы писали 17 сентября 2009 г., 20:45:01:
RdG On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:14:15AM -0400, Robert Huff typed:
I have a machine running
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #3: Tue Sep 15 18:49:58 EDT 2009 amd64
It has this in the config file for the running kernel:
options IPFIREWALL #firewall
options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE #enable logging to syslogd(8)
options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100#limit verbosity
options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT#allow everything by default
options IPFIREWALL_NAT #ipfw kernel nat support
options LIBALIAS
It (10.0.0.1) connects correctly to another machine (10.0.0.3);
I know because .3 mounts one of .1's disks using Samba.
With the ipfw rules appended below, I can't NAT, nor should I
be able to. (em0 faces the Internet; em1 faces the other
machine.)
However: using these I still can't get through
RdG Through to what? You seem to be able to connect on a local subnet, but
RdG not to the internet through NAT, which you say is ok, because you
shouldn't ?
RdG Please explain exactly what you want to do.
Have I forgotten something? Or misunderstood something?
If not ... how do I figure out what's wrong?
RdG /var/log/security is a good place to start, as your config seems to log
allmost
RdG all denies.
RdG BTW, CURRENT is a development branch. Fine if you want to run it, but you
RdG should do some basic debugging yourself before posting problems with it.
And
RdG then the -questions list is probably not the best place to find answers.
--
С уважением,
Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
