Re: Re : Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT
Hi, Michal, 2005-04-05 22:07 +0200Michal Mertl Didier Wiroth wrote: Hello, Thank you very much for replying. cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol patch /path/vidcontrol.diff.20050215 I'm using the RELENG_5 sources from today. The syscons.diff.20050215 works but the vidcontrol.diff.20050215 gives some errors. The diff is against the sources from -CURRENT where it applies and compiles cleanly. You should be ok using the current vidcontrol sources on -STABLE. The only difference is just some code purity fixes by Xin Li - probably in preparation for integrating the changes we speak about. I went into some problem when using the patch on my own laptop, which indicates that USB based mouse can play something nasty with the patchset :-( It does not affect the functionality seriously, but is really annoying. I would appreciate if someone can fix the issue. Cheers, -- Xin LI delphij delphij net http://www.delphij.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re : Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT
Hello, Thank you very much for replying. cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol patch /path/vidcontrol.diff.20050215 I'm using the RELENG_5 sources from today. The syscons.diff.20050215 works but the vidcontrol.diff.20050215 gives some errors. |Index: vidcontrol.c |=== |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol/vidcontrol.c,v |retrieving revision 1.48 |diff -u -r1.48 vidcontrol.c |--- vidcontrol.c 13 Jan 2005 03:59:44 - 1.48 |+++ vidcontrol.c 17 Jan 2005 05:27:25 - -- Patching file vidcontrol.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. Hunk #2 succeeded at 48. Hunk #3 succeeded at 66 with fuzz 1. Hunk #4 failed at 187. Hunk #5 succeeded at 223. Hunk #6 failed at 239. Hunk #7 failed at 257. Hunk #8 failed at 297. Hunk #9 failed at 332. Hunk #10 succeeded at 348 with fuzz 2. Hunk #11 failed at 377. Hunk #12 failed at 419. Hunk #13 failed at 507. Hunk #14 failed at 572. Hunk #15 failed at 669. Hunk #16 failed at 722. Hunk #17 failed at 743. Hunk #18 failed at 806. Hunk #19 succeeded at 891. Hunk #20 failed at 900. Hunk #21 failed at 933. Hunk #22 succeeded at 950 with fuzz 2. Hunk #23 failed at 962. Hunk #24 failed at 985. Hunk #25 failed at 1035. Hunk #26 failed at 1050. Hunk #27 succeeded at 1148. Hunk #28 succeeded at 1173. Hunk #29 succeeded at 1217. Hunk #30 succeeded at 1234. 19 out of 30 hunks failed--saving rejects to vidcontrol.c.rej done ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re : Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT
Didier Wiroth wrote: Hello, Thank you very much for replying. cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol patch /path/vidcontrol.diff.20050215 I'm using the RELENG_5 sources from today. The syscons.diff.20050215 works but the vidcontrol.diff.20050215 gives some errors. The diff is against the sources from -CURRENT where it applies and compiles cleanly. You should be ok using the current vidcontrol sources on -STABLE. The only difference is just some code purity fixes by Xin Li - probably in preparation for integrating the changes we speak about. Michal ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re : Re: Re : Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT
Unfortunately with patch applied it does not compile on stable: Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol cc -O -pipe -c vidcontrol.c vidcontrol.c: In function `video_mode': vidcontrol.c:500: error: `_VESA_800x600_DFL_COLS' undeclared (first use in this function) vidcontrol.c:500: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once vidcontrol.c:500: error: for each function it appears in.) vidcontrol.c:505: error: `_VESA_800x600_DFL_FNSZ' undeclared (first use in this function) vidcontrol.c:509: error: `_VESA_800x600_DFL_ROWS' undeclared (first use in this function) *** Error code 1 - Message d'origine - De: Michal Mertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mardi, Avril 5, 2005 10:07 pm Objet: Re: Re : Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT Didier Wiroth wrote: Hello, Thank you very much for replying. cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol patch /path/vidcontrol.diff.20050215 I'm using the RELENG_5 sources from today. The syscons.diff.20050215 works but the vidcontrol.diff.20050215 gives some errors. The diff is against the sources from -CURRENT where it applies and compiles cleanly. You should be ok using the current vidcontrol sourceson -STABLE. The only difference is just some code purity fixes by Xin Li - probably in preparation for integrating the changes we speak about. Michal ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
