Re: Recommended Video Card with OpenGL Acceleration?

2004-11-10 Thread Chris Kuethe
Just as a follow-up, I'm now running a GeForce2 MX400 with the nvidia
drivers port on 5.3 and it just works. Plenty quick enough for now. So
whoever it is that was wondering about whether or not the nvidia
drivers work on 5.3: yes, they work well.


-- 
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Recommended Video Card with OpenGL Acceleration?

2004-11-09 Thread Miguel Mendez
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 17:49:28 -0700
Chris Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

 I've started down the path of OpenGL hackery, and am looking for
 recommendations on good video cards support by X.org that have
 hardware accelerated OpenGL. I'll be running this on 5.3-stable. Thus
 far searches have indicated that ATI is to be avoided, NVIDIA is
 decent, and All cards supported by the DRI open source drivers work
 fine in FreeBSD. I would hope that if a card is said to work fine
 actually does do hardware OpenGL. (I have a laptop with a savage
 twister [0x8d01] that works fine with X, albeit very slowly. It'd be
 nice to have that usable.).

If you want to get the best performance the obvious choice is nvidia
hardware with their proprietary kernel driver. There used to be
stability issues in the past but those seem to have been fixed. I
wouldn't say ATI is to be avoided. If you don't have/need the latest and
greatest you will get 3D support from the DRI driver (up to 9200/R280).
You can get a 9200SE/128MB for $50 or so these days, enough if you don't
want to do heavy gaming and/or pixel/vertex shader programming.

The advantage is that, while performance is not as good as with nvidia
gear, you still have a 100% open source kernel and can get to the code
if needed. This might be important for some people, not so relevant for
end users. ATI used to have better 2D quality but this seems to have
changed, and nvidia now actually cares about image quality (I remember
the image quality of my old TNT to be really awful when compared to a
PCI Matrox card)

 If people would care to bounce me a dmesg or hardware description,
 X/Mesa/etc. versions and some glxgears framerates (csdemo framerates
 would be even better), that'd be much appreciated. I'd prefer to not
 have a completely frankensteined system, but if I need to be running
 some package straight out of CVS, then so be it.

For nvidia, use their kernel and X driver, for others Xorg should
provide the 3D support. I don't know about the Savage card, but if Xorg
supports the DRI part you should get 3D acceleration. Some cards only
have 2D support with sometimes Xv as well.


Cheers,
-- 
Miguel Mendez [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Extreme ways are back again
http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org| Extreme places I didn't know
PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1  | I broke everything new again
Note: All HTML mail goes to /dev/null| Everything that I'd owned



pgptMiobDMr2g.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Recommended Video Card with OpenGL Acceleration?

2004-11-08 Thread Chris Kuethe
I've started down the path of OpenGL hackery, and am looking for
recommendations on good video cards support by X.org that have
hardware accelerated OpenGL. I'll be running this on 5.3-stable. Thus
far searches have indicated that ATI is to be avoided, NVIDIA is
decent, and All cards supported by the DRI open source drivers work
fine in FreeBSD. I would hope that if a card is said to work fine
actually does do hardware OpenGL. (I have a laptop with a savage
twister [0x8d01] that works fine with X, albeit very slowly. It'd be
nice to have that usable.).

If people would care to bounce me a dmesg or hardware description,
X/Mesa/etc. versions and some glxgears framerates (csdemo framerates
would be even better), that'd be much appreciated. I'd prefer to not
have a completely frankensteined system, but if I need to be running
some package straight out of CVS, then so be it.

To forestall the ever-popular cries of STFA, I've already done some digging:
http://www.google.com/search?q=FreeBSD+OpenGL+acceleration
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/search.cgi?words=OpenGLmax=250sort=scoreindex=recentsource=freebsd-newbiessource=freebsd-questionssource=freebsd-x11
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-questionsw=2r=1s=OpenGLq=b
http://dri.sourceforge.net/
http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/faq/11.18.shtml
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/
...

-- 
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]