Way OT: How long does your box run for?

2004-09-03 Thread Andy Holyer
The other day I was explaining something to my boss (a suit), and I 
mentioned that a FreeBSD box would easily run for a year or more. Oh, 
he said, and then you've got to reboot it?. I explained that 
generally some upgrade comes along that reqwuires a reboot, but I 
realized that I don't know how long a box would stay up in the maximum. 
So, come on, this should be fun, what's the biggest uptime you've ever 
had for a BSD box?

---
Andy Holyer, Technical stuff
Hedgehog Broadband, 11 Marlborough Place Brighton BN1 1UB
08451 260895 x 241
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Way OT: How long does your box run for?

2004-09-03 Thread David Syphers
On Friday 03 September 2004 01:45 am, Andy Holyer wrote:
 The other day I was explaining something to my boss (a suit), and I
 mentioned that a FreeBSD box would easily run for a year or more. Oh,
 he said, and then you've got to reboot it?. I explained that
 generally some upgrade comes along that reqwuires a reboot, but I
 realized that I don't know how long a box would stay up in the maximum.
 So, come on, this should be fun, what's the biggest uptime you've ever
 had for a BSD box?

Netcraft has a list of long uptimes for websites, which has a lot of FreeBSDs 
(including number 1, with an uptime of nearly five years). Bad security, but 
still...

http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html

-David

-- 
+++ Divide By Cucumber Error. Please
Reinstall Universe And Reboot. +++
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Way OT: How long does your box run for?

2004-09-03 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Andy Holyer wrote:
The other day I was explaining something to my boss (a suit), 

You're a patient one, then ...
and I mentioned that a FreeBSD box would easily run for a year or more.
Oh, he said, and then you've got to reboot it?. I explained that 
generally
some upgrade comes along that reqwuires a reboot, but I realized that I
don't know how long a box would stay up in the maximum. So, come on,
this should be fun, what's the biggest uptime you've ever had for a 
BSD box?

For a publicly accessible host, around 150 days, which is probably too much;
generally things start to feel stale by then, to me, and security paranoia
grows in direct correlation to system uptime (which should reflect more on
my perceived knowledge of security and paranoia than on the Project's
software)
I've heard accounts of boxen acting as, say, LAN routers or LAN file
servers with uptimes of years.  IIRC, Netcraft now claims that most
new FreeBSD builds reset to zero after 400-something days, so
some of their statistics may be no longer as valid...
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Way OT: How long does your box run for?

2004-09-03 Thread Bill Moran
Andy Holyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The other day I was explaining something to my boss (a suit), and I 
 mentioned that a FreeBSD box would easily run for a year or more. Oh, 
 he said, and then you've got to reboot it?. I explained that 
 generally some upgrade comes along that reqwuires a reboot, but I 
 realized that I don't know how long a box would stay up in the maximum. 
 So, come on, this should be fun, what's the biggest uptime you've ever 
 had for a BSD box?

Aside from various uptime projects like the ones David commented on, it's
generally not practical to go for long uptimes, for exactly the reasons
you describe.

In practice:
My desktop generally maxes out at about 30 days uptime.  Something comes
up about once a month that causes me to reboot it.  Sometimes it's as
simple as a few days off from work, and I turn the computer off.

Most of the servers I manage (which are all intended for 24/7 access)
see about 3 months between reboots.  That's an average.  Some servers
are more aggresively updated than others, and are rebooted more often.

The fun part (for me) is that this is all _scheduled_ downtime.  For
the potentialtech.com server (for example) has about 3 hours of
unscheduled downtime since Jan 1.  And that downtime is the result
of a failed UPS at the colo facility.  It has 0 unscheduled downtime
due to software issues.

-- 
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Way OT: How long does your box run for?

2004-09-03 Thread Robert Huff

Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. writes:

  I've heard accounts of boxen acting as, say, LAN routers or LAN file
  servers with uptimes of years.

Within the last year or two, I had a conversation with someone
who claimed to have a machine runn9ing 2.2.x (or maybe it was 2.1.x)
continuously since applying the final security patch.

  IIRC, Netcraft now claims that most
  new FreeBSD builds reset to zero after 400-something days, so
  some of their statistics may be no longer as valid...

From the NetCraft FAQ:

Why do some Operating Systems never show uptimes above 497 days ?

The method that Netcraft uses to determine the uptime of a
server is bounded by an upper limit of 497 days for some
Operating Systems (see above). It is therefore not possible to
see uptimes for these systems that go beyond this upper
limit. Although we could in theory attempt to compute the true
uptime for OS's with this upper limit by monitoring for
restarts at the expected time, we prefer not to do this as it
can be inaccurate and error prone.

... which is not exactly the same thing.


Robert Huff



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Way OT: How long does your box run for?

2004-09-03 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Robert Huff wrote:
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. writes:
 

IIRC, Netcraft now claims that most
new FreeBSD builds reset to zero after 400-something days, so
some of their statistics may be no longer as valid...
   

From the NetCraft FAQ:
Why do some Operating Systems never show uptimes above 497 days ?
The method that Netcraft uses to determine the uptime of a
server is bounded by an upper limit of 497 days for some
Operating Systems (see above). It is therefore not possible to
see uptimes for these systems that go beyond this upper
limit. Although we could in theory attempt to compute the true
uptime for OS's with this upper limit by monitoring for
restarts at the expected time, we prefer not to do this as it
can be inaccurate and error prone.
	... which is not exactly the same thing.
 

Point taken.  Typing faster than thinking is dangerous;
particularly when not looking at the datum to which one
is referring.  Thank you.
KDK
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Way OT: How long does your box run for?

2004-09-03 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Friday, September 03, 2004 09:15:00 AM -0500 Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, 
S.P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Andy Holyer wrote:
The other day I was explaining something to my boss (a suit),

You're a patient one, then ...
and I mentioned that a FreeBSD box would easily run for a year or more.
Oh, he said, and then you've got to reboot it?. I explained that
generally
some upgrade comes along that reqwuires a reboot, but I realized that I
don't know how long a box would stay up in the maximum. So, come on,
this should be fun, what's the biggest uptime you've ever had for a
BSD box?
For a publicly accessible host, around 150 days, which is probably too
much;
generally things start to feel stale by then, to me, and security
paranoia
grows in direct correlation to system uptime (which should reflect more on
my perceived knowledge of security and paranoia than on the Project's
software)
In the old days, we used to have boxes with uptimes in the 900 day range. 
Nowadays that would be insanity.  As a security professional, I get irked 
that some of our boxes only get patched annually (because they only get 
rebooted annually).  It's far too risky a proposition these days.

Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Way OT: How long does your box run for?

2004-09-03 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Friday, September 03, 2004 10:55:09 AM -0400 Bill Moran 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the servers I manage (which are all intended for 24/7 access)
see about 3 months between reboots.  That's an average.  Some servers
are more aggresively updated than others, and are rebooted more often.
The fun part (for me) is that this is all _scheduled_ downtime.  For
the potentialtech.com server (for example) has about 3 hours of
unscheduled downtime since Jan 1.  And that downtime is the result
of a failed UPS at the colo facility.  It has 0 unscheduled downtime
due to software issues.
Well, if you're ruling out scheduled downtime, I have a box that's never 
been down since it was purchased four years ago.  :-)

'Course it started out as a RH 7.2 box, and now it's a FreeBSD 4.9 box, but 
it's never had a single minute of unscheduled downtime. :-)

Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Way OT: How long does your box run for?

2004-09-03 Thread Hugo Silva
I've had a 4.8 server with 280 days uptime, then the motherboard burned :/

I try never to reboot my servers, only when critical security updates are
issued. The reason for this is I work with shell providers mostly, and the
uptime is a big factor for the clients.

But of course, if choosing to reboot  apply a patch or let the server
unpatched with a possible root vulnerability, I'll go for the reboot
anytime.


 --On Friday, September 03, 2004 10:55:09 AM -0400 Bill Moran
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Most of the servers I manage (which are all intended for 24/7 access)
 see about 3 months between reboots.  That's an average.  Some servers
 are more aggresively updated than others, and are rebooted more often.

 The fun part (for me) is that this is all _scheduled_ downtime.  For
 the potentialtech.com server (for example) has about 3 hours of
 unscheduled downtime since Jan 1.  And that downtime is the result
 of a failed UPS at the colo facility.  It has 0 unscheduled downtime
 due to software issues.

 Well, if you're ruling out scheduled downtime, I have a box that's never
 been down since it was purchased four years ago.  :-)

 'Course it started out as a RH 7.2 box, and now it's a FreeBSD 4.9 box,
 but
 it's never had a single minute of unscheduled downtime. :-)

 Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 Adjunct Information Security Officer
 The University of Texas at Dallas
 AVIEN Founding Member
 http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
www.6s-gaming.com

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Way OT: How long does your box run for?

2004-09-03 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 9:45 AM +0100 9/3/04, Andy Holyer wrote:
I explained that generally some upgrade comes along that requires
a reboot, but I realized that I don't know how long a box would
stay up in the maximum. So, come on, this should be fun, what's
the biggest uptime you've ever had for a BSD box?
I don't think it would ever require a reboot.  The question is
whether you need to reboot to apply some prudent updates and
security fixes.
I have one server that I try to keep up as much as possible.  The
three longest runs on that machine are:
   373 days 10 hours, ending in July 2000  (long power outage)
   599 days 14 hours, ending in Sept 2002  (UPS failure)
   497 days 18 hours, ending in Apr  2004  (disk failure)
The first one ended because a power-station going into campus was
flooded (due to some construction in the area), and the building
did not have any power for about four hours.  My UPS lasted about
three and a half hours before giving out.
The second one was that the UPS itself melted down!  Well, it did
not quite melt, but it was seriously overheating and I had to
shutdown all the machines connected to it and unplug everything.
The UPS was literally too hot for me to touch, and once it cooled
down enough (which took about four hours), I could see that the
battery had started to melt.
The third was a disk problem, but I also believe it was a OS error
because the disk *getting* the error was one I should have been
able to ignore.  However the OS was confused over which disk got
the error, and it kept resetting the disk-controller for the main
system disk, instead of the one for the disk which had the errors.
So, I suspect the fault for that reboot is half hardware and half
the OS itself.
If you are going for long up times, then the stupidest thing you
can do is install it and forget it.  While I have long uptimes
on this machine, I also have only a few network services running,
and there are only two or three people who can log onto the
machine (and I trust them).  I use the ports collection to keep
many things up-to-date, and for some things in the base system
(like sendmail), I recompile them on a different machine and
then copy the pieces over to this server.  So, I manage to apply
the vast majority of security fixes, even though I do not reboot
and I do not have to stop/restart the main service that this
machine provides.
--
Garance Alistair Drosehn=   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Programmer   or  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rensselaer Polytechnic Instituteor  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Way OT: How long does your box run for?

2004-09-03 Thread Bill Moran
Hugo Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've had a 4.8 server with 280 days uptime, then the motherboard burned :/
 
 I try never to reboot my servers, only when critical security updates are
 issued. The reason for this is I work with shell providers mostly, and the
 uptime is a big factor for the clients.

It's interesting that the software is more reliable than the hardware.

This comes up on the PostgreSQL lists a lot.  A vast majority of the
data corruption problems that people report turn out to be hardware
failures.  PostgreSQL is actually several orders of magnitude more
reliable than the average box it runs on.  FreeBSD is the same way,
in my experience.

-- 
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Way OT: How long does your box run for?

2004-09-03 Thread Robert Huff

Hugo Silva writes:

  I try never to reboot my servers, only when critical security
  updates are issued. The reason for this is I work with shell
  providers mostly, and the uptime is a big factor for the clients.

Surely these folks can afford a spare machine on which to do
systems development and testing?


Robert Huff

  

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]