Re: complete listing of CPUTYPES
2008/8/30 Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I just switched from amd64 to i386 8-current on a machine and was using CPUTYPE?=nocona but want to know: a) Is this still correct for a intel dual core e6850 (3.0GHz) b) Is there a file that contains all the CPUTYPES and a description of what processors belong to which type? I think that's a gcc thing, more or less. man gcc gives a pretty exhaustive list of the cpu types (and synonyms) which you may set. -- -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: complete listing of CPUTYPES
- Original Message From: Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 2:55:11 PM Subject: complete listing of CPUTYPES I just switched from amd64 to i386 8-current on a machine and was using CPUTYPE?=nocona but want to know: a) Is this still correct for a intel dual core e6850 (3.0GHz) b) Is there a file that contains all the CPUTYPES and a description of what processors belong to which type? Since FreeBSD uses GCC check it here. http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: complete listing of CPUTYPES
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/8/30 Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I just switched from amd64 to i386 8-current on a machine and was using CPUTYPE?=nocona but want to know: a) Is this still correct for a intel dual core e6850 (3.0GHz) b) Is there a file that contains all the CPUTYPES and a description of what processors belong to which type? I think that's a gcc thing, more or less. man gcc gives a pretty exhaustive list of the cpu types (and synonyms) which you may set. You can also see a list of CPUTYPEs in the examples: /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf core and core2 exist (in 7.0-RELEASE). I guess core2 is what you are looking for. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
complete listing of CPUTYPES
I just switched from amd64 to i386 8-current on a machine and was using CPUTYPE?=nocona but want to know: a) Is this still correct for a intel dual core e6850 (3.0GHz) b) Is there a file that contains all the CPUTYPES and a description of what processors belong to which type? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: complete listing of CPUTYPES
Manolis Kiagias wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/8/30 Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I just switched from amd64 to i386 8-current on a machine and was using CPUTYPE?=nocona but want to know: a) Is this still correct for a intel dual core e6850 (3.0GHz) b) Is there a file that contains all the CPUTYPES and a description of what processors belong to which type? I think that's a gcc thing, more or less. man gcc gives a pretty exhaustive list of the cpu types (and synonyms) which you may set. You can also see a list of CPUTYPEs in the examples: /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf core and core2 exist (in 7.0-RELEASE). I guess core2 is what you are looking for. Every type is documented in gcc(1) except core and core2 do these actually do anything? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: complete listing of CPUTYPES
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 07:55:11AM -0400, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: I just switched from amd64 to i386 8-current on a machine and was using CPUTYPE?=nocona but want to know: a) Is this still correct for a intel dual core e6850 (3.0GHz) I think it should be CPUTYPE?=prescott on i386, according to /usr/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk. Roland -- R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) pgpLMRcC3x6ns.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: complete listing of CPUTYPES
Roland Smith wrote: On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 07:55:11AM -0400, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: I just switched from amd64 to i386 8-current on a machine and was using CPUTYPE?=nocona but want to know: a) Is this still correct for a intel dual core e6850 (3.0GHz) I think it should be CPUTYPE?=prescott on i386, according to /usr/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk. Thats the type that nocona seems to alias to (CFLAGS have -march=prescott) Roland ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: complete listing of CPUTYPES
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 08:47:39AM -0400, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: Manolis Kiagias wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/8/30 Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I just switched from amd64 to i386 8-current on a machine and was using CPUTYPE?=nocona but want to know: a) Is this still correct for a intel dual core e6850 (3.0GHz) b) Is there a file that contains all the CPUTYPES and a description of what processors belong to which type? I think that's a gcc thing, more or less. man gcc gives a pretty exhaustive list of the cpu types (and synonyms) which you may set. You can also see a list of CPUTYPEs in the examples: /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf core and core2 exist (in 7.0-RELEASE). I guess core2 is what you are looking for. Every type is documented in gcc(1) except core and core2 do these actually do anything? Yes. CPUTYPE is translated by /usr/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk into the options actually passed on to gcc. (This means that the list of valid values for CPUTYPE is not identical to the list of values that gcc accepts as arguments to -march.) This is to handle the fact that gcc might not yet know about all the newest CPU's. Setting CPUTYPE to any of 'core2' or 'prescott' or 'nocona' will actually pass on exactly the same flags to gcc. (I suspect that /usr/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk ought to be updated in -CURRENT and 7.x to reflect the fact that the version of gcc included there knows about more CPU models than the version of gcc included with 6.x does.) -- Insert your favourite quote here. Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
