Re: native xpdf vs static xpdf for linux (couldn't create a font for...)
Hello ;) On 04 06 12, Jonathan Chen wrote: You need to install ghostscript fonts for it to display properly. Easiest way to do this is to install print/ghostscript. I've asked the xpdf maintainer to put in a note about this, but it's been ignored... I forgot to mention, that I had ~/.xpdfrc with mappings to Ghostscript fonts (which I installed by hand ;), which was mentioned in Problems section at foolabs. But this doesn't help ;( Paulius ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: native xpdf vs static xpdf for linux (couldn't create a font for...)
Hello, On 04 06 12, horio shoichi wrote: What is your /usr/X11R6/etc/xpdfrc like ? It seems a lot of lines necessary for font handling are commented out in default install. well, /usr/X11R6/etc/xpdfrc is almost commented out, I copied it to ~/.xpdfrc, but option 'displayFontX' is not supported anymore, and it looks that it could help (of course how do I know since it doesn't work ;) Paulius ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
native xpdf vs static xpdf for linux (couldn't create a font for...)
Hello, I would like to use native xpdf (compiled from ports) for viewing pdf files, but it's almost impossible,, since for many pdf's it can't find used fonts and of course doesn't show any text. The question would be, why? ;) BTW, statically linked xpdf for linux which I downloaded from foolabs.com (ftp://ftp.foolabs.com/pub/xpdf/xpdf-3.00-linux.tar.gz) shows everything. Everything looks like: $ xpdf ~/sample.pdf Error: Couldn't create a font for 'BA+TimesNewRomanPSMT' $ ~/tmp/xpdf-3.00-linux/xpdf ~/sample.pdf $ I've put this pdf (generated with StarOffice) at: http://devnull.lt/files/sample.pdf $ ldd `which xpdf` /usr/X11R6/bin/xpdf: libt1.so.5 = /usr/local/lib/libt1.so.5 (0x28123000) libfreetype.so.9 = /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 (0x28173000) libXm.so.3 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.so.3 (0x281df000) libXt.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x28429000) libXp.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXp.so.6 (0x2847a000) libXext.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x28482000) libXpm.so.4 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4 (0x28491000) libSM.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x284a) libICE.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x284a9000) libX11.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x284c) libstdc++.so.4 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.4 (0x28588000) libm.so.2 = /lib/libm.so.2 (0x28644000) libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x2865d000) libz.so.2 = /lib/libz.so.2 (0x2873e000) libXau.so.0 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXau.so.0 (0x2874c000) I'm running 5.2-CURRENT, if this means something ;) TIA Paulius ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: native xpdf vs static xpdf for linux (couldn't create a font for...)
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:08:46 +0300 Paulius Bulotas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I would like to use native xpdf (compiled from ports) for viewing pdf files, but it's almost impossible,, since for many pdf's it can't find used fonts and of course doesn't show any text. The question would be, why? ;) BTW, statically linked xpdf for linux which I downloaded from foolabs.com (ftp://ftp.foolabs.com/pub/xpdf/xpdf-3.00-linux.tar.gz) shows everything. Everything looks like: $ xpdf ~/sample.pdf Error: Couldn't create a font for 'BA+TimesNewRomanPSMT' $ ~/tmp/xpdf-3.00-linux/xpdf ~/sample.pdf $ I've put this pdf (generated with StarOffice) at: http://devnull.lt/files/sample.pdf $ ldd `which xpdf` /usr/X11R6/bin/xpdf: libt1.so.5 = /usr/local/lib/libt1.so.5 (0x28123000) libfreetype.so.9 = /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 (0x28173000) libXm.so.3 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.so.3 (0x281df000) libXt.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x28429000) libXp.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXp.so.6 (0x2847a000) libXext.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x28482000) libXpm.so.4 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4 (0x28491000) libSM.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x284a) libICE.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x284a9000) libX11.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x284c) libstdc++.so.4 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.4 (0x28588000) libm.so.2 = /lib/libm.so.2 (0x28644000) libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x2865d000) libz.so.2 = /lib/libz.so.2 (0x2873e000) libXau.so.0 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXau.so.0 (0x2874c000) I'm running 5.2-CURRENT, if this means something ;) TIA Paulius ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is your /usr/X11R6/etc/xpdfrc like ? It seems a lot of lines necessary for font handling are commented out in default install. horio shoichi ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: native xpdf vs static xpdf for linux (couldn't create a font for...)
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:08:46PM +0300, Paulius Bulotas wrote: Hello, I would like to use native xpdf (compiled from ports) for viewing pdf files, but it's almost impossible,, since for many pdf's it can't find used fonts and of course doesn't show any text. The question would be, why? ;) BTW, statically linked xpdf for linux which I downloaded from foolabs.com (ftp://ftp.foolabs.com/pub/xpdf/xpdf-3.00-linux.tar.gz) shows everything. You need to install ghostscript fonts for it to display properly. Easiest way to do this is to install print/ghostscript. I've asked the xpdf maintainer to put in a note about this, but it's been ignored... Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- When all else fails, RTFM ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
