Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a
> * Benjamin Thelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-12-2005 21:15:25 +0100]: >> I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the >> only >> one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I overlook >> something? > > Just force the thing to install and don't give another thought to that > openssl dependency: > > pkg_add -f .tgz > > "f" like ... force! ;-) Martin, Usually "force" is something I like avoid ;-). Nevertheless I did it your way :-). But I additionally had to delete the dependency to openssl-beta, because portupgrade complained. I don't know it this was the best idea... Two messages were a little annoying, please see below. I don't know if it's bad to see "dependency registration is incomplete". . . . pkg_add: can't open dependency file '/var/db/pkg/openssl-beta-0.9.8a/+REQUIRED_BY'! dependency registration is incomplete pkg_add: warning: package 'de-openoffice.org-2.0.20051202' requires 'perl-threaded-5.8.7', but 'perl-5.8.7' is installed And I really don't know where this perl-threaded comes from - I even couldn't find a port called like this - I suppose, it's a knob. Best, Ben > > HTH, > Martin > > -- > Martin Möller - ICQ # 82221572 > GnuPG/PGP (DSA) Schlüssel-ID: 06746BEE - FAbdruck > 9D2E 943F A669 50E4 A638 E42F 2699 2A76 0674 6BEE > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a
Hello Mike, thanks for your response! I suppose you're using the ports openssl instead of the base system. Thus your solution is definitely a good way as far as I can see, but I would like to keep the base system openssl if possible. Best, Ben > Hi Benjamin, > > I had the same problem. The solution to this problem for me was the > portupgrade "-o" option to replace openssl-beta with openssl-stable and > update all the dependencies. Have a look in the portupgrade man page. > There is an example how to use this option. For me it looked something > like 'portupgrade -o security/openssl-stable openssl-beta' to get rid of > the beta dep. > Actually I don't know at what point openssl is important to openoffice > and if this might lead to some issues. However, I didn't have any > problems so far. > Greetings, > Mike > > Benjamin Thelen wrote: >> You FreeBSD guys, >> >> This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? Is >> there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), whether list >> (archives) nor google told me something _really_ helpful - just stupid >> work arounds -sorry. >> >> I suppose there are many of you using the OpenOffice-2.0 package from >> http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ which requires >> openssl-beta-0.9.8a >> to be installed (I don't understand why). >> >> Installing openssl-beta from ports at first doesn't hurt. But at the >> stage >> of portupgrading next time it starts to be a pain, so I end up removing >> openoffice-2 and openssl-beta _before_ I do a portupgrade. If I don't >> remove both ports, any port that requires openssl is built with >> openssl-beta instead of openssl from the base system. If I add >> WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes, which seemd to be a good solution, net-snmp >> (required for kdeutils) complains that it cannot build if there is a >> newer >> openssl version installed by a port. There we are again, byebye >> openssl-beta/openoffice, portupgrade, reinstall both. >> >> >> I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the >> only >> one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I overlook >> something? >> >> >> Thanks, >> Ben >> >> ___ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >> >> > > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a
* Benjamin Thelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-12-2005 21:15:25 +0100]: > I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the only > one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I overlook > something? Just force the thing to install and don't give another thought to that openssl dependency: pkg_add -f .tgz "f" like ... force! ;-) HTH, Martin -- Martin Möller - ICQ # 82221572 GnuPG/PGP (DSA) Schlüssel-ID: 06746BEE - FAbdruck 9D2E 943F A669 50E4 A638 E42F 2699 2A76 0674 6BEE ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a
Hi Benjamin, I had the same problem. The solution to this problem for me was the portupgrade "-o" option to replace openssl-beta with openssl-stable and update all the dependencies. Have a look in the portupgrade man page. There is an example how to use this option. For me it looked something like 'portupgrade -o security/openssl-stable openssl-beta' to get rid of the beta dep. Actually I don't know at what point openssl is important to openoffice and if this might lead to some issues. However, I didn't have any problems so far. Greetings, Mike Benjamin Thelen wrote: > You FreeBSD guys, > > This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? Is > there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), whether list > (archives) nor google told me something _really_ helpful - just stupid > work arounds -sorry. > > I suppose there are many of you using the OpenOffice-2.0 package from > http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ which requires openssl-beta-0.9.8a > to be installed (I don't understand why). > > Installing openssl-beta from ports at first doesn't hurt. But at the stage > of portupgrading next time it starts to be a pain, so I end up removing > openoffice-2 and openssl-beta _before_ I do a portupgrade. If I don't > remove both ports, any port that requires openssl is built with > openssl-beta instead of openssl from the base system. If I add > WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes, which seemd to be a good solution, net-snmp > (required for kdeutils) complains that it cannot build if there is a newer > openssl version installed by a port. There we are again, byebye > openssl-beta/openoffice, portupgrade, reinstall both. > > > I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the only > one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I overlook > something? > > > Thanks, > Ben > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a
> On Friday 09 December 2005 15:36, Benjamin Thelen wrote: >> > On Friday 09 December 2005 12:15, Benjamin Thelen wrote: >> >> You FreeBSD guys, >> >> >> >> This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? >> Is >> >> there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), whether list >> >> (archives) nor google told me something _really_ helpful - just >> stupid >> >> work arounds -sorry. >> >> >> >> I suppose there are many of you using the OpenOffice-2.0 package from >> >> http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ which requires >> >> openssl-beta-0.9.8a >> >> to be installed (I don't understand why). >> >> >> >> Installing openssl-beta from ports at first doesn't hurt. But at the >> >> stage >> >> of portupgrading next time it starts to be a pain, so I end up >> removing >> >> openoffice-2 and openssl-beta _before_ I do a portupgrade. If I don't >> >> remove both ports, any port that requires openssl is built with >> >> openssl-beta instead of openssl from the base system. If I add >> >> WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes, which seemd to be a good solution, net-snmp >> >> (required for kdeutils) complains that it cannot build if there is a >> >> newer >> >> openssl version installed by a port. There we are again, byebye >> >> openssl-beta/openoffice, portupgrade, reinstall both. >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the >> >> only >> >> one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I >> overlook >> >> something? >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ben >> >> Mike, >> Thanks for your answer. >> >> > You allready have the answer, you said it works when you build from >> > ports. If you don't want to always rebuild openoffice when you upgrade >> > ports mark it as ignored in pkgtools.conf. >> >> I already did - just because I don't want to compile OOo. Building OOo-2 >> on a PIII/1,13 isn't very funny. :-). OOo-1.1 was a little nightmare, >> especially because it took me a while to succeed - you'd surely find on >> google ;-). Last but not least, I don't have 9 free GBs. Really. :-) >> >> I just don't understand why the package I mentioned requires openssl, >> because I can't see any dependency on openssl, neither for building nor >> for running. >> >> >> A third way would be to use the ports openssl-beta as systems default? >> >> Ben >> >> > -Mike > > Your better off leaving openssl set to the one in base and building from > source anything that depends on openssl. The problem with packages is you > are at the mercy of how someone else built them. Mike, Yes, but this case is a little strange, isn't it? Nobody else is wondering, there actually is no dependency on openssl, using the ports openssl, even a beta may be a litte uncommon (?) and I think this URL I mentioned is the main source for getting OOo as a package. Despite the problem I face, thanks to Nakata Maho at this point for his work. > > I also don't see where the openssl dependency is comming from and have to > take your word for it the package of open office you tried had one. Short and clear ;-): [EMAIL PROTECTED] pkg_add /data/software/freebsd/OOo_2.0m143_FreeBSD60Intel_install_de.tbz pkg_add: could not find package openssl-beta-0.9.8a ! > > If your installed open office was built by you and works I highly > recommend > you back it up, something like > > pkg_create -b /var/db/pkg/openoffice.org-2.0.0_1 and save the resulting > openoffice.org-2.0.0_1.tgz somewhere safe. Now if in the future yoy want > to upgrade it again from source and it doesn't work you always have a > known > good copy to fall back on. That sounds interesting. I never used pkg_create. Thanks for your hint, I'll have a look at this and look for a fast compiling machine :-)! Thanks for your response! Best, Ben > > -Mike > > > > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a
On Friday 09 December 2005 15:36, Benjamin Thelen wrote: > > On Friday 09 December 2005 12:15, Benjamin Thelen wrote: > >> You FreeBSD guys, > >> > >> This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? Is > >> there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), whether list > >> (archives) nor google told me something _really_ helpful - just stupid > >> work arounds -sorry. > >> > >> I suppose there are many of you using the OpenOffice-2.0 package from > >> http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ which requires > >> openssl-beta-0.9.8a > >> to be installed (I don't understand why). > >> > >> Installing openssl-beta from ports at first doesn't hurt. But at the > >> stage > >> of portupgrading next time it starts to be a pain, so I end up removing > >> openoffice-2 and openssl-beta _before_ I do a portupgrade. If I don't > >> remove both ports, any port that requires openssl is built with > >> openssl-beta instead of openssl from the base system. If I add > >> WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes, which seemd to be a good solution, net-snmp > >> (required for kdeutils) complains that it cannot build if there is a > >> newer > >> openssl version installed by a port. There we are again, byebye > >> openssl-beta/openoffice, portupgrade, reinstall both. > >> > >> > >> I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the > >> only > >> one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I overlook > >> something? > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Ben > > Mike, > Thanks for your answer. > > > You allready have the answer, you said it works when you build from > > ports. If you don't want to always rebuild openoffice when you upgrade > > ports mark it as ignored in pkgtools.conf. > > I already did - just because I don't want to compile OOo. Building OOo-2 > on a PIII/1,13 isn't very funny. :-). OOo-1.1 was a little nightmare, > especially because it took me a while to succeed - you'd surely find on > google ;-). Last but not least, I don't have 9 free GBs. Really. :-) > > I just don't understand why the package I mentioned requires openssl, > because I can't see any dependency on openssl, neither for building nor > for running. > > > A third way would be to use the ports openssl-beta as systems default? > > Ben > > > -Mike Your better off leaving openssl set to the one in base and building from source anything that depends on openssl. The problem with packages is you are at the mercy of how someone else built them. I also don't see where the openssl dependency is comming from and have to take your word for it the package of open office you tried had one. If your installed open office was built by you and works I highly recommend you back it up, something like pkg_create -b /var/db/pkg/openoffice.org-2.0.0_1 and save the resulting openoffice.org-2.0.0_1.tgz somewhere safe. Now if in the future yoy want to upgrade it again from source and it doesn't work you always have a known good copy to fall back on. -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a
> On Friday 09 December 2005 12:15, Benjamin Thelen wrote: >> You FreeBSD guys, >> >> This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? Is >> there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), whether list >> (archives) nor google told me something _really_ helpful - just stupid >> work arounds -sorry. >> >> I suppose there are many of you using the OpenOffice-2.0 package from >> http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ which requires >> openssl-beta-0.9.8a >> to be installed (I don't understand why). >> >> Installing openssl-beta from ports at first doesn't hurt. But at the >> stage >> of portupgrading next time it starts to be a pain, so I end up removing >> openoffice-2 and openssl-beta _before_ I do a portupgrade. If I don't >> remove both ports, any port that requires openssl is built with >> openssl-beta instead of openssl from the base system. If I add >> WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes, which seemd to be a good solution, net-snmp >> (required for kdeutils) complains that it cannot build if there is a >> newer >> openssl version installed by a port. There we are again, byebye >> openssl-beta/openoffice, portupgrade, reinstall both. >> >> >> I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the >> only >> one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I overlook >> something? >> >> >> Thanks, >> Ben > Mike, Thanks for your answer. > You allready have the answer, you said it works when you build from ports. > If you don't want to always rebuild openoffice when you upgrade ports > mark it as ignored in pkgtools.conf. I already did - just because I don't want to compile OOo. Building OOo-2 on a PIII/1,13 isn't very funny. :-). OOo-1.1 was a little nightmare, especially because it took me a while to succeed - you'd surely find on google ;-). Last but not least, I don't have 9 free GBs. Really. :-) I just don't understand why the package I mentioned requires openssl, because I can't see any dependency on openssl, neither for building nor for running. A third way would be to use the ports openssl-beta as systems default? Ben > > -Mike > > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a
On Friday 09 December 2005 12:15, Benjamin Thelen wrote: > You FreeBSD guys, > > This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? Is > there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), whether list > (archives) nor google told me something _really_ helpful - just stupid > work arounds -sorry. > > I suppose there are many of you using the OpenOffice-2.0 package from > http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ which requires openssl-beta-0.9.8a > to be installed (I don't understand why). > > Installing openssl-beta from ports at first doesn't hurt. But at the stage > of portupgrading next time it starts to be a pain, so I end up removing > openoffice-2 and openssl-beta _before_ I do a portupgrade. If I don't > remove both ports, any port that requires openssl is built with > openssl-beta instead of openssl from the base system. If I add > WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes, which seemd to be a good solution, net-snmp > (required for kdeutils) complains that it cannot build if there is a newer > openssl version installed by a port. There we are again, byebye > openssl-beta/openoffice, portupgrade, reinstall both. > > > I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the only > one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I overlook > something? > > > Thanks, > Ben You allready have the answer, you said it works when you build from ports. If you don't want to always rebuild openoffice when you upgrade ports mark it as ignored in pkgtools.conf. -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a
You FreeBSD guys, This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? Is there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), whether list (archives) nor google told me something _really_ helpful - just stupid work arounds -sorry. I suppose there are many of you using the OpenOffice-2.0 package from http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ which requires openssl-beta-0.9.8a to be installed (I don't understand why). Installing openssl-beta from ports at first doesn't hurt. But at the stage of portupgrading next time it starts to be a pain, so I end up removing openoffice-2 and openssl-beta _before_ I do a portupgrade. If I don't remove both ports, any port that requires openssl is built with openssl-beta instead of openssl from the base system. If I add WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes, which seemd to be a good solution, net-snmp (required for kdeutils) complains that it cannot build if there is a newer openssl version installed by a port. There we are again, byebye openssl-beta/openoffice, portupgrade, reinstall both. I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the only one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I overlook something? Thanks, Ben ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
