Re: portupgrade confusing '-P' and '-p'?

[RW]

On Monday 19 June 2006 14:36, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I'm in the middle of configuring a repeatable jail installation with some
  ports - in a nutshell, I want to install from locally built packages, but
  if not available locally I want to build the port myself _and_ create a
  package for future repetition. To prevent remote fetching, I set the
  PKG_FETCH variable to /bin/false as recommended. Here's the part I found
  curious:

 I don't understand how you plan to build a port without of fetching of a
 distfile?

PKG_FETCH is for packages, not distfiles.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

portupgrade confusing '-P' and '-p'?

[freebsd-questions]

Hi,

I'm in the middle of configuring a repeatable jail installation with some
ports - in a nutshell, I want to install from locally built packages, but
if not available locally I want to build the port myself _and_ create a
package for future repetition. To prevent remote fetching, I set the
PKG_FETCH variable to /bin/false as recommended. Here's the part I found
curious:

# portinstall -N -P -p x11-toolkits/gtk20
[Updating the pkgdb format:dbm_hash in /var/db/pkg ... - 63 packages found 
(-0 +0)  done]
---  Checking for the latest package of 'x11-toolkits/gtk20'
---  Found a package of 'x11-toolkits/gtk20': 
/usr/ports/packages/All/gtk-2.8.18_1.tbz (gtk-2.8.18_1)
---  Fetching the package(s) for 'gtk-2.8.19' (x11-toolkits/gtk20)
[Updating the pkgdb format:dbm_hash in /var/db/pkg ... - 63 packages found 
(-0 +0)  done]
---  Fetching gtk-2.8.19
** The command returned a non-zero exit status: 127
** Failed to fetch 
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.3-release/All/gtk-2.8.19.tbz
** The command returned a non-zero exit status: 127
** Failed to fetch 
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.3-release/All/gtk-2.8.19.tgz
** Failed to fetch gtk-2.8.19
** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
! gtk-2.8.19(fetch error)
---  Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed
---  Fetching the latest package(s) for 'gtk20' (x11-toolkits/gtk20)
---  Fetching gtk20
** The command returned a non-zero exit status: 127
** Failed to fetch 
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.3-release/Latest/gtk20.tbz
** The command returned a non-zero exit status: 127
** Failed to fetch 
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.3-release/Latest/gtk20.tgz
** Failed to fetch gtk20
** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
! gtk20@(fetch error)
---  Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed
---  Located a package version 2.8.18_1 
(/usr/ports/packages/All/gtk-2.8.18_1.tbz)
---  Using it anyway although it is not the latest version (2.8.19), since 
-PP/--use-packages-only is specified
---  Installing 'gtk-2.8.18_1' from a package
---  Installing the new version via the package
pkg_add: warning: package 'gtk-2.8.18_1' requires 'libxml2-2.6.24_1', but 
'libxml2-2.6.26' is installed

Note from the above that portinstall is presuming that -PP was used and
is not building the port. I can omit the '-p' and this stops the occurrence
of this error, but then I don't get a package creation and that means I'll
have to build this port from scratch every time I want to install it. I
could force package creation of all ports, but this seems wasteful when
only a few require this process. Is this a bug in portupgrade, or have I
just used a conflicting array of arguments?

cheers,
-- Joel Hatton --
Infrastructure Manager  | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417
AusCERT - Australia's national CERT | Fax: +61 7 3365 7031
The University of Queensland| WWW: www.auscert.org.au
Qld 4072 Australia  | Email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: portupgrade confusing '-P' and '-p'?

[Alex Zbyslaw]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Note from the above that portinstall is presuming that -PP was used and
is not building the port. I can omit the '-p' and this stops the occurrence
of this error, but then I don't get a package creation and that means I'll
have to build this port from scratch every time I want to install it. I
could force package creation of all ports, but this seems wasteful when
only a few require this process. Is this a bug in portupgrade, or have I
just used a conflicting array of arguments?
 

Don't know why what you are doing doesn't work, but you can create the 
package afterwards with pkg_create.  So no, you won't have to build it 
every time.


--Alex


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: portupgrade confusing '-P' and '-p'?

[Sergey Matveychuk]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm in the middle of configuring a repeatable jail installation with some
 ports - in a nutshell, I want to install from locally built packages, but
 if not available locally I want to build the port myself _and_ create a
 package for future repetition. To prevent remote fetching, I set the
 PKG_FETCH variable to /bin/false as recommended. Here's the part I found
 curious:

I don't understand how you plan to build a port without of fetching of a
distfile?

-- 
Dixi.
Sem.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]