simple question on portupgrade
Peter writes: > Secondly, I see that the features of portupgrade for > upward and downward recursiveness use opposite > lettering to that of pkg_info: > > portupgrade -R is like pkg_info -r > portupgrade -r is like pkg_info -R Having been using both of these a lot recently, I'd like to cast a strong vote for making this happen. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
simple question on portupgrade
Good evening, I am looking at the "downward recursive" option of portupgrade. Does this option (-R) only include the immediate dependencies of the port in question or is it truly recursive in the sense that it will upgrade dependencies of dependencies as well? Secondly, I see that the features of portupgrade for upward and downward recursiveness use opposite lettering to that of pkg_info: portupgrade -R is like pkg_info -r portupgrade -r is like pkg_info -R Example: # portupgrade -Rn bash ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) - converters/libiconv (libiconv-1.9.2_2) - devel/gettext (gettext-0.14.5_2) - shells/bash (bash-3.1.10) # pkg_info -rx bash Dependency: libiconv-1.9.2_2 Dependency: gettext-0.14.5_2 This seems pretty silly. Am I missing something? -- Peter __ Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
