Re: update of OpenSSL from tarball

2004-03-20 Thread Lowell Gilbert
J.D. Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I thought I would post to the group my solution for updating OpenSSL
 w/o having to rebuild the entire machine...
 
 # tar xzf openssl-0.9.7d.tar.gz
 # cd openssl-0.9.7d
 # ./config --prefix=/usr --openssldir=/etc/ssl
 # make
 # make test
 # make install
 
 ..this seems to correctly place all the files where they need to be
 with the exception of a few. I did recompile a few apps since they had
 ldd to older files that were incorrect.
 
 The problem is that I build most things from tarballs and overwrite
 alot of the base install binariesso if I did this fix the
 'correct' way, I would have quite a mess on my hands.
 
 YMMV

Most peoples' mileage *does* vary, because updating OpenSSL by itself
isn't enough.  Everything that linked to it statically needs to be
updated as well, which most people won't have the skill (or
inclination) to track down.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Dependencies of statically linked apps (was Re: update of OpenSSL from tarball)

2004-03-20 Thread John Mills
On 20 Mar 2004, Lowell Gilbert wrote:

 J.D. Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  ..this seems to correctly place all the files where they need to be
  with the exception of a few. I did recompile a few apps since they had
  ldd to older files that were incorrect.

..

 Most peoples' mileage *does* vary, because updating OpenSSL by itself
 isn't enough.  Everything that linked to it statically needs to be
 updated as well, which most people won't have the skill (or
 inclination) to track down.

Good point, but how _does_ one learn which libs have been statically
linked when one has only the binary (assuming debug tags were stripped)?

If common dependent apps are identified in the bug or fix report, well and
good. Otherwise I don't see any alternative to that app's maintainers
making the vulnerability information available. If there is a central list
or clearing-house of such information, where would it be?

 - John Mills
   1884 Ridgewood Dr, NE
   Atlanta, GA 30307-1166
   404.377.2577
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


update of OpenSSL from tarball

2004-03-19 Thread J.D. Bronson
I thought I would post to the group my solution for updating OpenSSL w/o 
having to rebuild the entire machine...

# tar xzf openssl-0.9.7d.tar.gz
# cd openssl-0.9.7d
# ./config --prefix=/usr --openssldir=/etc/ssl
# make
# make test
# make install
..this seems to correctly place all the files where they need to be with 
the exception of a few. I did recompile a few apps since they had ldd to 
older files that were incorrect.

The problem is that I build most things from tarballs and overwrite alot of 
the base install binariesso if I did this fix the 'correct' way, I 
would have quite a mess on my hands.

YMMV

 -JDB

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]