Re: what's up with portsnap?

2007-05-23 Thread Jonathan Horne
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 06:03:18 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At 11:52 PM 5/22/2007, you wrote:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > # portsnap fetch
> > > Latest snapshot on server is older than what we already have!
> >
> >That's really strange.  And it doesn't happen for me.
> >Is it possible that you have a misbehaving proxy which is caching
> >a month-old snapshot?  Colin Percival
>
> Oh, crap.  The god of portsnap and things FBSD has spoken and said
> I'm a dipshit.  And of course he's right  ;)
>
> Yeah, it goes through squid cause IIRC you suggested it.  It
> speeds up multi-machine updates a bunch.  But when they all started
> doing the same thing, I figured it was something on the
> servers.  I've been snapping for over a year, and it's always worked
> great through squid.  Don't know what changed, but I gave squid a
> re-init, and portsnap is fetching 6200 patches.  I should probably
> just blow out ports and start from scratch at this point.
>
> Thanks, Colin!
>
> -RW
>
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

btw RW, you might take a look at using csup for maintaining your ports instead 
of portsnap.  when you clear your ports directory and start over, you will 
notice that portsnap takes quite a while to even start unpacking the snapshot 
(at least it does on my computer).  however, with csup doing it, the 
population of the ports directory start almost immediately.  to me it just 
feels like it gets done a lot quicker.  if you are familiar with csup, you 
might have already seen the ports-supfile in /usr/share/examples/cvsup/.  
give it a try and see what you think, you might be pleasantly surprised!
-- 
Jonathan Horne
http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: what's up with portsnap?

2007-05-23 Thread r17fbsd

At 11:52 PM 5/22/2007, you wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> # portsnap fetch
> Latest snapshot on server is older than what we already have!

That's really strange.  And it doesn't happen for me.
Is it possible that you have a misbehaving proxy which is caching
a month-old snapshot?  Colin Percival


Oh, crap.  The god of portsnap and things FBSD has spoken and said 
I'm a dipshit.  And of course he's right  ;)


Yeah, it goes through squid cause IIRC you suggested it.  It 
speeds up multi-machine updates a bunch.  But when they all started 
doing the same thing, I figured it was something on the 
servers.  I've been snapping for over a year, and it's always worked 
great through squid.  Don't know what changed, but I gave squid a 
re-init, and portsnap is fetching 6200 patches.  I should probably 
just blow out ports and start from scratch at this point.


Thanks, Colin!

   -RW

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: what's up with portsnap?

2007-05-22 Thread Colin Percival
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> # portsnap fetch
> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap3.FreeBSD.org... done.
> Latest snapshot on server is older than what we already have!
> Cowardly refusing to downgrade from Thu May 10 10:42:40 EDT 2007
> to Mon Apr 16 10:17:39 EDT 2007.

That's really strange.  And it doesn't happen for me.

Is it possible that you have a misbehaving proxy which is caching
a month-old snapshot?

Colin Percival
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


what's up with portsnap?

2007-05-22 Thread r17fbsd
Hope this hasn't been asked 2^32 times;  didn't see anything in the 
recent archives.


What is up with the portsnap servers?  I saw the announcement that 
"ports was frozen for the new XOrg blah... blah...".  Is that 
still the case?


Try to fetch and it says:

# portsnap fetch
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap3.FreeBSD.org... done.
Latest snapshot on server is older than what we already have!
Cowardly refusing to downgrade from Thu May 10 10:42:40 EDT 2007
to Mon Apr 16 10:17:39 EDT 2007.

And even if it was "frozen" how did I get to May 10, if it was frozen 
at Apr 16?!  I've ONLY used portsnap, not cvs for updates.  Oh yeah 
-- running 6.2-Release.


  -Thanks,  Rob

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"