Re: which syslog??? (rsyslog? syslog-ng? or default?)

2011-01-24 Thread David Brodbeck
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:52 PM, krad kra...@gmail.com wrote:
 Ive used syslog-ng for central logging in the past. It support tcp,
 encryption and logging to a db. To be honest though the most useful feature
 was that you can expand log files paths to include the date and hostname.
 This makes backing up of the files far more efficient as you dont have to
 use newsyslog to rotate them, which is a good thing for backups especially
 if you use rsync

I'm a bit late on this one, I know, but I also use syslog-ng.  My
favorite feature is the ability to split log files for different hosts
into different directories.  Very handy for centralized logging.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: which syslog??? (rsyslog? syslog-ng? or default?)

2011-01-10 Thread Friedrich Locke
Go for algr, i can't do wrong.

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Aleksandr Miroslav
alexmiros...@gmail.com wrote:
 I have some boxes (about 40) that I was tasked with creating a
 centralized logging infrastructure for. I see in ports that we have
 several different versions of rsyslog, and syslog-ng.

 Is there any reason to use one or the other? Or should I just use the
 syslog that come with the base OS?

 thanks,
 Alex
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: which syslog??? (rsyslog? syslog-ng? or default?)

2011-01-09 Thread krad
On 7 January 2011 22:13, Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote:

 PS: rsyslog can use standard syslog.conf entries, or it has extensions that
 enable more cool stuff.

 G


 -Original Message-
 From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:
 owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Aleksandr Miroslav
 Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 3:09 PM
 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Subject: which syslog??? (rsyslog? syslog-ng? or default?)

 I have some boxes (about 40) that I was tasked with creating a
 centralized logging infrastructure for. I see in ports that we have
 several different versions of rsyslog, and syslog-ng.

 Is there any reason to use one or the other? Or should I just use the
 syslog that come with the base OS?

 thanks,
 Alex
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org





 font size=1
 div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in
 0in 1.0pt 0in'
 /div
 This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
  and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
  any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
  and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
  received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
  return email and delete this email from your system.
 /font

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org



Ive used syslog-ng for central logging in the past. It support tcp,
encryption and logging to a db. To be honest though the most useful feature
was that you can expand log files paths to include the date and hostname.
This makes backing up of the files far more efficient as you dont have to
use newsyslog to rotate them, which is a good thing for backups especially
if you use rsync
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


which syslog??? (rsyslog? syslog-ng? or default?)

2011-01-07 Thread Aleksandr Miroslav
I have some boxes (about 40) that I was tasked with creating a
centralized logging infrastructure for. I see in ports that we have
several different versions of rsyslog, and syslog-ng.

Is there any reason to use one or the other? Or should I just use the
syslog that come with the base OS?

thanks,
Alex
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: which syslog??? (rsyslog? syslog-ng? or default?)

2011-01-07 Thread Gary Gatten
After a bit of research I picked rsyslog.  Actually, my syslog servers had to 
be RHEL, so I have all my logs going to 2 servers; one runs rsyslog and the 
other the syslogd that shipped with RHEL.  They have different retention 
policies, one keeps about 30 days of logs online, the other about 90 days.

Rsyslog has some cool features that may come in handy for a centralized logging 
environment.  I don't use many (any?) of them right now, but it's nice to know 
they're there.  Depending on your environment you may want to check it out.  
It's really handy if you can replace your sending hosts syslogd with rsyslogd - 
if the central log server fails it will buffer log  entries locally and then 
ship them when the server comes back up.  Also supports tcp based syslog and a 
couple other lossless protocols.  I have mostly Ci$co gear logging here so 
can't really replace their logging daemon!

HTH

G


-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org 
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Aleksandr Miroslav
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 3:09 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: which syslog??? (rsyslog? syslog-ng? or default?)

I have some boxes (about 40) that I was tasked with creating a
centralized logging infrastructure for. I see in ports that we have
several different versions of rsyslog, and syslog-ng.

Is there any reason to use one or the other? Or should I just use the
syslog that come with the base OS?

thanks,
Alex
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org





font size=1
div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 
1.0pt 0in'
/div
This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
 and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
 any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
 and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
 return email and delete this email from your system.
/font

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: which syslog??? (rsyslog? syslog-ng? or default?)

2011-01-07 Thread Gary Gatten
PS: rsyslog can use standard syslog.conf entries, or it has extensions that 
enable more cool stuff.

G


-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org 
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Aleksandr Miroslav
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 3:09 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: which syslog??? (rsyslog? syslog-ng? or default?)

I have some boxes (about 40) that I was tasked with creating a
centralized logging infrastructure for. I see in ports that we have
several different versions of rsyslog, and syslog-ng.

Is there any reason to use one or the other? Or should I just use the
syslog that come with the base OS?

thanks,
Alex
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org





font size=1
div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 
1.0pt 0in'
/div
This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
 and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
 any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
 and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
 return email and delete this email from your system.
/font

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org