Re: newsyslog.conf error on latest stable?

2000-10-14 Thread Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira

On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 11:49:34PM -0200, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote:
 On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 01:49:02AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
  
  This really sounds like you haven't got version 1.25.2.1 of 
  newsyslog.c installed  This was when the above format was added 
  and was committed to -stable on May 19.
 
[elided]
 /var/log/monthly.log^I^I^I640  12*$M1D0 Z$

 System message:

 newsyslog: malformed at:
 /var/log/monthly.log  640  12*$M1D0 Z

Well, Ricardo Bueno da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED], a
fellow brazilian with a similar problem, seems to have identified
the source of it. He luckily had 2 similar instalations with just
one of them functional. Therefore, doing a cross compare, he found
out  that the most noticeable difference was /etc/localtime.  Just
the broken one had undergone light savings (BRST).
Unfortunaly, I can verify that, erasing /etc/localtime
seems to do the trick. Our timezone is BRT and we are undergoing
light savings (BRST). Perhaps, this information might prove
useful. Does anyone else can verify that?
I can't seem to find anything wrong with the zone files
since all other binaries seems to be working. I can try a deeper
look but I can't promise anything. I am not a zone expert.

-- 
Mario S. F. Ferreira - UnB - Brazil - "I guess this is a signature."
lioux at ( freebsd dot org | linf dot unb dot br )
flames to beloved [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Linksys Etherfast and Brooktree Conflict?

2000-10-14 Thread Greg Pavelcak


I'm posting to -stable because that's what I'm running -- supped
and built a couple weeks ago -- but I don't know if the problem
is particularly relevant to -stable.

The problem is simple. When I put my LinkSys Etherfast in (dc0), 
I get no picture on my Hauppage TV Card; take it out and the card
works fine.

I've tried physically changing the positions of my PCI
cards, but that's no help. 

I wonder about irqs, since my 5 pci devices seem to only use 9,
10, and 11. Some dmesg follows.

Thanks.

Greg



pci1: Matrox MGA G200 AGP graphics accelerator at 0.0 irq 9
ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
pci0: Intel 82371AB/EB (PIIX4) USB controller at 7.2 irq 10
pcm0: AudioPCI ES1371 port 0xc400-0xc43f irq 10 at device 9.0 on pci0
fxp0: Intel Pro 10/100B/100+ Ethernet port 0xc800-0xc83f mem 
0xda00-0xda0f,0xda10-0xda100fff irq 11 at device 11.0 on pci0
dc0: ADMtek AN985 10/100BaseTX port 0xcc00-0xccff mem 0xda101000-0xda1013ff irq 9 at 
device 13.0 on pci0
sym0: 895 port 0xd000-0xd0ff mem 0xda103000-0xda103fff,0xda102000-0xda1020ff irq 9 
at device 15.0 on pci0
bktr0: BrookTree 878 mem 0xda104000-0xda104fff irq 10 at device 17.0 on pci0
pci0: unknown card (vendor=0x109e, dev=0x0878) at 17.1 irq 10
atapci1: HighPoint HPT366 ATA66 controller port 
0xdc00-0xdcff,0xd800-0xd803,0xd400-0xd407 irq 11 at device 19.0 on pci0
atapci2: HighPoint HPT366 ATA66 controller port 
0xe800-0xe8ff,0xe400-0xe403,0xe000-0xe007 irq 11 at device 19.1 on pci0
atkbd0: AT Keyboard irq 1 on atkbdc0
psm0: PS/2 Mouse irq 12 on atkbdc0
fdc0: NEC 72065B or clone at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0
sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0
ppc0: Parallel port at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Fatal Tarp in 4.1.1

2000-10-14 Thread Mike Harding


Just another data point - I also got 2 'Fatal Trap 12 - supervisor
page not present' followed by a system lockup.  Both appeared to have
occurred while 'dump' was backing up the system.  This happened with
4.1.1 - it had never happened before this and hasn't happened since I
upgraded the system to -STABLE (fingers crossed).  I'll post if it
happens again, I notice that there were changes made to the SCSI
drivers.

This is on a dual processor board with an Adaptec 7896/7897 SCSI
interface.

- Mike H.

   Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 07:46:37 -0700
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Cc: Stable [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
   Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
   Precedence: bulk
   X-RULES: lists

   On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 09:13:43AM -0800, Jason Neumann wrote:
Greetings,
A few days ago I received a 'Fatal Trap 12' followed by a spontaneous
reboot on 4.1.1-stable. My  installed src was up to date as of Sept. 29,
2000.

   A common cause of this is loading modules which are out of date with respect
   to the kernel you are running, e.g. the linux module which is loaded at boot.

   Kris


   To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: PNP /boot/kernel.conf

2000-10-14 Thread Jim Weeks


On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Erik Trulsson wrote:
 
 Unless I am badly mistaken you can use exactly the same syntax in
 /boot/kernel.conf and boot -c so you can put the lines above (minus
 prompts) in /boot/kernel.conf and it should work fine.

Well, I thought I had tried this when the box was running 3.2 and had been
plagued with errors :/

However, the proof is in the pudding ;-)

config pnp 1 0 enable os irq0 3 drq0 0 port0 0x2f8
config pnp 2 0 enable os irq0 5 drq0 0 port0 0x3e8
config q
avail memory = 17395712 (16988K bytes)
Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0328000.
Preloaded userconfig_script "/boot/kernel.conf" at 0xc032809c.
Probing for PnP devices:
CSN 1 Vendor ID: BRI9411 [0x1194490a] Serial 0xb562d73a Comp ID: @@@
[0x]
sio1: type 16550A
sio1 (siopnp BRI9411 sn 0xb562d73a) at 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa
CSN 2 Vendor ID: BRI9410 [0x1094490a] Serial 0xdd877d7e Comp ID: @@@
[0x]
sio2: type 16550A
sio2 (siopnp BRI9410 sn 0xdd877d7e) at 0x3e8-0x3ef irq 5 on isa

Thanks,

Jim



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Linksys etherfast and Brooktree Conflict?

2000-10-14 Thread Greg Pavelcak

Sorry to followup my own message, but I did hit on an
arrangement of cards that seems to make everyone happy.

Greg



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: *SOS* Can't change password on FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE

2000-10-14 Thread John Indra

On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 07:39:25AM +0200, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:

|try:
|cd /usr/src/lib/libutil
|make clean depend all install
|cd /usr/src/lib/crypt

Is this a typo or intentional? Cause in my system, there's only
/usr/src/lib/libcrypt

|make clean depend all install
|cd /usr/src/secure/lib/crypt

Same goes for this one, only can find /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt

|make clean depend all install
|cd /usr/src/usr.bin/passwd
|make clean depend all install

Assuming that Neil did a typo, then this solution doesn't solve the problem,
at least not on my system.

Are there any other solution? Have someone already contact the maintainer in
charge?

Thank you...

|Neil

Regards,
John



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Why cu i suid sgid

2000-10-14 Thread Nora Etukudo

On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 12:44:28PM +0200, Tomasz Paszkowski wrote:

 $ ls -l /dev/cuaa0
 crw-rw  1 uucp  dialer   28, 128 14 Paz 01:09 /dev/cuaa0
 $ ls -l /usr/bin/cu
 -r-sr-sr-x  1 uucp  dialer  123456  7 Paz 19:45 /usr/bin/cu
 
  So when I plug in to machine cisco console, everyone can operate on it.
 
  I think that 755 will be enough for cu.

Then all users but 'uucp' can't operate with 'cu' on the device owned by
'uucp'. The s-bit in the owner rights indicates that the 'cu' always
operate as user 'uucp' regardless of which user it has started and
therfore has the permisson for this device. May be we can talk about the
reason for s-bit in the group rights.

Liebe Grüße, Nora.
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.sappho-net.de/
 Lesbian Computer Networks, Finland   http://www.sappho.net/
 Web for Women (von Frauen, für Frauen)   http://www.w4w.net/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Why cu i suid sgid

2000-10-14 Thread Tomasz Paszkowski

On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 06:23:43PM +0200, Nora Etukudo wrote:
 
 Then all users but 'uucp' can't operate with 'cu' on the device owned by
 'uucp'. The s-bit in the owner rights indicates that the 'cu' always
 operate as user 'uucp' regardless of which user it has started and
 therfore has the permisson for this device. May be we can talk about the
 reason for s-bit in the group rights.

 But think about the situation when you have cisco console connected
 to the serial port. Everyone can operate on it.

-- 
   _ __   __ 
  /  \  | | / /  / \  / \  --- Tomasz Paszkowski --
  | |\ \| | \ \ |/ \||/ \| === IPv4://3575244866 === IPNg://3ffe:8010:59::2 ===
 /_/  \__/  /_/  \_/  \_/  ---Powered by Brain and Keyboard ---


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Why cu i suid sgid

2000-10-14 Thread Nora Etukudo

On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 06:28:29PM +0200, Tomasz Paszkowski wrote:

  But think about the situation when you have cisco console connected
  to the serial port. Everyone can operate on it.

Well, the 'cu' command is like many others in your unix -- if not to
say most others -- a program of general purpose and intended for the use
of several users. In your special case, you may restrict the use of 'cu'
but this isn't valid for normal cases. Better is the restriction on the
cisco itself. Most cisco's (if not all) can be password protected.

Liebe Grüße, Nora.
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.sappho-net.de/
 Lesbian Computer Networks, Finland   http://www.sappho.net/
 Web for Women (von Frauen, für Frauen)   http://www.w4w.net/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Why cu i suid sgid

2000-10-14 Thread Tomasz Paszkowski

On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 06:38:03PM +0200, Nora Etukudo wrote:
 
 Well, the 'cu' command is like many others in your unix -- if not to
 say most others -- a program of general purpose and intended for the use
 of several users. In your special case, you may restrict the use of 'cu'
 but this isn't valid for normal cases. Better is the restriction on the
 cisco itself. Most cisco's (if not all) can be password protected.

 I presume cisco can be password protected, but what with dialup modems
 connected to the server ? Now, evrytime after 'make world' I have to
 remember changing permisions to /dev/[cuaa*,ttyd*] devices or cu.

-- 
   _ __   __ 
  /  \  | | / /  / \  / \  --- Tomasz Paszkowski --
  | |\ \| | \ \ |/ \||/ \| === IPv4://3575244866 === IPNg://3ffe:8010:59::2 ===
 /_/  \__/  /_/  \_/  \_/  ---Powered by Brain and Keyboard ---


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Why cu i suid sgid

2000-10-14 Thread Blaz Zupan

  I presume cisco can be password protected, but what with dialup modems
  connected to the server ? Now, evrytime after 'make world' I have to
  remember changing permisions to /dev/[cuaa*,ttyd*] devices or cu.

Change /dev/MAKEDEV.local so that it modifies the permissions like you want
them to be. BTW, make world does not change the devices in /dev in any way, if
you don't run /dev/MAKEDEV.

Blaz Zupan,  Medinet d.o.o, Linhartova 21, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tel: +386-2-320-6320, Fax: +386-2-320-6325



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Why cu i suid sgid

2000-10-14 Thread Tomasz Paszkowski

On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 07:09:15PM +0200, Blaz Zupan wrote:
 
 Change /dev/MAKEDEV.local so that it modifies the permissions like you want
 them to be. BTW, make world does not change the devices in /dev in any way, if
 you don't run /dev/MAKEDEV.

 But cd /sys/etc ; make distribution do.

 

-- 
   _ __   __ 
  /  \  | | / /  / \  / \  --- Tomasz Paszkowski --
  | |\ \| | \ \ |/ \||/ \| === IPv4://3575244866 === IPNg://3ffe:8010:59::2 ===
 /_/  \__/  /_/  \_/  \_/  ---Powered by Brain and Keyboard ---


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Why cu i suid sgid

2000-10-14 Thread Bill Fumerola

On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 07:13:42PM +0200, Tomasz Paszkowski wrote:

  Change /dev/MAKEDEV.local so that it modifies the permissions like you want
  them to be. BTW, make world does not change the devices in /dev in any way, if
  you don't run /dev/MAKEDEV.
 
  But cd /sys/etc ; make distribution do.

Thankfully that's not the way we suggest you upgrade you /etc/*. You might
want to check into every piece of documentation that refers to mergemaster.

-- 
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]





To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



how noe Brown Ports!

2000-10-14 Thread Gary Kline



   Well, it bit me, even tho I'm upgraded to 4.1 on both FBSD platforms.
   Trying to do a make install of a port, I get::

   # make install
   Error: your port uses an old layout.  Please update it to match this bsd.port.mk.
   *** Error code 1

   I see the new pkg-* files and have removed the old pkg/ directory, but
   still bump into the same error.  I missed something in the ports- or
   stable- lists, just not sure what

   gary


-- 
   Gary D. Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Public service Unix



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message