Re: mounting a SCO harddisk (locally secondary drive) under freebsd?

2002-05-19 Thread Matthew Emmerton

On Mon, 20 May 2002, Karl M. Joch wrote:

 Hi,
 
 i have to replace 6 sco boxes with freebsd. is it possible to mount the sco
 harddrive under freebsd when it is locally built in the hardware as second
 drive? i already got their software in the freebsd compatibility running.
 but for moving the data and the kermit stuff i should get direct access to
 the drive. the boxes are still in production so i have no chance to the it
 at the moment.

There was some talk about this a few months ago; check the list
archives.  The basic gist was that no, there wasn't a way, since the
documents describing the SCO filesystems were never released to the
public.  However, there was some talk about Caldera (the proud owners of
SCO) releasing said documents, so work could potentially start on this.

There are some other approaches that may be more feasible for you:
1) back up the data onto tape and restore under FreeBSD
2) run the FreeBSD and SCO machines side-by-side and use FTP, NFS or SCO
VisionFS/AFPS (they implement the SMB protocol) to copy the data over

--
Matt Emmerton


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



subscribe

2002-05-19 Thread DTBS




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: makeworld worked - my first attempt at this revisited

2002-05-19 Thread parv

in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Chip Wiegand thusly...

 In a nutshell, these are the steps I followed -
 # less /usr/src/UPDATING

 # cd /usr/obj/
 # chflags -R noschg *
 # rm -rf usr (this didn't exist to begin with)
 # ls -la (it was empty before I even started)
 # cd /usr/src
 # make cleandir  make cleandir
 # make buildworld
 # make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC
 # make installkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC
 # reboot
 # boot -s
 # fsck -p
 # mount -t ufs -a

you do understand that there is no need to mount all the ufs's, only
filesystems need to installworld?  if you have only the required
partitions as ufs's, then, of course, there is no difference.


 # swapon -a

say, why would one want to do fsck and/or swapon? just to be safe?


 # cd /usr/src
 # make installworld
 # mergemaster -v

you may also want to look into -i option (to install uninstalled files
w/o being asked).


  - parv

-- 
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



[no subject]

2002-05-19 Thread Tadahiro Ikeda


subscribe freebsd-stable [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe cvs-all [EMAIL PROTECTED]
end



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Mirror of 4.6RC2 ISO (was Re: FreeBSD 4.6-RC2 (i386) is now available.

2002-05-19 Thread Mike Tancsa

At 02:16 AM 5/20/2002 +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
  Hi,
   Can you tell me the MD5 checksum of the image ? From the AUS 
 site,
  I got
 
  MD5 (4.6-RC2-install.iso) = 8cafce7c79b977500d2776bf74b7
 
   ---Mike

That's correct.
--
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]


Great!  I have made a local North American copy of the ISO available at
http://shell1.sentex.ca/4.6-RC2-install.iso

I have allocated 5Mb of outbound bandwidth to it.

 ---Mike

Mike Tancsa,  tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Providing Internet since 1994www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Re: asr driver INVARIANT M_WAITOK

2002-05-19 Thread Archie Cobbs

Fabien THOMAS writes:
 the kernel crash with M_WAITOK in INVARIANT mode.
 it seems that M_WAITOK is the problems is it possible to replace with
 M_DONTWAIT ?

Yes, as long as you check for a NULL return value (not normally
possible with M_WAITOK).

-Archie

__
Archie Cobbs * Packet Design * http://www.packetdesign.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



double man entries

2002-05-19 Thread parv

after upgrading to 4-stable-2002.05.17.16.15.01 (4.6-rc) -- from
4-stable-2002.05.02.08.43.44 (4.6-prerelease) -- i see double
entries for the same section of a man page, as now there exist
compressed (old)  uncompressed (new) versions

-r--r--r--   2 root wheel 999 May 19 12:13 /usr/share/man/man1/apropos.1
-r--r--r--   1 root wheel 605 Jan 20  2001 /usr/share/man/man1/apropos.1.gz
-r--r--r--   1 root wheel   30586 May 19 12:12 /usr/share/man/man1/ar.1
-r--r--r--   1 root wheel   10137 Aug 15  2001 /usr/share/man/man1/ar.1.gz
-r--r--r--   1 root wheel8458 May 19 12:18 /usr/share/man/man1/asn1parse.1
-r--r--r--   1 root wheel3657 May  3 17:32 
/usr/share/man/man1/asn1parse.1.gz
-r--r--r--   4 root wheel5650 May 19 12:15 /usr/share/man/man1/at.1
-r--r--r--   1 root wheel2368 Mar 17 01:36 /usr/share/man/man1/at.1.gz
-r--r--r--   2 root wheel3188 May 19 12:15 /usr/share/man/man1/basename.1
-r--r--r--   1 root wheel1582 Sep 20  2001 
/usr/share/man/man1/basename.1.gz
-r--r--r--   1 root wheel   34468 May 19 12:12 /usr/share/man/man1/bc.1
-r--r--r--   1 root wheel   11774 Mar  8  2001 /usr/share/man/man1/bc.1.gz

...there are total of 4298 entries like above.  i didn't encounter
any doublets w/ 4.6-prerelease during regular use of man, only
now in 4.6-rc.

man -a -w ar gives...

/usr/share/man/cat1/ar.1.gz (source: /usr/share/man/man1/ar.1)
/usr/share/man/cat1/ar.1.gz (source: /usr/share/man/man1/ar.1.gz)
/usr/share/man/man1aout/ar.1aout
/usr/share/man/man1aout/ar.1aout.gz
/usr/share/man/cat4/i386/ar.4.gz (source: /usr/share/man/man4/i386/ar.4)
/usr/share/man/cat4/i386/ar.4.gz (source: /usr/share/man/man4/i386/ar.4.gz)
/usr/share/man/man4/ar.4.gz
/usr/share/man/man5/ar.5
/usr/share/man/man5/ar.5.gz


...man 4 ar (yes, that is w/o -a option) produces ar(4) page twice.


below is part of /etc/make.conf which may be of some siginificance...

INSTALL=install -C
NOMANCOMPRESS=  false


...any ideas what went wrong and/or how to avoid it in future?


  - parv

-- 
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message



Bridge Firewall

2002-05-19 Thread Mike Grissom



I have a firewall bridge and for some reason when 
the traffic get high like at about 2.7Mbps it stops responding on the network 
and takes our network offline. We have 2 Linksys nics in it now. 
Last time this happened we had a realtek and a linksys nic in it and it gave 
some error like TX underrun, going to store and forward mode. When that 
error comes up thats when it stops responding. Its running 4.6-pre 
FreeBSD. Could it be the dc driver in 4.6? Anyone have any 
ideas? Thanks!