[releng_4 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386
TB --- 2004-04-19 23:21:06 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2004-04-19 23:21:06 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2004-04-19 23:21:06 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2004-04-19 23:21:06 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386 TB --- 2004-04-19 23:21:06 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src TB --- 2004-04-19 23:32:01 - building world (CFLAGS=-O -pipe) TB --- 2004-04-19 23:32:01 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src TB --- 2004-04-19 23:32:01 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4: populating >>> /home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/obj/other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/i386/usr/include >>> stage 4: building libraries >>> stage 4: make dependencies >>> stage 4: building everything.. TB --- 2004-04-20 06:22:29 - building generic kernel (COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe) TB --- 2004-04-20 06:22:29 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src TB --- 2004-04-20 06:22:29 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Tue Apr 20 06:22:31 GMT 2004 >>> Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Tue Apr 20 06:57:15 GMT 2004 TB --- 2004-04-20 06:57:15 - building LINT kernel (COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe) TB --- 2004-04-20 06:57:15 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src TB --- 2004-04-20 06:57:15 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT >>> Kernel build for LINT started on Tue Apr 20 06:57:16 GMT 2004 -- ===> LINT mkdir -p /home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/obj/other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys cd /other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/i386/conf; PATH=/home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/obj/other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/i386/usr/sbin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/obj/other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/i386/usr/bin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/obj/other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/i386/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin config -d /home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/obj/other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/LINT /other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/i386/conf/LINT /other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/i386/conf/LINT:957: unknown option "DA_OLD_QUIRKS" *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src. TB --- 2004-04-20 06:57:17 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2004-04-20 06:57:17 - ERROR: failed to build lint kernel TB --- 2004-04-20 06:57:17 - tinderbox aborted ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Should I merge fix for PR#64091 (NFS data corruption)?
On Monday, 19th April 2004, Stephen McKay wrote: >On Sunday, 18th April 2004, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > >>Should one patch (and reboot in case of NFS compiled in a kernel) >>both of a client and a server? > >It is a client-side patch. The server could be anything, though I've >only tested with FreeBSD. By the way, Eugen, how do I get on your whitelist? Your "challenge response" spam protection forgot to do the "challenge" bit! Stephen. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Any plans to update CVS beyond v1.11.5?
Well hallelujah! I couldn't ask for much better than that. I look forward to v1.11.15's arrival in STABLE. On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:05:55PM +0100, Colin Percival wrote: > At 20:59 19/04/2004, Doug Lee wrote: > >CVS is being updated but FreeBSD still uses v1.11.5. ... > >Any plans to update CVS in the base system? > > CVS 1.11.15 was imported into -current four days ago. I > would assume that it will be merged onto -stable at some > point after 4.10-RELEASE. > > Colin Percival > -- Doug Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.dlee.org Bartimaeus Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bartsite.com "I before E, except after C, or when sounded like A, as in neighbor and weigh, except for when weird foreign concierges seize neither leisure nor science from the height of society." ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Any plans to update CVS beyond v1.11.5?
At 20:59 19/04/2004, Doug Lee wrote: >CVS is being updated but FreeBSD still uses v1.11.5. ... >Any plans to update CVS in the base system? CVS 1.11.15 was imported into -current four days ago. I would assume that it will be merged onto -stable at some point after 4.10-RELEASE. Colin Percival ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Any plans to update CVS beyond v1.11.5?
> CVS is being updated but FreeBSD still uses v1.11.5. I'm trying to > use a FreeBSD box as a server for both FreeBSD and Windows CVS > clients, and I'm finding a few problems which, I believe, are fixed in > CVS versions after 1.11.5. Unless I missed something major, there's > not a port for keeping up with CVS either. > > Any plans to update CVS in the base system? It seems that Peter Wemm has updated CVS to version 1.11.15: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1758503+0+/usr/local/www/db/\ text/2004/cvs-all/20040418.cvs-all -- -jpeg. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Any plans to update CVS beyond v1.11.5?
CVS is being updated but FreeBSD still uses v1.11.5. I'm trying to use a FreeBSD box as a server for both FreeBSD and Windows CVS clients, and I'm finding a few problems which, I believe, are fixed in CVS versions after 1.11.5. Unless I missed something major, there's not a port for keeping up with CVS either. Any plans to update CVS in the base system? This is not a complaint, btw; it's just an attempted optimization of local resources. Please Cc me on replies. Thanks much. -- Doug Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.dlee.org Bartimaeus Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bartsite.com "Innovation is hard to schedule." -- Dan Fylstra ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[releng_4 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386
TB --- 2004-04-19 12:02:04 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2004-04-19 12:02:04 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2004-04-19 12:02:04 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2004-04-19 12:02:04 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386 TB --- 2004-04-19 12:02:04 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src TB --- 2004-04-19 12:12:16 - building world (CFLAGS=-O -pipe) TB --- 2004-04-19 12:12:16 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src TB --- 2004-04-19 12:12:16 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4: populating >>> /home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/obj/other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/i386/usr/include >>> stage 4: building libraries >>> stage 4: make dependencies >>> stage 4: building everything.. TB --- 2004-04-19 18:15:21 - building generic kernel (COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe) TB --- 2004-04-19 18:15:21 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src TB --- 2004-04-19 18:15:21 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Mon Apr 19 18:15:26 GMT 2004 >>> Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Mon Apr 19 18:47:30 GMT 2004 TB --- 2004-04-19 18:47:30 - building LINT kernel (COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe) TB --- 2004-04-19 18:47:30 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src TB --- 2004-04-19 18:47:30 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT >>> Kernel build for LINT started on Mon Apr 19 18:47:31 GMT 2004 -- ===> LINT mkdir -p /home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/obj/other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys cd /other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/i386/conf; PATH=/home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/obj/other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/i386/usr/sbin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/obj/other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/i386/usr/bin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/obj/other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/i386/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin config -d /home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/obj/other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/LINT /other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/i386/conf/LINT /other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/i386/conf/LINT:957: unknown option "DA_OLD_QUIRKS" *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src. TB --- 2004-04-19 18:47:32 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2004-04-19 18:47:32 - ERROR: failed to build lint kernel TB --- 2004-04-19 18:47:32 - tinderbox aborted ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: filesystem corruption with 1TB filesystem, 4.9-STABLE, twe
Please check the customer advisory at http://www.3ware.com/support/index.asp and make sure you don't have a known problem configuration. Also, I would recommend using the "FreeBSD 4.8 Beta Driver" on the 3ware website, or still better, use the driver at the tip of RELENG_4 at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/twe/?only_with_tag=RELENG_4 If you need any help with the 3ware product, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Vinod. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ollie Cook > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 10:06 AM > To: Matthew Seaman; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: filesystem corruption with 1TB filesystem, > 4.9-STABLE, twe > > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 04:51:16PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > Can you rule out hardware problems by substituting in a different > > known good 3-ware card? Last time I saw anything like this > was an IO > > controller chip going marginal through overheating under heavy load > > and flipping occasional bits on disk block addresses. > > Hi, > > This is the first time we've tried the 3ware ATA RAID cards > so I don't have > another 'known good' one. Usually we use SCSI RAID cards. If > I were to replace > it I still wouldn't be able to guarantee that is was 'known > good'. I may be > able to arrange a part replacement, just to test that theory, > in any case. > > Are you aware of any utilities which would be able to > diagnose what you > describe? I guess what I'm asking is how did you determine > that that was what > happened last time you saw these symtoms? > > Thanks, > > Ollie > > -- > Oliver CookSystems Administrator, Claranet UK > [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 20 7903 3065 > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: filesystem corruption with 1TB filesystem, 4.9-STABLE, twe
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 06:05:33PM +0100, Ollie Cook wrote: > This is the first time we've tried the 3ware ATA RAID cards so I don't have > another 'known good' one. Usually we use SCSI RAID cards. If I were to replace > it I still wouldn't be able to guarantee that is was 'known good'. I may be > able to arrange a part replacement, just to test that theory, in any case. Suppliers are usually glad to accomodate you with spare kit when the sale depends upon it. > Are you aware of any utilities which would be able to diagnose what you > describe? I guess what I'm asking is how did you determine that that was what > happened last time you saw these symtoms? Hard to say. We had around a hundred machines and this only happened to some of them. It took some time, and quite a lot of false starts but eventually we pinned it down to overheating, and fixed the problem by applying a larger heatsink and uprated fans. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: filesystem corruption with 1TB filesystem, 4.9-STABLE, twe
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 04:51:16PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Can you rule out hardware problems by substituting in a different > known good 3-ware card? Last time I saw anything like this was an IO > controller chip going marginal through overheating under heavy load > and flipping occasional bits on disk block addresses. Hi, This is the first time we've tried the 3ware ATA RAID cards so I don't have another 'known good' one. Usually we use SCSI RAID cards. If I were to replace it I still wouldn't be able to guarantee that is was 'known good'. I may be able to arrange a part replacement, just to test that theory, in any case. Are you aware of any utilities which would be able to diagnose what you describe? I guess what I'm asking is how did you determine that that was what happened last time you saw these symtoms? Thanks, Ollie -- Oliver CookSystems Administrator, Claranet UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 20 7903 3065 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
