Re: burncd audio produces white noise
Michael A. Koerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.05.16] wrote: 1. Starting with a known good audio CD 2. Rip via dd if=/dev/acd0t01 ... etc 3. burncd -f /dev/acd0 track01.cdr ... etc I've also used this, but have some problems: there is sometimes a blank section in before the tracks, and allways a long one after (and the CD player does not automatically detect that it should change to the next track. Is this a problem with the CD player in my car and CD-R, or with my procedure? I'll try a dd of the whole CD next, but being able to select tracks would be great. /Par -- Par Leijonhufvud [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Hawaiian-Welsh Exchange: Getting vowels and consonants to those in need. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: burncd audio produces white noise
Par Leijonhufvud wrote: Michael A. Koerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.05.16] wrote: 1. Starting with a known good audio CD 2. Rip via dd if=/dev/acd0t01 ... etc 3. burncd -f /dev/acd0 track01.cdr ... etc This might be because you don't use the appropriate blocksize. A more secure way would be # cp /dev/acd0t01 track01.cdr or to copy the whole CD at once # cp /dec/acd0 audiocd.image ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: burncd audio produces white noise
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote: Par Leijonhufvud wrote: Michael A. Koerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.05.16] wrote: 1. Starting with a known good audio CD 2. Rip via dd if=/dev/acd0t01 ... etc 3. burncd -f /dev/acd0 track01.cdr ... etc This might be because you don't use the appropriate blocksize. A more secure way would be # cp /dev/acd0t01 track01.cdr or to copy the whole CD at once # cp /dec/acd0 audiocd.image recoverdisk has recently been enhanced to do exactly this kind of stuff. It has not been MFC'ed yet, so you might want to download it from here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/src/tools/tools/recoverdisk/recoverdisk.c?rev=1.6content-type=text/plain Ulrich Spoerlein -- PGP Key ID: 20FEE9DD Encrypted mail welcome! Fingerprint: AEC9 AF5E 01AC 4EE1 8F70 6CBD E76E 2227 20FE E9DD Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Don't know. Don't care. pgpu6LZ61wNto.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ipw(4) breaking under load
Patrick Lamaizière wrote: is it just me, or is no one actually using ipw(4) under 6.1? Anyway, I set up a FreeBSD based AP using an ural(4) device. I'm connecting to it via laptop and ipw(4). This works fine, as long as you don't push it. Transferring some files via NFS gives me a lousy 100kB/s transfer rate, which quickly stalls and the connection wedges. Syslog reports: May 19 17:29:48 roadrunner kernel: ipw0: fatal error I've got this error with the iwi driver too (Intel 2200 BG). But not often (one or two times a week). It seems not related to the network load for me. Normal network traffic works just fine for me. Several SSH session, http traffic, pings etc. Only when pushing it, it quickly stalls. Ulrich Spoerlein -- PGP Key ID: 20FEE9DD Encrypted mail welcome! Fingerprint: AEC9 AF5E 01AC 4EE1 8F70 6CBD E76E 2227 20FE E9DD Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Don't know. Don't care. pgpEtr3JKOAj4.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?
Sorry for delay, ended up sick.. :( You say use tcpdump, is there something I should be looking out for? As NFS is serving files, even more strange is if I kill off the nfsd process it's zippy fast for a moment and then the CPU load goes through the roof, and it starts serving files slowly. So it's actually working, outside of it consumes all available CPU and brings the machine to it knees quickly. Doesn't matter if I access it from my Solaris box, my other FBSD boxes, and so on, it still dogs down terribly and never used. Anything anyone can think of config wise that might cause that, it would be nice to know. I have the following that I can think of that affects NFS configs: # # NFS # nfs_client_enable=NO # This host is an NFS client (or NO). nfs_access_cache=2# Client cache timeout in seconds nfs_server_enable=YES # This host is an NFS server (or NO). nfs_server_flags=-u -t -n 5 # Flags to nfsd (if enabled). mountd_enable=YES # Run mountd (or NO). mountd_flags=-r # Flags to mountd (if NFS server enabled). weak_mountd_authentication=NO # Allow non-root mount requests to be served. nfs_reserved_port_only=YES# Provide NFS only on secure port (or NO). nfs_bufpackets= # bufspace (in packets) for client rpc_lockd_enable=YES # Run NFS rpc.lockd needed for client/server. rpc_statd_enable=YES # Run NFS rpc.statd needed for client/server. rpcbind_enable=YES# Run the portmapper service (YES/NO). rpcbind_program=/usr/sbin/rpcbind # path to rpcbind, if you want a differe rpcbind_flags=# Flags to rpcbind (if enabled). I can't think of anything that should have changed, unless mergemaster updating the default files might have changed something that would have an effect. --- Howard Leadmon http://www.leadmon.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Kennaway Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 10:50 PM To: Howard Leadmon Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas? On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote: Hello All, I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the 5.x releases on the server I am having troubles with. I basically have a small network and just use NIS/NFS to link my various FBSD and Solaris machines together. This has all been running fine up till a few days ago, when all of a sudden NFS came to a crawl, and CPU usage so high the box appears to freeze almost. When I had 6.1-RC running all seemed well, then came the announcement for the official 6.1 release, so I did the cvs updates, made world, kernel, and ran mergemaster to get everything up to the 6.1 stable version. Now after doing this, something is wrong with NFS. It works, it will return information and open files, just it's very very slow, and while performing a request the CPU spike is astounding. A simple du of my home directory can take minutes, and machine all but locks up if the request is done over NFS. Here is top snip: PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 497 root 1 40 1252K 780K - 2 50:42 188.48% nfsd This is a nice IBM eServer with dual P4-XEON's and a couple GB or RAM on a disk array, and locally is screams, heck NFS used to scream till I updated. I am not really sure what info would be useful in debugging, so won't post tons of misc junk in this eMail, but if anyone has any ideas as to how best to figure out and resolve this issue it would sure be appreicated... Use tcpdump and related tools to find out what traffic is being sent. Also verify that you did not change your system configuration in any way: there have been no changes to NFS since the release, so it is unclear why an update would cause the problem to suddenly occur. Kris ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 6.1-RELEASE, em0 high interrupt rate and nfsd eats lots of cpu
Ahh, this might be my nfs problem I am now seeing, see my other posting to this list about that issue. If anyone knows of a fix for this, outside of downgrading to 6.0 please let me know. It's for sure a nusiance when I have half dozen other machines that NFS to that server. I don't have em0, but do have fxp0, and am seeing massive CPU if I do something like a du on the NFS mount. --- Howard Leadmon http://www.leadmon.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rong-en Fan Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 9:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 6.1-RELEASE, em0 high interrupt rate and nfsd eats lots of cpu On 5/15/06, Dmitriy Kirhlarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 02:15:08PM -0400, Rong-en Fan wrote: Hi, After upgrading from 5.5-PRERELEASE to 6.1-RELEASE on one nfs server today, I noticed that the load is very high, ranging from 4.x to 30.x, depends how many nfsd I run. From mrtg traffic graph, I did not notice there is high traffic. This box is 2 physical Xeon CPU w/ I have same situation today on RC2. One client installing world from nfs share. nfsd eat 91% CPU, load average 6-8. Very small disk activitie. I don't look interrupt rate. I, also, have em0. After some digging, I found the cpu-eater nfsd can be triggered by running ``du'' on nfs client (both FreeBSD 6.1-R and Linux box). The nfsd will eat lots of CPU. After the client's du is finished, the nfsd still eat lots of CPU. The workaround is to /etc/rc.d/nfsd restart Everything will be just fine. Besides du, on FreeBSD 6.1-R client, buildkernel over nfs will trigger the same behavior. I just downgraded this box to 6.0-RELEASE and everything works fine. Running du or buildkernel from nfs client do not trigger the same behavior. I will try to do a binary search from 6.0-R to 6.1-R see if I can find out related commits. By the way, I have another nfs server running 6.1-RELEASE, but it does not exhibit this behavior. Kernel conf and sysctl are basically the same for both boxes. Regards, Rong-En Fan ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: possible tcp problem
On Fri, May 19, 2006, Andras Got wrote: I'm using freebsd 6.1 and _sometimes_ (one for every ~30-40 minutes) I get mysql connect errors with permission denied. The mysql_connect returns error code 1, which is permission denied. Quite certainly not true: Errors: sendmail[37085]: gethostbyaddr(IP) failed: 1 ^ Can't connect to MySQL server on 'IP' (1) /usr/include/netdb.h:#defineHOST_NOT_FOUND 1 /* Authoritative Answer Host not found */ HTH, -- sh pgpowmI3S3K0X.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: drm/dri rocks
On 05/19/06 01:44, Matthew Gardiner wrote: On Friday 19 May 2006 05:07, Ronald Klop wrote: This commit of the drm/dri stuff yesterday on 6-STABLE rocks. It works out of the box on my i810. I think FreeBSD is now ready for the desktop since xlock looks really cool. Pardon? the DRM/DRI stuff yesturday? going by the ports/graphics/dri, it hasn't been touched in over three months. He was referring to an update of the kernel drivers: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2006-May/063838.html -Jonathan -- Jonathan Noack | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: ipw(4) breaking under load
I am using ipw on thinkpad t42p. Last night while updating the ports tree I got an error which disconnected the cvsup. Restarting worked fine. I assumed it was signal strength or noise at the time. I will monitor this more closely. My recurring problem is all ssh connections are locked when the dhcp lease expires and the system is idle. I am not currently on the laptop so I can not document the versions I am using. I built the driver a few days ago and downloaded the Intel 2100 firmware at that time. Other than the above it has worked fine for me. Doug. On Sat, 20 May 2006, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: Patrick Lamaizière wrote: is it just me, or is no one actually using ipw(4) under 6.1? Anyway, I set up a FreeBSD based AP using an ural(4) device. I'm connecting to it via laptop and ipw(4). This works fine, as long as you don't push it. Transferring some files via NFS gives me a lousy 100kB/s transfer rate, which quickly stalls and the connection wedges. Syslog reports: May 19 17:29:48 roadrunner kernel: ipw0: fatal error I've got this error with the iwi driver too (Intel 2200 BG). But not often (one or two times a week). It seems not related to the network load for me. Normal network traffic works just fine for me. Several SSH session, http traffic, pings etc. Only when pushing it, it quickly stalls. Ulrich Spoerlein -- PGP Key ID: 20FEE9DDEncrypted mail welcome! Fingerprint: AEC9 AF5E 01AC 4EE1 8F70 6CBD E76E 2227 20FE E9DD Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Don't know. Don't care. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: drm/dri rocks
On Sunday 21 May 2006 06:41, Jonathan Noack wrote: On 05/19/06 01:44, Matthew Gardiner wrote: On Friday 19 May 2006 05:07, Ronald Klop wrote: This commit of the drm/dri stuff yesterday on 6-STABLE rocks. It works out of the box on my i810. I think FreeBSD is now ready for the desktop since xlock looks really cool. Pardon? the DRM/DRI stuff yesturday? going by the ports/graphics/dri, it hasn't been touched in over three months. He was referring to an update of the kernel drivers: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2006-May/063838.html -Jonathan So I assume that those updates will appear in 6.2 or some other future update? how does RELENG_6 differ from my setup of RELENG_6_1? Matty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: drm/dri rocks
Matthew Gardiner wrote: On Sunday 21 May 2006 06:41, Jonathan Noack wrote: On 05/19/06 01:44, Matthew Gardiner wrote: On Friday 19 May 2006 05:07, Ronald Klop wrote: This commit of the drm/dri stuff yesterday on 6-STABLE rocks. It works out of the box on my i810. I think FreeBSD is now ready for the desktop since xlock looks really cool. Pardon? the DRM/DRI stuff yesturday? going by the ports/graphics/dri, it hasn't been touched in over three months. He was referring to an update of the kernel drivers: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2006-May/063838.html -Jonathan So I assume that those updates will appear in 6.2 or some other future update? how does RELENG_6 differ from my setup of RELENG_6_1? Matty RELENG_6_1 only has security and bug fixes. RELENG_6 gets all the things that will be in 6.2. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: drm/dri rocks
On 05/20/06 18:42, Matthew Gardiner wrote: On Sunday 21 May 2006 06:41, Jonathan Noack wrote: On 05/19/06 01:44, Matthew Gardiner wrote: On Friday 19 May 2006 05:07, Ronald Klop wrote: This commit of the drm/dri stuff yesterday on 6-STABLE rocks. It works out of the box on my i810. I think FreeBSD is now ready for the desktop since xlock looks really cool. Pardon? the DRM/DRI stuff yesturday? going by the ports/graphics/dri, it hasn't been touched in over three months. He was referring to an update of the kernel drivers: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2006-May/063838.html -Jonathan So I assume that those updates will appear in 6.2 or some other future update? Correct, these updates will appear in 6.2. how does RELENG_6 differ from my setup of RELENG_6_1? RELENG_6 is the branch from which 6.x releases are built. During the 6.1 release cycle, the RELENG_6 branch was copied to create the RELENG_6_1 errata branch, from which 6.1-RELEASE was actually built. New features and bug fixes for 6.2 go into RELENG_6, but only security and critical bug fixes will go into RELENG_6_1. -Jonathan -- Jonathan Noack | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: possible tcp problem
Hi, Yes... This was because a bad setting in pf.conf. The state rules/buffers or something filled from time to time. The sendmail error wasn't connected to this, they just in the same jail and almost similar errors. I thought 1 means the same accross programs. :( So I'm sorry for my false letter. :( Regards, Andras Stanislaw Halik wrote: On Fri, May 19, 2006, Andras Got wrote: I'm using freebsd 6.1 and _sometimes_ (one for every ~30-40 minutes) I get mysql connect errors with permission denied. The mysql_connect returns error code 1, which is permission denied. Quite certainly not true: Errors: sendmail[37085]: gethostbyaddr(IP) failed: 1 ^ Can't connect to MySQL server on 'IP' (1) /usr/include/netdb.h:#defineHOST_NOT_FOUND 1 /* Authoritative Answer Host not found */ HTH, -- sh ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: drm/dri rocks
On Sunday 21 May 2006 10:54, Jonathan Noack wrote: On 05/20/06 18:42, Matthew Gardiner wrote: On Sunday 21 May 2006 06:41, Jonathan Noack wrote: On 05/19/06 01:44, Matthew Gardiner wrote: On Friday 19 May 2006 05:07, Ronald Klop wrote: This commit of the drm/dri stuff yesterday on 6-STABLE rocks. It works out of the box on my i810. I think FreeBSD is now ready for the desktop since xlock looks really cool. Pardon? the DRM/DRI stuff yesturday? going by the ports/graphics/dri, it hasn't been touched in over three months. He was referring to an update of the kernel drivers: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2006-May/063838.html -Jonathan So I assume that those updates will appear in 6.2 or some other future update? Correct, these updates will appear in 6.2. how does RELENG_6 differ from my setup of RELENG_6_1? RELENG_6 is the branch from which 6.x releases are built. During the 6.1 release cycle, the RELENG_6 branch was copied to create the RELENG_6_1 errata branch, from which 6.1-RELEASE was actually built. New features and bug fixes for 6.2 go into RELENG_6, but only security and critical bug fixes will go into RELENG_6_1. In regards to stability, how stable are these additions? I'm assuming they've gone through a pretty rigorous testing before merging? Matty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: possible tcp problem
On Sun, May 21, 2006, Andras Got wrote:
[top-posting corrected]
On Fri, May 19, 2006, Andras Got wrote:
I'm using freebsd 6.1 and _sometimes_ (one for every ~30-40 minutes) I
get mysql connect errors with permission denied. The mysql_connect
returns error code 1, which is permission denied.
Quite certainly not true:
Errors:
sendmail[37085]: gethostbyaddr(IP) failed: 1
^
Can't connect to MySQL server on 'IP' (1)
/usr/include/netdb.h:#defineHOST_NOT_FOUND 1 /* Authoritative Answer
Host not found */
HTH,
Yes... This was because a bad setting in pf.conf. The state
rules/buffers or something filled from time to time.
If the state limit is being approached, try adaptive.{start,end} and/or
limiting the total number of states for offending connections.
The sendmail error wasn't connected to this, they just in the same
jail and almost similar errors. I thought 1 means the same accross
programs. :(
For errno -- yes. In that case, it's h_errno being set.
-- sh
pgpd45AuqlrD9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: drm/dri rocks
Matthew Gardiner wrote: In regards to stability, how stable are these additions? I'm assuming they've gone through a pretty rigorous testing before merging? Stable is perhaps a bad word. It refers to the fact the that ABI / API's are stable, in that they aren't changing, and not that code / changes themselves are necessarily stable. Everyone does their best to commit stable changes but if your want very well tested -stable may not be for you -release may be a better option. That said if everyone sat on -release issues in -stable would never be found :P Steve This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137 or return the E.mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
