Re: dd as an imaging solution.
On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 19:43:42 -0500 Sean Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Several months ago I was using Freesbie 1.x to dd a harddrive across the network as a drive duplication effort. This worked 7 computers got the image. I'm trying to do this again so I got the new Freesbie release 2.0 and fired it up across the computers and tried something simple such as: dd if=/dev/ad0 bs=1m | nc othercomputer 1 on the image provider nc -l 1 | dd of=/dev/ad0 bs=1m on the computer to receive the image. I received an operation not permitted. My first thought was they must be mounted. a quick check, and it seems they weren't. Next, am I really root? And sure enough I was. After a bit of discussion in #freesbie on freenode got me to set kern.geom.debugflags to 16 and I was able to write to ad0 like I had previously done. Yet when I tried to write to an individual slice I was presented with the same error. Anyone have any clue ? The eventual goal is to have a mass imaging all at once with dd, nc and tee Check out G4U (NetBSD based) ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dominic ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Changing portsnap servers
On Monday 05 February 2007 17:41, Phillip Ledger wrote: I have also tryed vairiose combination of the path on the server (e.g. SERVERNAME = mirror.internode.on.net/pub/FreeBSD/) to where the snapshot is located.howver these result in an error message bad flag in substituete command 1) I don't think Internode provide a portsnap mirror 2) You can just use the -s argument to portsnap to pick a mirror. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from. -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C pgpnNcKd4GlZg.pgp Description: PGP signature
Help with QLogic FC problem diagnosis (da0:isp0:0:0:0): lost device
Hello gentlemen, I have a QLogic FC card in a FreeBSD, connected to a CX300 storage which sometimes looses connection with no aparent reason. If someone had lived a similar problem or know of something that would help diagnose the cause, I would like to hear. When the problem happens all I get in the logs is: Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: isp0: Name Server Database Changed Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: isp0: Firmware State Config Wait-Ready Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: isp0: Target 126 (Loop 0x7e) Port ID 0xfe (role (none)) Arrived Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: Port WWN 0x200500051e034ad8 Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: Node WWN 0x10051e034ad8 Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: isp0: 2Gb link speed/s Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: isp0: Loop ID 255, Port ID 0x10500, Loop State 0x2, Topology 'F Port' Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: isp0: Target 255 (Loop 0xff) Port ID 0x10500 (role Initiator) Arrived Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: Port WWN 0x21e08b925d0e Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: isp0: Name Server Database Changed Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: isp0: Firmware State Config Wait-Ready Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: isp0: Target 126 (Loop 0x7e) Port ID 0xfe (role (none)) Arrived Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: Port WWN 0x200500051e034ad8 Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: Node WWN 0x10051e034ad8 Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: isp0: 2Gb link speed/s Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: isp0: Loop ID 255, Port ID 0x10500, Loop State 0x2, Topology 'F Port' Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: isp0: Target 255 (Loop 0xff) Port ID 0x10500 (role Initiator) Arrived Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: Port WWN 0x21e08b925d0e Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: Node WWN 0x20e08b925d0e Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: isp0: Fabric Device @ PortID 0x10400 Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: isp0: Fabric Device @ PortID 0x10500 Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: isp0: Target 0 (Loop 0x1) Port ID 0x1 (role Target) Departed Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: Port WWN 0x500601603022db3d Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: Node WWN 0x50060160b022db3d Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: (da0:isp0:0:0:0): lost device Feb 5 01:01:37 mailsrvr kernel: isp0: Retained login of Target 1 (Loop ID 0x2) Port 0x10400 and later, FreeBSD freezes (sometimes it panics). It is not very often that it happens, and it is under completly random circunstances (sometimes high load, sometimes the lowest load, on different hours, etc). -- === Eduardo Meyer pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble Mounting Seagate HD
I am having issues mounting a USB Seagate 300MB HD any suggestions. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Trouble Mounting Seagate HD
Stephen A. Lewis wrote: I am having issues mounting a USB Seagate 300MB HD any suggestions. I suggest you let us know what exactly the issues are. Did you plug it in and it installed Vista on your PC? Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, USt-Id: DE204219783 Any opinions expressed in this message are personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix GmbH Co KG in any way. FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. -- Doug Gwyn ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trouble Mounting Seagate HD
Stephen A. Lewis wrote: I am having issues mounting a USB Seagate 300MB HD any suggestions. Maybe its time to get a new HD? 300 megs is pretty small! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help with QLogic FC problem diagnosis (da0:isp0:0:0:0): lost device
On 2/5/07, Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Helpful information would be: a) Release b) Connection Topology It looks like you're going through a switch. Your short term solution will be to zone your box and the CX300 together excluding all else. A longer term solution is for me to MFC the new SAN evaluation code which is a bit less harsh. You are right, I am going through a switch. It is a 6.2-STABLE as of Feb 2nd. Is this code scheduled to be MFC'd? -- === Eduardo Meyer pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ifconfig carp1 destroy = kernel panic
Hi all, This combination of commands lead my freebsd servers to kernel panic. ifconfig bge0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig bge0 alias 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig carp create ifconfig carp create ifconfig carp0 192.168.1.222/24 vhid 1 advskew 0 pass somekey ifconfig carp1 10.1.1.222/24 vhid 2 advskew 0 pass somekey - to this point everything is ok - ifconfig carp1 destroy - at this point this will cause kernel panic. I tested with ifconfig carp1 delete before destroy but the result is the same. tested on freebsd 6.2 pre-release i386 SMP and freebsd 6.2 release amd64 SMP - in both cases kernel panic. This seems very similar to this PR - http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=92776 I'm going to test on 6.2 stable from today, but I'm not very optimistic. Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x24 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc0555bcd stack pointer = 0x28:0xe4b77bd4 frame pointer = 0x28:0xe4b77be8 code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags= resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 14 (swi1: net) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 0 Uptime: 7m2s Cannot dump. No dump device defined. aac0: shutting down controller...done P.S. should I open new PR or just follow up to pr #92776 ? -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help with QLogic FC problem diagnosis (da0:isp0:0:0:0): lost device
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 02:04:58PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote.. On 2/5/07, Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Helpful information would be: a) Release b) Connection Topology It looks like you're going through a switch. Your short term solution will be to zone your box and the CX300 together excluding all else. A longer term solution is for me to MFC the new SAN evaluation code which is a bit less harsh. You are right, I am going through a switch. I would really recommend to use zoning on a FC fabric, even after Matt has updated the code zoning is a good idea going forward. It is a 6.2-STABLE as of Feb 2nd. Is this code scheduled to be MFC'd? -- === Eduardo Meyer pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- end of quoted text --- -- Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dell PowerEdge 840 in FreeBSD
Felippe de Meirelles Motta wrote: Hi people, Somebody already got problems with PERC 5/i controller, stopping during the boot ? Reading the last message, i dont known the possible problem, look: mfi0: 587 (223981812s/0x0001/-1) - VD 00/0 progress 2% in 48s: Background Initialization progress on VD 00/0 is 2.03%(48s) mfi0:588 (223981820s/0x/0) - Battery temperature is normal mfi0: 589 (223981820s/0x/0) - Current capacity of the battery is above hold mfid0: MFI Logical Disk on mfi0 mfid0: 278784MB (578949632 sectors) RAID volume '0' is optimal My hardware informations are: Dell Poweredge 840 BIOS A01 Raid Controller LSI LOGIC Corporation PERC 5/i version 5.0.2-0003 3 HDs in RAID 5 I tested with FreeBSD 6.1 and 6.2, but, no success! I read about a possible bug in FreeBSD 6.1 with multiple volumes, but i don't find any notice that confirmed this, not even any correction/fix. Could you please try a verbose boot? This could provide more information and can sometimes very helpful for us. Thanks in advance! Cheers, -- Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Help with QLogic FC problem diagnosis (da0:isp0:0:0:0): lost device
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 08:00:30 -0800 Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Helpful information would be: a) Release b) Connection Topology It looks like you're going through a switch. Your short term solution will be to zone your box and the CX300 together excluding all else. A longer term solution is for me to MFC the new SAN evaluation code which is a bit less harsh. Sorry, couldn't resist, does this will comprehand support for the new 2460 HBA boards? -- Massimo.run(); A lack of leadership is no substitute for inaction. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Trouble Mounting Seagate HD
Stephen A. Lewis wrote: I am having issues mounting a USB Seagate 300MB HD any suggestions. After you plug in the external drive, are you seeing any messages in /var/log/messages that the drive has been detected by devd/usbd/whatever? I have a 500g WD mybook, and all I do is: 1. plug it in and wait a few seconds 2. mount /dev/da0s1d /mnt (as root) Not much else to it. Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ifconfig carp1 destroy = kernel panic
Stefan Lambrev wrote: Hi all, This combination of commands lead my freebsd servers to kernel panic. ifconfig bge0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig bge0 alias 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig carp create ifconfig carp create ifconfig carp0 192.168.1.222/24 vhid 1 advskew 0 pass somekey ifconfig carp1 10.1.1.222/24 vhid 2 advskew 0 pass somekey - to this point everything is ok - ifconfig carp1 destroy - at this point this will cause kernel panic. I tested with ifconfig carp1 delete before destroy but the result is the same. tested on freebsd 6.2 pre-release i386 SMP and freebsd 6.2 release amd64 SMP - in both cases kernel panic. This seems very similar to this PR - http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=92776 I'm going to test on 6.2 stable from today, but I'm not very optimistic. Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x24 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc0555bcd stack pointer = 0x28:0xe4b77bd4 frame pointer = 0x28:0xe4b77be8 code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags= resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 14 (swi1: net) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 0 Uptime: 7m2s Cannot dump. No dump device defined. aac0: shutting down controller...done P.S. should I open new PR or just follow up to pr #92776 ? Just for the records, I stumbled upon something similar some time ago while testing with a co-worker. We both had 6.2-PRERELEASE installed. I cannot remember if the same command sequence led to the panic, but we were mimicking each other's commands (with the adequate changes for each host of course), and both machines panicked on the same command. Hugo ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tab completion working partially
(Sorry for the double-posting, the last message wasn't sent properly) Hi I have problems with the tab-completion in my shell (bash). When there is only one choice possible, it works fine (e.g. cd /usr/portab il complete correctly to /usr/ports). However, when there is multiple choices (e.g. cd /usr/ltab) and bash usually shows a list of all possible options, it just exits the shell (Konsole or xterm windo is closed and I get thrown back to a login prompt when using a tty). In sh or csh, it's even worse : completion doesn't work at all. I'm running 6.2-STABLE, any ideas about this ? Firas ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ifconfig carp1 destroy = kernel panic
Hi all, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: Hello Stefan, You wrote on Monday, February 5, 2007, 7:06:16 PM: SL ifconfig bge0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 SL ifconfig bge0 alias 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 SL ifconfig carp create SL ifconfig carp create SL ifconfig carp0 192.168.1.222/24 vhid 1 advskew 0 pass somekey SL ifconfig carp1 10.1.1.222/24 vhid 2 advskew 0 pass somekey SL - to this point everything is ok - SL ifconfig carp1 destroy - at this point this will cause kernel panic. SL I tested with ifconfig carp1 delete before destroy but the result is the SL same. It seems to be fixed in CURRENT - src/sys/netinet/ip_carp.c Revision 1.47 Sorry if this sound too stupid, but do you think, that if I download rev. 1.47 (or latest rev. 1.48) of src/sys/netinet/ip_carp.c and I recompile the kernel this will/can fix the problem ? Anyway I'm going to test this tomorrow :) -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ifconfig carp1 destroy = kernel panic
Hello Stefan, You wrote on Monday, February 5, 2007, 7:06:16 PM: SL ifconfig bge0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 SL ifconfig bge0 alias 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 SL ifconfig carp create SL ifconfig carp create SL ifconfig carp0 192.168.1.222/24 vhid 1 advskew 0 pass somekey SL ifconfig carp1 10.1.1.222/24 vhid 2 advskew 0 pass somekey SL - to this point everything is ok - SL ifconfig carp1 destroy - at this point this will cause kernel panic. SL I tested with ifconfig carp1 delete before destroy but the result is the SL same. It seems to be fixed in CURRENT - src/sys/netinet/ip_carp.c Revision 1.47 -- Anton Yuzhaninov.
Re[2]: ifconfig carp1 destroy = kernel panic
Hello Stefan, You wrote on Monday, February 5, 2007, 9:26:44 PM: SL Hi all, SL Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: Hello Stefan, You wrote on Monday, February 5, 2007, 7:06:16 PM: SL ifconfig bge0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 SL ifconfig bge0 alias 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 SL ifconfig carp create SL ifconfig carp create SL ifconfig carp0 192.168.1.222/24 vhid 1 advskew 0 pass somekey SL ifconfig carp1 10.1.1.222/24 vhid 2 advskew 0 pass somekey SL - to this point everything is ok - SL ifconfig carp1 destroy - at this point this will cause kernel panic. SL I tested with ifconfig carp1 delete before destroy but the result is the SL same. It seems to be fixed in CURRENT - src/sys/netinet/ip_carp.c Revision 1.47 SL Sorry if this sound too stupid, but do you think, that if I download SL rev. 1.47 (or latest rev. 1.48) SL of src/sys/netinet/ip_carp.c and I recompile the kernel this will/can SL fix the problem ? ip_carp.c from current can contain code which don't work in RELENG_6 Instead try to merge only this changes to ip_carp.c: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet/ip_carp.c.diff?r1=1.46r2=1.47 -- Anton Yuzhaninov.
Re: Dell PowerEdge 840 in FreeBSD
Felippe de Meirelles Motta wrote: LI Xin wrote: Felippe de Meirelles Motta wrote: Hi people, Somebody already got problems with PERC 5/i controller, stopping during the boot ? Reading the last message, i dont known the possible problem, look: mfi0: 587 (223981812s/0x0001/-1) - VD 00/0 progress 2% in 48s: Background Initialization progress on VD 00/0 is 2.03%(48s) mfi0:588 (223981820s/0x/0) - Battery temperature is normal mfi0: 589 (223981820s/0x/0) - Current capacity of the battery is above hold mfid0: MFI Logical Disk on mfi0 mfid0: 278784MB (578949632 sectors) RAID volume '0' is optimal My hardware informations are: Dell Poweredge 840 BIOS A01 Raid Controller LSI LOGIC Corporation PERC 5/i version 5.0.2-0003 3 HDs in RAID 5 I tested with FreeBSD 6.1 and 6.2, but, no success! I read about a possible bug in FreeBSD 6.1 with multiple volumes, but i don't find any notice that confirmed this, not even any correction/fix. Could you please try a verbose boot? This could provide more information and can sometimes very helpful for us. Thanks in advance! Cheers, LI Xin, Thanks, more i dont have physical access in this server. The installation is completed successfully, but, in reboot her stopped in this message above. I show then one screenshot so that they see where the system paralyzes: http://br.geocities.com/lippemotta/P149_05_02_2007.jpg Thanks again! :) Hi, Some friends had problems in opening mine screenshot, then i posted again in: http://main.bh.freebsdbrasil.com.br/~lippe/P149_05_02_2007.jpg -- Atenciosamente, Felippe de Meirelles Motta FreeBSD Brasil LTDA. http://www.freebsdbrasil.com.br ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tab completion working partially
This message really isn't on topic for -stable, so please restrict responses to -questions. Thanks, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dd as an imaging solution.
Dominic Marks wrote: On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 19:43:42 -0500 Sean Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Several months ago I was using Freesbie 1.x to dd a harddrive across the network as a drive duplication effort. This worked 7 computers got the image. I'm trying to do this again so I got the new Freesbie release 2.0 and fired it up across the computers and tried something simple such as: dd if=/dev/ad0 bs=1m | nc othercomputer 1 on the image provider nc -l 1 | dd of=/dev/ad0 bs=1m on the computer to receive the image. I received an operation not permitted. My first thought was they must be mounted. a quick check, and it seems they weren't. Next, am I really root? And sure enough I was. After a bit of discussion in #freesbie on freenode got me to set kern.geom.debugflags to 16 and I was able to write to ad0 like I had previously done. Yet when I tried to write to an individual slice I was presented with the same error. Anyone have any clue ? The eventual goal is to have a mass imaging all at once with dd, nc and tee Check out G4U (NetBSD based) ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dominic ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only problem I can see here is that multiple parallel reads will have serious performance impacts, thus greatly increasing the cloning of the disk. The solution with dd, tee and netcat would just daisy chain the copy across the network which would be way faster. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
