Re: non-root user can not create zfs filesystem?

2008-10-23 Thread lhmwzy
This patch must be used in CURRENT??
cvsup src with tag=.
put and upzip the patch to /usr/src
usepatch  zfs_20080727.patch to patch the file?

Is it right?

I have done following what I said,but find a few file in /usr/src

-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel 4166 Oct 23 13:37 sha256.c
-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel0 Oct 23 13:37 sha256.c.orig
drwxr-xr-x   24 root  wheel   26 Oct 23 12:25 share
-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel11391 Oct 23 13:37 spare.t
-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel10335 Oct 23 13:37 spare.t.orig
drwxr-xr-x   56 root  wheel   57 Oct 23 13:08 sys
drwxr-xr-x   12 root  wheel   15 Oct 12 10:48 tools
-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel55965 Oct 23 13:37 u8_textprep.c
-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel0 Oct 23 13:37 u8_textprep.c.orig
drwxr-xr-x  228 root  wheel  230 Oct 23 13:11 usr.bin
drwxr-xr-x  195 root  wheel  197 Oct 23 13:11 usr.sbin
-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel11075 Oct 23 13:37 zfs.c
-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel0 Oct 23 13:37 zfs.c.orig
-rw-r--r--1 lhm   wheel  4548386 Oct 23 13:27 zfs_20080727.patch
-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel19599 Oct 23 13:37 zfsboot.c
-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel0 Oct 23 13:37 zfsboot.c.orig
-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel31739 Oct 23 13:37 zfsimpl.c
-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel0 Oct 23 13:37 zfsimpl.c.orig
-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel39098 Oct 23 13:37 zfsimpl.h
-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel0 Oct 23 13:37 zfsimpl.h.orig
-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel12492 Oct 23 13:37 zfsldr.S
-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel0 Oct 23 13:37 zfsldr.S.orig
-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel 5531 Oct 23 13:37 zfssubr.c
-rw-r--r--1 root  wheel0 Oct 23 13:37 zfssubr.c.orig

Is this correct??

2008/10/23 Andrew Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 lhmwzy wrote:

 where is the patch?
 I can't find it in freebsd-fs@ and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20080727.patch.bz2

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 6.4 RC1 locks up solid on first reboot

2008-10-23 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 06:27:45AM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote:
 On Thursday 23 October 2008 01:32:27 Jo Rhett wrote:
  I haven't had time to investigate, but after installing 6.4RC1 on a
  machine I've been using with 6.3 for a few months, it installs
  painlessly but on the first and subsequent reboots you see
 
  BTX Loader 1.00 blah blah blah
  ...
  Loading /boot/defaults/loader.con
  \
 
  At this point you have a hard refreeze -- no keyboard control, however
  I can reboot it from the Phantom card.
 
  System: Rackable C2004, dual Intel 2.66 processors, 4gb RAM, disk
  drive on built in SCSI port
 
  Absolutely nothing special, boots and runs 6.2 and 6.3 without a flaw.
 
  I'll have more time to investigate on Friday.  Anything specific that
  would be more or less useful to debug in particular?
 
 I did not investigate on this issue too much, but there is an workaround - 
 copy older /boot/loader over newer one. In my case, I am rebuilding whole
 world often, and now /boot/loader seems to not build correctly for me. Older 
 one is ~ 250 kB, rebuilt will be ~ 185 kB, and freezes.
 
 In your case, you would write old /boot/loader from 6.3 over new installed 
 with 6.4RC1 and it will boot normally again.
 
 I know it is only workaround, but it's quick and easy, and I have not too 
 much 
 time to investigate any further (not to mention I have no idea what to look 
 for and where).

Has anyone filed a PR on this problem, or contacted John Baldwin?

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: non-root user can not create zfs filesystem?

2008-10-23 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 02:23:14PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
 This patch must be used in CURRENT??

Correct.  This patch DOES NOT apply to RELENG_7 or earlier.

 cvsup src with tag=.

Consider using csup, which comes with the base system.

 put and upzip the patch to /usr/src
 usepatch  zfs_20080727.patch to patch the file?
 
 Is it right?
 
 I have done following what I said,but find a few file in /usr/src

This looks correct.  The .orig files are the originals.  Ones which are
zero bytes imply new files have been added.

What you want to look for is .rej files, which are rejects (implying the
patch did not apply cleanly).  find /usr/src -name *.rej

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: non-root user can not create zfs filesystem?

2008-10-23 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

lhmwzy wrote:

 This patch must be used in CURRENT??
 cvsup src with tag=.
 put and upzip the patch to /usr/src
 usepatch  zfs_20080727.patch to patch the file?
 
 Is it right?
[...]

No.  Current has been progressed too much for this patch to apply.

Cheers,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkkAGSQACgkQi+vbBBjt66CJIgCfQwnKSJZc/QeyjvW3J8pBoZyv
LKkAnRx1B8MdXNYwWjj9oas9NgXI0vtk
=qSC2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: non-root user can not create zfs filesystem?

2008-10-23 Thread lhmwzy
What's you mean?
This patch is not suit for Current or Current has alreday have this patch?

2008/10/23 Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 lhmwzy wrote:

 This patch must be used in CURRENT??
 cvsup src with tag=.
 put and upzip the patch to /usr/src
 usepatch  zfs_20080727.patch to patch the file?

 Is it right?
 [...]

 No.  Current has been progressed too much for this patch to apply.

 Cheers,
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

 iEYEARECAAYFAkkAGSQACgkQi+vbBBjt66CJIgCfQwnKSJZc/QeyjvW3J8pBoZyv
 LKkAnRx1B8MdXNYwWjj9oas9NgXI0vtk
 =qSC2
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 6.4 RC1 locks up solid on first reboot

2008-10-23 Thread Joe Koberg

Jeremy Chadwick wrote:

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 06:27:45AM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote:
  
I did not investigate on this issue too much, but there is an workaround - 
copy older /boot/loader over newer one. In my case, I am rebuilding whole






I have experienced loader troubles in the past when using customized 
compiler options in /etc/make.conf .  Rebuilding without compiler 
options fixed the issue.


Joe Koberg
joe at osoft dot us


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: non-root user can not create zfs filesystem?

2008-10-23 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 02:35:24PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
 What's you mean?
 This patch is not suit for Current or Current has alreday have this patch?

The patch was made against CURRENT's code dated August 27th.

There have been too many changes to CURRENT between August 27th and now
for the patch to apply cleanly/correctly.

Finally, this thread has gone from talking about user-error when
creating a ZFS pool to how to patch CURRENT to present-day ZFS code.
This is NOT the correct mailing list for CURRENT items.  Please start a
new thread on the freebsd-current mailing list instead.

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: non-root user can not create zfs filesystem?

2008-10-23 Thread lhmwzy
OK.close this thread.:)

2008/10/23 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 02:35:24PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
 What's you mean?
 This patch is not suit for Current or Current has alreday have this patch?

 The patch was made against CURRENT's code dated August 27th.

 There have been too many changes to CURRENT between August 27th and now
 for the patch to apply cleanly/correctly.

 Finally, this thread has gone from talking about user-error when
 creating a ZFS pool to how to patch CURRENT to present-day ZFS code.
 This is NOT the correct mailing list for CURRENT items.  Please start a
 new thread on the freebsd-current mailing list instead.

 --
 | Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
 | Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
 | UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
 | Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


gstat information on the CLI

2008-10-23 Thread Eduardo Meyer
Hello,

Its me again bothering you with basic things I cant accomplish.

I am planning on monitoring my disks, and the most important
information for me is thorughput and lengh queue of operations. I can
get the first information with iostat -w1 and sorta, which is perfect
for scripting.

However, I also need the L(q) information which FreeBSD gives me with
gstat. However, this curses interface wont allow me to use grep+awk to
get the information I need for the device (slices and disks, but not
labels) I need.

So I ask, how can I get this information other than gstat? Or, can
gstat work in non-interactive mode?

--
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: gstat information on the CLI

2008-10-23 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:20:45PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
 Hello,
 
 Its me again bothering you with basic things I cant accomplish.
 
 I am planning on monitoring my disks, and the most important
 information for me is thorughput and lengh queue of operations. I can
 get the first information with iostat -w1 and sorta, which is perfect
 for scripting.
 
 However, I also need the L(q) information which FreeBSD gives me with
 gstat. However, this curses interface wont allow me to use grep+awk to
 get the information I need for the device (slices and disks, but not
 labels) I need.

Can you tell me what the L(q) field actually represents in gstat?

The BUGS section of the gstat man page should indirectly answer your
other question (re: non-curses).

 So I ask, how can I get this information other than gstat? Or, can
 gstat work in non-interactive mode?

iostat -x should provide what you're looking for.  And remember, the
first sample data shown in iostat should be generally discarded.

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: gstat information on the CLI

2008-10-23 Thread Eduardo Meyer
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:20:45PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
 Hello,

 Its me again bothering you with basic things I cant accomplish.

 I am planning on monitoring my disks, and the most important
 information for me is thorughput and lengh queue of operations. I can
 get the first information with iostat -w1 and sorta, which is perfect
 for scripting.

 However, I also need the L(q) information which FreeBSD gives me with
 gstat. However, this curses interface wont allow me to use grep+awk to
 get the information I need for the device (slices and disks, but not
 labels) I need.

 Can you tell me what the L(q) field actually represents in gstat?

 The BUGS section of the gstat man page should indirectly answer your
 other question (re: non-curses).

Yes, I have read that. I am looking the source code for gstat. Its
simple, small and clear. I guess can be asily modified to have what I
want :)


 So I ask, how can I get this information other than gstat? Or, can
 gstat work in non-interactive mode?

 iostat -x should provide what you're looking for.  And remember, the
 first sample data shown in iostat should be generally discarded.

I need the queue lengh of pending disk operations. What L(q) shows is
the lengh queue, the queued number of pending operations (I believe).


 --
 | Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
 | Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
 | UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
 | Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |





-- 
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: gstat information on the CLI

2008-10-23 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 01:11:55PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:20:45PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
  Hello,
 
  Its me again bothering you with basic things I cant accomplish.
 
  I am planning on monitoring my disks, and the most important
  information for me is thorughput and lengh queue of operations. I can
  get the first information with iostat -w1 and sorta, which is perfect
  for scripting.
 
  However, I also need the L(q) information which FreeBSD gives me with
  gstat. However, this curses interface wont allow me to use grep+awk to
  get the information I need for the device (slices and disks, but not
  labels) I need.
 
  Can you tell me what the L(q) field actually represents in gstat?
 
  The BUGS section of the gstat man page should indirectly answer your
  other question (re: non-curses).
 
 Yes, I have read that. I am looking the source code for gstat. Its
 simple, small and clear. I guess can be asily modified to have what I
 want :)
 
  So I ask, how can I get this information other than gstat? Or, can
  gstat work in non-interactive mode?
 
  iostat -x should provide what you're looking for.  And remember, the
  first sample data shown in iostat should be generally discarded.
 
 I need the queue lengh of pending disk operations. What L(q) shows is
 the lengh queue, the queued number of pending operations (I believe).

It isn't documented, so I really have no idea what it means, hence my
question.  I'm curious why you're interested in that number; why does it
matter?

iostat -x provides the same kind of value, and you won't have to modify
any code to get what you need:

   waittransactions queue length

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: gstat information on the CLI

2008-10-23 Thread Eduardo Meyer
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 01:11:55PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:20:45PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
  Hello,
 
  Its me again bothering you with basic things I cant accomplish.
 
  I am planning on monitoring my disks, and the most important
  information for me is thorughput and lengh queue of operations. I can
  get the first information with iostat -w1 and sorta, which is perfect
  for scripting.
 
  However, I also need the L(q) information which FreeBSD gives me with
  gstat. However, this curses interface wont allow me to use grep+awk to
  get the information I need for the device (slices and disks, but not
  labels) I need.
 
  Can you tell me what the L(q) field actually represents in gstat?
 
  The BUGS section of the gstat man page should indirectly answer your
  other question (re: non-curses).

 Yes, I have read that. I am looking the source code for gstat. Its
 simple, small and clear. I guess can be asily modified to have what I
 want :)

  So I ask, how can I get this information other than gstat? Or, can
  gstat work in non-interactive mode?
 
  iostat -x should provide what you're looking for.  And remember, the
  first sample data shown in iostat should be generally discarded.

 I need the queue lengh of pending disk operations. What L(q) shows is
 the lengh queue, the queued number of pending operations (I believe).

 It isn't documented, so I really have no idea what it means, hence my
 question.  I'm curious why you're interested in that number; why does it
 matter?

 iostat -x provides the same kind of value, and you won't have to modify
 any code to get what you need:

   waittransactions queue length

Jeremy, thank you.

They show the same information, reading the code I see both show
DSM_QUEUE_LENGHT from devstat_compute_statistics().

Thanks again :)




-- 
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Promise SX4060 on 7.1-BETA2

2008-10-23 Thread David Boyd
I am attempting to install 7.1-BETA2 (from CD) onto a PC with a Promise
SX4060 RAID controller and two Seagate 120GB ATA disk drives.

The boot from CD keeps repeating the following (error) messages: (I'm
retyping here)


==
ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE task queue timeout - completing
request directly
ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE task queue timeout - completing
request directly
ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE task queue timeout - completing
request directly
ad4: WARNING - SET_MULTI task queue timeout - completing request directly
ad4: FAILURE - READ timed out LBA=0
ad4: FAILURE - READ retrying (1 retry left) LBA=0
ad4: FAILURE - READ timed out LBA=0
ad4: FAILURE - READ retrying (0 retries left) LBA=0

ad4: FAILURE - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE timed out
ad4: FAILURE - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE timed out
ad4: FAILURE - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE timed out
ad4: FAILURE - SETFEATURES SET_MULTI timed out

ad4: 114473MB Seagate ST3120814A 3.AAJ at ata2-master PIO4

ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE task queue timeout - completing
request directly
ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE task queue timeout - completing
request directly
ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE task queue timeout - completing
request directly
ad8: WARNING - SET_MULTI task queue timeout - completing request directly
ad8: FAILURE - READ timed out LBA=0
ad8: FAILURE - READ retrying (1 retry left) LBA=0
ad8: FAILURE - READ timed out LBA=0
ad8: FAILURE - READ retrying (0 retries left) LBA=0

ad8: FAILURE - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE timed out
ad8: FAILURE - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE timed out
ad8: FAILURE - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE timed out
ad8: FAILURE - SETFEATURES SET_MULTI timed out

ad8: 114473MB Seagate ST3120814A 3.AAJ at ata4-master PIO4

==

and then these messages (and minor variants) keep repeating (I've let it go
for at least one hour).

I have about three dozen of these computers (from a failed M$ project) and
would very much like to use them with FreeBSD.

Any ideas?  I'm game for almost anything.

Thanks.

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Promise SX4060 on 7.1-BETA2

2008-10-23 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 02:01:55PM -0400, David Boyd wrote:
 I am attempting to install 7.1-BETA2 (from CD) onto a PC with a Promise
 SX4060 RAID controller and two Seagate 120GB ATA disk drives.
 
 The boot from CD keeps repeating the following (error) messages: (I'm
 retyping here)

 {snip -- for dmesg errors, see URL below}

You're the second person to report this problem recently.  The other
person (see below) reported the same thing, also using a PATA
controller, and also using Seagate disks (though different models).

We now have two reproducible test cases where users are seeing continual
errors from the controller when attempting to set the transfer mode,
enable read and write caching, and SET_MULTI.  The only similarity so
far is that they're both PATA users.

In Kristian's case, his disks were in a usable state, but we ultimately
determine the Silicon Image controller might be responsible for what he
was seeing (the SMART errors we saw in his logs could've been from any
time in the past; he saw errors on multiple disks, and not all of those
disks shown SMART log errors)... while David's not using a Silicon Image
controller at all.

Kristian's setup:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2008-October/046023.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2008-October/046027.html

Silicon Image 0680 ATA100 (problem was also seen on Promise PDC20270)
ad4: Seagate ST3320620A 3.AAF at ata2-master PIO4
ad5: Seagate ST3320620A 3.AAF at ata2-slave  PIO4
ad6: Seagate ST3750640A 3.AAE at ata3-master PIO4
ad7: Seagate ST3320620A 3.AAD at ata3-slave  PIO4

David's setup (what we know so far):
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2008-October/046140.html

Promise SX4060
ad4: 114473MB Seagate ST3120814A 3.AAJ at ata2-master PIO4
ad8: 114473MB Seagate ST3120814A 3.AAJ at ata4-master PIO4

Soren/Andrey, can either of you comment on this?  If at all possible, it
would be good to get this hammered out before 7.1-RELEASE is tagged.

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


After an update stable doesn't boot

2008-10-23 Thread Reinhold
Hi

I just did a system update and after I've rebooted it doesn't boot up any
more.
All I'm getting is a blank screen with a curser blinking at the top left
corner of the screen.

This system was running 7.0-STABLE

Any ideas as to how I can get it back up?

Regards
Reinhold


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


After an update stable doesn't boot

2008-10-23 Thread Reinhold
Hi

I just did a system update and after I've rebooted it doesn't boot up any
more.
All I'm getting is a blank screen with a curser blinking at the top left
corner of the screen.

This system was running 7.0-STABLE

Any ideas as to how I can get it back up?

Regards
Reinhold

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 6.4 RC1 locks up solid on first reboot

2008-10-23 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday 23 October 2008 02:24:49 am Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 06:27:45AM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote:
  On Thursday 23 October 2008 01:32:27 Jo Rhett wrote:
   I haven't had time to investigate, but after installing 6.4RC1 on a
   machine I've been using with 6.3 for a few months, it installs
   painlessly but on the first and subsequent reboots you see
  
   BTX Loader 1.00 blah blah blah
   ...
   Loading /boot/defaults/loader.con
   \
  
   At this point you have a hard refreeze -- no keyboard control, however
   I can reboot it from the Phantom card.
  
   System: Rackable C2004, dual Intel 2.66 processors, 4gb RAM, disk
   drive on built in SCSI port
  
   Absolutely nothing special, boots and runs 6.2 and 6.3 without a flaw.
  
   I'll have more time to investigate on Friday.  Anything specific that
   would be more or less useful to debug in particular?
  
  I did not investigate on this issue too much, but there is an workaround - 
  copy older /boot/loader over newer one. In my case, I am rebuilding whole
  world often, and now /boot/loader seems to not build correctly for me. 
Older 
  one is ~ 250 kB, rebuilt will be ~ 185 kB, and freezes.
  
  In your case, you would write old /boot/loader from 6.3 over new installed 
  with 6.4RC1 and it will boot normally again.
  
  I know it is only workaround, but it's quick and easy, and I have not too 
much 
  time to investigate any further (not to mention I have no idea what to 
look 
  for and where).
 
 Has anyone filed a PR on this problem, or contacted John Baldwin?

Yes, but debugging these hangs is very non-trivial.  It likely involves 
disassembling the BIOS and trying to see where it can get stuck in a loop.

-- 
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: After an update stable doesn't boot

2008-10-23 Thread Reinhold
A little update.

I can boot into freebsd using the life cd and can mount the disk when I'm
in fixit.

But from there on I have no idea what to do to fix this problem.

Can any one please help

Thanks

On Thu, October 23, 2008 19:51, Reinhold wrote:
 Hi


 I just did a system update and after I've rebooted it doesn't boot up any
  more. All I'm getting is a blank screen with a curser blinking at the top
 left corner of the screen.

 This system was running 7.0-STABLE


 Any ideas as to how I can get it back up?


 Regards
 Reinhold


 ___
 freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: After an update stable doesn't boot

2008-10-23 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:40:23 +0100 (BST)
Reinhold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 A little update.
 
 I can boot into freebsd using the life cd and can mount the disk when
 I'm in fixit.
 
 But from there on I have no idea what to do to fix this problem.

Some quick checks:
- use fdisk (for example: fdisk ad0) to check if the correct slice is
active
- use boot0cfg -v to check the bootcode of the disk you are booting from

HTH
-- 
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: After an update stable doesn't boot

2008-10-23 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Reinhold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 A little update.

 I can boot into freebsd using the life cd and can mount the disk when I'm
 in fixit.

 But from there on I have no idea what to do to fix this problem.

Try reinstalling the bootloader.  You can do that by going into the
sysinstall disk partitioning screens, but not changing any slice or
partitioning settings.

 Can any one please help

 Thanks

 On Thu, October 23, 2008 19:51, Reinhold wrote:
 Hi


 I just did a system update and after I've rebooted it doesn't boot up any
  more. All I'm getting is a blank screen with a curser blinking at the top
 left corner of the screen.

 This system was running 7.0-STABLE


 Any ideas as to how I can get it back up?


 Regards
 Reinhold


 ___
 freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 ___
 freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: After an update stable doesn't boot

2008-10-23 Thread Reinhold
On Thu, October 23, 2008 21:57, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:

 Some quick checks:
 - use fdisk (for example: fdisk ad0) to check if the correct slice is
 active - use boot0cfg -v to check the bootcode of the disk you are booting
 from

Hi

Thanks for getting back to me.

Here is the info I have from fdisk and boot0cfg
# fdisk ad12
*** Working on device /dev/ad0 ***
parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are:
cylinders=310101 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl)

Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1
parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are:
cylinders=310101 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl)

Media sector size is 512
Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1
Information from DOS bootblock is:
The data for partition 1 is:
sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD)
start 63, size 312576642 (152625 Meg), flag 80 (active)
beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1;
end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63
The data for partition 2 is:
UNUSED
The data for partition 3 is:
UNUSED
The data for partition 4 is:
UNUSED

and from
# boot0cfg -v ad12
#flag start chstype  end chsoffset size
10x80  0:  1: 10xa51023:254:63  63312576642

version=1.0   drive=0x80mask=0xf   ticks=182
options=packet,update,nosetdrv
default_selection=F1 (Slice 1)

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: After an update stable doesn't boot

2008-10-23 Thread Reinhold
On Thu, October 23, 2008 22:02, Lowell Gilbert wrote:

 Try reinstalling the bootloader.  You can do that by going into the
 sysinstall disk partitioning screens, but not changing any slice or
 partitioning settings.

Hi

I tried to do this as well with no success,
What I did notice was that it lists all the disks starting with
ad10
ad12
ad18
ad22
ad6
and ad8

ad12 is where I have Freebsd installed on using UFS, the rest of the
drives are all for a zfs pool


 Can any one please help


 Thanks


 On Thu, October 23, 2008 19:51, Reinhold wrote:

 Hi



 I just did a system update and after I've rebooted it doesn't boot up
 any more. All I'm getting is a blank screen with a curser blinking at
 the top left corner of the screen.

 This system was running 7.0-STABLE



 Any ideas as to how I can get it back up?



 Regards
 Reinhold



 ___
 freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





 ___
 freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ___
 freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: After an update stable doesn't boot

2008-10-23 Thread Reinhold
Found the problem

Its not Freebsd, its the pci raid controller.
It was suggested to me on daemonforums.org to unplug all the drives and
then plug them in one by one until it happened again, and it did, it
happened when I plugged the first drive into the controller.

Any ways, now I have to figure out how to get the controller to not want
to boot the drives.

Thanks for the suggestions

On Thu, October 23, 2008 22:32, Reinhold wrote:
 On Thu, October 23, 2008 22:02, Lowell Gilbert wrote:


 Try reinstalling the bootloader.  You can do that by going into the
 sysinstall disk partitioning screens, but not changing any slice or
 partitioning settings.

 Hi


 I tried to do this as well with no success,
 What I did notice was that it lists all the disks starting with
 ad10 ad12 ad18 ad22 ad6 and ad8

 ad12 is where I have Freebsd installed on using UFS, the rest of the
 drives are all for a zfs pool


 Can any one please help



 Thanks



 On Thu, October 23, 2008 19:51, Reinhold wrote:


 Hi




 I just did a system update and after I've rebooted it doesn't boot
 up any more. All I'm getting is a blank screen with a curser
 blinking at the top left corner of the screen.

 This system was running 7.0-STABLE




 Any ideas as to how I can get it back up?




 Regards
 Reinhold




 ___
 freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]






 ___
 freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 ___
 freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]








___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


7.1 beta 2

2008-10-23 Thread security
I assume beta 2 is pretty darn close to what 7.1 release will be.  Is
there a list I can look at that details the outstanding issues/items
being tested?  I've checked the ERRATA and RELNOTES in the BETA2
directory, and didn't get much info.

The goal is building a multi i/f router (just forwarding between
connected networks) and dummynet enabled for WAN simulation.  Broadcom
gigE NIC's.

Thanks
Jim
(the whiny kid in back who asks if we're there yet)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[releng_7_1 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2008-10-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:48:55 - tinderbox 2.4 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:48:55 - starting RELENG_7_1 tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:48:55 - mkdir /tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/i386/pc98
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:48:55 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:48:55 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:48:55 - /usr/bin/csup -z -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s 
/tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/i386/pc98/supfile
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:54:48 - building world (CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe)
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:54:48 - cd /src
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:54:48 - ERROR: /src: No such file or directory
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:54:48 - tinderbox aborted
TB --- 1.94 user 1.02 system 353.20 real


http://tinderbox.des.no/tinderbox-releng_7-RELENG_7_1-i386-pc98.full
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[releng_7_1 tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2008-10-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:54:48 - tinderbox 2.4 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:54:48 - starting RELENG_7_1 tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:54:48 - mkdir /tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/ia64
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:54:48 - mkdir /tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/ia64/ia64
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:54:48 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:54:48 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:54:48 - /usr/bin/csup -z -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s 
/tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/ia64/ia64/supfile
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:00:39 - building world (CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe)
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:00:39 - cd /src
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:00:39 - ERROR: /src: No such file or directory
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:00:39 - tinderbox aborted
TB --- 1.97 user 0.96 system 350.73 real


http://tinderbox.des.no/tinderbox-releng_7-RELENG_7_1-ia64-ia64.full
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[releng_7_1 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2008-10-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:42:49 - tinderbox 2.4 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:42:49 - starting RELENG_7_1 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:42:49 - mkdir /tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/i386
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:42:49 - mkdir /tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/i386/i386
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:42:49 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:42:49 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:42:49 - /usr/bin/csup -z -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s 
/tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/i386/i386/supfile
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:48:54 - building world (CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe)
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:48:54 - cd /src
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:48:54 - ERROR: /src: No such file or directory
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:48:54 - tinderbox aborted
TB --- 1.98 user 0.95 system 365.53 real


http://tinderbox.des.no/tinderbox-releng_7-RELENG_7_1-i386-i386.full
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[releng_7_1 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2008-10-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:00:39 - tinderbox 2.4 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:00:39 - starting RELENG_7_1 tinderbox run for 
powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:00:39 - mkdir /tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/powerpc
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:00:39 - mkdir /tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:00:39 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:00:39 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:00:39 - /usr/bin/csup -z -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s 
/tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/powerpc/powerpc/supfile
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:05:53 - building world (CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe)
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:05:53 - cd /src
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:05:53 - ERROR: /src: No such file or directory
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:05:53 - tinderbox aborted
TB --- 2.05 user 0.79 system 313.33 real


http://tinderbox.des.no/tinderbox-releng_7-RELENG_7_1-powerpc-powerpc.full
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[releng_7_1 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2008-10-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:05:53 - tinderbox 2.4 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:05:53 - starting RELENG_7_1 tinderbox run for 
sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:05:53 - mkdir /tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/sparc64
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:05:53 - mkdir /tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:05:53 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:05:53 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:05:53 - /usr/bin/csup -z -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s 
/tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/sparc64/sparc64/supfile
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:11:19 - building world (CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe)
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:11:19 - cd /src
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:11:19 - ERROR: /src: No such file or directory
TB --- 2008-10-24 02:11:19 - tinderbox aborted
TB --- 1.97 user 0.91 system 326.51 real


http://tinderbox.des.no/tinderbox-releng_7-RELENG_7_1-sparc64-sparc64.full
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[releng_7_1 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2008-10-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:37:06 - tinderbox 2.4 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:37:06 - starting RELENG_7_1 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:37:06 - mkdir /tinderbox/RELENG_7_1
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:37:06 - mkdir /tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/amd64
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:37:06 - mkdir /tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/amd64/amd64
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:37:06 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:37:06 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:37:06 - /usr/bin/csup -z -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s 
/tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/amd64/amd64/supfile
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:42:49 - building world (CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe)
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:42:49 - cd /src
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:42:49 - ERROR: /src: No such file or directory
TB --- 2008-10-24 01:42:49 - tinderbox aborted
TB --- 1.95 user 0.97 system 343.08 real


http://tinderbox.des.no/tinderbox-releng_7-RELENG_7_1-amd64-amd64.full
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Promise SX4060 on 7.1-BETA2

2008-10-23 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov

David Boyd wrote:

I am attempting to install 7.1-BETA2 (from CD) onto a PC with a Promise
SX4060 RAID controller and two Seagate 120GB ATA disk drives.


Did you try to select Safe mode in boot menu or boot with ACPI disabled?
Can you boot your system in verbose mode and show dmesg.boot?

--
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]