Re: 11.1-BETA2 builds and 11.1-RELEASE schedule reminder

2017-06-19 Thread Ed Schouten
Hi there,

2017-06-19 22:28 GMT+02:00 Xin LI :
> Sounds like https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219882 ?
>  Could you please check if that's the case?

Glen also pointed me to that PR on IRC. It turns out that that does
indeed fix it. Thanks for all the quick replies!

-- 
Ed Schouten 
Nuxi, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
KvK-nr.: 62051717
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: 11.1-BETA2 builds and 11.1-RELEASE schedule reminder

2017-06-19 Thread Glen Barber
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 08:29:08PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:24:59PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> > Hi Glen,
> > 
> > [ +stable ]
> > 
> > 2017-06-15 18:54 GMT+02:00 Glen Barber :
> > > As a reminder, the 11.1-BETA2 builds are scheduled to begin 16 June 2017
> > > at 00:00 UTC (roughly 7 hours from now).
> > 
> > I just gave the 11.1-BETA2 build a try:
> > 
> > - amd64: Boots perfectly fine, at least in VirtualBox.
> > - i386: When started in VirtualBox (5.0.30), it starts to print some
> > kernel panic stack trace during boot, but ends up rebooting
> > immediately, meaning I cannot capture the trace for you.
> > 
> > Exactly the same virtual machine is capable of booting an already
> > existing installation of FreeBSD/i386, so this may be a regression.
> > 
> > Can others reproduce this as well?
> > 
> 
> Yes.  Turn on the APIC option for the VM, under 'General Settings.'
> 

Correction: it is under 'System Settings.'

> I think this is related to this PR:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219882
> 

Glen
 


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: 11.1-BETA2 builds and 11.1-RELEASE schedule reminder

2017-06-19 Thread Glen Barber
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:24:59PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hi Glen,
> 
> [ +stable ]
> 
> 2017-06-15 18:54 GMT+02:00 Glen Barber :
> > As a reminder, the 11.1-BETA2 builds are scheduled to begin 16 June 2017
> > at 00:00 UTC (roughly 7 hours from now).
> 
> I just gave the 11.1-BETA2 build a try:
> 
> - amd64: Boots perfectly fine, at least in VirtualBox.
> - i386: When started in VirtualBox (5.0.30), it starts to print some
> kernel panic stack trace during boot, but ends up rebooting
> immediately, meaning I cannot capture the trace for you.
> 
> Exactly the same virtual machine is capable of booting an already
> existing installation of FreeBSD/i386, so this may be a regression.
> 
> Can others reproduce this as well?
> 

Yes.  Turn on the APIC option for the VM, under 'General Settings.'

I think this is related to this PR:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219882

Glen



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: 11.1-BETA2 builds and 11.1-RELEASE schedule reminder

2017-06-19 Thread Xin LI
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Ed Schouten  wrote:
> Hi Glen,
>
> [ +stable ]
>
> - i386: When started in VirtualBox (5.0.30), it starts to print some
> kernel panic stack trace during boot, but ends up rebooting
> immediately, meaning I cannot capture the trace for you.

Sounds like https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219882 ?
 Could you please check if that's the case?

Cheers,
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: 11.1-BETA2 builds and 11.1-RELEASE schedule reminder

2017-06-19 Thread Ed Schouten
Hi Glen,

[ +stable ]

2017-06-15 18:54 GMT+02:00 Glen Barber :
> As a reminder, the 11.1-BETA2 builds are scheduled to begin 16 June 2017
> at 00:00 UTC (roughly 7 hours from now).

I just gave the 11.1-BETA2 build a try:

- amd64: Boots perfectly fine, at least in VirtualBox.
- i386: When started in VirtualBox (5.0.30), it starts to print some
kernel panic stack trace during boot, but ends up rebooting
immediately, meaning I cannot capture the trace for you.

Exactly the same virtual machine is capable of booting an already
existing installation of FreeBSD/i386, so this may be a regression.

Can others reproduce this as well?

-- 
Ed Schouten 
Nuxi, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
KvK-nr.: 62051717
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"