Re: Bug 237666 - repeated messages of "uhub_reattach_port: giving up port reset - device vanished"
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 01:53:16PM -0400, Gerard E. Seibert wrote: I was told to resubmit this with the bug's title in the subject line. Therefore, I am. I am just inquiring to see if any progress had been made regarding bug: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237666 This bug affects both the 12.x and 13.x branches of FreeBSD. Fortunately, it does not affect <= 11.x branches. FreeBSD 12.2 is due out in October and version 13.0 only five months later. At present, this bug infects both the 12.x and 13.x branches making updating systems beyond 11.x impossible for users of the afflicted systems. The fact that this bug has gone unremedied for so long is somewhat disheartening. Hi, I encountered this bug sometime last year; this year in April it was bothersome enough to try to do something about it. I "fixed" it by compiling and installing a new kernel with everything USB-related removed. Fortunately the machine does not need a USB peripheral of any sort. I've only ever run 12-stable on this machine. And it gave the usb error messages with nothing usb attached, before installing the new kernel. -- J. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: 11.4 sendmail with SASL and ports openssl?
On 2020-08-11 09:49, Bengt Ahlgren wrote: > I have since long compiled sendmail in base with SASL using a src.conf > like this: > > # sendmail with SASL required for outgoing SMTP AUTH, see: > # https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/SMTP-Auth.html > # depends on port security/cyrus-sasl2 > SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include/sasl -DSASL > SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib > SENDMAIL_LDADD=-lsasl2 > > Since I'm still using 11.4, I had to start using openssl from ports due > to qt5 5.15. Then the above didn't work anymore, so a bit reluctantly I > added -I/usr/local/include to the CFLAGS above, fearing that some other > random include file could be picked up. It however compiled and the > resulting binary is linked thus: > > # ldd /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/sendmail > /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/sendmail: > libsasl2.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.3 (0x8008db000) > libutil.so.9 => /lib/libutil.so.9 (0x800af9000) > libssl.so.11 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.11 (0x800d0d000) > libcrypto.so.11 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.11 (0x80100) > libwrap.so.6 => /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6 (0x8014cb000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x8016d4000) > libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 (0x801a8b000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x801c8c000) > > Does this look right? Are there any know issues with this? > > Thanks, > > Bengt > [...] I've run into enough problems over SSL with qt5 and FreeBSD 11 that I have been running this command: cd /usr/ports; svn update -r541317 Mk/Uses/qt.mk devel/qt5 */qt5-* after every svn update to circumvent the very problem you're seeing. For some reason or other, I haven't yet been able to muster a whole lot of enthusiasm for updating to FreeBSD 12 yet. -- George signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 11.4 sendmail with SASL and ports openssl?
11.08.2020 20:49, Bengt Ahlgren wrote: > I have since long compiled sendmail in base with SASL using a src.conf > like this: > > # sendmail with SASL required for outgoing SMTP AUTH, see: > # https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/SMTP-Auth.html > # depends on port security/cyrus-sasl2 > SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include/sasl -DSASL > SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib > SENDMAIL_LDADD=-lsasl2 > > Since I'm still using 11.4, I had to start using openssl from ports due > to qt5 5.15. Then the above didn't work anymore, so a bit reluctantly I > added -I/usr/local/include to the CFLAGS above, fearing that some other > random include file could be picked up. The Handbook was updated. Take a look to the link you have in the comment above for new settings. > It however compiled and the > resulting binary is linked thus: > > # ldd /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/sendmail > /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/sendmail: > libsasl2.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.3 (0x8008db000) > libutil.so.9 => /lib/libutil.so.9 (0x800af9000) > libssl.so.11 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.11 (0x800d0d000) > libcrypto.so.11 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.11 (0x80100) > libwrap.so.6 => /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6 (0x8014cb000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x8016d4000) > libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 (0x801a8b000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x801c8c000) > > Does this look right? Are there any know issues with this? If it's working for you, that's fine. If you like to minimize linking with ports libraries, use updated instructions from the Handbook. Sendmail will build and link with base system libssl/libcrypto and use only libsasl2 from ports/packages. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
11.4 sendmail with SASL and ports openssl?
I have since long compiled sendmail in base with SASL using a src.conf like this: # sendmail with SASL required for outgoing SMTP AUTH, see: # https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/SMTP-Auth.html # depends on port security/cyrus-sasl2 SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include/sasl -DSASL SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib SENDMAIL_LDADD=-lsasl2 Since I'm still using 11.4, I had to start using openssl from ports due to qt5 5.15. Then the above didn't work anymore, so a bit reluctantly I added -I/usr/local/include to the CFLAGS above, fearing that some other random include file could be picked up. It however compiled and the resulting binary is linked thus: # ldd /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/sendmail /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/sendmail: libsasl2.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.3 (0x8008db000) libutil.so.9 => /lib/libutil.so.9 (0x800af9000) libssl.so.11 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.11 (0x800d0d000) libcrypto.so.11 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.11 (0x80100) libwrap.so.6 => /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6 (0x8014cb000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x8016d4000) libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 (0x801a8b000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x801c8c000) Does this look right? Are there any know issues with this? Thanks, Bengt ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
