Re: call for ALTQ users
how can i help you? 2007/7/29, Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Expanding the net a bit. -- Forwarded message -- From: Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Jul 28, 2007 2:03 PM Subject: call for ALTQ users To: freebsd-net [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm looking at extending ifnet to support multiple tx queues. It appears that this will inevitably interact with ALTQ. I don't know anyone using ALTQ so I need users to raise their hands to eventually test prospective changes. Thanks. -Kip ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: call for ALTQ users
i has no 10G interfaces, but if i can help ... i'm using 200Mbit internet, gigabit intranet, any type of traffic, voip, http etc etc 2007/7/29, OutBackDingo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sounds exactly like what we do, multiple queues on bonded high speed 10G interfaces On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 16:53:36 -0700 Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/28/07, Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how can i help you? I'd like to understand how ALTQ is being used currently. Are there users using it on high bandwidth interfaces? As currently implemented it would force serialization, increased locking overhead, and potentially loss of locality on cards that support multiple queues (i.e. most 10GigE cards). -Kip 2007/7/29, Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Expanding the net a bit. -- Forwarded message -- From: Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Jul 28, 2007 2:03 PM Subject: call for ALTQ users To: freebsd-net [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm looking at extending ifnet to support multiple tx queues. It appears that this will inevitably interact with ALTQ. I don't know anyone using ALTQ so I need users to raise their hands to eventually test prospective changes. Thanks. -Kip ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscribe@ freebsd.org ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pmtud + ipnat RELENG_6_2 appears to be broken
YES. thank you! your latest patch solved my problems. going to test it tomorrow in production. 2007/7/26, Andrew Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:42:21PM +0400, Alexey Karagodov wrote: patch did not help ... ifconfig: lagg0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.0.255.255 inet 10.0.0.2 netmask 0x broadcast 10.0.255.255 ether XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX media: Ethernet autoselect status: active laggproto lacp laggport: em1 flags=1cACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING laggport: em0 flags=1cACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING i was tried to change laggproto, it doesn't help. i can NOT increase MTU on lagg interface above 1500 and on vlan interface above lagg's MTU -4 . also i've increased MTU on both ems to 9000 and after that i still can't increase MTU on lagg interface above 1500 please, HELP ... Please test this attached patch, note it includes the previous change too. regards, Andrew ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pmtud + ipnat RELENG_6_2 appears to be broken
patch did not help ... ifconfig: # ifconfig em0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 options=1bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING ether XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX full-duplex) status: active lagg: laggdev lagg0 em1: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 options=1bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING ether XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX full-duplex) status: active lagg: laggdev lagg0 pfsync0: flags=0 mtu 2020 syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128 lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 pflog0: flags=141UP,RUNNING,PROMISC mtu 33160 lagg0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.0.255.255 inet 10.0.0.2 netmask 0x broadcast 10.0.255.255 ether XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX media: Ethernet autoselect status: active laggproto lacp laggport: em1 flags=1cACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING laggport: em0 flags=1cACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING vlan302: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1496 inet 192.168.111.7 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.111.255 inet 192.168.111.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.111.255 ether XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX media: Ethernet autoselect status: active vlan: 302 parent interface: lagg0 vlan150: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST ,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1496 inet 192.168.150.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.150.255 ether XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX media: Ethernet autoselect status: active vlan: 150 parent interface: lagg0 and other VLANs . all on lagg0 interface i was tried to change laggproto, it doesn't help. i can NOT increase MTU on lagg interface above 1500 and on vlan interface above lagg's MTU -4 . also i've increased MTU on both ems to 9000 and after that i still can't increase MTU on lagg interface above 1500 please, HELP ... and VERY LITTLE part of dmesg: vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) 2007/7/25, Andrew Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] : On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 03:15:17AM +0400, Alexey Karagodov wrote: is there any progress? just one me too this problem appeared for me when i try to use vlan over lagg ( to em NICs ) lagg on RELENG_6 is currently broken due to subtle differences that wernt taken into account when it was MFCd. Can you please test this patch. Index: if_lagg.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/net/if_lagg.c,v retrieving revision 1.11.2.3 diff -u -p -r1.11.2.3 if_lagg.c --- if_lagg.c 12 Jul 2007 20:40:24 - 1.11.2.3
Re: pmtud + ipnat RELENG_6_2 appears to be broken
is there any progress? just one me too this problem appeared for me when i try to use vlan over lagg ( to em NICs ) thanx kernel: vlan301: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1510) 2007/7/13, Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Jul 12, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Stephen Clark wrote: The MTU is actually defined in reference to a network segment such as an ethernet collision domain, and applies to all machines sending traffic to that segment. If the MTU is really 1280, nobody else should be sending larger packets, and the drivers will drop any larger packets they receive and generate the appropriate ICMP error First thanks for responding but thats the problem, this did't generate an icmp when the packet was dropped. kernel: rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1294) This message did not result in any icmp packet. I was running tcpdump looking for them. Taking a quick look at ether_input() in src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c suggests that you are right-- if the incoming packet exceeds the MTU being set, the input errors count for that interface is incremented, but no ICMP_UNREACH_NEEDFRAG is generated even if DF flag is set. You might file a PR and see whether you can get Andre or one of the other networking gurus interested in fixing this. Or maybe I'll give it a try myself if I can get some free time :-) -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hard Hang, nothing in logs / no panics
just another some words: i have had similar trouble but my server reboots problem was in ECC correctable errors but FreeBSD kernel just reboot machine when this occures linux kernel wrote me what is the problem i don't know how to figure out that in FreeBSD and other hardware issues ... ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fast rate of major FreeBSD releases to STABLE
all the problem of freebsd is that freebsd-team tries (mostly unsuccesfully) to do EVERYTHING freebsd team not just do freebsd, they doing freebsd5, freebsd6, freebsd7, ports, etc ... and nothing of this can work REALLY STABLE AND FUNCTIONAL i don't like linux, but sometimes i have to choose it i don't like openbsd, but some network features of openbsd i don't see in freebsd people, just try to do FreeBSD, not flavour ... thanx 2007/5/25, Oleg Gritsak [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Actually, I don't see how RELENG_X branch will help. %-\ I would suggest this scheme: branch . - as now, the recent versions branch sec - versions bump strictly at 1-st of january and 1-st of july, other updates fix only security issues. That would be really great improvement to ports, but not sure community has enough programmers among port maintaners, so it's just another dream :o( This looks like another call to have RELENG_x branches on ports, with which I agree. -- системный администратор ООО Сиб-ЭкоМеталл тел. (3912) 609942 (144) ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fast rate of major FreeBSD releases to STABLE
and sorry for my english! :) 2007/6/6, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 10:50:23AM +0400, Alexey Karagodov wrote: all the problem of freebsd is that freebsd-team tries (mostly unsuccesfully) to do EVERYTHING freebsd team not just do freebsd, they doing freebsd5, freebsd6, freebsd7, ports, etc ... and nothing of this can work REALLY STABLE AND FUNCTIONAL i don't like linux, but sometimes i have to choose it i don't like openbsd, but some network features of openbsd i don't see in freebsd people, just try to do FreeBSD, not flavour ... thanx Uh thanks for your input! thx, Kris ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?
please, dmesg, mptable -verbose, mptable -grope 2007/4/25, Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400 From: Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and what is this, i mean why: WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. I thought it was pretty clear. ipsec is not multi-processor safe and requires the use of GIANT. If you have IPSEC in your kernel the network stack will also be giant locked which will cut performance. Yep, google for extensive discussion (hint: FAST_IPSEC) No visible changes in behaviour with FAST_IPSEC Fast IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. mptable still shows ONE CPU Alex. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?
+1 i'm using IPSec with out such limitations ... fix it. than we will continue conversation about your CPU troubles 2007/4/20, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]: - Скрыть цитируемый текст - On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400 From: Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and what is this, i mean why: WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. I thought it was pretty clear. ipsec is not multi-processor safe and requires the use of GIANT. If you have IPSEC in your kernel the network stack will also be giant locked which will cut performance. Yep, google for extensive discussion (hint: FAST_IPSEC) Kris 2007/4/19, Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello! On the Pentium-D box, kernel detects both CPUs, but it seems like scheduler use only one. (from dmesg) Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #2: Thu Apr 19 00:19:54 MSD 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/P4D WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (2808.41-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf64 Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,C MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0xe49dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14,b15 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM AMD Features2=0x1LAHF Logical CPUs per core: 2 real memory = 1046757376 (998 MB) avail memory = 1015095296 (968 MB) ACPI APIC Table: INTEL DG965SS FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! (from top) last pid: 12408; load averages: 4.99, 4.91, 4.08up 0+01:08:02 19:26:23 265 processes: 8 running, 256 sleeping, 1 zombie CPU states: 35.0% user, 0.0% nice, 14.1% system, 0.9% interrupt, 50.0% idle Mem: 267M Active, 503M Inact, 171M Wired, 29M Cache, 109M Buf, 1636K Free Swap: 2006M Total, 2006M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1399125 1 1090 4684K 2808K RUN0 11:20 18.85% qmgr 1819300 1 40 33552K 30824K select 0 8:58 13.57% perl5.8.8 1821300 1 40 33364K 30644K select 0 9:15 6.05% perl5.8.8 12398125 1 40 3588K 2524K select 0 0:00 2.00% cleanup 1394 root1 1040 3444K 1596K RUN0 1:58 1.66% master 10601125 1 970 3580K 1728K select 0 0:18 0.83% trivial-rewri 10051125 1 970 4536K 2688K RUN0 0:13 0.63% scache All processes runs on CPU0, and I did not see less than 50% idle cpu. What can be wrong? Alex. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tproxy on freebsd
real transparent proxy provided by Cisco's WCCP with, for example, Squid. this protocol detects HTTP (and so on) traffic on any port and redirects it to proxy-server. same thing (not just permanent redirection of port 80 to proxy but *DETECTING* HTTP traffic and proxying it) can be achived by TrafficInspector for Windows. do you know such thing for *nix systems? thanx. 2007/4/19, zen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Adrian Chadd wrote: On 19/04/07, zen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if there is any such thing , i'm willing to be a tester . i will deploy it on my server and enviroment ( live one) I'm talking to someone about it who has some patches against -current. We'll see what can be done. i'm glad to hear that. can't wait to see and test it Thankfully! The solution for FreeBSD looks doable without having to keep NAT state like TPROXY does.. this is GREAT!! Adrian Regards Zen ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?
kernel config please and /etc/sysctl.conf 2007/4/19, Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello! On the Pentium-D box, kernel detects both CPUs, but it seems like scheduler use only one. (from dmesg) Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #2: Thu Apr 19 00:19:54 MSD 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/P4D WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (2808.41-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf64 Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,C MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0xe49dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14,b15 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM AMD Features2=0x1LAHF Logical CPUs per core: 2 real memory = 1046757376 (998 MB) avail memory = 1015095296 (968 MB) ACPI APIC Table: INTEL DG965SS FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! (from top) last pid: 12408; load averages: 4.99, 4.91, 4.08up 0+01:08:02 19:26:23 265 processes: 8 running, 256 sleeping, 1 zombie CPU states: 35.0% user, 0.0% nice, 14.1% system, 0.9% interrupt, 50.0% idle Mem: 267M Active, 503M Inact, 171M Wired, 29M Cache, 109M Buf, 1636K Free Swap: 2006M Total, 2006M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1399125 1 1090 4684K 2808K RUN0 11:20 18.85% qmgr 1819300 1 40 33552K 30824K select 0 8:58 13.57% perl5.8.8 1821300 1 40 33364K 30644K select 0 9:15 6.05% perl5.8.8 12398125 1 40 3588K 2524K select 0 0:00 2.00% cleanup 1394 root1 1040 3444K 1596K RUN0 1:58 1.66% master 10601125 1 970 3580K 1728K select 0 0:18 0.83% trivial-rewri 10051125 1 970 4536K 2688K RUN0 0:13 0.63% scache All processes runs on CPU0, and I did not see less than 50% idle cpu. What can be wrong? Alex. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?
and what is this, i mean why: WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. 2007/4/19, Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello! On the Pentium-D box, kernel detects both CPUs, but it seems like scheduler use only one. (from dmesg) Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #2: Thu Apr 19 00:19:54 MSD 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/P4D WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (2808.41-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf64 Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,C MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0xe49dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14,b15 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM AMD Features2=0x1LAHF Logical CPUs per core: 2 real memory = 1046757376 (998 MB) avail memory = 1015095296 (968 MB) ACPI APIC Table: INTEL DG965SS FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! (from top) last pid: 12408; load averages: 4.99, 4.91, 4.08up 0+01:08:02 19:26:23 265 processes: 8 running, 256 sleeping, 1 zombie CPU states: 35.0% user, 0.0% nice, 14.1% system, 0.9% interrupt, 50.0% idle Mem: 267M Active, 503M Inact, 171M Wired, 29M Cache, 109M Buf, 1636K Free Swap: 2006M Total, 2006M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1399125 1 1090 4684K 2808K RUN0 11:20 18.85% qmgr 1819300 1 40 33552K 30824K select 0 8:58 13.57% perl5.8.8 1821300 1 40 33364K 30644K select 0 9:15 6.05% perl5.8.8 12398125 1 40 3588K 2524K select 0 0:00 2.00% cleanup 1394 root1 1040 3444K 1596K RUN0 1:58 1.66% master 10601125 1 970 3580K 1728K select 0 0:18 0.83% trivial-rewri 10051125 1 970 4536K 2688K RUN0 0:13 0.63% scache All processes runs on CPU0, and I did not see less than 50% idle cpu. What can be wrong? Alex. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SFF supported computers
macmini 2007/2/18, Bleeding Edge [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I'm looking for a recommendation on a small form factor system. I've looked at some of the models from AOpen , Shuttle and Microstar. I'd like an AMD 64 (or dual core) box (lower cost) with SATA/EIDE disk support. I plan on running FreeBSD mostly and occasionally Red Hat or Fedora for customer projects. If someone can recommend a system/motherboard combination and perhaps an agp video card. I write lamp/perl things and need a box for development. Thanks, BE - It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is a good choice of sata-ii raid controller for freebsd?
http://www.3ware.com/ 2007/2/8, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:47:10PM +0200, Clayton Milos wrote: I can highly recommend the Areca family of SATA-II controllers. I have a ARC-1110 (4 poort RAID controller) with 4x 320GB Western Digital SATA-II drives attached to it in a RAID5 configuration. I have questions: 1) Do these controllers, from a BIOS level, permit SMART commands to be sent directly to the drives (via pass(4)) so you can monitor drives for potential upcoming failures and perform drive tests, via smartctl? 2) Regardless of performance, have you actually tried a hard failure with these controllers and seen what both the controller and the OS do? A good example is to pull the SATA power plug out of one of the drives in the array while it's powered on and see what happens, both from a controller perspective and what FreeBSD does. The same question applies to hot-swapping. 3) Does Areca provide any form of carriage/enclosure medium, such as an enclosure which supports 4 drives, allows hot-swapping, and allows you to query the enclosure for statistics (fan RPM, thermals, and so on)? 4) string'ing the cli32 binary returns some references to SMART, but the monitoring is generally retarded (literally, not slang) -- it looks as if it just wants to use SMART to say drive bad or drive good. This is not an effective use of SMART, and does nothing for those wanting to monitor drives properly (read: temperature, excessive ECC, perform SMART tests for bad blocks, etc.). 5) Is there native FreeBSD 6.x binaries for administrative utilities? It doesn't look like it, but maybe I'm looking at the wrong utility: ~/V1.5_50930 $ file cli32 cli32: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1, for FreeBSD 4.2, statically linked, not stripped Many controllers (including Adaptec) these days suffer from some or all of the above issues, too. Ultimately this turns me off to using any form of RAID controller; vendors who refuse to give full documentation for their hardware to engineers who want to write drivers for it, refuse to implement proper passthrough methods (I'm looking at you, Adaptec) so that you can talk to the drives directly if need be, nor provide you with any form of useful FreeBSD support (here's our old crusty 3.x a.out binaries built by a guy who left the company 7 years ago! Thanks for buying company, bye!) The best out of the bunch in this regards seems to be Promise, who despite having ehhh controllers, has given Soren lots of documen- tation and has been helpful in providing him answers to his questions. I can't say the same for other controller vendors. I'm sorry if I sound bitter, but I must have gone through 4 different brands of SATA RAID controllers before saying screw this and going with non-RAID or using geom. I don't have anything against Areca (I've never used their hardware), but I have no desire to use hardware which does not support the above things -- which in 2007 should be standard by all means. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networkinghttp://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: impossible rc.d ordering problem with stf and pf ?
or just make a symlink from /etc/rc.d/pf to /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pf i solved this way problem with FQDN in pf rules 2007/1/28, Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 12/23/-58 20:59, Pete French wrote: Am trying to solve a little problem with 'pf'. I have a ruleset which has some firewall rules for the IPv6 interface stf0. This works fine, except when I rreboot the machine, as the pf script is run before the network_ipv6 script - so stf0 does not exist. but I cannot work out how to arrange for stf0 to be created before the pf script is run - as network_ipv6 requires 'routing', but the pf script says it must be run before 'routing', if I am reading the 'REQUIRE' and 'BEFORE' lines correctly. Pete, I've played with that problems a few times. It's not a perfect solution, but you may create your own pf loading script and place it in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/. To make sure it's running late in startup, use a proper # REQUIRE: line. That way (and that what makes me saying it's not perfect) pf load script /etc/rc.d/pf is being run but aborts loading pf rules in first place and later (when rc is working though /usr/local/etc/rc.d/) pf rules are loaded by your custom script. HTH, Volker ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Netgraph - ng_bpf help (first experience)
is there a need in ng_ether module?
On 10/11/06, Eduardo Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ngctl msg my_node: setprogram { thisHook=hook1 ifMatch=hook2
ifNotMatch=hook3 bpf_prog_len=16 bpf_prog=[ { code=40 jt=0 jf=0 k=12
} { code=21 jt=0 jf=4 k=34525 } { code=48 jt=0 jf=0 k=20 } { code=21
jt=0 jf=11 k=6 } { code=40 jt=0 jf=0 k=56 } { code=21 jt=8 jf=9 k=80 }
{ code=21 jt=0 jf=8 k=2048 } { code=48 jt=0 jf=0 k=23 } { code=21 jt=0
jf=6 k=6 } { code=40 jt=0 jf=0 k=20 } { code=69 jt=4 jf=0 k=8191 } {
code=177 jt=0 jf=0 k=14 } { code=72 jt=0 jf=0 k=16 } { code=21 jt=0
jf=1 k=80 } { code=6 jt=0 jf=0 k=8192 } { code=6 jt=0 jf=0 k=0 } ] } }
How should I create my_node before?
Absolutely.
Absolutely what? I meant how should I create, say how to create my
node. The man page does not mentions anything about it.
Thanks again for the help.
--
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NFS locking: lockf freezes (rpc.lockd problem?)
it's all is very good, but what can you say about to fix problem with rpc.lockd ??? 2006/8/29, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, 2006-Aug-28 13:23:30 +, Michael Abbott wrote: I think there is a case to be made for special casing SIGKILL, but in a sense it's not so much the fate of the process receiving the SIGKILL that counts: after all, having sent -9 I know that it will never process again. Currently, if you send SIGKILL, the process will never enter userland again. Going further, so that if you send a process SIGKILL, it will always terminate immediately is significantly more difficult. In the normal case, a process is sleeping on some condition with PCATCH specified. If the process receives a signal, sleep(9) will return ERESTART or EINTR and the code has to then arrange to return back to userland (which will cause the signal to be handled as per sigaction(2) and the processes signal handlers). In some cases, it may be inconvenient to unwind back to userland from a particular point so PCATCH isn't specified on the sleep. -- Peter Jeremy ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE: Unexplained power off
you have ichwd ... what settings in bios and on motherboard related to watchdog? 2006/8/17, Android Andrew [:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thank you for answers! Yesterday the last iteration of high load testing finished with just another power off. There are two ways of problem-solving have been outlined in this thread. One way - hardware problem, e.g. PSU. Another way - software, e.g. APM/ACPI problem. I could not find any PSU for replacement at this moment. So, I've been playing with BIOS and kernel options. I disabled dynamic overclocking, hyperthreading options in BIOS. There's no Disable APM (or something like this) or Disable ACPI in my BIOS. I can only disable some ACPI functions or extensions (like Enable ACPI 2 extensions). I've recompiled kernel without apm/acpi options and without SMP support. I was typing After recompilation system is still working without crashing when system just turned off :) my loader.conf: loader_logo=beastie if_myk_load=YES nvidia_load=YES sysctl.conf: net.inet.tcp.msl=7500 net.inet.udp.blackhole=1 net.inet.ip.random_id=1 kern.ipc.somaxconn=4096 net.inet.icmp.icmplim=100 last dmesg: Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #8: Wed Aug 16 21:11:42 EEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/callisto Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz (3010.67-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf43 Stepping = 3 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0x649dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM real memory = 2147090432 (2047 MB) avail memory = 2092273664 (1995 MB) kbd1 at kbdmux0 ichwd module loaded acpi0: A M I OEMRSDT on motherboard acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_PR_.CPU1._PDC] (Node 0xc5c81c60), AE_BAD_HEADER acpi_throttle0: ACPI CPU Throttling on cpu0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 11 at device 1.0 on pci0 pci4: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 nvidia0: GeForce 6600 mem 0xd400-0xd7ff,0xd800-0xdfff,0xd300-0xd3ff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci4 nvidia0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pci0: multimedia at device 27.0 (no driver attached) pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 11 at device 28.0 on pci0 pci3: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 pcib3: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 10 at device 28.3 on pci0 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib3 myk0: Marvell 88E8053 Gigabit Ethernet Controller, Ver. 8.12.2.3 port 0xc800-0xc8ff mem 0xd2efc000-0xd2ef irq 10 at device 0.0 on pci2 myk0: Ethernet address: 00:13:d4:d0:31:e5 uhci0: UHCI (generic) USB controller port 0x8000-0x801f irq 5 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: UHCI (generic) USB controller on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: UHCI (generic) USB controller port 0x8400-0x841f irq 11 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: UHCI (generic) USB controller on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: UHCI (generic) USB controller port 0x8800-0x881f irq 3 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: UHCI (generic) USB controller on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: UHCI (generic) USB controller port 0x9000-0x901f irq 10 at device 29.3 on pci0 uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb3: UHCI (generic) USB controller on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: Intel 82801GB/R (ICH7) USB 2.0 controller mem 0xd2dff800-0xd2dffbff irq 5 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb4: EHCI version 1.0 usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 usb4: Intel 82801GB/R (ICH7) USB 2.0 controller on ehci0 usb4: USB revision 2.0 uhub4: Intel EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered uhub4: device problem (IOERROR), disabling port 7 pcib4: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 30.0 on pci0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib4 isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: ISA bus on isab0 atapci0: Intel ICH7 UDMA100 controller port
Re: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE: Unexplained power off
yes, that's correct question ... your's mobo reports about everything is fine may be mistaken ... check your ACPI and related settings and hardware 2006/8/15, Christoph Schug [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Aug 15, 2006, Android Andrew [:] wrote: At first I thought that problem could be in CPU, power supply, mobo chips overheating, but temperature sensors reported everything is OK. To be on the safe side I installed additional radiators and coolers. But it doesn't solve the problem. I've noticed that system is unstable under high disk io load during compilation. How have you checked your power supply? Is it capable enough to run all your components under high load? -cs ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QUOTA+SNAPSHOT
hi everybody! is QUOTA+SNAPSHOT problem solved? any work-around? also i was tried to dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/swap/swap.bin bs=1m count=32768 and server stop serving any requests except ping and scroll-lock in console on 18983936K of writed data. my dmesg.boot: Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p3 #1: Tue Jul 18 15:02:07 MSD 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM ACPI APIC Table: PTLTD APIC Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz (3614.55-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0x659dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,TM2,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14 AMD Features=0x20100800SYSCALL,NX,LM real memory = 9663676416 (9216 MB) avail memory = 8283246592 (7899 MB) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 6 ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 Version 2.0 irqs 24-47 on motherboard ioapic2 Version 2.0 irqs 48-71 on motherboard ioapic3 Version 2.0 irqs 72-95 on motherboard ioapic4 Version 2.0 irqs 96-119 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 ichwd module loaded acpi0: PTLTD RSDT on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 cpu1: ACPI CPU on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 pci0: unknown at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pci0: base peripheral at device 1.0 (no driver attached) pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 16 at device 2.0 on pci0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.0 on pci1 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 ahd0: Adaptec AIC7902 Ultra320 SCSI adapter port 0x2400-0x24ff,0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xdc20-0xdc201fff irq 32 at device 2.0on pci2 ahd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs ahd1: Adaptec AIC7902 Ultra320 SCSI adapter port 0x2c00-0x2cff,0x2800-0x28ff mem 0xdc202000-0xdc203fff irq 33 at device 2.1on pci2 ahd1: [GIANT-LOCKED] aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs pci1: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pcib3: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.2 on pci1 pci3: ACPI PCI bus on pcib3 3ware device driver for 9000 series storage controllers, version: 3.60.02.012 twa0: 3ware 9000 series Storage Controller port 0x3000-0x30ff mem 0xdc30-0xdc3000ff,0xde80-0xdeff irq 48 at device 1.0 on pci3 twa0: [FAST] twa0: INFO: (0x15: 0x1300): Controller details:: Model 9500S-12, 12 ports, Firmware FE9X 2.08.00.006, BIOS BE9X 2.03.01.052 em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection Version - 3.2.18 port 0x3400-0x343f mem 0xdc32-0xdc33 irq 54 at device 2.0 on pci3 em0: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:74:ad:f0 em1: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection Version - 3.2.18 port 0x3440-0x347f mem 0xdc34-0xdc35 irq 55 at device 2.1 on pci3 em1: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:74:ad:f1 pci1: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 0.3 (no driver attached) pcib4: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 16 at device 4.0 on pci0 pci4: ACPI PCI bus on pcib4 pcib5: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 16 at device 6.0 on pci0 pci5: ACPI PCI bus on pcib5 pcib6: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.0 on pci5 pci6: ACPI PCI bus on pcib6 pci5: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pcib7: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.2 on pci5 pci7: ACPI PCI bus on pcib7 twa1: 3ware 9000 series Storage Controller port 0x4000-0x40ff mem 0xdc50-0xdc5000ff,0xdf00-0xdf7f irq 96 at device 1.0 on pci7 twa1: [FAST] twa1: INFO: (0x15: 0x1300): Controller details:: Model 9500S-12, 12 ports, Firmware FE9X 2.08.00.006, BIOS BE9X 2.03.01.052 pci5: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 0.3 (no driver attached) uhci0: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-A port 0x1400-0x141f irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-A on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-B port 0x1420-0x143f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-B on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-C port 0x1440-0x145f irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-C on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI
Re: Professional sound card
audigy and maybe m-audio Revolution 7.1 2006/8/7, Marco Pirovano [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, I'm looking for a professional sound card available under FreeBSD-stable. Any suggestions ? Thank you very much. Ciao, Marco * Marco Pirovano * Universita' Bocconi, Area Sistemi Informatici e Telematici * Piazza Sraffa 11 - 20136 Milano * Tel. +39 02 5836.3173 Fax. +39 02 5836.3160 VoIP. 02 5828.3173 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Monitoring temperature with acpi (sysctls)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:31:3: class=0x0c0500 card=0x618015d9 chip=0x24d38086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) SMBus Controller' class= serial bus subclass = SMBus 2006/7/27, Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bruno Ducrot wrote: Could you please try (if you have a working smb device) # smbmsg -p Well, i don't think its being detected/supported. I tried loading all the smbus related kernel modules, but no device. Id Refs AddressSize Name 19 0xc040 2d1624 kernel 21 0xc06d2000 606acacpi.ko 33 0xc4dca000 2000 smbus.ko 41 0xc4dcc000 3000 iicsmb.ko 53 0xc4dcf000 3000 iicbus.ko 61 0xc4de4000 3000 smb.ko 71 0xc4df3000 3000 iic.ko 81 0xc4df6000 3000 if_ic.ko You should also try to load these kernel modules: alpm.ko, amdpm.ko, intpm.ko, viapm.ko However, dmesg seems to show that there is a SMBus device on the MB. pci0: serial bus, SMBus at device 31.3 (no driver attached) If none of the mentioned modules attach, please look at the output from pciconf -lv. What's the entry for your SMBus device (pci0:31:3)? Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. (On the statement print 42 monkeys + 1 snake:) By the way, both perl and Python get this wrong. Perl gives 43 and Python gives 42 monkeys1 snake, when the answer is clearly 41 monkeys and 1 fat snake.-- Jim Fulton ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Monitoring temperature with acpi (sysctls)
me too. chipset - e7520 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NFS Locking Issue
me - too ... 2006/6/29, Michael Collette [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This last week I had been working on a test network to test out 6.1 prior to upgrading our production boxes from 5.4. That's when I ran across the rpc.lockd issues that have been discussed earlier. Our production setup has diskless clients running KDE, which due to this bug is now dead on 6.1. I also have my mail server delivering messages to a file server via NFS. I even have servers booting diskless with NFS provided file systems... all of which are dead on 6.1. The last discussion our bug updates I've seen on this issue were about 3 months ago. This leaves me with a number of questions I hope can be answered here on this list. Is NFS a big deal for most other users, or am I out here on the fringe using it as much as I do? Is anyone working on a fix for this? If so, is there any kind of time frame where this fix might be MFC'd to 6-STABLE? I guess I'm still just a bit stunned that a bug this obvious not only found it's way into the STABLE branch, but is still there. Maybe it's not as obvious as I think, or not many folks are using it? All I know for sure here is that if I had upgraded to 6.1 my network would have been crippled. Later on, -- Michael Collette IT Manager TestEquity LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- С Уважением, Алексей Карагодов. Проектирование, построение, администрирование и поддержка информационных систем. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD 6 and MySQL with DBs on a NAS
there was some problems with NFS on FreeBSD 6 ... try to google problem related to NFS or search this mailing list 2006/6/27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I was wondering if anyone else had encountered this issue and/or come up with what needs to be done to resolve it: I currently have MySQL 5.0.22 built from ports on a FreeBSD 6.1 machine with the DB data residing on a NetApp share connected via NFS. A strange thing happens often after a few hours or a couple of days, some tables that are very active start to crash for no apparent reason as far as I can tell. Example output from check table tablename: ++---+--+---+ | Table | Op| Msg_type | Msg_text | ++---+--+---+ | dbname.tablename | check | warning | Table is marked as crashed | | dbname.tablename | check | error| Found key at page 18259968 that points to record outside datafile | | dbname.tablename | check | error| Corrupt | ++---+--+---+ Upon moving the DB data to a local drive, the system operates flawlessly and has done so for many weeks, but I really need to keep these data on the networked share. The problem didn't happen when I was using FreeBSD 4.11, it only started after upgrading to FreeBSD 6.0 or 6.1. A poster on a MySQL mailing list suggested perhaps it could be a file locking issue at the OS level and so I post my inquiry here. I've seen this happen on FreeBSD 6.0 and 6.1 with MySQL 4.1.x and MySQL 5.0.x built from ports. Has anyone else seen this and if so has a resolution been found? -- Mark P. Hennessy ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- С Уважением, Алексей Карагодов. Проектирование, построение, администрирование и поддержка информационных систем. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.1 Stable keeps hanging
any way, post your configs (kernel's too) and etc etc etc ... i have a computer, it's doesn't work. what's the problem? ... 2006/6/2, Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I am running 6.1 stable, AMD64 on Dell 2850, Intel Xeon. It keeps hanging for no reason, no panic message or core and I have to reboot the system whenever it freezes. Any idea where to check? Denny ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- С Уважением, Алексей Карагодов. Проектирование, построение, администрирование и поддержка информационных систем. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ciss0: ADAPTER HEARTBEAT FAILED? on a new bought HP dl360g3
it looks like '6.1 with qouta' bug back again ... server works normaly for 10-15 minutes, then everything in the kernel working perfectly, user-land programs - hangs up ... cat /var/run/dmesg.boot: Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #6: Wed May 31 20:43:31 MSD 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM ACPI APIC Table: PTLTD APIC Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz (3600.15-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0x659dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,TM2,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14 AMD Features=0x20100800SYSCALL,NX,LM Logical CPUs per core: 2 real memory = 9663676416 (9216 MB) avail memory = 8283570176 (7899 MB) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 6 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 7 ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 Version 2.0 irqs 24-47 on motherboard ioapic2 Version 2.0 irqs 48-71 on motherboard ioapic3 Version 2.0 irqs 72-95 on motherboard ioapic4 Version 2.0 irqs 96-119 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 ichwd module loaded acpi0: PTLTD RSDT on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 cpu1: ACPI CPU on acpi0 cpu2: ACPI CPU on acpi0 cpu3: ACPI CPU on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 pci0: unknown at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pci0: base peripheral at device 1.0 (no driver attached) pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 16 at device 2.0 on pci0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.0 on pci1 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 ahd0: Adaptec AIC7902 Ultra320 SCSI adapter port 0x2400-0x24ff,0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xdc20-0xdc201fff irq 32 at device 2.0on pci2 ahd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs ahd1: Adaptec AIC7902 Ultra320 SCSI adapter port 0x2c00-0x2cff,0x2800-0x28ff mem 0xdc202000-0xdc203fff irq 33 at device 2.1on pci2 ahd1: [GIANT-LOCKED] aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs pci1: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pcib3: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.2 on pci1 pci3: ACPI PCI bus on pcib3 3ware device driver for 9000 series storage controllers, version: 3.60.02.012 twa0: 3ware 9000 series Storage Controller port 0x3000-0x30ff mem 0xdc30-0xdc3000ff,0xde80-0xdeff irq 48 at device 1.0 on pci3 twa0: [FAST] twa0: INFO: (0x15: 0x1300): Controller details:: Model 9500S-12, 12 ports, Firmware FE9X 2.04.00.005, BIOS BE9X 2.03.01.047 em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection Version - 3.2.18 port 0x3400-0x343f mem 0xdc32-0xdc33 irq 54 at device 2.0 on pci3 em0: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:74:ad:f0 em1: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection Version - 3.2.18 port 0x3440-0x347f mem 0xdc34-0xdc35 irq 55 at device 2.1 on pci3 em1: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:74:ad:f1 pci1: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 0.3 (no driver attached) pcib4: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 16 at device 4.0 on pci0 pci4: ACPI PCI bus on pcib4 pcib5: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 16 at device 6.0 on pci0 pci5: ACPI PCI bus on pcib5 pcib6: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.0 on pci5 pci6: ACPI PCI bus on pcib6 pci5: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pcib7: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.2 on pci5 pci7: ACPI PCI bus on pcib7 twa1: 3ware 9000 series Storage Controller port 0x4000-0x40ff mem 0xdc50-0xdc5000ff,0xdf00-0xdf7f irq 96 at device 1.0 on pci7 twa1: [FAST] twa1: INFO: (0x15: 0x1300): Controller details:: Model 9500S-12, 12 ports, Firmware FE9X 2.04.00.005, BIOS BE9X 2.03.01.047 pci5: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 0.3 (no driver attached) uhci0: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-A port 0x1400-0x141f irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-A on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-B port 0x1420-0x143f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-B on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-C port 0x1440-0x145f irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-C
Re: RC2 binary upgrade: var/empty: no chmod allowed
chflags -R noschg /var/empty 2006/5/3, Martin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello everyone, When BETA4 was released, I installed it on a very old machine of mine, and tried doing a binary upgrade from 6.0-RELEASE to 6.1-BETA4. I got an error almost immediately that it failed to write because it couldn't chmod var/empty (due to the schg flag being set). I also had other problems which in retrospect were likely pilot error. Around that time, a bunch of other stuff came up and I let the matter drop. I just binary upgraded my 6.1-BETA4 installation to 6.1-RC2 and ran into the same thing. I was able to work around it by using the holographic shell to chflags /var/empty so that the installer could write to it, which it does when I retry the install. BTW - I am doing a custom distribution set including base, doc, games, info, man, and the GENERIC kernel. Everything else I install from either a local cvsup mirror or a package build machine. Has anyone else seen this? I can't rule out pilot error here. Thanks, Marty ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cc can't build 32-bit executables on amd64
workaround i use: 32-bit jail on amd64 system ... not so bad ... 2006/5/2, Mikhail Teterin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tuesday 02 May 2006 05:59, Peter Jeremy wrote: = But probably not as fast since it's using a generic 'C' core instead = of a hand-tweaked assembler core. I read Mikhail's comment as meaning = that it is possible to build non-trivial 32-bit executables on amd64, = there's just work still needed to make this work as a general case. Thanks, Peter. You are correct, that was my meaning. Interestingly, the assembler-optimized 32-bit routines made lame slower than the native 64-bit code in my experiments (one may wish to compare assembler vs. C lame on i386 too). But it all *worked*, which was the point... -mi ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Freebsd Stable 6.x ipsec slower than with 4.9
... to at least three persons :) ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.1RC system nearly freezing
it happend to me too. power line was down and server was restarted 3 times while FSCK after early unplanned shutdown. i have no time to fix it and fastest way for me was: boot from another source, backup, rebuild array (RAID5 on 3ware 9500S), and reinstall everything :( 2006/4/20, Henri Hennebert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, I upgrade a web, squid, mail server (under SMP with 2 pentium III) to 6.1-RC (Apr 9 2006) and encounter 2 `freezing'. The system is still responding to http requests but I can't login on the console or through ssh -- no shell prompt. No more mail delivery. I break to KDB and found more then 1000 sendmail processes waiting for devfs... call boot(0) can't complete the shutdown process. I join the KDB informations. Let me know if more informations are needed. Thanks for your time Henri This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Instant crash with FreeBSD 6.1-RC and 4GB RAM
try to update BIOS ... 2006/4/13, Francois Tigeot [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 03:47:02PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 09:43:06PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: I just tried booting a FreeBSD-6.1-RC1/amd64 CD in a machine with an Athlon-64 X2 4400+ and 4GB of memory. The mainboard is an Asus A8V-E-SE. The kernel displays its copyright and then crashes almost instantly. The screen is filled with the letter 'k' and the machine reboots soon after that. [...] If the memory is limited to 3GB in the BIOS, FreeBSD boots as expected. I would appreciate if someone could share some insight about this problem. Replace the broken 1GB memory stick? :-) Well, with the same sticks, the same CD boots correctly in an Opteron/Supermicro H8SSL-i machine Silly me, I thought it could have been a software bug, when it was in fact a hardware one... Any recommandation for a known working socket 939 mainboard with PCI-E graphics ? -- Francois Tigeot ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disappointed
ok! tell me, how can i help you to make stable - stable? please. don't answer me - GIVE US MONEY! i will not pay! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disappointed
thanx :) it not everytime working (i've this exprerience), but i will try :) to ask help again if needed ... ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disappointed
hi. i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to make two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and another 7.0 current and they supporting old version, lower then 6.0 i want to ask developers, why you developing new system, 7.0, if you don't finish old, 6.0 ?! finish 6.0, make it work, and upgrade it to 7.0 and to 8.0 and to 9.0 and so on ... what so new and revolutionary in 7.0 in comparison with 6.0 ?! to use your system i must be a DEVELOPER, but i don't have so much time! i don't want to develope! i want to use, i want to help you with some advise ( e.g. what feature to add, what feature to change etc), i can and i want to share some of my hardware to feet your needs, make a mirror, make a test server/workstation/notebook/PDA etc. i'm not an freebsd developer. i'm just admin and a user. your system is most greatest i ever seen. another wonderful system is SOLARIS. but your's is so unstable ... ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disappointed
2006/4/6, Dennis Melentyev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Alexey, 2006/4/6, Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hi. i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to make two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and another 7.0 current and they supporting old version, lower then 6.0 i want to ask developers, why you developing new system, 7.0, if you don't finish old, 6.0 ?! finish 6.0, make it work, and upgrade it to 7.0 and to 8.0 and to 9.0and so on ... what so new and revolutionary in 7.0 in comparison with 6.0 ?! to use your system i must be a DEVELOPER, but i don't have so much time! i 'Must' is a t strong word. If they wish - they will. If you need you have two options: do it yourself or pay some money to someone who can. Period. Or have you paid them for that? :) Just don't use any system in production without having it tested first. This world is not perfect, and software is way less perfect than world. :) ok. then, freebsd-developers may change The Power To Serve to The Power To Test, FreeBSD is an advanced operating system to FreeBSD is an advanced operating system in stage of forever development, etc. pay money to use stable (working) product or help us to develope it for free ... don't want to develope! i want to use, i want to help you with some advise ( e.g. what feature to add, what feature to change etc), i can and i want to share some of my hardware to feet your needs, make a mirror, make a test server/workstation/notebook/PDA etc. i'm not an freebsd developer. i'm just That's great! That's your contribution to the project. Every one here contribute whatever they can: money, hardware, code, PR, support. But no one can say what someone must to do. PS. Без обид? а то! :) какие обиды. нормальненько так беседуем ... -- Dennis Melentyev ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disappointed
2006/4/6, Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Quoting Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2006/4/6, Dennis Melentyev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Alexey, 2006/4/6, Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hi. i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to make two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and another 7.0 current and they supporting old version, lower then 6.0 i want to ask developers, why you developing new system, 7.0, if you don't finish old, 6.0 ?! finish 6.0, make it work, and upgrade it to 7.0 and to 8.0 and to 9.0and so on ... what so new and revolutionary in 7.0 in comparison with 6.0 ?! to use your system i must be a DEVELOPER, but i don't have so much time! i 'Must' is a t strong word. If they wish - they will. If you need you have two options: do it yourself or pay some money to someone who can. Period. Or have you paid them for that? :) Just don't use any system in production without having it tested first. This world is not perfect, and software is way less perfect than world. :) ok. then, freebsd-developers may change The Power To Serve to The Power To Test, FreeBSD is an advanced operating system to FreeBSD is an advanced operating system in stage of forever development, etc. pay money to use stable (working) product or help us to develope it for free ... Boy. I don't get it. It hasn't cost you anymore than time to use FreeBSD. If your concerned with how a particular version runs on various hardware, simply wait to see what others experiences have been with it. You are not *required* to use the latest version(s). For that matter; you're not required to use it at all. But personally, after years of usage; I'd have to say that all-in-all, you'd be hard pressed to find a better OS - especially for the money. ;) and again. if *NIX developers can't answer user's question, they say get out or it's your problem or try something else or For that matter; you're not required to use it at all. everytime one answer for multiple question WE ARE *NIX, WE ARE GODS. YOU, GO TRY SOMETHING ELSE --Chris don't want to develope! i want to use, i want to help you with some advise ( e.g. what feature to add, what feature to change etc), i can and i want to share some of my hardware to feet your needs, make a mirror, make a test server/workstation/notebook/PDA etc. i'm not an freebsd developer. i'm just That's great! That's your contribution to the project. Every one here contribute whatever they can: money, hardware, code, PR, support. But no one can say what someone must to do. PS. Без обид? а то! :) какие обиды. нормальненько так беседуем ... -- Dennis Melentyev -- Linux is not, nor never will be, UNIX. he don't want to be a UNIX. he don't need it. - FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p12 (SMP - 900x2) Tue Mar 7 19:37:23 PST 2006 / ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
routed
hello! while system start-up, routed takes very long time to start, about minute or two. and then actualy not starting till login prompt (so ntpdate can't obtain time from internet and so on) rc.conf: watchdogd_enable=YES accounting_enable=YES check_quotas=YES defaultrouter=172.17.224.1 http://10.0.224.1/ hostname=host http://main.kp.clubnemo.ru/ cloned_interfaces=vlan1 vlan101 vlan102 vlan103 ifconfig_em1=up ifconfig_vlan1=inet 172.16.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 vlan 1 vlandev em1 ifconfig_vlan101=inet 82.111.222.111 http://83.102.211.181/ netmask 255.255.255.240 vlan 101 vlandev em1 ifconfig_vlan103=inet 172.17.244.73 http://10.0.244.73/ netmask 255.255.224.0 vlan 103 vlandev em1 ifconfig_vlan103_alias0=inet 192.168.0.49 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig_vlan103_alias1=ether 00:0a:48:0f:cb:ea gateway_enable=YES router_enable=YES ipv6_enable=YES ipv6_gateway_enable=YES ipv6_router_enable=YES ipv6_default_interface=em0 pf_enable=YES pflog_enable=YES named_enable=YES amd_enable=YES ftpd_enable=YES lpd_enable=YES nfs_reserved_port_only=NO nis_client_enable=YES nis_server_enable=YES ntpdate_enable=YES ntpdate_flags=-b pool.ntp.org ntpd_enable=YES ntpd_sync_on_start=YES rpcbind_enable=YES sshd_enable=YES usbd_enable=YES dhcpd_enable=YES apache22_enable=YES rpc_statd_enable=YES rpc_lockd_enable=YES mysql_enable=YES inetd_enable=YES swapfile=/var/swap/1GB #emulation #svr4_enable=YES #linux_enable=YES #ibcs2_enable=YES #locale keychange=61 ^[[K keybell=normal mousechar_start=3 moused_enable=YES saver=green blanktime=60 font8x8=koi8-r-8x8 font8x14=koi8-r-8x14 font8x16=koi8-r-8x16 scrnmap=NO keyrate=fast keymap=ru.koi8-r dmesg.boot: Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #9: Fri Mar 3 15:52:49 MSK 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ACPI APIC Table: PTLTD APIC Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz (3600.14-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0x659dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,TM2,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14 AMD Features=0x20100800SYSCALL,NX,LM Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs real memory = 5368709120 (5120 MB) avail memory = 4114673664 (3924 MB) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 6 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 7 ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 Version 2.0 irqs 24-47 on motherboard ioapic2 Version 2.0 irqs 48-71 on motherboard ioapic3 Version 2.0 irqs 72-95 on motherboard ioapic4 Version 2.0 irqs 96-119 on motherboard ichwd module loaded acpi0: PTLTD RSDT on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 cpu1: ACPI CPU on acpi0 cpu2: ACPI CPU on acpi0 cpu3: ACPI CPU on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 pci0: unknown at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pci0: base peripheral at device 1.0 (no driver attached) pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 16 at device 2.0 on pci0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.0 on pci1 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 ahd0: Adaptec AIC7902 Ultra320 SCSI adapter port 0x2400-0x24ff,0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xdd20-0xdd201fff irq 32 at device 2.0on pci2 ahd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs ahd1: Adaptec AIC7902 Ultra320 SCSI adapter port 0x2c00-0x2cff,0x2800-0x28ff mem 0xdd202000-0xdd203fff irq 33 at device 2.1on pci2 ahd1: [GIANT-LOCKED] aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs pci1: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pcib3: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.2 on pci1 pci3: ACPI PCI bus on pcib3 em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection Version - 3.2.18 port 0x3000-0x303f mem 0xdd30-0xdd31 irq 54 at device 2.0 on pci3 em0: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:74:51:16 em1: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection Version - 3.2.18 port 0x3040-0x307f mem 0xdd32-0xdd33 irq 55 at device 2.1 on pci3 em1: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:74:51:17 pci1: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 0.3 (no driver attached) pcib4: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 16 at device 4.0 on pci0 pci4: ACPI PCI bus on pcib4 pcib5: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 16 at device 6.0 on pci0 pci5: ACPI PCI bus on pcib5 pcib6: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.0 on pci5 pci6: ACPI PCI bus on pcib6 pci5: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pcib7: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.2 on pci5 pci7: ACPI PCI bus on pcib7 pci5: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 0.3 (no
Re: configure scripts ignores parameters
try begining yuor scripts with: #!/bin/sh :) 2006/3/3, Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]: * Elisey O. Savateev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-03 16:10 +0500]: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 11:56:09 +0100 Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have shells/bash (bash-3.1.10) installed? Yes. I have. I had one problem here, but unfortunately not the time to really look at it (and I don't have time to try it again). My bash3 here did not correctly process | for foo | do echo $foo | done A similar contruct seems to be in some (most, all?) configure scripts, which automatically use bash to be executed (if it's available). I installed shells/bash2 (bash-2.05b.007_4) and my problem disappeared. HTH, Nicolas -- http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
routed
while system start-up, routed takes very long time to start, about minute or two. and then actualy not starting till login prompt (so ntpdate can't obtain time from internet and so on) rc.conf: watchdogd_enable=YES accounting_enable=YES check_quotas=YES defaultrouter=10.0.224.1 hostname=main.kp.clubnemo.ru cloned_interfaces=vlan1 vlan101 vlan102 vlan103 ifconfig_em1=up ifconfig_vlan1=inet 172.16.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 vlan 1 vlandev em1 ifconfig_vlan101=inet 83.102.211.181 netmask 255.255.255.240 vlan 101 vlandev em1 ifconfig_vlan103=inet 10.0.244.73 netmask 255.255.224.0 vlan 103 vlandev em1 ifconfig_vlan103_alias0=inet 192.168.0.49 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig_vlan103_alias1=ether 00:0a:48:0f:cb:ea gateway_enable=YES router_enable=YES ipv6_enable=YES ipv6_gateway_enable=YES ipv6_router_enable=YES ipv6_default_interface=em0 pf_enable=YES pflog_enable=YES named_enable=YES amd_enable=YES ftpd_enable=YES lpd_enable=YES nfs_reserved_port_only=NO nis_client_enable=YES nis_server_enable=YES ntpdate_enable=YES ntpdate_flags=-b pool.ntp.org ntpd_enable=YES ntpd_sync_on_start=YES rpcbind_enable=YES sshd_enable=YES usbd_enable=YES dhcpd_enable=YES apache22_enable=YES rpc_statd_enable=YES rpc_lockd_enable=YES mysql_enable=YES inetd_enable=YES swapfile=/var/swap/1GB #emulation #svr4_enable=YES #linux_enable=YES #ibcs2_enable=YES #locale keychange=61 ^[[K keybell=normal mousechar_start=3 moused_enable=YES saver=green blanktime=60 font8x8=koi8-r-8x8 font8x14=koi8-r-8x14 font8x16=koi8-r-8x16 scrnmap=NO keyrate=fast keymap=ru.koi8-r dmesg.boot: Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #9: Fri Mar 3 15:52:49 MSK 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ACPI APIC Table: PTLTD APIC Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz (3600.14-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0x659dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,TM2,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14 AMD Features=0x20100800SYSCALL,NX,LM Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs real memory = 5368709120 (5120 MB) avail memory = 4114673664 (3924 MB) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 6 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 7 ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 Version 2.0 irqs 24-47 on motherboard ioapic2 Version 2.0 irqs 48-71 on motherboard ioapic3 Version 2.0 irqs 72-95 on motherboard ioapic4 Version 2.0 irqs 96-119 on motherboard ichwd module loaded acpi0: PTLTD RSDT on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 cpu1: ACPI CPU on acpi0 cpu2: ACPI CPU on acpi0 cpu3: ACPI CPU on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 pci0: unknown at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pci0: base peripheral at device 1.0 (no driver attached) pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 16 at device 2.0 on pci0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.0 on pci1 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 ahd0: Adaptec AIC7902 Ultra320 SCSI adapter port 0x2400-0x24ff,0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xdd20-0xdd201fff irq 32 at device 2.0on pci2 ahd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs ahd1: Adaptec AIC7902 Ultra320 SCSI adapter port 0x2c00-0x2cff,0x2800-0x28ff mem 0xdd202000-0xdd203fff irq 33 at device 2.1on pci2 ahd1: [GIANT-LOCKED] aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs pci1: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pcib3: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.2 on pci1 pci3: ACPI PCI bus on pcib3 em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection Version - 3.2.18 port 0x3000-0x303f mem 0xdd30-0xdd31 irq 54 at device 2.0 on pci3 em0: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:74:51:16 em1: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection Version - 3.2.18 port 0x3040-0x307f mem 0xdd32-0xdd33 irq 55 at device 2.1 on pci3 em1: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:74:51:17 pci1: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 0.3 (no driver attached) pcib4: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 16 at device 4.0 on pci0 pci4: ACPI PCI bus on pcib4 pcib5: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge irq 16 at device 6.0 on pci0 pci5: ACPI PCI bus on pcib5 pcib6: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.0 on pci5 pci6: ACPI PCI bus on pcib6 pci5: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pcib7: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.2 on pci5 pci7: ACPI PCI bus on pcib7 pci5: base peripheral, interrupt controller at device 0.3 (no driver attached) uhci0: Intel 82801EB (ICH5) USB controller USB-A port 0x1400-0x141f irq
Re: dhclient in 6.0
try install /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-client and edit your rc.conf: dhclient_program=/usr/local/sbin/dhclient dhclient_flags= see manual for isc-dhcp3-client 2006/2/3, Frank Altpeter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi there, kalin mintchev wrote on 2006-02-03 at 13:55:01 CET: 2006/2/3, make stuff up [EMAIL PROTECTED]: thank you... does that mean back to 5.4 for now? Try install /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-client/ without a connection? try to manually ifconfig your fxp0 - this should work. Le deagh dhùraghd, Frank Altpeter -- *** FA-RIPE *** http://blog.foxalpha.de/ *** SIG at 11 *** | I'm always ravenous when I'm about to take a long journey. | Rygel - DNA Mad Scientist ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
