[panic] iwi - sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock
Hello, I encounter a very annyoing panic with iwi0 on 'my' hp laptop 'Compaq nx8220'. See kern/103368. Maybe the other open iwi-messages are related (kern/89926 etc.)? Is there a way to tell an Intel PRO/2200BG-card to only use 802.11b and not 11g without crashing the system? Additional feedback can be provided if necessary. Regards, Holger Kipp ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do I change kern.ipc.shmmax in FreeBSD 5.x automatically after reboot?
Hello, I have the following entries in /boot/loader.conf: kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 kern.ipc.semmns=500 kern.ipc.semmni=40 kern.ipc.semmap=500 which are set correctly. Unfortunately, the following two entries kern.ipc.shmmax=51200 kern.ipc.shmall=65526 do not change the corresponding values according to sysctl, no matter whether I put them in /boot/loader.conf or /etc/sysctl.conf. Changing them by hand (as root with 'sysctl') afterwards however _does_ work, so I have (for now) put those two settings in a little script (/usr/local/etc/rc.d/000_sysctl.sh) Has this behaviour changed for 6.x? Anyone who could explain this behaviour? Regards, Holger ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: two external ips
RYAN vAN GINNEKEN wrote on Monday, Mo 12.09.2005 09:32 need help setting up machine to forward external ips Could you provide more details? What do you want to accomplish? What networks are to be used (dmz, internal and/or external networks, default routes etc.) Do you want to forward all IP packets, or do you want to filter this based on protocol, ports, direction etc. (eg tcp: http/https/ftp/ssh, udp: dns) For general info about routing/nat/firewall you might find the man-pages for ipnat, ipfw, ipf and pf (pfctl) useful (or confusing, if you are new to this ;-) If the subject really just means that you want to use a computer with one NIC that has two external IPs, you just might to add an alias. See 'man ifconfig' for this and keep an eye on the _non-conflicting_(!) netmask. Regards, Holger Kipp ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: vinum volume manager
Tomas Palfi wrote on Wednesday, 07.09.2005 14:25 Hi All, I have used the following message as a template, I have exactly the same problem with vinum, and wonder if someone knows the solution to it. However, it appears that the vinum config isn't being saved, as rebooting the machine can't find the vinum root partition, and after manually booting to the pre-vinum root (ufs:ad0s1a) running vinum list shows no volume information. During the reboot, vinum appears to load ok, but it can't find the root (as shown by the last bit of the dmesg): I have the same problem on 4.10 with ide-disks (3ware controller), but without mounting root via vinum. Anyway, you might succeed if you tell vinum the names of the devices it should use in /boot/loader.conf, eg. with: vinum.drives=/dev/twed1 /dev/twed2 /dev/twed3 /dev/twed4 there is also a vinum command 'read' which will read the configuration from the drive(s) specified. Please note that if you do not specify all drives in one command, vinum will not find the other drives and complain about missing drives, marking the relevant volumes as degraded or worse. Hope this helps. Best regards, Holger Kipp ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: update libpthread
Khanh Cao Van wrote on Tue 21.06.2005 16:00 Peter Jeremy tell me that I have to update libpthread to be able to install JDK 1.4 on freeBSD 4.7 . But I could not find out what ports contain that lib . Help me if you know . Not port. Base system. Considering this, the best solution for you seems to be to upgrade the base system to 4.8-RELEASE or later. Please do not tell me about why still using freeBSD 4.7 . It not my own , it the customer's and I have to work on it if I do not want my project false . If I was , I'll take the latest 5.4 immediatly For cvsup see: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html Regards, Holger Kipp ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: autofs
Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote on Fri 10.06.2005 14:34 Why autofs was exclude from FreeBSD? google says: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2004-September/000737.html http://freebsdaddicts.org/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=1042 --- 8 snip --- markm 2004-11-10 19:54:18 UTC FreeBSD src repository Modified files: sys/conf files sys/modules Makefile Removed files: sys/modules/autofs Makefile sys/fs/autofsautofs.h autofs_util.c autofs_vfsops.c autofs_vnops.c Log: Remove at request of author, perhaps to be re-added later. -- Regards, Holger Kipp ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sshd on 5.4-STABLE broken!?
Hi, I am still having a problem with sshd-behaviour which looks similar to bin/33155 or maybe it is related to bin/74255? - what am I doing wrong? - is someone else experiencing the same behaviour? - can I provide any additional data? the systems in question are default installations with only a few additional packages (like webservers with apache_modssl, mod_perl), but no openssl from ports or other magical changes to the configuration. All 5.4-STABLE systems were updated from 5.3-STABLE. Connecting to a server with ssh and pressing ctrl-c instead of entering a password results in a process that won't terminate. After ten processes have been created like this, login via ssh is (of course) not possible any longer... I do see this behaviour on several servers with FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE from 16.11.2004 (SMP) and one server with FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE from 11.05.2005 (SMP) (HP ProLiant DL360/380) and I don't see this on another server with FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE from 06.11.2005 (SMP) and FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE from 16.11.2005 (single processor AMD Duron) (Dell PowerEdge 2800 and Home-PC with ASRock-Board) so this is really strange. Below is output of ps and sockstat with the relevant entries as found on one of those misbehaving systems. Ideas welcome! Regards, Holger Kipp server1 is 5.4-STABLE #17: Wed May 11 11:52:39 CEST 200 24734 ?? Ss 0:00,04 sshd: unknown [priv] (sshd) 24736 ?? S 0:00,00 sshd: blubber [pam] (sshd) root sshd 24736 3 stream - ?? root sshd 24736 4 tcp4 server1:22 server2:3220 root sshd 24736 5 stream (not connected) root sshd 24736 7 stream - ?? root sshd 24734 3 stream - ?? root sshd 24734 4 tcp4 server1:22 server2:3220 root sshd 24734 5 stream (not connected) root sshd 24734 7 stream - ?? a few minutes later: 24736 ?? I 0:00,00 sshd: blubber [pam] (sshd) root sshd 24736 3 stream - ?? root sshd 24736 4 tcp4 server1:22 server2:3220 root sshd 24736 5 stream (not connected) root sshd 24736 7 stream - ?? -- again: 24736 ?? I 0:00,00 sshd: blubber [pam] (sshd) 25350 ?? Ss 0:00,04 sshd: unknown [priv] (sshd) 25352 ?? S 0:00,00 sshd: blubber [pam] (sshd) root sshd 25352 3 stream - ?? root sshd 25352 4 tcp4 server1:22 server2:1076 root sshd 25352 5 stream (not connected) root sshd 25352 6 stream - ?? root sshd 25350 3 stream - ?? root sshd 25350 4 tcp4 server1:22 server2:1076 root sshd 25350 5 stream (not connected) root sshd 25350 6 stream - ?? root sshd 24736 3 stream - ?? root sshd 24736 4 tcp4 server1:22 server2:3220 root sshd 24736 5 stream (not connected) root sshd 24736 7 stream - ?? and two minutes later: 24736 ?? I 0:00,00 sshd: blubber [pam] (sshd) 25352 ?? I 0:00,00 sshd: blubber [pam] (sshd) root sshd 25352 3 stream - ?? root sshd 25352 4 tcp4 server1:22 server2:1076 root sshd 25352 5 stream (not connected) root sshd 25352 6 stream - ?? root sshd 24736 3 stream - ?? root sshd 24736 4 tcp4 server1:22 server2:3220 root sshd 24736 5 stream (not connected) root sshd 24736 7 stream - ?? and eleven hours later: 24736 ?? I 0:00,00 sshd: blubber [pam] (sshd) 25352 ?? I 0:00,00 sshd: blubber [pam] (sshd) root sshd 25352 3 stream - ?? root sshd 25352 5 stream (not connected) root sshd 25352 6 stream - ?? root sshd 24736 3 stream - ?? root sshd 24736 5 stream (not connected) root sshd 24736 7 stream - ?? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Performance issue
Same test on a 5.3-STABLE from 31.01.2005: 81,90 real77,05 user 3,51 sys 22908 maximum resident set size 620 average shared memory size 20083 average unshared data size 128 average unshared stack size 5379 page reclaims 26 page faults 0 swaps 36 block input operations 0 block output operations 0 messages sent 0 messages received 0 signals received 62 voluntary context switches 10623 involuntary context switches This is a on a slow dual-processor system: Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel Pentium III (732.98-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x683 Stepping = 3 Features=0x387fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CM OV,PAT,PSE36,PN,MMX,FXSR,SSE real memory = 2281635840 (2175 MB) avail memory = 2232012800 (2128 MB) ACPI APIC Table: PTLTDAPIC FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 (if this is of any help). Scheduler is 4BSD. Regards, Holger Kipp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Pete French Sent: Mon 09.05.2005 18:10 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance issue Whereas, the typical result for the new rig looked more like 105.36 real71.10 user33.41 sys ... 10548 involuntary context switches Now I just ran this test myself. This machine is a 2.4 gig P4 with hyperthreading enabled. Much as I am an AMD fan, I would expect a 1gig Athlon to be significantly slower than a 2.4 gig Pentium 4. but: 93.45 real56.55 user36.85 sys 1857 involuntary context switches Uhhh... so it takes almost the same time to do the calculation, but spends actually *more* of it in system space. Does far less context switches though, but I am assuming thats due to HTT. Numbers look very odd to me. So I then ran it on another P4 system we have round here which is still running 4.11. This is a 2.66 gig P4, not a 2.4 so it should be a bit faster, but: 33.77 real33.49 user 0.07 sys 711 involuntary context switches Over two and a half times faster ?! Thats not right at all! All the new systems I have tried are 5.4-RC4, so should be the latest and greatest. When my colleague finishes on his machine I can try a GENERIC 5.4-RC4 kernel on another P4 and see what that gives. -pcf. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FreeBSD and very heavy web server
peceka wrote on Fri 22.04.2005 10:40 On 4/21/05, Kipp Holger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: peceka wrote on Thu 21.04.2005 11:02 Yes, I expect many parallel connections... I've got two machines for that, so traffic will be divided by DNS round robin. But 1024 child processes will be good thing too, thanks. - Does it make sense to separate static and dynamic requests? You might want to use separate servers(*) for static and dynamic requests, using a quick low-footprint webserver for static requests that allows for many parallel requests. Maybe lighttpd is all you need (ymmv) Unfortunately, all pages will be dynamic :\ You don't have any static requests for .gif/.jpg/.css-files etc.? lighttpd does support php4, CGI, FastCGI and load-balanced FastCGI, and also php-code caching. Just go to http://www.lighttpd.net/ I haven't tried it myself, though, as we have slightly more complicated requirements here ;-) - Make sure you don't run out of mbufs, open file descriptors etc. Ok, I'll have an eye open on this. If you have a lot of parallel connections you might also want to monitor tcp connections and tune corresponding sysctls, so you don't have any useless entries in your tables. But I'm not an expert in this field (especially with10k+ open sockets...) - the default settings have worked for me most of the time. Regards, Holger ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FreeBSD and very heavy web server
peceka wrote on Thu 21.04.2005 11:02 i must set up a web server. I want to do this on FreeBSD 5.X. and Apache 1.3 for this and php4. What do you mean by 'very heavy web server'? Please be more specific. - Do you expect many parallel connections? Default configuration allows for 512 child processes with apache, so you might want to set this higher during compilation (eg set to 1024). - Does it make sense to separate static and dynamic requests? You might want to use separate servers(*) for static and dynamic requests, using a quick low-footprint webserver for static requests that allows for many parallel requests. Maybe lighttpd is all you need (ymmv) - Make sure you don't run out of mbufs, open file descriptors etc. - ... Regards, Holger Kipp (*) eg shttpd, lighttpd,... ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can FreeBSD be installed on DellPowerEdge2800 ?
On Tue 01.03.2005 17:49, lhmwzy wrote: Please reply to hk at alogis dot com. This is not my native account. Subject: Can FreeBSD be installed on DellPowerEdge2800 ? Yes Anybody did this? Yes. Any help is appreciateed? Boot from FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-CD and install. No problems so far. You might want to disable USB within BIOS, though, because they seem to be shared with other critical devices (nics and raidcontroller). But I don't use USB anyway. Then you might want to upgrade to 5-STABLE. This is on Dell PowerEdge 2800 with 2GB ECC RAM, 4 x 36GB SCSI and amrd-Controller (PERC-4-something). Binary copy of SAP 4.6C and Oracle 8 (from a working installation on FreeBSD 4.x) works nearly without changes (using emulators/linux_base-suse-9.1 and one additional rpm (some compatibility-thing)). Regards, Holger Kipp ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[WORKAROUND]: 'setxkbmap de' does not work as expected
Hello, I encountered a problem with setxkbmap. I connect from Cygwin, start afterstep and issue setxkbmap de. This gives an error. A different call with parameters taken from /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb/keymap/xfree86 works, though: $ setxkbmap -v 9 de Setting verbose level to 9 locale is C Couldn't interpret _XKB_RULES_NAMES property Use defaults: rules - 'xorg' model - 'pc101' layout - 'us' Warning! Multiple definitions of keyboard layout Using command line, ignoring X server setxkbmap in free(): warning: junk pointer, too high to make sense Applied rules from xorg: model: pc101 layout: de options:t~ Trying to build keymap using the following components: keycodes: xfree86+aliases(qwertz) types: complete compat: complete symbols:pc/pc(pc101)+pc/de geometry: pc(pc101) Error loading new keyboard description It does however work correctly with setxkbmap -v 10 -keycodes xfree86 -types default -symbols en_US(pc105)+de -geometry pc(pc102) Setting verbose level to 10 locale is C Couldn't interpret _XKB_RULES_NAMES property Use defaults: rules - 'xorg' model - 'pc101' layout - 'us' setxkbmap in free(): warning: junk pointer, too high to make sense Warning! Multiple definitions of keycodes Using command line, ignoring rules file Warning! Multiple definitions of symbols Using command line, ignoring rules file Warning! Multiple definitions of types Using command line, ignoring rules file Warning! Multiple definitions of geometry Using command line, ignoring rules file Applied rules from xorg: model: pc101 layout: us variant:X ( ( options:(258BJQYbr| Trying to build keymap using the following components: keycodes: xfree86 types: default compat: complete symbols:en_US(pc105)+de geometry: pc(pc102) % -- This is with FreeBSD 5.3-BETA3 default install (updated, but default installation of xorg-* as it was on the iso-images): xorg-clients-6.7.0_3 X client programs and related files from X.Org xorg-documents-6.7.0 Documentation of X11 protocol and libraries from X.Org xorg-fonts-100dpi-6.7.0 X.Org 100dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-75dpi-6.7.0 X.Org 75dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-cyrillic-6.7.0 X.Org Cyrillic bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-encodings-6.7.0 X.Org font encoding files xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps-6.7.0 X.Org miscellaneous bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-truetype-6.7.0 X.Org TrueType fonts xorg-fonts-type1-6.7.0 X.Org Type1 fonts xorg-fontserver-6.7.0 X font server from X.Org xorg-libraries-6.7.0_1 X11 libraries and headers from X.Org xorg-manpages-6.7.0 X.Org library manual pages xorg-server-6.7.0_5 X.Org X server and related programs xorg-vfbserver-6.7.0 X virtual framebuffer server from X.Org Regards, Holger Kipp ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
