Constant rebooting after power loss
Today one of my home servers lost power two times in a short period of time. After that, the system just couldn't get up. Background checks couldn't get started. The messages was how / /tmp /var etc...had to much errors. And at the end, always got this: automatic reboot will start in 15sec. I went to single user mode, and ran FSCK manually. That solved the problem. But the server was down for 2 hours. This is not the first time that I had to do this. Every now and then I have seen this on BSD servers without UPS. My question is: Would it happen if I had ZFS as a file system on all partitions including root? The setup was FreeBSD 8.1, with two disks in raid 1 with gmirror. -- Marko Lerota Sent from my Gnus Mailer ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Constant rebooting after power loss
George Kontostanos gkontos.m...@gmail.com writes: Not with the same behavior and it depends on what your server is doing at the time of the power interruption. It was in stage of booting after first power loss. but ZFS is not the solution to your problem. ZFS is not designed to replace the needs of a UPS. I'm just asking if this wouldn't happen if I used ZFS. I read that ZFS don't need fsck because the files are always consistent on filesystem regardless of power loses. That the corruption can occur only if disks are damaged. But not when power goes down. I'm not planing to buy UPS for home use. -- Marko Lerota Sent from my Gnus Mailer ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: WANTED: good server tutorial
Jason Hsu jhsu802...@jasonhsu.com writes: I'm looking for a good step-by-step quick-and-dirty FreeBSD server tutorial for the current stable version. Most of the tutorials I've seen are for outdated versions of FreeBSD. My setup is: Internet - Modem - Firewall/server computer - Ethernet switch - Other computers I wrote some tutorial/article about this topic. Feel free to comment. http://www.techaddictive.com/linux-unix/freebsd-router-firewall-howto/ -- Marko Lerota Sent from my Gnus Mailer ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Best way to switch from Linux to BSD
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes: Are there any good tutorials for using BSD on the desktop? Simple answer, if your only goal is to have a Unix-like desktop, you're better off sticking with Linux. FreeBSD is not really focused on desktop use, whereas a lot of the Linux distributions are, and if you're happy with the ones you are using there is no good reason to switch. I agree with that. I had problems with Flash on AMD64 so sometimes I couldn't watch Youtube videos :-). And that's not good at all :-). I'm now using Linux as a desktop, and I'm not completely satisfied with it. But all the servers are on FreeBSD, and I'm completely satisfied with this. -- Marko Lerota Sent from my Gnus Mailer ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Best way to switch from Linux to BSD
Pete French petefre...@ingresso.co.uk writes: Am impressed - I didnt realise it was possible at all under amd64! I ended up using 'gnash' which doesnt really do the job to be honest, but it better than nothing. These days I find the best solution is keeping a copy of Windows inside VirtualBox for those moments when I need stuff that freeBSD can't do (primarily talking to HP iLo's these days, since I can't make Java work in Firefox) Now you reminded me how pissed I was as a sysadmin :-). I had to deal with IBM RSA's and Dell DRAC's. They all use Java. Use to hate everything that came with Java :-). -- Marko Lerota Sent from my Gnus Mailer ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Upgrading to 7.0 - stupid requirements
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are you connected via a modem or something? 2-3 days to download some packages cannot be right if you have a decent internet connection. No I have 5Mbps link. It's not the link issue. It's the compilation time from ports because there are only small portion of precompiled packages. And some of my apps need special switches like to tell PHP to build module for apache. I cant do that just from portupgrade -faP. If you use BSD system only for few apps like PHP/Apache/MySQL it would be easy. But if you have lots of stuff for desktop machine (gnome,xfce etc.) it's very painful, long, and waste of time. (I don't have x386 33MHz CPU) This thing should be solved. I liked the way that my OS have independance from ports. So no metter what I do with ports, my OS and his apps will work. And If I upgrade the OS I dont want to recompile ports for that. If this thing can be solved (I'm not programmer so I don't know) I can donate some amount of $ for development. I think that this would make lots of people happy. -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrading to 7.0 - stupid requirements
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Then the servers. Why should I reinstall all my databases and such? I always liked that FreeBSD base (OS) is separated from packages. And no matter what I do with the packages, my OS will always work. I don't want dependency hell like in Linux. Now you are telling me that my database might not work after upgrade to a new version. Is that it? First, try to relax. Sorry, but I'm pissed off now, not relax any more. portupgrade -faP requests to reinstall everything from precompiled packages. It will only fall back to compiling them locally if the package is unavailable (e.g. for legal reasons). It passed two days from portupgrade -faP, and it didn't finished yet. To be worse, I have to do it again because the PC had to be rebooted. So in the next 2-3 days I can sit with my PC and wait with him to finish the upgrade. It will be three days because of [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] And I have to pray the god that I don't have the power loss. Now apache and acroread doesn't work any more and I'm afraid that I'll find some other stuff that don't work too. So can anyone tell me this is not stupid??? Reinstalling all applications because of upgrade? This can be called new installation. Not upgrade. Now I'm thinking that It would be much easier that I backup my files, databases and other stuff and do fresh installation. But why So I can do the same thing when 8_0 comes out? This is the worst thing that I found about FreeBSD for now. This have to be changed or fixed somehow, because the upgrade is not possible if you have lots of ports installed, and certainly can't be called upgrade! -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: broken MBR
Torfinn Ingolfsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But unless the OP wants the specific boot loader from and MS-DOS disk, he can get the same effect _without_ usinf non-FreeBSD tools by using fdisk -B diskname I used the FreeBSD livefs fixit mode and executed this fdisk -B /dev/ad4 it complained that no geom found but it worked -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
broken MBR
Insted of F1 I get F-| on boot menu and system won't boot. How do I remove FreeBSD boot manager from MBR? I didn't find any docs in man fdisk or boot0cfg. -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upgrading to 7.0 - stupid requirements
In http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html says Updating Existing Systems An upgrade of any existing system to FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE constitutes a major version upgrade, so no matter which method you use to update an older system you should reinstall any ports you have installed on the machine. This will avoid binaries becoming linked to inconsistent sets of libraries when future port upgrades rebuild one port but not others that link to it. This can be done with: # portupgrade -faP etc... Why!!! Do you know how much time I have to spend with my PC to reinstall all of this programs from ports? Only openoffice takes one day! And where is Gnome and such...There must be other way...I would not reinstall my packages ;) Then the servers. Why should I reinstall all my databases and such? I always liked that FreeBSD base (OS) is separated from packages. And no matter what I do with the packages, my OS will always work. I don't want dependency hell like in Linux. Now you are telling me that my database might not work after upgrade to a new version. Is that it? -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD 6.3 or FreeBSD 7.0
Jimmy Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But if you are using 1 server for production use FreeBSD-6.3-R. My 2 cents for FreeBSD-7.0-R. For my personal servers I'll jump to 7.0-R, but for some customers, will wait for 7.1-R. TNX -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD 6.3 or FreeBSD 7.0
I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for my servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable or production release? -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: System hangs up every day
Дмитрий Комалеев [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have written already, that I tried to plug a system HDD to another sever with the same configuration; on the new platform the system hanging didn't stop. The RAID controller remained the same, but it has the own error log and it is clear. em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection Version - 6.6.6 :)) options MP_WATCHDOG options SW_WATCHDOG Try to compile the GENERIC SMP kernel with all ALTQ options but without watchdog options. Maybe this will work. -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CARP make panics after upgrade
From FreeBSD 5.4 to FreeBSD 6.2. I had two old FreeBSD 5.4 servers, and when I upgraded one of them CARP was crashing that upgraded machine which was in backup mode. I had to shutdown the carp interface so I can work. Later I figured out that in new versions of FreeBSD configuration was changed, so when I switched to new configuration everything worked fine. I think it's worth mentioning it here. Here is the old config that panics, man pfsync(4) from 5.4 cloned_interfaces=carp0 carp1 network_interfaces=lo0 sis0 sis1 sis2 carp0 carp1 pfsync0 ifconfig_sis0=10.0.0.254/24 ifconfig_sis1=192.168.0.254/24 ifconfig_sis2=192.168.254.254/24 ifconfig_carp0=vhid 1 pass foo 10.0.0.1/24 ifconfig_carp1=vhid 2 pass bar 192.168.0.1/24 ifconfig_pfsync0=up syncif sis2 And here is the new config that doesn't network_interfaces=lo0 sis0 sis1 sis2 cloned_interfaces=carp0 carp1 ifconfig_sis0=10.0.0.254/24 ifconfig_sis1=192.168.0.254/24 ifconfig_sis2=192.168.254.254/24 ifconfig_carp0=vhid 1 pass foo 10.0.0.1/24 ifconfig_carp1=vhid 2 pass bar 192.168.0.1/24 pfsync_enable=YES pfsync_syncdev=sis2 -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
question about CARP
In handbook at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/carp.html is written that two machines should have different VHIDs. But man page of carp says VHIDs should be the same. Which is wright configuration? From handbook or from man page? 6.2-RELEASE-p4 -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: question about CARP
Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Each shared CARP IP should have the same VHID. The example in the handbook lists two CARP IP addresses. Now I get it. I didn't saw different IP's. TNX -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2
Martin Blapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I just fixed those issues with the port. Thanks for reporting ! So we can safely use libpthread.so again? No need to use libmap.conf? -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2
Renato Botelho [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I found the problem, a bad REINPLACE_CMD was changing wrong var on configure scripts, don't respecting PTHREAD_LIBS. It's fixed now on 0.90_3. No, It's not. Today I added a new server with fresh clamav-0.90_3 package. Sockstat again started to jump to the sky. -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I dont use simscan but use clamav for scanning emails passed from exim. I noticed that cpu usage went through the roof and there was dozens of clamd in sockstat. On a dual xeon it did cause some smtp lag but on weaker specs it caused the smtp to completely backlog and stopped emails arriving. I downgraded back to 0.88.7 again and all is fine again. Dozens? Lucky you. I had 600 of them. OK, now we know that simscan is not the problem. -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2
Martin Blapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Even with libthr the CPU usage is still far too high ... I'm currently looking at the code. Take a look at this post. I also have CPU usage problems and simscan installed. http://www.mail-archive.com/toaster@shupp.org/msg04119.html Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up Tom Collins Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:33:52 -0800 On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote: One thing to keep in mind, if you are not using the :attach in simcontrol, do NOT enable rip mime in simscan as that will cause clamdscan to basically scan the message and the attachment twice. Clamav does a very good job of scanning encoded content and attachments all by itself. No need to duplicate effort. I recently took a look at ripmime to see if it had a setting that would simply dump the attachment filenames without actually creating the attachments. It, unfortunately, does not. I haven't looked at the source to see if it would be possible to build a modified version to accomplish my goals or not. I guess I could modify my simscan to run ripmime, look at the attachment filenames, and then delete them all before calling clamav. OR, I could simply pass the message file to clamav instead of having it scan the entire directory. In the case of large attachments, it's a big waste of CPU cycles to scan the entire message twice. I might just skip attachment blocking at this point, and hope that clamav will catch all of the scr and pif crap. -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stable on Blade server
Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We're 100% FreeBSD-only and i was looking to buy IBM blade servers: can anyone reccomend any of them? models? particular hw/firmware/misc If you use FreeBSD don't look upon IBM blades at all. I've installed few freebsd 5.4 on IBM HS20 blades. If you need console, the only way to get there is through java web interface that sucks, brakes and crashes constantly. Because the keyboard is not supported you have to use it. Everything else also sucked. We had two blade chassis with 28 blade servers and I have never been so frustrated like I was with them and IBM people that did not solve our problem. -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Downgrade to 5.5
Albert Shih [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well after this thing I want to downgrade to 5.x. Can I use this process: I make buildworld buildkernel on a FreeBSD 5.x server. I make a tar.gz of /usr/obj and /usr/src I tranfert this two tar.gz on my 6-stable server. Untar on right place make installkernel on /usr/src from 5.x reboot make installworld. I tried regularly like it was upgrade but it was downgrade from 6-STABLE to 5.4-RELEASE and it didn't worked. I don't really care if the 6-stable-/usr/local/bin running on my downgrade server. Because this server running only nfsd. I had the same problems, it happened only if you have QUOTA option in kernel. Other-ways it worked OK. They said it would be fixed long time ago, but they didn't. -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Downgrade to 5.5
Albert Shih [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I tried regularly like it was upgrade but it was downgrade from 6-STABLE to 5.4-RELEASE and it didn't worked. Event you build on a different server (a server running 5.x) ? No, on the same. It was disaster. It was in pre production :) Easier and quicker would be a clean installation. Down time could be only 30min. With downgrade you only might get in trouble. I don't running QUOTA FreeBSD was once known for good NFS performance :( I had to downgrade two clusters with nfs to 5.4 Release -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Downgrade to 5.5
Albert Shih [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: WellI known but I can do that now. Because I can reboot the server, but I can re-install (I don't have access to the console). Good luck to you. It's very possible that after reboot you don't get ssh prompt :) Most servers have console and remote cdrom through java. IBM call it RSA adapter, HP and Sun ILO(M) cards. Maybe the server have these cards. FreeBSD was once known for good NFS performance :( Yes...the same server running with 0 crash during 3.5 years in same configuration. After I pass to 6.x (01/2006) I loose the count of crash FreeBSD is the best NFS server (and best OS I known)...long time ago :-(( Personnaly I prefer to have a very stable NFS server, and I don't really care to have wpa or something like that. Someone said on this list, that priority now are new features, so developers have no time to fix bugs. I prefer stability over the new features also, and most of the people on this list I think. That's one of the reasons that I escaped from Penguins. I'm not developper, then I don't known the problem of FreeBSD, but I'm very sad to see the situation of 6.x (em problem, watchdog, crash etc...). Now I'm looking of OpenBSD I'm not developer also, but I think that OpenBSD and FreeBSD developers share the code. At least for scsi controllers and ethernet cards. So it's possible to have the same problem on OpenBSD. Could someone enlighten me? -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: carp0 interface goes down on 6.2-PRERELEASE
Ari Suutari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: carp0: flags=49UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING mtu 1500 inet 192.168.5.59 netmask 0xff00 carp: BACKUP vhid 55 advbase 1 advskew 0 + sleep 5 + ifconfig carp0 carp0: flags=8LOOPBACK mtu 1500 carp: INIT vhid 55 advbase 1 advskew 0 See, here the interface is up, but after 5 seconds it has gone down. Could anybody give a hint why this happens ? There are messages on console about promiscuous mode being enabled/disabled, but nothing else. I think the interface didn't get sync from other carp interface, so it doesn't know that he is the MASTER or BACKUP, and because of that goes into the INIT state. Setup at least 2 interfaces like in this example and try it out. Example So on cluster1 put this in rc.conf NETWORK ### defaultrouter=10.0.0.1 hostname=cluster1.somehost.net ifconfig_bge0=inet 10.0.0.101 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig_bge1=inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 cloned_interfaces=carp0 network_interfaces=carp0 pfsync0 bge0 bge1 lo0 ifconfig_carp0=vhid 1 pass ugly_password 10.0.0.103/24 ifconfig_pfsync0=up syncif bge1 pfsync_enable=YES pfsync_syncdev=bge1 on cluster2 put this in rc.conf NETWORK ### defaultrouter=10.0.0.1 hostname=cluster2.somehost.net ifconfig_bge0=inet 10.0.0.102 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig_bge1=inet 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 cloned_interfaces=carp0 network_interfaces=carp0 pfsync0 bge0 bge1 lo0 ifconfig_carp0=vhid 1 pass ugly_password advskew 100 10.0.0.103/24 ifconfig_pfsync0=up syncif bge1 pfsync_enable=YES pfsync_syncdev=bge1 -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: carp0 interface goes down on 6.2-PRERELEASE
Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Marko Lerota wrote: I think the interface didn't get sync from other carp interface, so it doesn't know that he is the MASTER or BACKUP, and because of that goes into the INIT state. Shouldn't it then move to MASTER since the other server could possibly be dead? Yes, but if interface had _never_ received any pfsync packet, and sysctl is set to net.inet.carp.preempt=0 ? Maybe it's because of that. Don't know really. Documentation for this is not so good. Someone who knows this code and how this really works, should write handbook like documentation. Clusters are always complex, and for that, docs should be *very* detailed. If someone does that, I'll buy him a beer. -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: carp0 interface goes down on 6.2-PRERELEASE
Marko Lerota [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Shouldn't it then move to MASTER since the other server could possibly be dead? Yes, but if interface had _never_ received any pfsync packet, and sysctl is set to net.inet.carp.preempt=0 ? Maybe it's because of that. Don't know really. Documentation for this is not so good. Someone who knows this code and how this really works, should write handbook like documentation. Clusters are always complex, and for that, docs should be *very* detailed. If someone does that, I'll buy him a beer. I meant: Maybe first they have to talk to each other and say: OK, I will be the master first, and you wait. And if I don't send you any more sync packets, then you should be in charge :) If they didn't agree on that, and don't know about each other, that should be the INIT state. Thats the only reasonable thing that I could think of, because there is no such INIT state in documentation [EMAIL PROTECTED]@#!@ -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PERC trouble?
Paul Saab [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: this was fixed after 6.1-RELEASE. You need to grab the driver from -stable. What does it mean? That I could run 6.1-RELEASE but have some drivers from -stable or -current? -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Critical Bug in 6.1 (nfs server bad performance)
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 03:17:46PM +0200, Marko Lerota wrote: After some testing I saw that nfs server with 6.1 release or stable have problems with CPU performance. I had 2 servers. One 5.4 and one 6.1. The servers are identical in configuration and only have nfs servers running. If you try to copy something to 6.1, CPU gets abnormal and load averages gets to 2,5 to 6 or more and thus kill the server. On 5.4 it's OK. Load averages is not over 0.50 ever. Please review the archives for the patch that is being reviewed. Kris Sorry, now I saw the post from Tue May 23. I also have the options QUOTA in kernel config. Why it's not in the errata html page? http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/errata.html -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Critical Bug in 6.1 (nfs server bad performance)
After some testing I saw that nfs server with 6.1 release or stable have problems with CPU performance. I had 2 servers. One 5.4 and one 6.1. The servers are identical in configuration and only have nfs servers running. If you try to copy something to 6.1, CPU gets abnormal and load averages gets to 2,5 to 6 or more and thus kill the server. On 5.4 it's OK. Load averages is not over 0.50 ever. -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk Tacunka Witco ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
