Re: hardware for home use large storage

2010-02-09 Thread Niki Denev
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Peter C. Lai pe...@simons-rock.edu wrote:
 On 2010-02-09 05:32:02PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
 On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
 One similar product that does seem to work well is iLO, available on
 HP/Compaq hardware.

 I've heard great things about that.  It seems like a much better design -
 it's essentially a small server that is independent from the main host. Has
 it's own LAN and serial ports as well.

 Charles

 Dell PowerEdge Remote Access (DRAC) cards also provided this as well,
 and for a while there, you could actually VNC into them. But HP offers iLO
 for no extra charge or discount upon removal (DRACs are worth about $250)
 and has become such a prominent must-have datacenter feature that the
 iLO term is beginning to become genericized for web-accessible and virtual
 disc-capable onboard out-of-band IP-console management.

 --
 ===
 Peter C. Lai                 | Bard College at Simon's Rock
 Systems Administrator        | 84 Alford Rd.
 Information Technology Svcs. | Gt. Barrington, MA 01230 USA
 peter AT simons-rock.edu     | (413) 528-7428
 ===


I thought that their VNC implementation is non-standard, and
I wasn't able to VPN into them, at least on the latest Core i7 models.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: I've borked my ZFS system upgrading to -STABLE

2009-05-28 Thread Niki Denev
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Ruben van Staveren ru...@verweg.com wrote:

 On 27 May 2009, at 22:44, Kevin Day wrote:

 tries to do a chflags on it, fails because ZFS doesn't support flags


 are the pools already upgraded to v13 ? if not please do so with zpool
 upgrade -a

 Then in single user mode do

 zfs list -H | awk '{print $1}' | xargs -n 1 zfs set version=3

 flags should work now


 Regards,
        Ruben

Just curious... doesn't  a zfs upgrade -a do the same thing?

Regards,
Niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: AMD Geode LX crypto accelerator (glxsb)

2008-06-27 Thread Niki Denev
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Stephen Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 I am trying to compile it on 6.2 and get
 make: don't know how to make cryptodev_if.h. Stop

 ???
 where is this file?

 Thanks,
 Steve


Have you applied the 6.2 patch included in the latest tgz that Patrick posted?

Regards,
Niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: AMD Geode LX crypto accelerator (glxsb)

2008-06-22 Thread Niki Denev
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Patrick Lamaizière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Le Fri, 6 Jun 2008 23:41:35 +0200,
 Patrick Lamaizière [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :

 Hello,

 I'm trying to port the glxsb driver from OpenBSD to FreeBSD 7-STABLE
 (via the NetBSD port).
  The glxsb driver supports the security block of the Geode LX
 series processors.  The Geode LX is a member of the AMD Geode family
 of integrated x86 system chips.

 Driven by periodic checks for available data from the generator,
 glxsb supplies entropy to the random(4) driver for common usage.

 glxsb also supports acceleration of AES-128-CBC operations for
 crypto(4).

 Well, I hope this is the final version.

 http://user.lamaiziere.net/patrick/glxsb-220608.tar.gz

 I added a patch for FreeBSD 6 but i'am not able to test it.

 On 7-STABLE, I've tested with hundred openssl encryptions and some flood
 pings under ipsec in the background. Looks good for me.

 If someone can test and review it, it would be cool.

 Thanks, Regards.

It compiles on without a problem on 6.2 and loads on my Soekris
Net5501-70 running pfSense (6.2-RELEASE-p11)

glxsb0: AMD Geode LX Security Block (AES-128-CBC,RNG) mem
0xa000-0xa0003fff irq 10 at device 1.2 on pci0

Thanks!,
Niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: USB support + Supermicro IPMI KVM = no keyboard

2008-03-31 Thread Niki Denev
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Steven Hartland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  - Original Message -
  From: Erik Stian Tefre [EMAIL PROTECTED]


   Steven Hartland wrote:
   When booting a default kernel e.g. standard install cd the KVM over LAN
   keyboard on Supermicro's IPMI modules refuse to function. Once installed
   if we build a kernel without USB all is good.
  
   So two questions:-
   1. Can usb support be disabled from the loader?
   2. Anyone got any ideas why USB would break the IPMI keyboard?
  
   The IPMI keyboard is a USB keyboard. It seems to work OK on a box
   running 7.0:
  
   port 6 addr 2: high speed, self powered, config 1, Multidevice(0x0002),
   Peppercon AG(0x14dd), rev 0.01
  
   ukbd0: Peppercon AG Multidevice, class 0/0, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2 on 
 uhub3
  
   The same box running 6.2 did not connect the device as a usb keyboard.

  Thanks Eric unfortunately we had the same issue with 7.0-RC1 and 7.0-PREREL
  I'll look at dropping usb back into our kernel we're running atm and
  see if it detects the above as that might well help diagnose the issue.


 Regards
 Steve


We've had the same problem, and changing USB Mouse Type
from Windows = 2000, Mac OS X to Other Operating System
made the keyboard available again.

P.S. : The setting is located under the KVM Settings-Keyboard/Mouse menu
on the IPMI web interface.


-- 
Nikolay Denev ICDSoft Ltd.
System Administrator http://www.icdsoft.com/
m: 359-888-952-352
p: 1-617-544-3022
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


make release in a jail

2008-02-29 Thread Niki Denev
Any ideas on how to do make release in jail?
It seems that it needs to mount devfs which is not possible inside a jail.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup error

2007-06-06 Thread Niki Denev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

zen wrote:
 hi,
 recently i tried to update my fresh install machine of 6.2RELEASE to
 6.2STABLE,
 but alway failed with these error msgs:
 
 proxy2# /usr/local/bin/cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/stable-supfile
 Parsing supfile /etc/stable-supfile
 Connecting to cvsup.id.FreeBSD.org
 Connected to cvsup.id.FreeBSD.org
 Server software version: SNAP_16_1h
 Negotiating file attribute support
 Exchanging collection information
 
 
 ***
 *** runtime error:
 ***ASSERT failed
 ***file
 /work/a/ports/lang/ezm3/work/ezm3-1.2/libs/m3core/src/runtime/common/RTHeapMap.m3,
 line 35
 ***
 
  use option @M3stackdump to get a stack trace
 Abort (core dumped)
 proxy2#
 
 could anyone tell me what is the problems??
 it AM2 X2 proc build on amd64 arch
 
 TIA
 
 ZeN

Have you tried csup(1) ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGZm3PHNAJ/fLbfrkRAsvUAJ98xCLSiKGHqK4JF6KU2zkWlV42dwCeMmNx
L5OBvM3+C5j6qFn41Yssv8c=
=CCVh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Asus DVD Writer not recognized

2007-04-19 Thread Niki Denev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Marius Nuennerich wrote:
 Hi list,
 
 we've got a Asus DRW-1814BLT here which is not recognized by 6.2. I
 can't find it neither in dmesg nor in atacontrol. The Bios detects it
 fine and even Linux. This writer is SATA:
 
 http://www.asus.com/products4.aspx?modelmenu=2model=1488l1=6l2=35l3=0
 
 The device is connected to:
 atapci0: JMicron JMB363 SATA300 controller port
 0xcc00-0xcc07,0xc880-0xc883,0xc800-0xc807,0xc480-0xc483,0xc400-0xc40f
 mem 0xfbefe000-0xfbef irq 40 at device 0.0 on pci2
 atapci0: Reserved 0x10 bytes for rid 0x20 type 4 at 0xc400
 atapci0: [MPSAFE]
 atapci0: Reserved 0x2000 bytes for rid 0x24 type 3 at 0xfbefe000
 atapci0: AHCI Version 01.00 controller with 2 ports detected
 
 Or:
 
 atapci1: VIA 8237A SATA150 controller port
 0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb880-0xb883,0xb800-0xb807,0xb480-0xb483,0xb400-0xb40f,0xb000-0xb0ff
 irq 21 at device 15.0 on pci0
 atapci1: Reserved 0x10 bytes for rid 0x20 type 4 at 0xb400
 atapci1: [MPSAFE]
 atapci1: Reserved 0x100 bytes for rid 0x24 type 4 at
 atapci1: Reserved 0x8 bytes for rid 0x10 type 4 at 0xbc00
 atapci1: Reserved 0x4 bytes for rid 0x14 type 4 at 0xb880
 
 Neither works.
 
 Any ideas what to try?
 
 Thanks in advance
 Marius

SATA ATAPI devices are currently unsupported by FreeBSD.


Regards,
Niki

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGJyReHNAJ/fLbfrkRAicfAKCsaTerkSZyItX3WcflIPPWoyjEuQCfWRUs
kVjKdF/5gjhKBB0GsHS/9Eg=
=nxbW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


ural(4) deassociates if no activity (possible wpa_supplicant problem)

2006-07-18 Thread Niki Denev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

I've noticed something very interesing while using a ural(4) usb wifi device.

When i plug the usb device, and there is absolutely no network activity, exactly
after five minutes the device deassociates from the access point.

I've put some debug printf's in ural_newstate and when i plug the device,
i get several IEEE80211_S_SCAN state changes,
then i gets from IEEE80211_S_AUTH to ASSOC and then RUN.
Nothing wrong here, but exactly after five minutes of no activity (measured
with stopwatch) i get a state transition from IEEE80211_S_RUN to 
IEEE80211_S_AUTH
and it stays that way, until i remove/insert the device again or send HUP to
wpa_supplicant and restart dhclient.

This looks maybe like wpa_supplicant problem, and i think i've had similar 
problems with
ath(4) mini-pci card and card bus ral(3), but as far as i remember the period of
inactivity was much greater with them (i'll try to test this on these cards too 
when
i have access to them again)


Regards,
- --niki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEvLWOHNAJ/fLbfrkRAkSbAJ90SYFCkdtjEw3hckrQ/B2O0geWHgCgoj5j
gF7/O+dMKdNUrvFydNODQrE=
=piip
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ural(4) deassociates if no activity (possible wpa_supplicant problem)

2006-07-18 Thread Niki Denev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Niki Denev wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I've noticed something very interesing while using a ural(4) usb wifi device.
 
 When i plug the usb device, and there is absolutely no network activity, 
 exactly
 after five minutes the device deassociates from the access point.
 
 I've put some debug printf's in ural_newstate and when i plug the device,
 i get several IEEE80211_S_SCAN state changes,
 then i gets from IEEE80211_S_AUTH to ASSOC and then RUN.
 Nothing wrong here, but exactly after five minutes of no activity (measured
 with stopwatch) i get a state transition from IEEE80211_S_RUN to 
 IEEE80211_S_AUTH
 and it stays that way, until i remove/insert the device again or send HUP to
 wpa_supplicant and restart dhclient.
 
 This looks maybe like wpa_supplicant problem, and i think i've had similar 
 problems with
 ath(4) mini-pci card and card bus ral(3), but as far as i remember the period 
 of
 inactivity was much greater with them (i'll try to test this on these cards 
 too when
 i have access to them again)
 
 
 Regards,
 --niki

Well, after a few more moments investigating the problem it seems that dhclient 
is to blame.
If i don't start it i don't get disconnected, and also i noticed that the five 
minute interval
matches the dhclient renewal period of 300 seconds.

So the logical question is, why dhclient makes my ural(4) adapter deassociate, 
and what i can
do to prevent this :)

Thanks!

- --niki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEvLdOHNAJ/fLbfrkRAnt+AKCnpfDdSucSccRTm4Qmg4ONVWQqzwCgygJp
EE+HPPMAbzIhMOsHO6Q+f6o=
=NXMO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: well-supported SATA RAID card?

2006-03-10 Thread Niki Denev
On Friday 10 March 2006 11:07, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
 Mornin'

  After not having much success with the hptmv driver for highpoint's
  rocketraid 1820A, I'm wondering if other folks have had good luck with
  any SATA RAID cards with at least 6 ports... Is there a SATA RAID card
  with utilities that let you manage while the OS is running that folks
  have had good luck with? I've been happy with the megaraid series on
  linux at my job, but I'm wondering if the management utilities are there
  on freebsd, etc.

 http://www.icp-vortex.com/english/product/pci/rz_sata_8/8586rz_e.htm

 Expensive? Yes.

 Fast, reliable, cheap - pick any two ;-)

If this is the same hardware as the Intel Integrated Raid controllers (SRCS14L 
and similar) also made by ICP, then they are anything but fast :)

I would choose Areca or 3ware.

 HTH,
 Patrick


Regards,
Niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


filesystem snapshot timestamp not correct?

2006-02-28 Thread Niki Denev
Hello,

I'm running a 6.1-PRE machine and have created the following 
scripts called from /etc/crontab :

0   0   *   *   *   root/usr/local/sbin/make_snapshot.sh
15  0   *   *   *   root
/usr/local/sbin/purge_snapshot.sh

make_snapshot.sh :
#!/bin/sh
date=`date +%d-%m-%y`
/sbin/mksnap_ffs / /.snap/snapshot-$date

purge_snapshot.sh:
#!/bin/sh
/usr/bin/find /.snap -name snapshot-* -type f -ctime +7d -exec /bin/rm '{}' \;

so i will have snapshot created each day, and all snapshots older than 7 days 
will be deleted.

but i have more than 7 files in /.snap :
ls -la /.snap/
total 125460
drwxrwxr-x   2 root  operator512 Feb 28 00:00 .
drwxr-xr-x  19 root  wheel   512 Feb 27 13:08 ..
-r--r-   1 root  operator  536870984 Feb 28 09:36 snapshot-20-02-06
-r--r-   1 root  operator  536870984 Feb 28 09:36 snapshot-21-02-06
-r--r-   1 root  operator  536870984 Feb 28 09:36 snapshot-22-02-06
-r--r-   1 root  operator  536870984 Feb 28 09:36 snapshot-23-02-06
-r--r-   1 root  operator  536870984 Feb 28 09:36 snapshot-24-02-06
-r--r-   1 root  operator  536870992 Feb 28 09:36 snapshot-25-02-06
-r--r-   1 root  operator  536870992 Feb 28 09:36 snapshot-26-02-06
-r--r-   1 root  operator  536870992 Feb 28 09:36 snapshot-27-02-06
-r--r-   1 root  operator  536870992 Feb 28 09:57 snapshot-28-02-06

and most of them are with the same timestamp?

Any ideas? Probably i'm doing something wrong, but can't see it yet...

Regards,
Niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: filesystem snapshot timestamp not correct?

2006-02-28 Thread Niki Denev
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 10:48, you wrote:
 Hi

 On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:40:36 +0200,

  Niki Denev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Any ideas? Probably i'm doing something wrong, but can't see it yet...

 Tri it.

 DIR=/.snap
 nice sh -c cd $DIR ; rm -rf `date -v-7d +'snapshot-%d-%m-%y'`
 +1+2+3+4+5+6+
  NAKAMURA Takeshi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  I have poor english.

Thanks, this will work... but i was under the impression that 
the snapshots will have meaningful timestamps too. 
At least this is what is mentioned in /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/README.snapshot :

  2) Run dump on the snapshot. You will get a dump that is
 consistent with the filesystem as of the timestamp of the
 snapshot.

Regards,
Niki

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: filesystem snapshot timestamp not correct?

2006-02-28 Thread Niki Denev
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 10:59, you wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:40:36AM +0200, Niki Denev wrote:
  Hello,
 
  I'm running a 6.1-PRE machine

 So why haven't you tested the quota patch I posted, since you posted a
 month ago about quota deadlocks? ;-)

 Kris

Sorry for this :-/
I have just rebuilt the machine yesteday, and was planning to test it by the
 end of the week. (i'll try today if time permits).
It's already in production and i will try to schedule the test when there are
little users.

Niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: filesystem snapshot timestamp not correct?

2006-02-28 Thread Niki Denev
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 10:59, Kris Kennaway wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:55:34AM +0200, Niki Denev wrote:
  On Tuesday 28 February 2006 10:48, you wrote:
   Hi
  
   On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:40:36 +0200,
  
Niki Denev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideas? Probably i'm doing something wrong, but can't see it
yet...
  
   Tri it.
  
   DIR=/.snap
   nice sh -c cd $DIR ; rm -rf `date -v-7d +'snapshot-%d-%m-%y'`
   +1+2+3+4+5+6+
NAKAMURA Takeshi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have poor english.
 
  Thanks, this will work... but i was under the impression that
  the snapshots will have meaningful timestamps too.
  At least this is what is mentioned in
  /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/README.snapshot :
 
2) Run dump on the snapshot. You will get a dump that is
   consistent with the filesystem as of the timestamp of the
   snapshot.

 It means as of the time the snapshot was made.

 Kris

I see, thanks :)
So then is there any meaningful value of the timestamps i
get with 'ls'?

Niki

Niki


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Patch for quota deadlock

2006-02-28 Thread Niki Denev
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 09:51, Kris Kennaway wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:40:37AM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
  Anyway, I'll discuss with my colleagues and we'll see if we want to take
  the risk.

 Thanks, it would be a big help if you're willing to try.

 Kris

I'm jumping here from the [snaphost timestamps] thread.

Here is what happened when i compiled the kernel with QUOTAS enabled, 
enable_quotas=YES in rc.conf, and LK_NOWAIT patch applied :

[...]
orm0: ISA Option ROMs at iomem 
0xc-0xc7fff,0xd2000-0xd37ff,0xd3800-0xd4fff on isa0
sc0: System console at flags 0x100 on isa0
sc0: VGA 16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300
sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
sio1: port may not be enabled
vga0: Generic ISA VGA at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0
Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec
module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (amr_linux, 0x806124c0, 0) error 6
acd0: CDRW YAMAHA CRW2200E/1.0D at ata1-master UDMA33
da2 at ahd1 bus 0 target 2 lun 0
da2: SEAGATE ST336807LW 0C01 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device
da2: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing 
Enabled
da2: 35003MB (71687372 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4462C)
da0 at ahd0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0: SEAGATE ST336807LW 0C01 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device
da0: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing 
Enabled
da0: 35003MB (71687372 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4462C)
da1 at ahd0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0
da1: SEAGATE ST336807LW 0C01 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device
da1: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing 
Enabled
da1: 35003MB (71687372 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4462C)
da3 at ahd1 bus 0 target 3 lun 0
da3: SEAGATE ST336807LW 0C01 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device
da3: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing 
Enabled
da3: 35003MB (71687372 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4462C)
SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0 created (id=4003401795).
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider da0s1a detected.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm1 created (id=3399956475).
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm1: provider da0s1d detected.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider da1s1a detected.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm1: provider da1s1d detected.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm1: provider da1s1d activated.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm1: provider da0s1d activated.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm1: provider mirror/gm1 launched.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider da2s1a detected.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm2 created (id=2672834031).
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm2: provider da2s1d detected.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider da3s1a detected.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider da3s1a activated.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider da2s1a activated.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider da1s1a activated.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider da0s1a activated.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider mirror/gm0 launched.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm2: provider da3s1d detected.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm2: provider da3s1d activated.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm2: provider da2s1d activated.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm2: provider mirror/gm2 launched.
GEOM_STRIPE: Device gs0 created (id=496013215).
GEOM_STRIPE: Disk mirror/gm1 attached to gs0.
GEOM_STRIPE: Disk mirror/gm2 attached to gs0.
GEOM_STRIPE: Device gs0 activated.
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/stripe/gs0a
Loading configuration files.
Entropy harvesting: interrupts ethernet point_to_point kickstart.
swapon: adding /dev/stripe/gs0b as swap device
Starting file system checks:
/dev/mirror/gm0: FILE SYSTEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS
/dev/mirror/gm0: clean, 3605 free (53 frags, 444 blocks, 0.2% fragmentation)
/dev/stripe/gs0a: FILE SYSTEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS
/dev/stripe/gs0a: clean, 24175769 free (102961 frags, 3009101 blocks, 0.3% 
fragmentation)
Setting hostname: srv.office
kern.corefile: %N.core - /var/coredumps/%U/%N-%P.core
bge0: link state changed to DOWN
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
bge0: flags=8b843UP,BROADCASTg,RUNNING,SIMPLEXe,MULTICAST mtu 11500
options=1:bRXCSUM,TXCSUM, VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWlTAGGING
inet6 xxx pkrefixlen 64 tent ative scopeid 0xs1
inet xx.xx.xx.xx netmask a0xff80 broadtcast xx 
ether x
cmedia: Ethernet hautoselect (nonea)
status: no cnarrier
add net default: gateway xx
Addditional routing options:.
Starting devd.
hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 - C1
Mounting NFS file systems:.
Turning on accounting.
Accounting enabled
Creating and/or trimming log files:.
Starting syslogd.
ELF ldconfig 
path: /lib /usr/lib /usr/lib/compat /usr/X11R6/lib /usr/local/lib 
/usr/local/libdata/ldconfig/mysql
32-bit compatibility ldconfig path:
Checking quotas: done.
Enabling quotas:KDB: stack backtrace:
vfs_badlock() at vfs_badlock+0x95
assert_vop_locked() at assert_vop_locked+0x77
quotaon() at quotaon+0x182
ufs_quotactl() 

Re: Patch for quota deadlock

2006-02-28 Thread Niki Denev
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 12:03, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[...]
 
  Thanks, I forgot about this.  You'll need these patches too:
 
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c.diff?r1
 =1.77r2=1.78
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c.diff?r1
 =1.78r2=1.79

 Here is the combined patch, without the $FreeBSD$ bits that won't
 apply on RELENG_6:

[...]

Thanks, i'm rebuilding now.

Niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Patch for quota deadlock

2006-02-28 Thread Niki Denev
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 12:15, Niki Denev wrote:
 On Tuesday 28 February 2006 12:03, Kris Kennaway wrote:
 [...]

   Thanks, I forgot about this.  You'll need these patches too:
  
   http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c.diff?
  r1 =1.77r2=1.78
   http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c.diff?
  r1 =1.78r2=1.79
 
  Here is the combined patch, without the $FreeBSD$ bits that won't
  apply on RELENG_6:

 [...]

 Thanks, i'm rebuilding now.

 Niki

I was able to transfer the whole (9G) imap folder via rsync this time.
This is actually the first time i was able to do that with QUOTA enabled.
I will leave it this way and monitor for issues, but it seems that the 
quota deadlock problem is gone i hope :)

Many thanks, and sorry again for the delay :)

Regards,
Niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: route labels in pf.conf

2006-02-20 Thread Niki Denev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Niki Denev wrote:
 Hi,
 
 on one 6.1-PRERELEASE box i found that pf.conf's manual page
 mentions rtlabels :
 
[...]

Filed as PR docs/93590


- --niki

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD+YGMHNAJ/fLbfrkRAv19AJ9hFGnmoNeR7qgyK9CVb2XOlCBH2wCfbC5s
pVf7AvTEcVqPrnBhK/bd4ag=
=S/nv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


route labels in pf.conf

2006-02-19 Thread Niki Denev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

on one 6.1-PRERELEASE box i found that pf.conf's manual page
mentions rtlabels :

   route label   Any address whose associated route has label
   label.  See route(4) and route(8).

But it seems that this is OpenBSD specific, and not implemented in FreeBSD?
While it would be VERY cool to have this feature in FreeBSD, maybe
the manual page should be updated to not include it for now?

- --- pf.conf.5.orig  Sun Feb 19 13:49:27 2006
+++ pf.conf.5   Sun Feb 19 13:53:10 2006
@@ -1283,13 +1283,6 @@
 .Bl -tag -width xx -compact
 .It Ar any
 Any address.
- -.It Ar route label
- -Any address whose associated route has label
- -.Ar label .
- -See
- -.Xr route 4
- -and
- -.Xr route 8 .
 .It Ar no-route
 Any address which is not currently routable.
 .It Ar table
@@ -1383,7 +1376,6 @@
 pass in proto tcp from 10.0.0.0/8 port  1024 \e
   to ! 10.1.2.3 port != ssh
 pass in proto tcp from any os OpenBSD flags S/SA
- -pass in proto tcp from route DTAG
 .Ed
 .It Ar all
 This is equivalent to from any to any.
@@ -2734,7 +2726,7 @@
  from ( any | no-route | self | host |
  { host-list } | route string ) [ port ] [ os ]
  to   ( any | no-route | self | host |
- - { host-list } | route string ) [ port ]
+ { host-list } ) [ port ]

 ipspec = any | host | { host-list }
 host   = [ ! ] ( address [ / mask-bits ] |  string  )
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD+F2UHNAJ/fLbfrkRArcrAJwIh/PGHpj9U3kK4+LHXFW/zt0ndACffLgj
s637CU1zenkNpi/8cIvoh7w=
=J1Oi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SSH login takes very long time...sometimes

2006-02-16 Thread Niki Denev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Atanas wrote:
 Dag-Erling Smørgrav said the following on 02/15/06 23:35:
 David Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 I did once mail des@ to ask him if he'd mind me changing the default
 login timeout for sshd to be (say) 5 minutes rather than 1 minute,
 but I think he was busy at the time. Judging by the PR mentioned
 above it should be at least 2m30s by default. Des, would you mind
 this change being made?

 No objection, just let me see the patch first.

 DES
 
 Just a thought, wouldn't this open a new possibility for denial of
 service attacks?
 
 Last year I already had to decrease the LoginGraceTime from 120 to 30
 seconds on my production boxes, but it didn't help much, so on top of
 that I got to implement (reinvent the wheel again) a script tailing the
 auth.log and firewalling bad gyus in order to secure sshd and let my
 legitimate users in.
 
 I really miss the inetd features. A setting like nowait/100/20/5
 (/max-child[/max-connections-per-ip-per-minute[/max-child-per-ip]])
 would effectively bounce the bad guys, but AFAIK (correct me if I'm
 wrong), ssh is no longer supposed to work via inetd and still has no
 such capabilities.
 
 I'd be nice to have something like for instance the sendmail's client
 and rate connection limits, but I guess this is not the right place to ask.
 
 Regards,
 Atanas
 __


I solved this for me with the following pf(4) rule :

pass in quick on $ext inet proto tcp from any to any port ssh flags S/SA \
  keep state (source-track rule, max-src-conn $max_conn_per_ip, 
max-src-conn-rate $max_conn_rate, \
  overload tempban-ssh flush global)

with appropriate $max_conn_per_ip and $max_conn_rate limits,
and expiretable in a cronjob to flush all entries in the tempban-ssh table 
which
are older than predefined period.

I hope this helps.

- --niki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD9RS9HNAJ/fLbfrkRAi/bAKCe6T8RIGeVaq/EGkcxFa26jcK5xACeIoES
YEQ6LosYdZ824h8dVwwRo7c=
=ZhLi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: src upgrade to 6 from 5.4

2006-02-10 Thread Niki Denev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 09:41:40PM -0600, Robert Uzzi wrote:
[...]

 How did you disable ccache?  If you did it by setting NOCCACHE it doesn't
 really work.  Comment out the ccache stuff completely from /etc/make.conf
 and try again.
 
 
 Cheers,

I'm using the following lines in my make.conf because of this problem :

.if ${.CURDIR:M/usr/ports/*}
CC=/usr/local/libexec/ccache/cc
CXX=/usr/local/libexec/ccache/c++
.endif


- --niki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD7Sb1HNAJ/fLbfrkRAv7/AKC/7FnnTZdDPWufJG4l0bUMqdOoTQCgprsV
qaDiVIpDnmn6pBraGZE9XTM=
=0ehi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: diskio / filesystem related deadlock on SMP 6.0-STABLE machine.

2006-01-26 Thread Niki Denev
+0x4b2
Xfast_syscall() at Xfast_syscall+0xa8
--- syscall (341, FreeBSD ELF64, sigsuspend), rip = 0x800684b3c, rsp = 
0x7fffed28, rbp = 0xe3e0 ---
(null)() at 0x800684b3c
*** error reading from address e3e8 ***


I hope this is sufficient.

P.S. Sorry no crashdump, because i'm running on gmirror-ed gstripe,
maybe i can try later to attach another disk to the machine to use it 
only for crashdumps.

Regards,
Niki Denev.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


manual escape to debugger on serial console not working?

2006-01-26 Thread Niki Denev
Hello,

While investigating a problem with one server i 
installed a serial console on it.
The machine has a supermicro board with console redirection enabled
on the same port, and everything seems ok, i.e. when the machine panics
i get a debugger on the serial console, but when i try to manually escape
to the debugger with BREAK (~#) i get this on the screen :
The following connections are open:
  #0 client-session (t4 r0 i0/0 o0/0 fd 4/5 cfd -1)

Manual enter to the debugger works only if i go physically  to the
keyboard and do a CTRL-ALT-ESC, 
then i get KDB: enter: manual escape to debugger on the serial console.


i have this added to my kernel conf :
options  BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER
options  KDB
options  DDB

and this in /boot/loadaer.conf :
console=comconsole

Maybe the fact that there is physically attached keyboard interferes with the 
serial console?


Regards,
Niki Denev
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: manual escape to debugger on serial console not working?

2006-01-26 Thread Niki Denev
On Thursday 26 January 2006 10:54, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
 * Niki Denev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-26 10:50 +0200]:
  to the debugger with BREAK (~#) i get this on the screen :
  The following connections are open:
#0 client-session (t4 r0 i0/0 o0/0 fd 4/5 cfd -1)

 Are you using ssh?

 man ssh
Escape Characters
[...]

 Nicolas

Ah, this was the missing link :)
I completely forgot the part that i must
type ~~# to actually send a BREAK.

Thank You, Nicolas!

Regards,
Niki Denev
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: diskio / filesystem related deadlock on SMP 6.0-STABLE machine.

2006-01-26 Thread Niki Denev
On Thursday 26 January 2006 10:40, Niki Denev wrote:

[...]

After i disabled option QUOTA in both my default kernel config
and the one i compiled with the debugging options i was unable
to reproduce the deadlock again. (i hope it stays that way :) )
This, together with the report in my previous post probably point
that the problem is in the QUOTA support.

Regards,
Niki Denev
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: diskio / filesystem related deadlock on SMP 6.0-STABLE machine.

2006-01-26 Thread Niki Denev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Kris Kennaway wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 05:07:56PM +0200, Niki Denev wrote:
 On Thursday 26 January 2006 10:40, Niki Denev wrote:
 [...]

 After i disabled option QUOTA in both my default kernel config
 and the one i compiled with the debugging options i was unable
 to reproduce the deadlock again. (i hope it stays that way :) )
 This, together with the report in my previous post probably point
 that the problem is in the QUOTA support.
 
 Actually, I think this is known.
 
 Kris

Yes, sorry for this.
I found a thread on -hackers from November 2005 which seems related:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2005-November/014339.html

Anyway, the machine in question is still not very actively used and
i can use it as a guinea pig if someone has the time to look at this,
if not, maybe it should be noted somewhere that at this point options QUOTA
may cause deadlocks to avoid similar questions/postings? :)


Niki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD2TbsHNAJ/fLbfrkRAv9BAJ4oCP1rMGnztUFR/3AT8KNnVxuVdQCdFD9w
ctMFkroDrgtO8Au46TBzfSY=
=Seff
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Adaptec SCSI going nuts

2006-01-26 Thread Niki Denev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Joshua Coombs wrote:
 Just got a dual Opteron system to play with amd64 builds of FreeBSD.
 Poking around to see how it behaived, I initially tossed FreeBSD 4.11 on
 it, and was surprised to see a dump of the scsi controller state at the
 end of the dmesg.  Tried 6.0-Rel, both x86 and amd64, same behavior. 
 Bumped up to 6-stable from yesterday, same behavior.  After the dump,
 the system appears solid, no other errors, so I'm guessing it's just a
 problem with how the card is initialized, FreeBSD corrects it and moves on.
 
 Should I be more concerned, or consider it a quirk of the machine?
 
 Joshua Coombs
 
[...]

I was seeing similar stuff on one machine.
I solved the problem with forcing the scsi controller to U160,
and splitting the disks on the both channels to distribute the load.
(mine was dual-channel onboard U320 and four Seagate 36G 10Krpm hdds)
I've heard that this has something to do with firmware incompatibility on
some Seagate SCSI drives and Adaptec U320 controllers, but i don't know if
it's true.
I haven't found stability issues before and after this change, but i left
it at U160 to get rid of these messages.

Niki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD2VSMHNAJ/fLbfrkRAlfWAJ9Q+O23RU16oNT4PSKyRXLYDpggOQCgkumW
oZxp6JHj+M5tfK0S700bj0k=
=kXPQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


drm problem after portupgrade to Xorg 6.9

2006-01-25 Thread Niki Denev
Hello,

I've just upraded my Xorg port to the latest relase 6.9,
and begin to get this when i start X :

agp0: binding memory at bad offset 0
error: [drm:pid610:radeon_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon_cp_init called without lock 
held
error: [drm:pid610:drm_unlock] *ERROR* Process 610 using kernel context 0

My machine is running 6.0-STABLE,
It's Pentium 4 2.0Ghz with Radeon 9600LE

dmesg is attached.

Any hints are appreciated.
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286919243 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286919299 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286920059 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286920114 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286921015 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286921070 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286921836 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286921891 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286922643 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286922698 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286923449 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286923504 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286924251 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286924306 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286925169 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286925224 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286925985 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286926041 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286926791 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286926846 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286927597 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286927652 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286928391 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286928446 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286929301 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286929355 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286930112 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286930169 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286930926 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286930982 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286931731 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286931786 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286932545 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286932601 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286933466 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286933521 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286934267 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286934323 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286935073 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286935128 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286935880 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286935935 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286936694 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286936748 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286937599 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286937655 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286938408 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286938462 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286939207 usec for pid 
37002 (artsd)
calcru: runtime went backwards from 286940498 usec to 286939262 

Re: diskio / filesystem related deadlock on SMP 6.0-STABLE machine.

2006-01-25 Thread Niki Denev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Niki Denev wrote:
 
[...]

I received off the list suggestion to try a patch from -CURRENT for
vfs_lookup.c. I think that this patch is already commited to -STABLE,
and so i rebuilt my kernel and world again today, but the problem is
still here.
The machine deadlocked very hard this time, it even stopped responding
to ping requests.
This time i was rsyncing this monstrous imap mailbox (about 8G),
and ran several times du -sh Maildir on the target machine,
everything looked ok, and then i decided to run iostat and when i
pressed enter the shell freezed.

I will try to setup debugger on the serial console tomorrow to see
if i can get some useful info.
I'm open to suggestions on how to debug this :)

Thanks,

Niki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD158JHNAJ/fLbfrkRAspmAJ9VJdqMiVljckJUtgipZx1i/UTh1QCcCV+I
K2qgeScOMZGz4fxMFnvnE9Q=
=cOPx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: drm problem after portupgrade to Xorg 6.9

2006-01-25 Thread Niki Denev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Mike Jakubik wrote:
 Patrick Lamaizière wrote:
 I've just upraded my Xorg port to the latest relase 6.9,
 and begin to get this when i start X :

 agp0: binding memory at bad offset 0
 error: [drm:pid610:radeon_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon_cp_init called without
 lock held
 error: [drm:pid610:drm_unlock] *ERROR* Process 610 using kernel
 context 0
 
 
 Is your AGP chipset supported?
 
 What does dmesg|grep agp say?

dri:
dri-6.4.1,2 OpenGL hardware acceleration drivers for the DRI

agp:
agp0: Intel 82845 host to AGP bridge mem 0xf800-0xfbff at device 0.0 
on pci0

drm :
drm0: ATI Radeon AP 9600 port 0xc800-0xc8ff mem 
0xe000-0xefff,0xff4f-0xff4f irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1
info: [drm] AGP at 0xf800 64MB
info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.19.0 20050911

uname :
FreeBSD ndenev 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #2: Tue Jan 17 15:35:56 EET 2006
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386


- --niki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD1/y0HNAJ/fLbfrkRAnZcAJ45gcQhPVpcBdXDrrA1jEqW+LnjMgCfaYe4
m5nnSK6Ra/oQheMLd1RqmSI=
=JjBP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


diskio / filesystem related deadlock on SMP 6.0-STABLE machine.

2006-01-20 Thread Niki Denev
Hello,

I'm experiencing some problems with a 6.0-STABLE machine,
cvsupped and rebuilt yesterday.
I'm not sure that the problem is related to this last update, because
this machine is not very loaded currently.

The machine is with dual opteron mb from Supermicro,
with two Opteron 244s and 4GB of DDR 400 ECC Registered memory,
integrated Adaptec U320 SCSI controller (forced to U160 mode),
and four Seagate 36G 10K rpm scsi drives.

The kernel config is generic SMP with enabled QUOTA support,
accounting_enable=YES in rc.conf
and the root fs is a software Raid-10 running two striped mirrors
using geom_mirror and geom_stripe with the help of a little /boot partition
for loading the kernel and the required modules.

Kernel conf, dmesg and loader.conf are available here :

http://www.totalterror.net/freebsd/srv/

Yesterday i was able to deadlock the machine two times, doing
exactly the same thing :
I was doing rsync from another machine to this one. I was syncing
one rather big imap(Maildir) folder, about 270K msgs(files),
and at the same time i was syncing this folder contents via the bincimap
imap server on a remote machine running Kmail.
Then i run a du -sh on the folder in question.and all my shells to it
 stopped working... 
I was able to ping the machine and connect to listening ports, 
but without getting banners from the daemons. 
There was also zero HDD activity at this time.
Unfortunately i forgot to enter the debuger and get a trace...(but, will it
 show something meaningfull or just the keyboard interrupt handler?)

After reseting the machine booted and rebuilt it's secondary components on 
the both mirrors ( maybe this is normal? it seems it's happeing everytime the 
machine is uncleanly restarted)

This is a big problem for me because this machine will soon 
enter in production, and should be able to serve imap to a dozen of clients.
I know that 270K msg in single imap folder is stupid,
but our old imap server running FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE(quite old STABLE)
on AMD 1800+ with 2G of ram and 80G IDE disk has no problems with it,
except being very slow of course

I hope this info is enough, if not i will gladly provide more.

Any suggestions are welcome,
Thanks.

--niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Creating a system RAID-10 device

2006-01-17 Thread Niki Denev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Sven Willenberger wrote:
 I hope this is the appropriate mailing list for this question, if not
 please redirect me as needed.
 
 My goal is to create a filesystem consisting of a striped raid array
 over 3 mirror raid arrays that would encompass the entire filesystem
 including the /boot and root partitions.
 
 Generally I would create a RAID10 from 6 disks as follows:
 
 gmirror label -v -b round-robin md1 da0 da1
 gmirror label -v -b round-robin md2 da2 da3
 gmirror label -v -b round-robin md3 da4 da5
 
 gstripe label -v -s 131072
 md0 /dev/mirror/md1 /dev/mirror/md2 /dev/mirror/md3
 
 newfs /dev/stripe/md0
 
 naturally the problem here is that it cannot be done on a system that
 booted from da0. I have seen the example of setting up a mirrored system
 drive
 (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/geom-mirror.html )
 
 which won't quite work for my case either. Using this method I could
 probably get the one mirror (md1) to work, but I know of no way of then
 adding the other 2 mirror sets and then redoing the system to stripe
 across all 3 mirrored sets.
 
 The only thing I could think of was to boot from the livecd and create
 the 6-disk array and then trying to install FreeBSD onto this
 filesystem. In order to do this the installer would have to
 recognize /dev/stripe/md0 as a valid drive -- is there any way to have
 this happen?
 
 Sven
 

I've done this for a server in our office.
I used four disks, and did the following :
Split each disk on 2 parts, one about 60M
for /boot, and the other part to the end of the disk.
Then i created geom_mirror from the four 60M slices.
(yah, mirror from 4 devices, it wastes a little space, but
so what disks are cheap)
and then with the big slices i created two geom_mirrors
with 2 slices each, and then mirrored them.

It looks something like this :

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mount
/dev/mirror/gm0 on /boot_mirror (ufs, local, noatime, synchronous)
/dev/stripe/gs0a on / (ufs, local, noatime, with quotas, soft-updates)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] gmirror status
  NameStatus  Components
mirror/gm0  COMPLETE  da0s1a
  da1s1a
  da2s1a
  da3s1a
mirror/gm1  COMPLETE  da0s1d
  da1s1d
mirror/gm2  COMPLETE  da2s1d
  da3s1d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gstripe status
  Name  Status  Components
stripe/gs0  UP  mirror/gm1
mirror/gm2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] cat /boot/loader.conf
geom_mirror_load=YES
geom_stripe_load=YES
vfs.root.mountfrom=ufs:/dev/stripe/gs0a

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ls -lad /boot*
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel   16 Jun 25  2005 /boot - boot_mirror/boot
drwxr-xr-x  4 root  wheel  512 Jun 25  2005 /boot_mirror

Then i can boot a RAID-10 software array with GEOM on FreeBSD
and also have the added bonus that i can boot from any
of the four disks if any fails. (well, i guess i still
will have to chose other disk for boot from the scsi bios)

Regards,
- --niki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDzXC+HNAJ/fLbfrkRAlKyAJ9bhXwCQe2ZuLI6KL32yRGWCrnhsACfVSrM
TkQzpNM4UVy9V0OSNAk9RLY=
=NNNa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ifconfig hidessid not hiding SSID on 802.11b with PRISM 2.5 based card

2006-01-10 Thread Niki Denev
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 16:02, Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
 I have set hidessid option to an Intersil PRISM 2.5 based cart, acting
 as hostap, and the ssid stills gets broadcasted, aparently. Other
 FreeBSD systems and the Windows software supplied by the vendor can find
 the SSID while scanning.

 I would like to know if hidessid should hide it in ordinary scans like
 those ones, and how to test it better to see if ssid stills broadcasted
 in the beacons, if it is possible (say, any debug option or tool).

 Thanks!

I think that for SSID hiding to work there is a need for the firmware 
on the card to support this. (at least on Prism2/2.5 hardware)
Maybe your firmware does not support ssid hiding.
You can try to update it.

hth,
--niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


devfs.rules and serial devices question

2005-12-13 Thread Niki Denev
Hi all,

I'm setting up a UPS on one machine,
and the ups daemon (nut) works as user upsd.
To make it work properly i have added in devfs.rules the
following :

permttyd0   0660
own ttyd0   upsd:upsd

But it still does not work because ttyd0.init and ttyd0.lock
are still owned by root.
I'll try adding them too to the devfs.rules file,
but i'm wondering if this is the expected behaviour of devfs?
I think that maybe it will be better if one specify ttyd0 in the
file, that rule also to apply for ttyd0.init and ttyd0.lock files.
What do you think?

--niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


top(1) displaying threads

2005-11-30 Thread Niki Denev
Hello,

From some time in 6.0 and -current top(1) shows by default also the kernel 
threads.
But the top(1) manual page still says that the default behaviour is NOT to 
show them.

Maybe something like this will be enough:

--- usr.bin/top/top.local.1 Fri Jul 18 02:56:39 2003
+++ usr.bin/top/top.local.1.fix Wed Nov 30 18:51:35 2005
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@

 .SH DISPLAY OF THREADS
 The '-H' option will toggle the display of kernel visible thread contexts.
-At runtime the 'H' key will toggle this mode. The default is OFF.
+At runtime the 'H' key will toggle this mode. The default is ON.

 .SH DESCRIPTION OF MEMORY
 Mem: 9220K Active, 1032K Inact, 3284K Wired, 1MB Cache, 2M Buf, 1320K Free
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: top(1) displaying threads

2005-11-30 Thread Niki Denev
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 20:18, John Baldwin wrote:
 On Wednesday 30 November 2005 11:55 am, Niki Denev wrote:
  Hello,
 
  From some time in 6.0 and -current top(1) shows by default also the
  kernel threads.
  But the top(1) manual page still says that the default behaviour is NOT
  to show them.
 
  Maybe something like this will be enough:
 
  --- usr.bin/top/top.local.1 Fri Jul 18 02:56:39 2003
  +++ usr.bin/top/top.local.1.fix Wed Nov 30 18:51:35 2005
  @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
   .SH DISPLAY OF THREADS
   The '-H' option will toggle the display of kernel visible thread
  contexts. -At runtime the 'H' key will toggle this mode. The default is
  OFF. +At runtime the 'H' key will toggle this mode. The default is ON.
 
   .SH DESCRIPTION OF MEMORY
   Mem: 9220K Active, 1032K Inact, 3284K Wired, 1MB Cache, 2M Buf, 1320K
  Free

 The manpage is correct.  The problem is that kernel threads such as
 ithreads are really kernel processes currently.

Oh, i see.
I was confused by the THR column, but now everything is clear :)

Thanks and sorry for the noise.

--niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


inconsistent arp(8) mac address output using if_bridge

2005-11-20 Thread Niki Denev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

I have a small machine setup to act as simple network gateway.
I have one wireless and one wired interfaces without IP configuration
on them, and they are added as if_bridge(4) members.
When i issue arp -na command on the machine i get this:

? (10.10.10.240) at 0.14.a5.1a.dc.73 on bridge0
? (10.10.10.241) at 4.4b.80.80.80.3 on bridge0
? (10.10.10.246) at 0.a0.cc.62.99.c3 on bridge0
? (10.10.10.253) at 0.5.4e.4f.7b.eb on bridge0
? (172.16.1.1) at 00:30:48:83:93:e9 on ep0 [ethernet]
? (172.16.37.9) at 00:0f:b0:01:30:c0 on ep0 [ethernet]

While the mac addresses appear to be correct, maybe
this should be fixed to be consistent with the default
mac address output?

- --niki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDgLd0HNAJ/fLbfrkRAt37AKDJ5P9PC1tf6VCyBDv83KwjNTqirwCgvhoW
noztCOr2cpcaEqEjiBLAclc=
=7DFZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: inconsistent arp(8) mac address output using if_bridge

2005-11-20 Thread Niki Denev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Niki Denev wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I have a small machine setup to act as simple network gateway.
 I have one wireless and one wired interfaces without IP configuration
 on them, and they are added as if_bridge(4) members.
 When i issue arp -na command on the machine i get this:
 
 ? (10.10.10.240) at 0.14.a5.1a.dc.73 on bridge0
 ? (10.10.10.241) at 4.4b.80.80.80.3 on bridge0
 ? (10.10.10.246) at 0.a0.cc.62.99.c3 on bridge0
 ? (10.10.10.253) at 0.5.4e.4f.7b.eb on bridge0
 ? (172.16.1.1) at 00:30:48:83:93:e9 on ep0 [ethernet]
 ? (172.16.37.9) at 00:0f:b0:01:30:c0 on ep0 [ethernet]
 
 While the mac addresses appear to be correct, maybe
 this should be fixed to be consistent with the default
 mac address output?
 
 --niki

Sorry, forgot the mention the os version :

FreeBSD gimli 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov  3 09:36:13
UTC 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386

- --niki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDgLlYHNAJ/fLbfrkRAnM8AJ0WbFS29X9F3FTah1S3Rnb/P7BZOgCeNeTr
at9AxPhl6kvnVV7XBFY3lns=
=Tgdb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ahd0: Invalid Sequencer interrupt occurred.

2005-11-11 Thread Niki Denev
Ricardo A. Reis wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 The University where i work recent  acquire a new server, i install
 FreeBSD 6.0 and update for STABLE yestarday,
 in dmesg i see this messages
 
 
 ahd0: Invalid Sequencer interrupt occurred.
 
 

I've had similar problems with Dual channel U320 adaptec
controller (built in on supermicro board) and Seagate U320 drives.
The solution was to force the drives to U160 speed from the BIOS,
and split the drives equaly on the two channels to reduce the bottleneck.

--niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: kernel: calcru: runtime went backwards

2005-11-07 Thread Niki Denev
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
 Giovanni P. Tirloni wrote:
 
 Try this,

  http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/faq/book.html#CALCRU-NEGATIVE
 
 
 Thank you.  I must admit that I missed this.  Unfortunately all the
 suggestions in this FAQ seem to be out of date - none of the suggested
 sysctls or kernel config options seem to apply to FreeBSD 6.
 
 Stephen

I have the same problem after the switch to 6.0 from 5.4 :

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-November/019171.html

I've set the kern.timecounter sysctl to i8254 as suggested by Joseph Koshy.
Now it seems that i get these messages rarely, maybe onece a day.
Before this i get maybe 4-5 daily.
Now it clearly looks that this has something to do with excessive thread
usage.

--niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: calcru: runtime went backwards ?

2005-11-01 Thread Niki Denev
Niki Denev wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I've recently upgraded my server from 5.4-STABLE to 6.0-RC1
 and shortly after that i began to see these messages in my dmesg:
 
 calcru: runtime went backwards from 1488581 usec to 1488580 usec for pid
 65583 (mpsnmp)
[snip]

dmesg and output of kern.timecounter sysctl can be found here :
http://totalterror.net/freebsd/calcru/


--niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: calcru: runtime went backwards ?

2005-11-01 Thread Niki Denev
Joseph Koshy wrote:
dmesg and output of kern.timecounter sysctl can be found here :
 
 
 Changing your timecounter to i8254 may help.
 
 Bug 43491 and 72338 seem to be related:
 
   http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72338
   http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=43491
 
 --
 FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy

Thanks, i've changed it to i8254 and will watch it for a
couple of days.

--niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: calcru: runtime went backwards ?

2005-11-01 Thread Niki Denev
Niki Denev wrote:
 Joseph Koshy wrote:
 
dmesg and output of kern.timecounter sysctl can be found here :


Changing your timecounter to i8254 may help.

Bug 43491 and 72338 seem to be related:

  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72338
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=43491

--
FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy
 
 
 Thanks, i've changed it to i8254 and will watch it for a
 couple of days.
 
 --niki

i've got three more of them this morning...
and it seems that only my program triggers them.
i think it's the only application that uses
threads on my system, maybe this is related?

--niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: sendfile + non local filesystem + lighttpd = EOPNOTSUPP

2005-10-30 Thread Niki Denev
Niki Denev wrote:
 
 
 I get the same behaviour also with 6.0-RC1 (cvsupped an hour ago)
 

Ok,
In this awful piece of code created for testing purposes
if i set FILETOSEND to local file it works ok,
but if the file is located on smbfs sendfile returns Operation
not supported.
If this is not a bug, maybe it should be documented? (also the
error code that sendfile returns)

(again, the machine is 6.0-RC1 cvsupped yesterday, with SMP kernel)

---[sendfile_test.c]---
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include sys/types.h
#include sys/socket.h
#include sys/uio.h
#include fcntl.h
#include unistd.h
#include string.h
#include errno.h
#include sys/types.h
#include sys/socket.h
#include netinet/in.h
#include arpa/inet.h

#define FILETOSEND /var/log/messages
//#define FILETOSEND /mnt/smb/somefile.dat

int main() {
int fd;
int sock;
int result;
struct sockaddr_in sa;

fd = open(FILETOSEND, O_RDONLY);
sock = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
memset(sa, 0, sizeof(sa));
sa.sin_family = AF_INET;
sa.sin_port = htons(9); /* discard enabled in inetd */
inet_aton(127.0.0.1, sa.sin_addr);

printf(connecting socket ... );
errno = 0;
result = connect(sock, (struct sockaddr *)sa, sizeof(sa));
printf(%s\n, errno?strerror(errno):ok);

printf(calling sendfile ... );
errno = 0;
result = sendfile(fd, sock, 0, 0, NULL, NULL, 0);
printf(%s\n, errno?strerror(errno):ok);

close(fd);
close(sock);
return(0);
}
---[end of sendfile_test.c]---
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: sendfile + non local filesystem + lighttpd = EOPNOTSUPP

2005-10-30 Thread Niki Denev
This thread seems to relate to the same problem in
dfbsd :
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/kernel/2005-03/msg00101.html

I think that this should be fixed, the man page did not mentions
EOPNOTSUPP and this can lead to further confusion because it seems
 that HP-UX for example sets errno to EOPNOTSUPP when the socket is not TCP.

Any comments?

P.S.: It seems like i'm talking to myslef, i hope it's
because it's sunday :)

--niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


sendfile + non local filesystem + lighttpd = EOPNOTSUPP

2005-10-29 Thread Niki Denev
Hello,

I seem to have a problem serving files with
lighttpd from non local (smbfs) filesystem.
Lighttpd tries to use sendfile(2) but, it returns
with -1 and errno Operation not supported,
but i can't find this error in the documented errors
on the manpage.
Forcing lighttpd to not use sendfile fixes the problem,
but i would really like to use it...

Any suggestions?

-

 40793 lighttpd CALL  open(0x8089c80,0,0x80bac00)
 40793 lighttpd NAMI  /usr/local/www/data/stuff/downloads/some_file.txt
 40793 lighttpd RET   open 8
 40793 lighttpd CALL  sendfile(0x8,0x7,0,0,0x1b22,0,0xbfbfc600,0)
 40793 lighttpd RET   sendfile -1 errno 45 Operation not supported
 40793 lighttpd CALL  write(0x6,0x8089400,0x5d)
 40793 lighttpd GIO   fd 6 wrote 93 bytes
   2005-10-29 08:43:09: (network_freebsd_sendfile.c.174) sendfile:
 Operation not supported 45
   
 40793 lighttpd RET   write 93/0x5d
 40793 lighttpd CALL  close(0x8)


Here /usr/local/www/data/stuff/downloads is a smbfs mount.
If the file is local everything works as expected.




--niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: sendfile + non local filesystem + lighttpd = EOPNOTSUPP

2005-10-29 Thread Niki Denev
David G. Lawrence wrote:
Hello,

I seem to have a problem serving files with
lighttpd from non local (smbfs) filesystem.
Lighttpd tries to use sendfile(2) but, it returns
with -1 and errno Operation not supported,
but i can't find this error in the documented errors
on the manpage.
Forcing lighttpd to not use sendfile fixes the problem,
but i would really like to use it...

Any suggestions?
 
 
What version of FreeBSD?
  
 
 -DG

ouch.. sorry i forgot to include the version ..

It's 5.4-STABLE about 3-4 months old. (i'll try to
update to 6.0 this weekend)
And the lighttpd version is the latest from the ports,
1.4.6 i think.

--niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: sendfile + non local filesystem + lighttpd = EOPNOTSUPP

2005-10-29 Thread Niki Denev
Niki Denev wrote:
 David G. Lawrence wrote:
 
Hello,

I seem to have a problem serving files with
lighttpd from non local (smbfs) filesystem.
Lighttpd tries to use sendfile(2) but, it returns
with -1 and errno Operation not supported,
but i can't find this error in the documented errors
on the manpage.
Forcing lighttpd to not use sendfile fixes the problem,
but i would really like to use it...

Any suggestions?


   What version of FreeBSD?
 

-DG
 
 
 ouch.. sorry i forgot to include the version ..
 
 It's 5.4-STABLE about 3-4 months old. (i'll try to
 update to 6.0 this weekend)
 And the lighttpd version is the latest from the ports,
 1.4.6 i think.
 
 --niki

I get the same behaviour also with 6.0-RC1 (cvsupped an hour ago)


--niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SCSI troubles

2005-07-04 Thread Niki Denev

Tomas Randa wrote:

Hi,

I Am running 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Sun May  8 18:23:40 CEST 
2005 with Adaptec 29320 or 2930U2 controller and with heavy load on SCSI 
I have the following problems ending with system freeze. Have anybody 
some opinion where could be problem?





Hi,

I have similar problems under load on one DualOpteron machine,
i noticed that when i set the controller in U160 mode the messages
dissaperar. So i split the drives in the server equaly on the both
scsi channels on the motherboard and set the controller to U160.
I have then run while(1) { make clean; make universe; } which is still
runnnig for about 3 days. Before that the machine was rebooting about
every couple of hours if under load.
From what i understand this is not exactly a FreeBSD problem, but rather
a consequence of U320 being really hard on the hardware with pushing it
to the limits.

--niki



Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: ahd0: Invalid Sequencer interrupt occurred.
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel:  Dump Card State Begins 

Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: ahd0: Dumping Card State at program address 
0x23c Mode 0x0

Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: Card was paused
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: INTSTAT[0x0] SELOID[0x0] SELID[0x10] 
HS_MAILBOX[0x0]
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: INTCTL[0x80]:(SWTMINTMASK) SEQINTSTAT[0x0] 
SAVED_MODE[0x11]
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: 
DFFSTAT[0x33]:(CURRFIFO_NONE|FIFO0FREE|FIFO1FREE)
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: SCSISIGI[0x0]:(P_DATAOUT) SCSIPHASE[0x0] 
SCSIBUS[0x0]
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: LASTPHASE[0x1]:(P_DATAOUT|P_BUSFREE) 
SCSISEQ0[0x0]
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: SCSISEQ1[0x12]:(ENAUTOATNP|ENRSELI) 
SEQCTL0[0x0] SEQINTCTL[0x6]:(INTMASK1|INTMASK2)
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: SEQ_FLAGS[0x0] SEQ_FLAGS2[0x0] 
QFREEZE_COUNT[0x2]
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: KERNEL_QFREEZE_COUNT[0x2] 
MK_MESSAGE_SCB[0xff00] MK_MESSAGE_SCSIID[0xff]
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: SSTAT0[0x0] SSTAT1[0x0] SSTAT2[0x0] 
SSTAT3[0x0] PERRDIAG[0x0]
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: 
SIMODE1[0xa4]:(ENSCSIPERR|ENSCSIRST|ENSELTIMO) LQISTAT0[0x0]
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: LQISTAT1[0x0] LQISTAT2[0x0] LQOSTAT0[0x0] 
LQOSTAT1[0x0]

Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: LQOSTAT2[0x0]
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel:
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: SCB Count = 16 CMDS_PENDING = 0 LASTSCB 
0x CURRSCB 0xf NEXTSCB 0xff40

Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: qinstart = 28 qinfifonext = 28
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: QINFIFO:
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: WAITING_TID_QUEUES:
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: Pending list:
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: Total 0
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: Kernel Free SCB list: 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 
9 10 11 12 13 0

Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: Sequencer Complete DMA-inprog list:
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: Sequencer Complete list:
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: Sequencer DMA-Up and Complete list:
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: Sequencer On QFreeze and Complete list:
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel:
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel:
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: ahd0: FIFO0 Free, LONGJMP == 0x8000, SCB 0xe
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: 
SEQIMODE[0x3f]:(ENCFG4TCMD|ENCFG4ICMD|ENCFG4TSTAT|ENCFG4ISTAT|ENCFG4DATA|ENSAVEPTRS)
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: SEQINTSRC[0x0] DFCNTRL[0x0] 
DFSTATUS[0x89]:(FIFOEMP|HDONE|PRELOAD_AVAIL)
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: SG_CACHE_SHADOW[0x2]:(LAST_SEG) 
SG_STATE[0x0] DFFSXFRCTL[0x0]
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: SOFFCNT[0x0] MDFFSTAT[0x5]:(FIFOFREE|DLZERO) 
SHADDR = 0x00, SHCNT = 0x0
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: HADDR = 0x00, HCNT = 0x0 
CCSGCTL[0x10]:(SG_CACHE_AVAIL)

Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel:
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: ahd0: FIFO1 Free, LONGJMP == 0x8063, SCB 0xf
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: 
SEQIMODE[0x3f]:(ENCFG4TCMD|ENCFG4ICMD|ENCFG4TSTAT|ENCFG4ISTAT|ENCFG4DATA|ENSAVEPTRS)
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: SEQINTSRC[0x0] DFCNTRL[0x0] 
DFSTATUS[0x89]:(FIFOEMP|HDONE|PRELOAD_AVAIL)
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: SG_CACHE_SHADOW[0x2]:(LAST_SEG) 
SG_STATE[0x0] DFFSXFRCTL[0x0]
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: SOFFCNT[0x0] MDFFSTAT[0x5]:(FIFOFREE|DLZERO) 
SHADDR = 0x00, SHCNT = 0x0
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: HADDR = 0x00, HCNT = 0x0 
CCSGCTL[0x10]:(SG_CACHE_AVAIL)
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: LQIN: 0x8 0x0 0x0 0xe 0x0 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x0 
0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: ahd0: LQISTATE = 0x0, LQOSTATE = 0x0, 
OPTIONMODE = 0x42

Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: ahd0: OS_SPACE_CNT = 0x20 MAXCMDCNT = 0x1
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: ahd0: SAVED_SCSIID = 0x0 SAVED_LUN = 0x0
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel:
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: SIMODE0[0xc]:(ENOVERRUN|ENIOERR)
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: CCSCBCTL[0x4]:(CCSCBDIR)
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: ahd0: REG0 == 0x6d8e, SINDEX = 0x10e, DINDEX 
= 0x102
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: ahd0: SCBPTR == 0xe, SCB_NEXT == 0xff40, 
SCB_NEXT2 == 0xff6d

Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: CDB 12 20 0 80 8 b5
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: STACK: 0x237 0x2 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0
Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel:  Dump Card State Ends 

Jul  1 16:14:58 srv kernel: Copied 18 bytes of sense data offset 

Re: background fsck can be dangerous!

2005-07-02 Thread Niki Denev

Luke Crawford wrote:

 disabling background fsck while continuing to run soft updates
 will make little difference.

 Personally, I would recommend that you keep your disk mount
 configuration as it is, and that you buy a UPS.



Well, i surely need an UPS, that's out of question,
but the problem that i had was not about loss/corruption on
files on disk.
Before the background fsck finished some files were unreadable,
and they happened to be some libraries used by my mail software.
After the fsck finished these libraries were accessible again and
everything was normal and working, at least this is what it looked
like to me.
So, i think that if i had disabled background fsck (as i did now)
i should have skipped the loss of these about ten emails...

--niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


background fsck can be dangerous!

2005-06-29 Thread Niki Denev
Hello,

I want just to share my last experience with the combination of
power failure + background fsck. After the power returned and the 
machine booted, it sheduled background fsck after 60 seconds, but
at this point most of the services were already started, and some of them 
seemed to rely on files that were probably in unclean state before the check.
This unfortunately leaded to some lost email...after the fsck completed,
everything runs ok, but i have now set background_fsck to NO in rc.conf.

Here is a sad sample from my qmail log file :
@400042c1badc24fc21cc delivery 1: 
success: 
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:_Shared_object_libpq.so.3_not_found,_required_by_dspam/did_0+0+1/
@400042c1badc24fff25c status: local 2/30 remote 0/20
@400042c1badc250151ec delivery 4: 
success: 
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:_Shared_object_libpq.so.3_not_found,_required_by_dspam/did_0+0+1/
@400042c1badc2502bd34 status: local 1/30 remote 0/20
@400042c1badc25050ef4 end msg 23982
@400042c1badc2508b0a4 delivery 2: 
success: 
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:_Shared_object_libpq.so.3_not_found,_required_by_dspam/did_0+0+1/
@400042c1badc250a9cd4 status: local 0/30 remote 0/20
@400042c1badc250c7d4c end msg 24087
@400042c1badc2510942c end msg 24040


--niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


kernel or syslogd problem under exterme load (many processes and filedescs open)

2005-01-31 Thread Niki Denev
Hello,
Recently while testing a program on a 5.3-STABLE machine
with dual Athlon MP 2200+ (SMP enabled), i made a mistake
and the program basicaly became a fork() bomb.
It flooded my dmesg and messages with these messages (which is normal):
Jan 29 18:13:20 tormentor kernel: maxproc limit exceeded by uid 1001, 
please see tuning(7) and login.conf(5).
Jan 29 18:13:25 tormentor kernel: kern.ipc.maxpipekva exceeded; see 
tuning(7)

but i've also noticed several mangled messages in the log, like these :
Jan 29 18:08:25 tormentor kernel: kernmaxpr.ipc.maxpipekocva excee 
limidet exd;ce sedeeed t buninyg( u7)id 1001, please see tuni
ng(7) and login.conf(5).
Jan 29 18:08:28 tormentor kernel:

Probably this is some sort of race condition, either in the kernel 
output or syslogd?

--niki
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]