Re: /sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c 1.168 MFC?

2006-08-22 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 03:23:37PM -0400, David Gilbert wrote:
 Could someone please MFC at least v 1.168 of ata-chipset.c into
 RELENG_6?  Specifically the Nvidia NFORCE-4 support?  Most of the
 AMD64 motherboards I've gotten lately require this patch.  
 
 I have been able to apply diff between 1.165 and 1.168 to RELENG-6 and
 it makes the chipset work.  (this also requires 1.65 to 1.68 of
 ata-pci.h).
 
 Any takers?
 
I'll do it in a few days if Soren doesn't do it earlier -- I
also have plenty of such motherboards which want to meet 6.x.


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD committer


pgpDteDSzmLZB.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: /sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c 1.168 MFC?

2006-08-22 Thread Søren Schmidt

I plan to bacport *all* of ATA, as there are so many bugfixes that a resync
is needed.
ATA from -current fits right into 6-stable so its a nobrainer it just need a
little more exposure...

-Søren

On 8/22/06, Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 03:23:37PM -0400, David Gilbert wrote:
 Could someone please MFC at least v 1.168 of ata-chipset.c into
 RELENG_6?  Specifically the Nvidia NFORCE-4 support?  Most of the
 AMD64 motherboards I've gotten lately require this patch.

 I have been able to apply diff between 1.165 and 1.168 to RELENG-6 and
 it makes the chipset work.  (this also requires 1.65 to 1.68 of
 ata-pci.h).

 Any takers?

I'll do it in a few days if Soren doesn't do it earlier -- I
also have plenty of such motherboards which want to meet 6.x.


Cheers,
--
Ruslan Ermilov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD committer




___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: /sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c 1.168 MFC?

2006-08-22 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Hi Soren,

On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 10:56:19AM +0200, S?ren Schmidt wrote:
I plan to bacport *all* of ATA, as there are so many bugfixes that a
resync is needed.
ATA from -current fits right into 6-stable so its a nobrainer it just need
a little more exposure...
 
Do you have any ETA?  Yes, I'm currently running HEAD version of sys/dev/ata/
on these motherboards.

Thanks!


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD committer


pgpEhZyMYNSLZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: /sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c 1.168 MFC?

2006-08-22 Thread Søren Schmidt

Give me a few days and I'll get to it if I dont get any serious issues
before that...

-Søren

On 8/22/06, Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi Soren,

On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 10:56:19AM +0200, S?ren Schmidt wrote:
I plan to bacport *all* of ATA, as there are so many bugfixes that a
resync is needed.
ATA from -current fits right into 6-stable so its a nobrainer it just
need
a little more exposure...

Do you have any ETA?  Yes, I'm currently running HEAD version of
sys/dev/ata/
on these motherboards.

Thanks!


Cheers,
--
Ruslan Ermilov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD committer




___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


/sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c 1.168 MFC?

2006-08-21 Thread David Gilbert
Could someone please MFC at least v 1.168 of ata-chipset.c into
RELENG_6?  Specifically the Nvidia NFORCE-4 support?  Most of the
AMD64 motherboards I've gotten lately require this patch.  

I have been able to apply diff between 1.165 and 1.168 to RELENG-6 and
it makes the chipset work.  (this also requires 1.65 to 1.68 of
ata-pci.h).

Any takers?

Dave.

-- 

|David Gilbert, Independent Contractor.   | Two things can be  |
|Mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|  equal if and only if they |
|http://daveg.ca  |   are precisely opposite.  |
=GLO
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]