Re: ALTQ on GIF tunnels?
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 05:36:16PM -0600, J. Buck Caldwell wrote: J> Gleb Smirnoff wrote: J> >On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 11:48:34PM -0600, J. Buck Caldwell wrote: J> >J> Is there any work on adding support for ALTQ to the GIF tunnel J> >J> interface? I'm having wonderful results getting ALTQ working on normal J> >J> interfaces, but it would be heavenly to prioritize the traffic inside J> >J> the tunnels. J> > J> >You can (and probably should) enable ALTQ on the physical interface J> >that gif(4) runnels use for encapsulated packets. J> > J> Yes, but that doesn't do any good for the packets traveling inside the J> tunnel. Specifically, I have a corporate network hooked to a branch via J> VPN, and want to prioritize not just the tunnel over ordinary traffic, J> but prioritize different types of traffic inside the tunnel. You tag packets with ALTQ identifier in ipfw/pf, and this identifier isn't lost after packet is encapsulated. So, when going out the physical interface the packet will be queued according to the ALTQ policy you have specified. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ALTQ on GIF tunnels?
Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 11:48:34PM -0600, J. Buck Caldwell wrote: J> Is there any work on adding support for ALTQ to the GIF tunnel J> interface? I'm having wonderful results getting ALTQ working on normal J> interfaces, but it would be heavenly to prioritize the traffic inside J> the tunnels. You can (and probably should) enable ALTQ on the physical interface that gif(4) runnels use for encapsulated packets. Yes, but that doesn't do any good for the packets traveling inside the tunnel. Specifically, I have a corporate network hooked to a branch via VPN, and want to prioritize not just the tunnel over ordinary traffic, but prioritize different types of traffic inside the tunnel. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ALTQ on GIF tunnels?
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 11:48:34PM -0600, J. Buck Caldwell wrote: J> Is there any work on adding support for ALTQ to the GIF tunnel J> interface? I'm having wonderful results getting ALTQ working on normal J> interfaces, but it would be heavenly to prioritize the traffic inside J> the tunnels. You can (and probably should) enable ALTQ on the physical interface that gif(4) runnels use for encapsulated packets. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ALTQ on GIF tunnels?
Is there any work on adding support for ALTQ to the GIF tunnel interface? I'm having wonderful results getting ALTQ working on normal interfaces, but it would be heavenly to prioritize the traffic inside the tunnels. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
