Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU on pentium D
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 4:47:48 am Alex Povolotsky wrote: Hello! I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1 launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable shows cluster-one# mptable -verbose === MPTable looking for EBDA pointer @ 0x040e, found, searching EBDA @ 0x0009e800 searching CMOS 'top of mem' @ 0x0009e400 (633K) searching default 'top of mem' @ 0x0009fc00 (639K) searching BIOS @ 0x000f MP FPS found in BIOS @ physical addr: 0x000fe200 --- MP Floating Pointer Structure: location: BIOS physical address: 0x000fe200 signature:'_MP_' length: 16 bytes version: 1.4 checksum: 0x9f mode: Virtual Wire --- MP Config Table Header: physical address: 0x000fe210 signature:'PCMP' base table length:64 version: 1.4 checksum: 0x7f OEM ID: '' Product ID: '' OEM table pointer:0x OEM table size: 0 entry count: 1 local APIC address: 0xfee0 extended table length:0 extended table checksum: 0 --- MP Config Base Table Entries: -- Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step Flags 0 0x14BSP, usable 15 6 4 0xbfebfbff === while in dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #2: Thu Apr 19 00:19:54 MSD 2007 tark...@cluster-one.zinester.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/P4D WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (2808.41-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf64 Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH ,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0xe49dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14,b15 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM AMD Features2=0x1LAHF real memory = 1046757376 (998 MB) avail memory = 1015095296 (968 MB) ACPI APIC Table: INTEL DG965SS FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard [...] SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! The kernel is, of course, SMP. What can I do, where can I search for solution? Second core IS enabled in BIOS cluster-one# sysctl hw | grep cpu hw.ncpu: 2 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_usage: 100.00% cluster-one# sysctl machdep | grep cpu machdep.cpu_idle_hlt: 1 machdep.hlt_cpus: 2 machdep.hlt_logical_cpus: 0 machdep.logical_cpus_mask: 2 so second CPU is halted, attempt to start it with sysctl does not help Alex. What does 'sysctl machdep | grep hyper' show? -- John Baldwin ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU on pentium D
6.2 is really quite old now, does 7.x or even 8.x work? Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Alex Povolotsky tark...@webmail.sub.ru I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1 launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable shows ... This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmas...@multiplay.co.uk. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400 From: Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and what is this, i mean why: WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. I thought it was pretty clear. ipsec is not multi-processor safe and requires the use of GIANT. If you have IPSEC in your kernel the network stack will also be giant locked which will cut performance. Yep, google for extensive discussion (hint: FAST_IPSEC) No visible changes in behaviour with FAST_IPSEC Fast IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. mptable still shows ONE CPU Alex. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?
please, dmesg, mptable -verbose, mptable -grope 2007/4/25, Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400 From: Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and what is this, i mean why: WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. I thought it was pretty clear. ipsec is not multi-processor safe and requires the use of GIANT. If you have IPSEC in your kernel the network stack will also be giant locked which will cut performance. Yep, google for extensive discussion (hint: FAST_IPSEC) No visible changes in behaviour with FAST_IPSEC Fast IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. mptable still shows ONE CPU Alex. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?
Alexey Karagodov wrote: please, dmesg, mptable -verbose, mptable -grope 2007/4/25, Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400 From: Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and what is this, i mean why: WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. I thought it was pretty clear. ipsec is not multi-processor safe and requires the use of GIANT. If you have IPSEC in your kernel the network stack will also be giant locked which will cut performance. Yep, google for extensive discussion (hint: FAST_IPSEC) No visible changes in behaviour with FAST_IPSEC Fast IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. mptable still shows ONE CPU Alex. Full dmesg: Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #5: Wed Apr 25 13:37:13 MSD 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/P4D Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (2808.41-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf64 Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0xe49dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14,b15 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM AMD Features2=0x1LAHF Logical CPUs per core: 2 real memory = 1046757376 (998 MB) avail memory = 1015087104 (968 MB) ACPI APIC Table: INTEL DG965SS FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ichwd module loaded kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: INTEL DG965SS on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 acpi_perf0: ACPI CPU Frequency Control on cpu0 acpi_perf0: failed in PERF_STATUS attach device_attach: acpi_perf0 attach returned 6 acpi_perf0: ACPI CPU Frequency Control on cpu0 acpi_perf0: failed in PERF_STATUS attach device_attach: acpi_perf0 attach returned 6 acpi_throttle0: ACPI CPU Throttling on cpu0 cpu1: ACPI CPU on acpi0 acpi_perf1: ACPI CPU Frequency Control on cpu1 acpi_perf1: failed in PERF_STATUS attach device_attach: acpi_perf1 attach returned 6 acpi_perf1: ACPI CPU Frequency Control on cpu1 acpi_perf1: failed in PERF_STATUS attach device_attach: acpi_perf1 attach returned 6 acpi_throttle1: ACPI CPU Throttling on cpu1 acpi_throttle1: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle1 attach returned 6 acpi_button0: Sleep Button on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 pci0: display, VGA at device 2.0 (no driver attached) pci0: simple comms at device 3.0 (no driver attached) em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection Version - 6.2.9 port 0x30e0-0x30ff mem 0x5030-0x5031,0x50324000-0x50324fff irq 20 at device 25.0 on pci0 em0: Ethernet address: 00:19:d1:03:10:d9 pci0: serial bus, USB at device 26.0 (no driver attached) pci0: serial bus, USB at device 26.1 (no driver attached) pci0: serial bus, USB at device 26.7 (no driver attached) pci0: multimedia at device 27.0 (no driver attached) pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 28.0 on pci0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 28.1 on pci0 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 atapci0: GENERIC ATA controller port 0x2018-0x201f,0x2024-0x2027,0x2010-0x2017,0x2020-0x2023,0x2000-0x200f mem 0x5010-0x501001ff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci2 ata2: ATA channel 0 on atapci0 ata3: ATA channel 1 on atapci0 pcib3: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 28.2 on pci0 pci3: ACPI PCI bus on pcib3 pcib4: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 28.3 on pci0 pci4: ACPI PCI bus on pcib4 pcib5: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 28.4 on pci0 pci5: ACPI PCI bus on pcib5 pci0: serial bus, USB at device 29.0 (no driver attached) pci0: serial bus, USB at device 29.1 (no driver attached) pci0: serial bus, USB at device 29.2 (no driver attached) pci0: serial bus, USB at device 29.7 (no driver attached) pcib6: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 30.0 on pci0 pci6: ACPI PCI bus on pcib6 atapci1: SiI 3114 SATA150 controller port 0x1018-0x101f,0x1024-0x1027,0x1010-0x1017,0x1020-0x1023,0x1000-0x100f mem 0x50004800-0x50004bff irq 22 at device 1.0 on pci6 ata4: ATA channel 0 on atapci1 ata5: ATA channel 1 on atapci1 ata6: ATA channel 2 on atapci1
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU on pentium D
Alex Povolotsky wrote: I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1 launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable shows Hyperthreading is disabled by default in FreeBSD (for security reasons). You can enable it via sysctl if you want (machdep.hyperthreading_allowed=1). However, note that it might not make your machine any faster (in fact, a UP kernel might be faster; it depends on the kind of programs that you're running). Also not that there is a potential security issue with hyper- threading (information leak). Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd When your hammer is C++, everything begins to look like a thumb. -- Steve Haflich, in comp.lang.c++ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU on pentium D
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 04:47:48 am Alex Povolotsky wrote: Hello! I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1 launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable shows cluster-one# mptable -verbose === MPTable looking for EBDA pointer @ 0x040e, found, searching EBDA @ 0x0009e800 searching CMOS 'top of mem' @ 0x0009e400 (633K) searching default 'top of mem' @ 0x0009fc00 (639K) searching BIOS @ 0x000f MP FPS found in BIOS @ physical addr: 0x000fe200 --- MP Floating Pointer Structure: location: BIOS physical address: 0x000fe200 signature:'_MP_' length: 16 bytes version: 1.4 checksum: 0x9f mode: Virtual Wire --- MP Config Table Header: physical address: 0x000fe210 signature:'PCMP' base table length:64 version: 1.4 checksum: 0x7f OEM ID: '' Product ID: '' OEM table pointer:0x OEM table size: 0 entry count: 1 local APIC address: 0xfee0 extended table length:0 extended table checksum: 0 --- MP Config Base Table Entries: -- Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step Flags 0 0x14BSP, usable 15 6 4 0xbfebfbff === while in dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #2: Thu Apr 19 00:19:54 MSD 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/P4D WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (2808.41-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf64 Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH ,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0xe49dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14,b15 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM AMD Features2=0x1LAHF real memory = 1046757376 (998 MB) avail memory = 1015095296 (968 MB) ACPI APIC Table: INTEL DG965SS FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard [...] SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! The kernel is, of course, SMP. What can I do, where can I search for solution? Second core IS enabled in BIOS cluster-one# sysctl hw | grep cpu hw.ncpu: 2 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_usage: 100.00% cluster-one# sysctl machdep | grep cpu machdep.cpu_idle_hlt: 1 machdep.hlt_cpus: 2 machdep.hlt_logical_cpus: 0 machdep.logical_cpus_mask: 2 so second CPU is halted, attempt to start it with sysctl does not help Alex. It's seeing it as an HTT thread. Try changing 'machdep.hyperthreading_allowed'. -- John Baldwin ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU on pentium D
John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 25 April 2007 04:47:48 am Alex Povolotsky wrote: Hello! I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1 launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable shows Hmm. I am running PentiumD 3.0 Ghz on Asus p5p800-vm motherboard. Needed to update BIOS to make CPU work correctly. Also, i am not running RELEASE. I run 6.2-STABLE cvsupped regulary. I have no problem like that, top shows 0 and 1 in C column for different processes. So,I'd simply recomment to cvs and rebuild the kernel and update your MB BIOS to the latest. -- Regards, Artem ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU on pentium D
John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 25 April 2007 04:47:48 am Alex Povolotsky wrote: Hello! I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1 launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable shows cluster-one# mptable -verbose === MPTable looking for EBDA pointer @ 0x040e, found, searching EBDA @ 0x0009e800 searching CMOS 'top of mem' @ 0x0009e400 (633K) searching default 'top of mem' @ 0x0009fc00 (639K) searching BIOS @ 0x000f MP FPS found in BIOS @ physical addr: 0x000fe200 --- MP Floating Pointer Structure: location: BIOS physical address: 0x000fe200 signature:'_MP_' length: 16 bytes version: 1.4 checksum: 0x9f mode: Virtual Wire --- MP Config Table Header: physical address: 0x000fe210 signature:'PCMP' base table length:64 version: 1.4 checksum: 0x7f OEM ID: '' Product ID: '' OEM table pointer:0x OEM table size: 0 entry count: 1 local APIC address: 0xfee0 extended table length:0 extended table checksum: 0 --- MP Config Base Table Entries: -- Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step Flags 0 0x14BSP, usable 15 6 4 0xbfebfbff === while in dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #2: Thu Apr 19 00:19:54 MSD 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/P4D WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (2808.41-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf64 Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH ,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0xe49dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14,b15 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM AMD Features2=0x1LAHF real memory = 1046757376 (998 MB) avail memory = 1015095296 (968 MB) ACPI APIC Table: INTEL DG965SS FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard [...] SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! The kernel is, of course, SMP. What can I do, where can I search for solution? Second core IS enabled in BIOS cluster-one# sysctl hw | grep cpu hw.ncpu: 2 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_usage: 100.00% cluster-one# sysctl machdep | grep cpu machdep.cpu_idle_hlt: 1 machdep.hlt_cpus: 2 machdep.hlt_logical_cpus: 0 machdep.logical_cpus_mask: 2 so second CPU is halted, attempt to start it with sysctl does not help Alex. It's seeing it as an HTT thread. Try changing 'machdep.hyperthreading_allowed'. Well, it is a Pentium D. It is supposed to have two cores, not just hyperthreading! How can it be at all? Alex. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU on pentium D
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 03:20:05 pm Alex Povolotsky wrote: John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 25 April 2007 04:47:48 am Alex Povolotsky wrote: Hello! I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1 launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable shows cluster-one# mptable -verbose === MPTable looking for EBDA pointer @ 0x040e, found, searching EBDA @ 0x0009e800 searching CMOS 'top of mem' @ 0x0009e400 (633K) searching default 'top of mem' @ 0x0009fc00 (639K) searching BIOS @ 0x000f MP FPS found in BIOS @ physical addr: 0x000fe200 --- MP Floating Pointer Structure: location: BIOS physical address: 0x000fe200 signature:'_MP_' length: 16 bytes version: 1.4 checksum: 0x9f mode: Virtual Wire --- MP Config Table Header: physical address: 0x000fe210 signature:'PCMP' base table length:64 version: 1.4 checksum: 0x7f OEM ID: '' Product ID: '' OEM table pointer:0x OEM table size: 0 entry count: 1 local APIC address: 0xfee0 extended table length:0 extended table checksum: 0 --- MP Config Base Table Entries: -- Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step Flags 0 0x14BSP, usable 15 6 4 0xbfebfbff === while in dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #2: Thu Apr 19 00:19:54 MSD 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/P4D WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (2808.41-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf64 Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH ,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0xe49dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14,b15 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM AMD Features2=0x1LAHF real memory = 1046757376 (998 MB) avail memory = 1015095296 (968 MB) ACPI APIC Table: INTEL DG965SS FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard [...] SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! The kernel is, of course, SMP. What can I do, where can I search for solution? Second core IS enabled in BIOS cluster-one# sysctl hw | grep cpu hw.ncpu: 2 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_usage: 100.00% cluster-one# sysctl machdep | grep cpu machdep.cpu_idle_hlt: 1 machdep.hlt_cpus: 2 machdep.hlt_logical_cpus: 0 machdep.logical_cpus_mask: 2 so second CPU is halted, attempt to start it with sysctl does not help Alex. It's seeing it as an HTT thread. Try changing 'machdep.hyperthreading_allowed'. Well, it is a Pentium D. It is supposed to have two cores, not just hyperthreading! How can it be at all? Because multicores actually show up as HTT and you have to do extra work to figure out if they are really cores or threads, and apparently 6.2 gets it wrong on your machine. -- John Baldwin ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?
+1 i'm using IPSec with out such limitations ... fix it. than we will continue conversation about your CPU troubles 2007/4/20, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]: - Скрыть цитируемый текст - On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400 From: Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and what is this, i mean why: WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. I thought it was pretty clear. ipsec is not multi-processor safe and requires the use of GIANT. If you have IPSEC in your kernel the network stack will also be giant locked which will cut performance. Yep, google for extensive discussion (hint: FAST_IPSEC) Kris 2007/4/19, Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello! On the Pentium-D box, kernel detects both CPUs, but it seems like scheduler use only one. (from dmesg) Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #2: Thu Apr 19 00:19:54 MSD 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/P4D WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (2808.41-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf64 Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,C MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0xe49dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14,b15 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM AMD Features2=0x1LAHF Logical CPUs per core: 2 real memory = 1046757376 (998 MB) avail memory = 1015095296 (968 MB) ACPI APIC Table: INTEL DG965SS FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! (from top) last pid: 12408; load averages: 4.99, 4.91, 4.08up 0+01:08:02 19:26:23 265 processes: 8 running, 256 sleeping, 1 zombie CPU states: 35.0% user, 0.0% nice, 14.1% system, 0.9% interrupt, 50.0% idle Mem: 267M Active, 503M Inact, 171M Wired, 29M Cache, 109M Buf, 1636K Free Swap: 2006M Total, 2006M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1399125 1 1090 4684K 2808K RUN0 11:20 18.85% qmgr 1819300 1 40 33552K 30824K select 0 8:58 13.57% perl5.8.8 1821300 1 40 33364K 30644K select 0 9:15 6.05% perl5.8.8 12398125 1 40 3588K 2524K select 0 0:00 2.00% cleanup 1394 root1 1040 3444K 1596K RUN0 1:58 1.66% master 10601125 1 970 3580K 1728K select 0 0:18 0.83% trivial-rewri 10051125 1 970 4536K 2688K RUN0 0:13 0.63% scache All processes runs on CPU0, and I did not see less than 50% idle cpu. What can be wrong? Alex. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?
kernel config please and /etc/sysctl.conf 2007/4/19, Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello! On the Pentium-D box, kernel detects both CPUs, but it seems like scheduler use only one. (from dmesg) Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #2: Thu Apr 19 00:19:54 MSD 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/P4D WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (2808.41-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf64 Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,C MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0xe49dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14,b15 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM AMD Features2=0x1LAHF Logical CPUs per core: 2 real memory = 1046757376 (998 MB) avail memory = 1015095296 (968 MB) ACPI APIC Table: INTEL DG965SS FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! (from top) last pid: 12408; load averages: 4.99, 4.91, 4.08up 0+01:08:02 19:26:23 265 processes: 8 running, 256 sleeping, 1 zombie CPU states: 35.0% user, 0.0% nice, 14.1% system, 0.9% interrupt, 50.0% idle Mem: 267M Active, 503M Inact, 171M Wired, 29M Cache, 109M Buf, 1636K Free Swap: 2006M Total, 2006M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1399125 1 1090 4684K 2808K RUN0 11:20 18.85% qmgr 1819300 1 40 33552K 30824K select 0 8:58 13.57% perl5.8.8 1821300 1 40 33364K 30644K select 0 9:15 6.05% perl5.8.8 12398125 1 40 3588K 2524K select 0 0:00 2.00% cleanup 1394 root1 1040 3444K 1596K RUN0 1:58 1.66% master 10601125 1 970 3580K 1728K select 0 0:18 0.83% trivial-rewri 10051125 1 970 4536K 2688K RUN0 0:13 0.63% scache All processes runs on CPU0, and I did not see less than 50% idle cpu. What can be wrong? Alex. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?
and what is this, i mean why: WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. 2007/4/19, Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello! On the Pentium-D box, kernel detects both CPUs, but it seems like scheduler use only one. (from dmesg) Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #2: Thu Apr 19 00:19:54 MSD 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/P4D WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (2808.41-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf64 Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,C MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0xe49dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14,b15 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM AMD Features2=0x1LAHF Logical CPUs per core: 2 real memory = 1046757376 (998 MB) avail memory = 1015095296 (968 MB) ACPI APIC Table: INTEL DG965SS FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! (from top) last pid: 12408; load averages: 4.99, 4.91, 4.08up 0+01:08:02 19:26:23 265 processes: 8 running, 256 sleeping, 1 zombie CPU states: 35.0% user, 0.0% nice, 14.1% system, 0.9% interrupt, 50.0% idle Mem: 267M Active, 503M Inact, 171M Wired, 29M Cache, 109M Buf, 1636K Free Swap: 2006M Total, 2006M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1399125 1 1090 4684K 2808K RUN0 11:20 18.85% qmgr 1819300 1 40 33552K 30824K select 0 8:58 13.57% perl5.8.8 1821300 1 40 33364K 30644K select 0 9:15 6.05% perl5.8.8 12398125 1 40 3588K 2524K select 0 0:00 2.00% cleanup 1394 root1 1040 3444K 1596K RUN0 1:58 1.66% master 10601125 1 970 3580K 1728K select 0 0:18 0.83% trivial-rewri 10051125 1 970 4536K 2688K RUN0 0:13 0.63% scache All processes runs on CPU0, and I did not see less than 50% idle cpu. What can be wrong? Alex. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400 From: Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and what is this, i mean why: WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. I thought it was pretty clear. ipsec is not multi-processor safe and requires the use of GIANT. If you have IPSEC in your kernel the network stack will also be giant locked which will cut performance. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 pgp2WZGCeoOcS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400 From: Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and what is this, i mean why: WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. I thought it was pretty clear. ipsec is not multi-processor safe and requires the use of GIANT. If you have IPSEC in your kernel the network stack will also be giant locked which will cut performance. Yep, google for extensive discussion (hint: FAST_IPSEC) Kris -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?
Hi, Alex Povolotsky wrote: Hello! On the Pentium-D box, kernel detects both CPUs, but it seems like scheduler use only one. (from dmesg) Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #2: Thu Apr 19 00:19:54 MSD 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/P4D WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (2808.41-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf64 Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,C MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0xe49dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,EST,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14,b15 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM AMD Features2=0x1LAHF Logical CPUs per core: 2 real memory = 1046757376 (998 MB) avail memory = 1015095296 (968 MB) ACPI APIC Table: INTEL DG965SS FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 Are you sure it is second CPU ? :) May be it is single processor with HT? SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! (from top) last pid: 12408; load averages: 4.99, 4.91, 4.08up 0+01:08:02 19:26:23 265 processes: 8 running, 256 sleeping, 1 zombie CPU states: 35.0% user, 0.0% nice, 14.1% system, 0.9% interrupt, 50.0% idle Mem: 267M Active, 503M Inact, 171M Wired, 29M Cache, 109M Buf, 1636K Free Swap: 2006M Total, 2006M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1399125 1 1090 4684K 2808K RUN0 11:20 18.85% qmgr 1819300 1 40 33552K 30824K select 0 8:58 13.57% perl5.8.8 1821300 1 40 33364K 30644K select 0 9:15 6.05% perl5.8.8 12398125 1 40 3588K 2524K select 0 0:00 2.00% cleanup 1394 root1 1040 3444K 1596K RUN0 1:58 1.66% master 10601125 1 970 3580K 1728K select 0 0:18 0.83% trivial-rewri 10051125 1 970 4536K 2688K RUN0 0:13 0.63% scache All processes runs on CPU0, and I did not see less than 50% idle cpu. What can be wrong? Alex. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
