Re: FreeBSD Release 8.0 floppy images

2010-05-11 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi,
Mark Linimon wrote:
 You can still build them.  They just won't be built by default.

Trying that now on 8.0-RELEASE amd64 Thanks.


Ken Smith wrote:

 building them now
 fails due to another of the handful of reasons we wanted
 to abandon floppies
 ...
 the 'livefs'
 one can't and it recently started overflowing.

I hope that's stable or current  not 8.0-RELEASE.


 Those reasons combined with the fact I can't even test
 them any more all combined to convince the developer
 community 8.0 was a reasonable point to let floppy
 support fall by the wayside.

Thanks for the reply.
Understandable that developers hosts have lost interest in floppies.
But a lot of old servers  laptops used as spare terminas etc may
have floppy  ether but no cdrom or USB, inc eg this laptop running 7.2:
http://www.berklix.org/~jhs/hardware/laptops/dell_latitude_xpi_p133st/

I suspect people who live near you may sometime offer to drop off
a spare old PC with a floppy ;-)

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey: BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
Mail plain text,  Not HTML quoted-printable Base64 http://www.asciiribbon.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Release 8.0 floppy images

2010-05-10 Thread Royce Williams
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 7:08 PM, pluknet pluk...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 10 May 2010 06:05, Joseph Olatt j...@eskimo.com wrote:

 As for floppies building, it was turned off intentionally starting from 8.0.
 See http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revisionrevision=188437

I'm guessing that this because of resource constraints (getting
everything to fit)?  I assume that if it was just that folks weren't
using them, it would be easy to keep them.  A few data points:

* We have some older Dell DRAC systems that don't support PXE very
well, but do support loading remote floppy images.

* There are still folks in countries where computer hardware doesn't
get refreshed as quickly as in the U.S., and floppies are still a
viable install option.

* When I'm not at $WORK, one of my hobbies is restoring old computers
(Whistle Interjets, Qubes, etc.) the way that some people restore old
cars -- with the twist of using modern OSes.  Of course, they can run
NetBSD :-), but freebsd-update is a killer feature for keeping slower
systems patched.  Of course, some of them don't support floppies,
either.

In practice, once the initial install is done, floppies aren't needed.
 And we can always pop out the drive, and put it in a system that
supports CD booting and install from there.  But it's more work. :-)

Royce
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Release 8.0 floppy images

2010-05-10 Thread Julian H. Stacey
  As for floppies building, it was turned off intentionally starting from 8.0.
  See http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revisionrevision=188437

I looked earlier at URL above earlier, but just 
kensmith(CC added)
Log Message: Turn off the building of boot floppies for amd64/i386.
No reason in there, why or URL pointer to a list discussion.


 I'm guessing that this because of resource constraints (getting
 everything to fit)?  I assume that if it was just that folks weren't
 using them, it would be easy to keep them.  A few data points:

Seconded.

Ken, 
I'd suggest it would be good to commit  post a comment why removed.
It will later affect rescue capability of some older servers when
they get upgraded, (I guess many/most legacy production servers
still are 7.*, at least till 8.1 comes out).
Thanks

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey: BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
Mail plain text,  Not HTML quoted-printable Base64 http://www.asciiribbon.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Release 8.0 floppy images

2010-05-10 Thread Mark Linimon
You can still build them.  They just won't be built by default.

mcl
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Release 8.0 floppy images

2010-05-10 Thread Ken Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 5/10/10 12:36 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
 I'd suggest it would be good to commit  post a comment why removed.
 It will later affect rescue capability of some older servers when
 they get upgraded, (I guess many/most legacy production servers
 still are 7.*, at least till 8.1 comes out).

When I started down the pathway to removing them it was
with the intention of removing *all* mention of floppies
as part of system installation.  There are quite a few
things it would be really nice to rip out of sysinstall
(they're hindering other progress) that are there because
of floppies.  We figured it had reached the point progress
on making sysinstall better (or at least less annoying)
in various ways being hindered by floppy support wasn't
in the majority of peoples' best interest.

It turned out progressing on that isn't going as well as
hoped, pc98 has stronger ties to floppies than was originally
thought.  So, after turning off the building of floppies
things got a bit stalled on the removal of what I'll call
floppy-isms in sysinstall.

It's still the basic path we'd like to follow, it's just
slowed down a bit.

As for building them at all goes...  It turns out that by
mistake (a system doing automated release builds on a
regular interval) we discovered that building them now
fails due to another of the handful of reasons we wanted
to abandon floppies goes (above mentioned ripping out of
stuff was just one).  Most of the floppies involved
can go multi-volume if necessary (e.g. the mfs floppy
can span more than one physical floppy) but the 'livefs'
one can't and it recently started overflowing.

Those reasons combined with the fact I can't even test
them any more all combined to convince the developer
community 8.0 was a reasonable point to let floppy
support fall by the wayside.

- -- 
Ken Smith
- - From there to here, from here to  |   kensm...@buffalo.edu
  there, funny things are everywhere.   |
  - Theodore Geisel |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkvoogwACgkQ/G14VSmup/bC3ACfbuczpAnz1FuC3gzzSWa3BM3I
TPsAnRE/KnBwM2v9akXNuQJJmtJGnBF6
=p7a/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Release 8.0 floppy images

2010-05-09 Thread pluknet
On 10 May 2010 06:05, Joseph Olatt j...@eskimo.com wrote:
 Hi,

 Are floppy images no longer supplied with FreeBSD 8?

 The folling link [1] in the Handbook:
 ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/8.0-RELEASE/floppies/

 results in the following error:

 550 /pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/8.0-RELEASE/floppies/: No such file or 
 directory


As for floppies building, it was turned off intentionally starting from 8.0.
See http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revisionrevision=188437

-- 
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org