Re: ata(4) -STABLE subsystem and tags MFC
It seems Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: Hello there Soren, any chances patch for ata subsystem at date: 2002/04/18 19:11:45; that fixes tagged support for ata(4) will be MFC'd before 4.6-R? If you mean the patch that went into -current it doesn't apply to the -stable branch at all, it fixed a problem introduced by the busdma integration, not the problem that apparently hit some on -stable. -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: ata(4) -STABLE subsystem and tags MFC
Hi again, On Mon, 6 May 2002, Søren Schmidt wrote: SS any chances patch for ata subsystem at SS SS date: 2002/04/18 19:11:45; SS SS that fixes tagged support for ata(4) will be MFC'd before 4.6-R? SS SS If you mean the patch that went into -current it doesn't apply to SS the -stable branch at all, it fixed a problem introduced by the SS busdma integration, not the problem that apparently hit some on -stable. Well then it's another problem in -stable, and currently tagged ata is not workable in all our -stable environments with IBM disks :( Machines do not crash, but constantly reinitialising ATA subsystem just at trying to boot first FS at tagged disk. What info do you need so we can try to fix this? Thanks. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: ata(4) -STABLE subsystem and tags MFC
It seems Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: SS If you mean the patch that went into -current it doesn't apply to SS the -stable branch at all, it fixed a problem introduced by the SS busdma integration, not the problem that apparently hit some on -stable. Well then it's another problem in -stable, and currently tagged ata is not workable in all our -stable environments with IBM disks :( Machines do not crash, but constantly reinitialising ATA subsystem just at trying to boot first FS at tagged disk. What info do you need so we can try to fix this? I need to be able to reproduce it here in my lab, and so far I havn't had any luck with that. There also doesn't seem to be any easy to find denominator between the systems that fail... The problem is probably timing related, perhaps I have gotten something a wee bit out of spec, but not enough for all systems to fail... Anyhow this is a bitch to debug -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: ata(4) -STABLE subsystem and tags MFC
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Søren Schmidt wrote: SS Well then it's another problem in -stable, and currently tagged ata is not SS workable in all our -stable environments with IBM disks :( Machines do not SS crash, but constantly reinitialising ATA subsystem just at trying to boot SS first FS at tagged disk. SS SS What info do you need so we can try to fix this? SS SS I need to be able to reproduce it here in my lab, and so far I havn't SS had any luck with that. There also doesn't seem to be any easy to find SS denominator between the systems that fail... SS SS The problem is probably timing related, perhaps I have gotten something SS a wee bit out of spec, but not enough for all systems to fail... SS SS Anyhow this is a bitch to debug Yeah, I see. By the way, I have a test machine handy, and also space GXP disc, so I'm going to build testcase. It's K6/2-450 at TX motherboard. What info do I need to send? (possibly, we should move the discussion of the precise details to private mail, yeah?) Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
