Am 06.02.2011 um 13:23 schrieb Spil Oss:
Hi All,
Don't know if this is expected behaviour.
My LAN (bge0) and WLAN (wlan0) are bridged in bridge0. I tried to run
rtadvd on bridge0 but that didn't result in ipv6 addresses on my
network. Tried running rtadvd directly /usr/sbin/rtadvd -c
/etc/rtadvd.conf -f -D and saw the requests coming in from the client
but that didn't result in a working ipv6 network. Wild guessing I
tried loading it with /usr/sbin/rtadvd -f -D bge0 and I had a
functional ipv6 network.
Is this intended behaviour? Am I doing something wrong?
It appears to be intentional; there was some discussion a couple years back,
and the current behavior is for virtual interfaces to not receive link-local
addresses.
Since I prefer to have bridge0 as the main interface, I simply manually
configured a link local address:
ipv6_enable=YES
ipv6_gateway_enable=YES
ipv6_network_interfaces=bridge0 gif0
ipv6_ifconfig_bridge0=fe80::21c:c0ff:fe7d:8c50%bridge0
ipv6_ifconfig_bridge0_alias0=2001:470:1f0b:::1 prefixlen 64
ipv6_ifconfig_gif0=2001:470:1f0a:::2 2001:470:1f0a:::1 prefixlen 128
$ cat /etc/rtadvd.conf
bridge0:\
:addrs#1:addr=2001:470:1f0b::::raflags#64:
The IPv4 side of gif0 is brought up through a linkup script triggered by mpd
when my DSL connection comes up; that also updates the endpoint address for the
HE tunnel.
Oh, this is on -stable from Dec 4.
HTH,
Stefan
--
Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de Fon +49 151 14070811
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
