Re: [toolchain] amd64-gcc question
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 04:04:07PM -0553, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 11/15/15 13:58, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> I pkg-installed amd64-gcc over the weekend hoping for Graphite > >> (auto-loop parallelization) support, but no go. > > When you say "amd64-gcc" where did you obtain that from? As a > > FreeBSD port/package, or somewhere else? > > I pkg-installed it originally, but as of last Monday, there was a port > as well, I did a 'portsnap fetch update' (all box-stock ports configs) & > there it was > > > > >> just did a 'portsnap fetch upgrade' & there is now a port > >> for amd64-gcc, but it includes no files & no pkg-descr file. > > This is a little weird. I have packaged GCC 4.6 (lang/gcc46), > > GCC 4.7 (lang/gcc47), GCC 4.8 (lang/gcc48), GCC 4.9 (lang/gcc49), > > GCC 5 (lang/gcc5 and lang/gcc5-devel) and GCC 6 snapshot (lang/gcc6-devel) > > as well as the "canonical" version of GCC (lang/gcc, currently > > GCC 4.8 and in the process of being moved to GCC 4.9). > > > > All of these build and package on amd64, feature pkg-descr, etc. > > And as a FreeBSD user leveraging the official FreeBSD Ports Collection > > is the recommended approach. > > > > None of them would be called amd64-gcc or similar, though. > > amd64-gcc-5.2.0 > amd64-xtoolchain-gcc-0.1 > > is what pkg calls them Those are cross toolchain packages to cross build base with modern gcc Bapt signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[Differential] [Accepted] D3190: ar: enable deterministic mode by default
bapt accepted this revision. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3190 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: emaste, brooks, bapt Cc: freebsd-toolchain-list ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[Differential] [Accepted] D3175: ar: add -U (unique) option to disable -D (deterministic) mode
bapt accepted this revision. bapt added a comment. This is one of the changes I really needed! REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3175 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: emaste, imp, brooks, bapt Cc: freebsd-toolchain-list ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[Differential] [Commented On] D2887: Allow ELF Tool Chain elfcopy to be installed as objcopy
bapt added a subscriber: bapt. bapt added a comment. Why not always build elfcopy and just make a hardlink objcopy if MK_ELFCOPY_AS_OBJCOPY is set? That will make elfcopy always available to users REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2887 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: emaste, andrew Cc: bapt, bdrewery, freebsd-toolchain-list, emaste ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[Differential] [Accepted] D2887: Allow ELF Tool Chain elfcopy to be installed as objcopy
bapt accepted this revision. bapt added a reviewer: bapt. This revision has a positive review. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2887 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: emaste, andrew, bapt Cc: bapt, bdrewery, freebsd-toolchain-list, emaste ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[Differential] [Accepted] D2187: Ensure cross assembler, linker and objcopy are used for the build32 stage
bapt accepted this revision. bapt added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. yup you are right This looks ok for me I still would be more confident with @imp reviewing as well :) BRANCH /head REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2187 To: dim, imp, rodrigc, bapt Cc: imp, freebsd-toolchain ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[Differential] [Accepted] D2156: Switch to ELF toolchain readelf
bapt accepted this revision. bapt added a reviewer: bapt. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2156 To: emaste, imp, bapt Cc: freebsd-toolchain ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[Differential] [Accepted] D1974: Support out-of-tree binutils with in-tree compiler
bapt accepted this revision. bapt added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Looks ok to me REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1974 To: emaste, bapt Cc: andrew, freebsd-toolchain ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Resurrecting clang external toolchain support in Makefile.inc
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:55:17PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: On Feb 11, 2015, at 7:14 PM, Peter Grehan gre...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi Warner, I like this patch better than the one I have. I’m not 100% sure the ‘else’ clause will work The else for CROSS_BINUTILS_PREFIX ? If so, yes, that appears to work: I'm building with in-tree binutils. Ok for this to be committed ? Yes. I’m happy. Ok for me as well! Best regards, Bapt pgpklV6hta4Jx.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Resurrecting clang external toolchain support in Makefile.inc
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 07:50:59PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
On Feb 10, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Peter Grehan gre...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi toolchain folk,
I've recently tried using the base system clang as an external toolchain
i.e.
make CROSS_COMPILER_PREFIX=/usr/bin/ buildworld
.. and found that this no longer works after r273755 which split XFLAGS
into XC/XCXXFLAGS. This appears to be because the XFLAGS definitions that
define --sysroot and -B options aren't being passed through to clang,
resulting in using header files from the host system.
My quick hack was
--- Makefile.inc1 (revision 278542)
+++ Makefile.inc1 (working copy)
@@ -374,6 +374,8 @@
TARGET_ABI?=unknown
TARGET_TRIPLE?= ${TARGET_ARCH:C/amd64/x86_64/}-${TARGET_ABI}-freebsd11.0
XCFLAGS+= -target ${TARGET_TRIPLE}
+XCFLAGS+= ${XFLAGS}
+XCXXFLAGS+=${XFLAGS}
.endif
.endif
However, this doesn't look to be the right way to fix this.
Any opinions on a proper fix ?
I have a similar “fix” in my tree as well, but hadn’t pushed it because I
wasn’t quite sure the right way either.
Warner
In my opinion we should track down the last traces of XFLAGS and turn them into
proper XCFLAGS and XCXXFLAGS, the intent was to get rid of XFLAGS because the
name was confusing.
so instead of adding XFLAGS to XC*FLAGS, the XFLAGS should juste be converted
into XC*FLAGS directly in my opinion.
Best regards,
Bapt
pgpyZlqtlD99a.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[Differential] [Updated] D1516: Update aarch64 patch for binutils 2.25
bapt added a comment. Just for the record I approved via IRC REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1516 To: emaste, andrew, bapt Cc: freebsd-toolchain ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Using more elftoolchain tools?
Hi all, From what I can see on the elftoolchain website, they do have working replacement for: - size(1) - addr2line(1) - strings(1) - nm(1) - strip(1) Does anyone knows if there are known issues with those? or if they are viable replacement for the version we have in base? I'm planning to spend a bit of time on those (I think emaste@ is already working on strip(1) so I'll skip that one). Best regards, Bapt pgpgbiMr9wEKw.pgp Description: PGP signature
