RE: Recent Changes to Rum driver - seems to have..

2009-02-14 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
I am sure you're right Andrew I would not have expected the change unless
there was a good reason for it - I find some time to do some testing and
give feedback

-Original Message-
From: Andrew Thompson [mailto:thom...@freebsd.org] 
Sent: 12 February 2009 04:24
To: Hans Petter Selasky
Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org; Thomas Sparrevohn
Subject: Re: Recent Changes to Rum driver - seems to have..

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:00:45AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
 On Tuesday 10 February 2009, Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:
  Reintroduced panics when the device is used heavily - it also reports
the
  needs callback   in dmesg - Unless this is known I can post a dmesg
 
 
 Hi Thomas,
 
 Andrew Thompson decided to re-port the driver from USB1. I've tried to fix

 most of the bugs now. If the fixes are not in -current yet you can fetch 
 if_rum*[ch] from:
 
 svn --username anonsvn --password anonsvn \
   checkout svn://svn.turbocat.net/i4b/trunk/i4b/src/sys/dev/usb2
 
 
 Do you have a backtrace of the panics ?
 
 Sorry about the inconvenience.

Please watch the mud slinging, there were very good reasons for changing
the wlan code back to the USB1 state (bugs and all).

Each regression will be investigated and fixed.


































































































































































___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: Recent Changes to Rum driver - seems to have..

2009-02-11 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
That explains it - Here you go 

-Original Message-
From: Hans Petter Selasky [mailto:hsela...@c2i.net] 
Sent: 11 February 2009 09:01
To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org; Andrew Thompson
Cc: Thomas Sparrevohn
Subject: Re: Recent Changes to Rum driver - seems to have..

On Tuesday 10 February 2009, Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:
 Reintroduced panics when the device is used heavily - it also reports the
 needs callback   in dmesg - Unless this is known I can post a dmesg


Hi Thomas,

Andrew Thompson decided to re-port the driver from USB1. I've tried to fix 
most of the bugs now. If the fixes are not in -current yet you can fetch 
if_rum*[ch] from:

svn --username anonsvn --password anonsvn \
  checkout svn://svn.turbocat.net/i4b/trunk/i4b/src/sys/dev/usb2


Do you have a backtrace of the panics ?

Sorry about the inconvenience.

--HPS

































































































































































core.txt.46.bz2
Description: Binary data
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: Recent Changes to Rum driver - seems to have..

2009-02-11 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
Ok will do - Just need to get out of Vista land - so it will take a little
while

-Original Message-
From: Hans Petter Selasky [mailto:hsela...@c2i.net] 
Sent: 11 February 2009 15:17
To: Thomas Sparrevohn
Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org; 'Andrew Thompson'
Subject: Re: Recent Changes to Rum driver - seems to have..

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for reporting this bug!

I've analysed your panic and have made the following patch:

http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=157544

Accumulated patches are available from my private SVN. I recommend updating 
all files in the usb2 directory.

 svn --username anonsvn --password anonsvn \
   checkout svn://svn.turbocat.net/i4b/trunk/i4b/src/sys/dev/usb2


--HPS
 






























































































































































___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Recent Changes to Rum driver - seems to have..

2009-02-10 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
Reintroduced panics when the device is used heavily - it also reports the
needs callback   in dmesg - Unless this is known I can post a dmesg 

___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: HEADSUP usb2/usb4bsd to become default in GENERIC

2009-02-06 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
On Friday 06 February 2009 15:19:01 M. Warner Losh wrote:
 Doesn't the busdma issue need to be solved before we do this?  usb2
 currently doesn't work if you have memory above 4GB due to this
 issue.  I thought we tagged it as a show stopper for making it the
 default.
 
 Warner

To be honst - I stongly recommend that it's fixed before. I know the problem is
not related to the USB2 stack as such - However the way the problem occurs
e.g. a corruption in the ATA dma load make it far from clear that it's a USB 
bounce 
buffer problem and my error reports was generally ignored with the - there 
nothing wrong 
with the ATA code - quite correctly as it turned out but - it kept me using an 
old kernel
before the old brain got around to thinking about USB 

So I would love to see it fixed and I am not quite sure what the hold up is? 
Last time I heard
- we seemed to be caugth in between - a double there nothing wrong with the 
dma code 
and that is the way USB works ;-) 

I am sure there is more to it however ;-0)

Regards
T.
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: USB2 patches

2009-02-01 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
Before we switch GENERIC - would it be possibly to have the bus dma issue
committed as well? Without the patch manually added none of my umass devices
work under amd64 

-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org]
On Behalf Of Alfred Perlstein
Sent: 01 February 2009 03:06
To: Andrew Thompson
Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: USB2 patches

I'll defer to Hans if he feels confident or not about this.

For what it's worth, we're about to switch GENERIC to use
usb4bsd.

-Alfred

* Andrew Thompson thom...@freebsd.org [090131 15:20] wrote:
 Hi,
 
 
 I have several patches in my svn user branch that I would like to see
 committed to HEAD. Some of these change the usb2 core code so I am
 interested in feedback or shootdowns. I am right behind the change to
 USB2 and this is an effort to help. 
 
 The patch can be found here,
  http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/usb_head1.diff
  73 files changed, 9229 insertions(+), 13261 deletions(-)
 
 but its rather large so it may be easier to look at the various changes
 via the svn web interface.
 
 http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/user/thompsa/usb/
 
 
 r187750
   http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revisionrevision=187750
 
   Change over to using taskqueue(9) instead of hand rolled threads and
   the config_td system. This removes the config_td code and makes the
   API much simpler to use.
 
 r187751, r187752, r187753, r187754, r187755, r187756
   http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revisionrevision=187751
 
   Change over to usb2_proc w/ taskqueues for the usb2/ethernet,
   usb2/serial and usb2/wlan code.
 
 r187965
   http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revisionrevision=187965
 
   Move most of the ifnet logic into the usb2_ethernet module, this
includes,
- make all usb ethernet interfaces named ue%d
- handle all threading in usb2_ethernet
- provide default ioctl handler
- handle mbuf rx
- provide locked callbacks for init,start,stop,etc
 
   The drivers are not much more than data pushers now.
 
 
 regards,
 Andrew

-- 
- Alfred Perlstein
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 











































































































































































___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Advice on booting from usb2

2009-01-10 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn


I have a 4GB SDHC card that I have formatted with ufs and installed a current 
kernel on - Its connected to a USB reader. 
Now here is the thing - I can boot the kernel with USB2 well enough but when it 
comes to mount root - it looks like
USB2 has not probed and attached the device yet and I get the mount root from 
prompt - however it does not show
the cam devices 

Any advice? 
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Advice on booting from usb2

2009-01-10 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
On Saturday 10 January 2009 15:23:48 Olivier SMEDTS wrote:

The patch works for me and allows me to boot - however eventually I get the 

usb2_pc_common_mem_cb:429: Page offset was not preserved!

Error - I wonder if the error is specific to the Nvidia Nforce 590 Intel
chipset or its more generic as but seems to occur quite rarely 



 
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Advice on booting from usb2

2009-01-10 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
On Saturday 10 January 2009 18:40:10 Hans Petter Selasky wrote:

 
 It is chipset independent. It appears at the moment data is bounced, because 
 you have too much memory in the computer :-) Currently the USB drivers only 
 supports 32-bits of DMA addressing.
 
 --HPS
 


Well I guess its not the worst kind of problem to have ;-)
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: USB4BSD release candidate number 3 - request for review

2008-11-05 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 08:15:52 Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
 Hi,
 
  And one last thing:
  # usbdevs -v
  usbdevs: no USB controllers found
 
 
 That command is no longer supported. Use usbconfig instead. I'm not sure if 
 it is currently installed by default.
 
 --HPS
 

usbconfig does not install per default - it does not even seem to compile - 
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: USB4BSD release candidate number 3 - request for review

2008-10-31 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
On Sunday 26 October 2008 15:33:20 Hans Petter Selasky wrote:


What is the device naming change to? 

 Hi,
 
 A new USB release is available:
 
 http://www.selasky.org/hans_petter/usb4bsd/for_review/
 
 %md5 usb2_release_003.*
 MD5 (usb2_release_003.diff) = e31a032d0234bb7d72eb968c33118d84
 MD5 (usb2_release_003.tar.gz) = 0a0d9dd44e93ba2ceaa849c577f6fecf
 %sha256 usb2_release_003.*
 SHA256 (usb2_release_003.diff) = 
 9b4359f76eeef43d9b6c0c524198e529f2debff14e6158ebac8f35d51efb211b
 SHA256 (usb2_release_003.tar.gz) = 
 3040714546fc21bc2943c2e7aec1734150845271664aad44639ff5c553e3ed31
 
 Changes since 002 release:
 
 1) LibUSB20 is now fully documented
 2) LibUSB20 is now fully backwards compatible with LibUSB 0.1.12 
 from /usr/ports/devel/libusb .
 3) All Makefiles have a license in them
 4) usbconfig now supports dynamic quirks (add, remove and view)
 5) All USB modules have been fragmented into smaller parts:
 ./Makefile
 ./bluetooth/Makefile
 ./bluetooth_fw/Makefile
 ./bluetooth_ng/Makefile
 ./controller/Makefile
 ./controller_at91dci/Makefile
 ./controller_ehci/Makefile
 ./controller_musb/Makefile
 ./controller_ohci/Makefile
 ./controller_uhci/Makefile
 ./controller_uss820dci/Makefile
 ./core/Makefile
 ./ethernet/Makefile
 ./ethernet_aue/Makefile
 ./ethernet_axe/Makefile
 ./ethernet_cdce/Makefile
 ./ethernet_cue/Makefile
 ./ethernet_dav/Makefile
 ./ethernet_kue/Makefile
 ./ethernet_rue/Makefile
 ./image/Makefile
 ./input/Makefile
 ./input_hid/Makefile
 ./input_kbd/Makefile
 ./input_ms/Makefile
 ./misc/Makefile
 ./misc_dbp/Makefile
 ./misc_fm/Makefile
 ./ndis/Makefile
 ./quirk/Makefile
 ./scanner/Makefile
 ./serial/Makefile
 ./serial_ark/Makefile
 ./serial_bsa/Makefile
 ./serial_bser/Makefile
 ./serial_chcom/Makefile
 ./serial_cycom/Makefile
 ./serial_foma/Makefile
 ./serial_ftdi/Makefile
 ./serial_gensa/Makefile
 ./serial_ipaq/Makefile
 ./serial_lpt/Makefile
 ./serial_mct/Makefile
 ./serial_modem/Makefile
 ./serial_moscom/Makefile
 ./serial_plcom/Makefile
 ./serial_visor/Makefile
 ./serial_vscom/Makefile
 ./storage/Makefile
 ./storage_ata/Makefile
 ./storage_fs/Makefile
 ./storage_mass/Makefile
 ./storage_rio/Makefile
 ./template/Makefile
 ./wlan/Makefile
 ./wlan_ral/Makefile
 ./wlan_rum/Makefile
 ./wlan_zyd/Makefile
 
 The following file has been deleted:
 src/sys/dev/usb2/controller/uss820dci_pccard.c
 
 --HPS
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ___
 freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: USB4BSD release candidate number 3 - request for review

2008-10-31 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
On Friday 31 October 2008 15:56:42 Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
 On Friday 31 October 2008, Olivier SMEDTS wrote:
  Hello,
 
  Each device driver has been splitted since RC3.
  Look in /boot/kernel/usb2_*. You can use modules.
  For example, for my usb mouse, I use usb2_input_ums.
 
 Hi,
 
 Looks like I made a small typo there. The module is named usb2_input_ms 
 while the kernel option is named usb2_input_ums. The kernel option should 
 be named usb2_input_ms.
 

Is this the same issue?

config: Error: device usb2_controller_uss820dci is unknown
config: Error: device usb2_ethernet_dav is unknown


 Alfred: Can you fix this before committing?
 
 --HPS
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Panic with USB2 release candidate

2008-10-16 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
I downloaded the release candidate 2 for the new USB stack and while it work 
very well for most things 
I am getting repeated panics when using heavy disk traffic - I believe the 
issue is related to the 
problems I described in the out of bounce buffers mail - Yet with the new 
stack it show up
correctly in the USB UMASS dma code as a fault

Anyhow its a pretty nasty panic - I have a number of core dumps if its of any 
use

___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Out of bounce buffers

2008-10-15 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
I will be answering this one myself

Further debugging seems fortunately to vindicate the ATA drivers - I tried
to disable most other drivers - USB, if etc. And the problem goes away 

I now need to tie down where the problem occurs - but what seems to happen
is that a DMA read sanity check fails due to the segment has been
overwritten/changed/freed while the ATA driver was holding the same tag 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Sparrevohn
Sent: 13 October 2008 22:08
To: 'Søren Schmidt'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Out of bounce buffers 



Hi 

I have had a weird issue since the change in April where the SATA Port
multipliers was introduced. The system started issuing DATA load FAILURE
in the ata-dmaload every time that disk subsystem got loaded. Because the
code prior from 10/04-2008 worked fine and Ignored the problem and simply
used the code prior to the SATA Port multiplier was introduced. The reason
was twofold - One I did not time to investigate and two I suspected it could
be a hw error - using cheap SATA disks.

Well finally I have had time to investigate and the problem occurs because
the system runs out of bounce buffers 

I have tested the entire disk for errors using a Hitachi tools and there
seems to no problems - down to the degree that I can get the system to work
with the current ATA subsystem as long as I only use one disk ;-) Regardless
of which of the 4 disks - 

however if I add a second disk to the subsystem it will eventually (after
17-40GB of restores) give me a DATA load failures - Naturally I suspected
the disk drives - however as I said - I can fully restore without the error
occurring as long as I only use one disk

Puzzled by this I started plastering the code with printf's to see what
happened - patch included just FYI - It turns out that the kernel runs out
of bounce buffers - which is very surprising - Can anybody give any advice
on this?





___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Native USB now works on MCP55 on AMD64

2007-06-19 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
Thanks - Thanks - I am very very pleased to inform you that the MCP55 USB 
native USB stack now attaches correctly under 
the AMD64 and all my USB devices seems to work - I believe that I had  a GNAT 
problem
report about it that can be closed

Thanks a million 
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Advise on debugging ohci?

2007-06-15 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn


Hi 

I am currently trying to pin down a problem with the native USB stack on the 
AMD64 -
when I am booting in 64bit mode with the MCP55 USB stack it fails in usb_attach 
- so
far the only clear error I have found is that the first Unit is not found 
correctly - below is the 32BIT
debug output  

ohci0: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xdfffc000-0xdfffcfff irq 21 at 
device 11.0 on pci0
ohci0: Reserved 0x1000 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xdfffc000
ioapic0: routing intpin 21 (PCI IRQ 21) to vector 49
ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
ohci0: [ITHREAD]
ohci_init: start
usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support
ohci_alloc_sed: allocating chunk
ohci_init: SMM active, request owner change
usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting
usb0: resetting
ohci_dumpregs: rev=0x0110 control=0x06bf command=0x
   intrstat=0x0004 intre=0x804a intrd=0x804a
   hcca=0x00287000 percur=0x ctrlhd=0x00286fe0
   ctrlcur=0x bulkhd=0x00286fc0 bulkcur=0x
   done=0x fmival=0xa7782edf fmrem=0x80001f8d
   fmnum=0x0011 perst=0x2a2f lsthrs=0x0628
   desca=0x0100120a descb=0x stat=0x
   port1=0x0100 port2=0x0100
 HCCA: frame_number=0x0013 done_head=0x
usbd_match
usbd_match
usb0: OHCI (generic) USB controller on ohci0
usbd_attach
usb0: USB revision 1.0
usbd_new_device bus=0xc5b66000 port=0 depth=0 speed=2
ohci_open: pipe=0xc5b5c280, addr=0, endpt=0 (0)
ohci_root_ctrl_control type=0x80 request=06
ohci_root_ctrl_control wValue=0x0100
usbd_new_device: adding unit addr=1, rev=100, class=9, subclass=0, protocol=0, 
maxpacket=64, len=18, speed=2
ohci_root_ctrl_close

On the AMD64 version the ohci the usbd_new_device seems to get the wrong 
information

ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
ohci0: [ITHREAD]
ohci_init: start
usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support
ohci_alloc_sed: allocating chunk
ohci_init: SMM active, request owner change
usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting
usb0: resetting
ohci_dumpregs: rev=0x0110 control=0x06bf command=0x
   intrstat=0x0004 intre=0x804a intrd=0x804a
   hcca=0x95853000 percur=0x ctrlhd=0x95852fe0
   ctrlcur=0x bulkhd=0x95852fc0 bulkcur=0x
   done=0x fmival=0xa7782edf fmrem=0x8000207b
   fmnum=0x0011 perst=0x2a2f lsthrs=0x0628
   desca=0x0100120a descb=0x stat=0x
   port1=0x0100 port2=0x0100
 HCCA: frame_number=0x0013 done_head=0x
usbd_match
usbd_match
usb0: OHCI (generic) USB controller on ohci0
usbd_attach
usb0: USB revision 1.0
usbd_new_device bus=0x80e48000 port=0 depth=0 speed=2
ohci_open: pipe=0xff015f34b200, addr=0, endpt=0 (0)
ohci_root_ctrl_control type=0x80 request=06
ohci_root_ctrl_control wValue=0x0100
usbd_new_device: adding unit addr=1, rev=00, class=0, subclass=0, protocol=0, 
maxpacket=0, len=0, speed=2
usbd_new_device: illegal descriptor 0
usbd_remove_device: 0xff015f34b300
ohci_root_ctrl_close

When I compile with DIAGNOSTICS enabled on the amd64 - The system panics with 
No data or something like that 
at that point - does anybody have any suggestions? - With the HPS stack 
everything works fine - so its not the devices

Regards
Thomas 
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: USB fails to attach in the SMP version of GENERIC with Nforce 590

2007-02-20 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
Yes - I am always normally running CURRENT - It was when I couldn't get USB
to work
I tried with the 6.2 Image I had installed from and was surprised to
discover it worked 
Under 6.2 - but then I discovered that SMP wasn't enabled 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Baldwin
Sent: 20 February 2007 16:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Thomas Sparrevohn; freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: USB fails to attach in the SMP version of GENERIC with Nforce
590

On Saturday 17 February 2007 16:34, Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:
 HI
 Its a bit of a weird problem - If I boot the 6.2 RELEASE UP kernel -  
 all USB devices works fine
 however it I boot with the most recent (cvsup today) - It fails  
 attaching the root device.
 The only major difference are that the 6.2-RELEASE looks like its a  
 UP kernel or at least
 it never starts the 3 other cores

Well, you cvsupp'ed current (7.0) not 6.x-stable, was that on purpose?
It does look like the uhub(4) driver is what is keeling over.

-- 
John Baldwin
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: amd64/109274: MCP55 USB Controller fails to attach in AMD64 Current SMP Kernel

2007-02-20 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
The following reply was made to PR usb/109274; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Thomas Sparrevohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'John Baldwin' [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: amd64/109274: MCP55 USB Controller fails to attach in AMD64 
Current SMP Kernel
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:39:15 -

 That what I did and USB does not work under SMP AMD64 with this chipset - I
 did send a mail to that effect on both
 Mailing lists including dmesg etc. 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: John Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: 20 February 2007 16:48
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: Thomas Sparrevohn; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: amd64/109274: MCP55 USB Controller fails to attach in AMD64
 Current SMP Kernel
 
 On Sunday 18 February 2007 07:39, Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:
  
  Number: 109274
  Category:   amd64
  Synopsis:   MCP55 USB Controller fails to attach in AMD64 Current SMP
 Kernel
  Confidential:   no
  Severity:   critical
  Priority:   high
  Responsible:freebsd-amd64
  State:  open
  Quarter:
  Keywords:   
  Date-Required:
  Class:  sw-bug
  Submitter-Id:   current-users
  Arrival-Date:   Sun Feb 18 12:40:06 GMT 2007
  Closed-Date:
  Last-Modified:
  Originator: Thomas Sparrevohn
  Release:AMD64 Current (cvsup 17/02)
  Organization:
  Environment:
  Description:
  The USB MCP55 Controller fails to attach in AMD64 Current leaving no
 keyboards working etc.
  How-To-Repeat:
  Boot the system in AMD64 Mode - I have pciconf/devinfo dumps available
  Fix:
  Reverting to 6.2 RELEASE works - however that means that the system does
 not run in SMP
 
 Dude, just build an SMP kernel on 6.2.  SMP isn't enabled in GENERIC on
 6.x by default.
 
 -- 
 John Baldwin
 
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: amd64/109274: MCP55 USB Controller fails to attach in AMD64 Current SMP Kernel

2007-02-20 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn
The following reply was made to PR usb/109274; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Thomas Sparrevohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'John Baldwin' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: amd64/109274: MCP55 USB Controller fails to attach in AMD64 
Current SMP Kernel
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:39:51 -

 By the way I am using CURRENT 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: John Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: 20 February 2007 16:48
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: Thomas Sparrevohn; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: amd64/109274: MCP55 USB Controller fails to attach in AMD64
 Current SMP Kernel
 
 On Sunday 18 February 2007 07:39, Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:
  
  Number: 109274
  Category:   amd64
  Synopsis:   MCP55 USB Controller fails to attach in AMD64 Current SMP
 Kernel
  Confidential:   no
  Severity:   critical
  Priority:   high
  Responsible:freebsd-amd64
  State:  open
  Quarter:
  Keywords:   
  Date-Required:
  Class:  sw-bug
  Submitter-Id:   current-users
  Arrival-Date:   Sun Feb 18 12:40:06 GMT 2007
  Closed-Date:
  Last-Modified:
  Originator: Thomas Sparrevohn
  Release:AMD64 Current (cvsup 17/02)
  Organization:
  Environment:
  Description:
  The USB MCP55 Controller fails to attach in AMD64 Current leaving no
 keyboards working etc.
  How-To-Repeat:
  Boot the system in AMD64 Mode - I have pciconf/devinfo dumps available
  Fix:
  Reverting to 6.2 RELEASE works - however that means that the system does
 not run in SMP
 
 Dude, just build an SMP kernel on 6.2.  SMP isn't enabled in GENERIC on
 6.x by default.
 
 -- 
 John Baldwin
 
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: USB fails to attach in the SMP version of GENERIC with Nforce 590

2007-02-20 Thread Thomas Sparrevohn


On 20 Feb 2007, at 21:12, John Baldwin wrote:


On Tuesday 20 February 2007 13:42, Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:
Yes - I am always normally running CURRENT - It was when I  
couldn't get USB

to work
I tried with the 6.2 Image I had installed from and was surprised to
discover it worked
Under 6.2 - but then I discovered that SMP wasn't enabled


So what I see from your e-mail is that a 6.2 UP kernel works fine (but
no SMP), and a 7.0 SMP kernel breaks, but you want SMP.  Have you
tried a 6.2 SMP kernel?  I imagine that is going to work fine.

You have way too many variables here.  The USB breakage could be due
to SMP vs UP (I doubt it) or due to 6.2 vs 7.0 (more likely).



Well not really that many variables - as the DVD Drives does not work  
with 6.2.0-RELEASE and
they do with Sorens latest changes and was ever only really concerned  
about CURRENT.


But anyhow - I just tested with a 6.2.0-RELEASE SMP kernel and as you  
suspected it works fine
meaning that we back at the fact that CURRENT does have a problem  
(Only tested with GENERIC).


I am going to test with CURRENT and the new USB stack and feedback  
the results - Werner Losh
had experienced  problems that looked the same on a Dell Laptop - so  
maybe its specific to Dell -
I don't really know - but that it works with 6.2 only seems to state  
that it is not inherent


Regards
	Thomas 
___

freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]