[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #7507] Launch server by correct name in freeciv-web mode

2016-07-25 Thread Andreas Røsdal 
Follow-up Comment #4, patch #7507 (project freeciv):

> Topology is not ruleset setting, but server setting. So you are saying that
freeciv-web should be able to use classic ruleset as it is, except for the
capability string?

Yes, I think so. Well, except for topology and arctic terrain coast tendering.
The diff between Fcweb and classic should be very small.

___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #7507] Launch server by correct name in freeciv-web mode

2016-07-25 Thread Marko Lindqvist 
Follow-up Comment #3, patch #7507 (project freeciv):

> except that Freeciv-web doesn't support all map topoligies

Topology is not ruleset setting, but server setting. So you are saying that
freeciv-web should be able to use classic ruleset as it is, except for the
capability string?

___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #7507] Launch server by correct name in freeciv-web mode

2016-07-25 Thread Marko Lindqvist 
Follow-up Comment #2, patch #7507 (project freeciv):

> What would a typical usage of this patch be?

Testing. I don't expect end-users to benefit from this directly, but it inches
us closer to a point where freeciv-web stuff can be unit-tested against
regular server/client.

___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #7507] Launch server by correct name in freeciv-web mode

2016-07-25 Thread Andreas Røsdal 
Follow-up Comment #1, patch #7507 (project freeciv):

This is interesting!

About the Fcweb rulesets: Freeciv-web should be able to use the classic
rulesets, except that Freeciv-web doesn't support all map topoligies, and that
is doesn't support arctic coast tendering. If there was a different way to
negotiate map topology support than in the rulesets, then Freeciv-web could
use classic. Maintaining and updating Fcweb is costly.

What would a typical usage of this patch be? 

___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #7507] Launch server by correct name in freeciv-web mode

2016-07-25 Thread Marko Lindqvist 
URL:
  

 Summary: Launch server by correct name in freeciv-web mode
 Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: cazfi
Submitted on: Mon 25 Jul 2016 11:58:11 AM EEST
Category: client
Priority: 5 - Normal
  Status: Ready For Test
 Privacy: Public
 Assigned to: None
Originator Email: 
 Open/Closed: Open
 Discussion Lock: Any
 Planned Release: 3.0.0
 Contains string changes: None

___

Details:

Attached patch makes client to try to launch correct server binary in
freeciv-web mode.

Note that server still fails immediately in the typical situation that there's
no suitable rulesets available for freeciv-web server (It might be time to
bring fcweb ruleset in some form to freeciv proper svn, and only patch it in
freeciv-web git)



___

File Attachments:


---
Date: Mon 25 Jul 2016 11:58:11 AM EEST  Name: SpawnFreecivWeb.patch  Size: 4kB
  By: cazfi



___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev