Re: [Freedos-devel] Freedos EDIT
Hello, On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 22:28, Eric Auer wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > I just noticed that the source to FreeDOS EDIT > > > https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.2/repos/base/edit.zip > > is incomplete as it assumes an existing DFLAT library which is not > > included, and at least non-trivil to locate on the internet. > If you have troubles to find or compile, let me know. > Looking at my archives, there was a file with the obscure name > DFP100S.ZIP containing the sources. Such things happened when > people pretended that web browsers are unable to access files > with longer names than 8+3 characters :-p > Well DOS does not without LFN, and I try to use 8.3 to create DOS packages. Aitor ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Freedos EDIT
tom ehlert [22/04/2022 14.31]: Can you complete the build with this? https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/devel/libs/dflat/ no. this is linux stuff with unknown conversion status. won't touch. How is this Linux stuff? This is the _readme.txt_ file from that directory: === if you use watcom c, and are having trouble compiling, here's a hint from the freedos-devel mailing list: >> Try these lines: >> >> wcc -ml -i=c:\\WATCOM\h -i=c:\freedos\source\INC hworld.c >> wlink @owlink.wcl >> >> where owlink.wcl is: >> === >> system dos >> option map >> option stack=8192 >> name hworld.exe >> file hworld >> libpath c:\freedos\source\lib >> libpath c:\watcom\lib286 >> libpath c:\watcom\lib286\dos >> library dflatplo.lib >> library dtool2lo.lib >> === >> >> And it works for me. > > Works also for me. :) === -- Hilsen Harald ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Freedos EDIT
Hi Tom, I just noticed that the source to FreeDOS EDIT https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.2/repos/base/edit.zip is incomplete as it assumes an existing DFLAT library which is not included, and at least non-trivil to locate on the internet. Looking at my archives, there was a file with the obscure name DFP100S.ZIP containing the sources. Such things happened when people pretended that web browsers are unable to access files with longer names than 8+3 characters :-p There also is DFLAT100.zip which was used for EDIT 0.9a, but I have to say my experience with EDIT is mostly 0.7a to 0.7d, while the versions 0.81 and 0.82 are Joe's field of expertise instead. Regards, Eric ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Freedos EDIT
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022, 7:34 AM tom ehlert wrote: > > I think in the FreeDOS "beta" days, the distributions included > > programming libraries too, basically a copy of the "libs" tree from > > Ibiblio. > what "libs" tree? > This link, one level up from the DFLAT link I shared in my other email: > https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/devel/libs/ See how the directory path ends in "libs"? That's the "libs" tree. > ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Freedos EDIT
Hallo Herr Jim Hall, am Freitag, 22. April 2022 um 11:57 schrieben Sie: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2022, 4:22 AM tom ehlert wrote: > I just noticed that the source to FreeDOS EDIT > https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.2/repos/base/edit.zip > is incomplete as it assumes an existing DFLAT library which is not > included, and at least non-trivil to locate on the internet. > Can you complete the build with this? > https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/devel/libs/dflat/ no. this is linux stuff with unknown conversion status. won't touch. > I think in the FreeDOS "beta" days, the distributions included > programming libraries too, basically a copy of the "libs" tree from > Ibiblio. what "libs" tree? > But we probably stopped doing that around FreeDOS 1.0, but > didn't remember the libs dependency for any code. well done. Tom ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Freedos EDIT
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022, 4:22 AM tom ehlert wrote: > > I just noticed that the source to FreeDOS EDIT > > https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.2/repos/base/edit.zip > is incomplete as it assumes an existing DFLAT library which is not > included, and at least non-trivil to locate on the internet. > Can you complete the build with this? https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/devel/libs/dflat/ I think in the FreeDOS "beta" days, the distributions included programming libraries too, basically a copy of the "libs" tree from Ibiblio. But we probably stopped doing that around FreeDOS 1.0, but didn't remember the libs dependency for any code. ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Freedos EDIT
I just noticed that the source to FreeDOS EDIT https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.2/repos/base/edit.zip is incomplete as it assumes an existing DFLAT library which is not included, and at least non-trivil to locate on the internet. Tom ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
