Re: [Freedos-devel] re:Don't you think its better to use Msdos file names?

2004-02-24 Thread Kenneth J. Davis

Hi, to answer your question:

   DOS\HELP   - all help files

This contains only files which are called project.*, like
project or project.cn or project.es or project.htm ...
Actually the CURRENT way is even simpler:

DOS\HELP\ contains files which are called project. So for example
the help file of PG would be in the file DOS\HELP\PG ...
DOS\HELP\ also contains a subdirectory HHSTNDRD with HTML help:
DOS\HELP\HHSTNDRD\PG.HTM
But you do not have to provide pg.htm - this is usually written by
the maintainer of HTML Help. Even DOS\HELP\PG is usually put there
by the maintainer of the help system. It is often something like
the output of PG /? or a copy of PG.MAN ...
..

Minor corrections, the html help files are maintained as
a set for the BASE files by our help maintainer (Robert) and
installed as a set, where the fasthelp files are added to each
package (for all sets BASE, UTIL, etc) usually by me when
creating the package (which is why it tends to match the
program.MAN or program /? output).  The fasthelp files are
now in the form of HELP\PROGRAM.LANG falling back to
HELP\PROGRAM.EN if no translation or language is found.

Jeremy




---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps  Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click
___
Freedos-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel


Re: [Freedos-devel] re:Don't you think its better to use Msdos file names?

2004-02-24 Thread Kenneth J. Davis
..

I keep my binary files inside BIN of PGnnn.ZIP now, it
looks like I ought to drop the BIN directory to align
with your idea, give me a 'yes' please.

 
 Eric.
 
BAHCL


Not if you are only doing it for distribution package
reasons, otherwise go ahead.  While I encourage all
maintainers to create packages that separate the files
into BIN, DOC, HELP, NLS, etc., if you distribute the
program separately from a FreeDOS distribution as well,
it is really weird to include the extra PROGRAM name
in the zip (e.g. DOC\PG\PG.MAN should just be DOC\PG.MAN
and you should do PG.EXE or BIN\PG.EXE as you prefer).

Also, the discussion regarding BIN is not yet settled.

Jeremy




---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps  Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click
___
Freedos-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel


Re: [Freedos-devel] re:Don't you think its better to use Msdos file names?

2004-02-24 Thread maintainer freedospg
Hi Jeremy,

Thanks for you explanation.
Looks like DOSEMU's setting, I'll take your
suggestion.

BIN\PG.EXE 
DOC\PG\PG.MAN

regards,
BAHCL


 --- Kenneth J. Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 Not if you are only doing it for distribution
 package
 reasons, otherwise go ahead.  While I encourage all
 maintainers to create packages that separate the
 files
 into BIN, DOC, HELP, NLS, etc., if you distribute
 the
 program separately from a FreeDOS distribution as
 well,
 it is really weird to include the extra PROGRAM
 name
 in the zip (e.g. DOC\PG\PG.MAN should just be
 DOC\PG.MAN
 and you should do PG.EXE or BIN\PG.EXE as you
 prefer).
 
 Also, the discussion regarding BIN is not yet
 settled.
 
 Jeremy
 


_
...
  
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=22281/*http://ringtone.yahoo.com.hk/


---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps  Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click
___
Freedos-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel


Re: [Freedos-devel] re:Don't you think its better to use Msdos file names?

2004-02-23 Thread maintainer freedospg
Hi Eric,

Thanks for your explanation!
And I should have known better.

 
 [This is a reply to the question by BAHCL: What if
 DOS\HELP ends up
  to contain several files which are all called
 readme? Answer: This
  does not happen. PG would only be allowed to have
 files DOS\HELP\PG
  and DOS\HELP\HHSTNDRD\PG.HTM in the help directory,
 the rest of the
  readme / documentation would be in DOS\DOC\PG\ ...]
 
 PS: The ZIP would NOT contain a DOS directory. You
 first CD to \DOS
 and then unzip THERE. So the ZIP contains for
 example a DOC\PG\ directory!

I keep my binary files inside BIN of PGnnn.ZIP now, it
looks like I ought to drop the BIN directory to align
with your idea, give me a 'yes' please.

 
 Eric.
 
BAHCL

_
...
  
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=22281/*http://ringtone.yahoo.com.hk/


---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps  Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click
___
Freedos-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel