[Freedos-user] Please remove me

2005-07-24 Thread Fox
Hi,

As I will not have internet connection for 3 months, please remove me from 
both user and devel lists (don't want to fill up my mailbox).

Best regards,
Fox


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] NTFS4DOS and FreeDOS - Works with UMBPCI, Fails with EMM386

2005-07-24 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi!

11-Июл-2005 17:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:

MD Never load a driver, shell, or application before HIMEM and EMM386.  They
MD are fundamental first loaders as they configure your basic memory
MD situation.  That SHELL command has got to come later in CONFIG.SYS.  The
MD rest should be fine, although I'd still stick them afterwards for form's
MD sake.
SHELL=a:\command.com /p
1234?DEVICE=A:\FDOS\HIMEM.EXE

 SHELL is parsed later than any DEVICE statement, together with INSTALL
and SET. And it not changes anything, beside internal buffer, where
remembered argument of this statement.




---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77alloc_id492op=click
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] More FreeDOS FDISK tests - failure is repeatable

2005-07-24 Thread Michael Devore

At 03:29 PM 7/23/2005 +0100, Gerry Hickman wrote:

Biggest mitigating factors are that if your hard drive behaves without 
errors, is reasonably standard with expected parameters, and there is no 
corruption of the program, the MBR write on startup won't occur.


Ah, so this bug only happens with faulty hard-drives or file-systems?


No, it also happens if there is a something which corrupts FDISK during 
runtime -- what that might be we don't know as yet, it could be FDISK 
itself or it could be something else.  The problem can also happen if FDISK 
doesn't understand the BIOS information it receives.  I do not know whether 
that situation actually occurs in real life systems.  Beyond that, I could 
come up with other scenarios that might fail, but one could speculate for 
hours on any number of potential failure risks when using DOS and I don't 
think it would productive to do that.


Basically, FDISK is currently operating with a big hole in the safety net 
users generally accept as being present.  But as your disks are brand new 
without existing data, any overwrite of your disks' MBR with garbage would 
be a fairly minor nuisance, easily corrected by other means.





---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user