[Freedos-user] Microsoft’s patents

2006-01-14 Thread Eli
For many (most?) people, FreeDOS offers a chance to start our Windows 
machines in DOS mode in order to do maintenance work on the hard drives 
with no open files.  Not just for rescue when the machine crashes, but 
for total backup of a known-good system.


James Tabor is probably right.  To do this right, we need a simple, 
stable DOS (or MS-DOS emulator), with drivers for hard disks, USB flash 
disks, USB hard disks, LANs, etc., which can read and write all 
varieties of FAT and NTFS without damaging long file names and other 
metadata.


I know.  I know.  MS-DOS and Windows are not, and never were, the best 
possible operating systems.  But please remember that over 99% of 
computer users do not buy (or build) a computer and operating system 
just to have the best possible operating system or hardware.  We select 
the hardware and operating system that will run the software we need or 
want, hopefully with the least pain.  Most applications, including some 
that I personally find indispensable, have never been written for any 
operating systems but MS-DOS and Windows.  So I still buy and build 
Intel-Windows computers.


It would be stupid and short-sighted of Microsoft to make FreeDOS and 
like systems go away, especially since they no longer sell or support 
MS-DOS.


Please keep up the good work.  I await FreeDOS 1.0.0 with bated breath.

   ---Eli


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] FAT and other file systems

2006-01-14 Thread Tom Lee Mullins

Christian Voß wrote:


Hi,
 
I can't understand that you talk only about linux filesystems as an 
alternative. There are more options like i.e. HFS, HFS+ and FFS. And 
HFS /HFS+ are under GPL so we can use it without repressions.
And I think it is not more difficult to write HFS or FFS in the kernel 
of FreeDOS than ReiserFS or XFS or all the other candidates.


Would JFS (journalling file system) be considered an alternative?

--


TomLeeM / BigWarpGuy * * http://tomleem.homestead.com * *  
* * Director  of Communications - * - Linkmaster  *  * * * * * *

* *  OS/2 Warp - eComStation Org * * OS/2 World *  * * * * * *
* * http://www.os2ecs.org  * * http://www.os2world.com  * *
* * Supporting Past OS/2 Users and Future eCS Users * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 





---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] FAT and other file systems

2006-01-14 Thread Christian Voß

2006/1/14, Tom Lee Mullins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Christian Voß wrote: Hi, I can't understand that you talk only about linux filesystems as an
 alternative. There are more options like i.e. HFS, HFS+ and FFS. And HFS /HFS+ are under GPL so we can use it without repressions. And I think it is not more difficult to write HFS or FFS in the kernel
 of FreeDOS than ReiserFS or XFS or all the other candidates.Would JFS (journalling file system) be considered an alternative?

HFS isn't a JFS and it is more stable then FAT. And HFS is under GPL.
--TomLeeM / BigWarpGuy * * http://tomleem.homestead.com
 * ** * Directorof Communications - * - Linkmaster** * * * * ** *OS/2 Warp - eComStation Org * * OS/2 World ** * * * * ** * http://www.os2ecs.org* * 
http://www.os2world.com* ** * Supporting Past OS/2 Users and Future eCS Users * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log filesfor problems?Stop!Download the new AJAX search engine that makessearching your log files as easy as surfing theweb.DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click___Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user



[Freedos-user] re: Microsoft=92s patents

2006-01-14 Thread Eric Auer

Hi Eli,

 James Tabor is probably right.  To do this right, we need a simple,
 stable DOS (or MS-DOS emulator), with drivers for hard disks, USB flash
 disks, USB hard disks, LANs, etc., which can read and write all
 varieties of FAT and NTFS without damaging long file names and other
 metadata.

You want Linux

 Most applications, including some
 that I personally find indispensable, have never been written for any
 operating systems but MS-DOS and Windows.  So I still buy and build
 Intel-Windows computers.

On which you can run Linux for maintenance. Actually you can even run
most of the apps on it (in Wine) better than on DOS ;-).

 It would be stupid and short-sighted of Microsoft to make FreeDOS and
 like systems go away, especially since they no longer sell or support
 MS-DOS.

They already documented that in their 2000 PDF about FAT: You can
always use your FAT/... drivers for purposes like booting, firmware,
diagnosis, maintenance... Their comment can even be read as you can
always include FAT driver is in your operating system :-).


http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/hwdev/download/hardware/fatgen103.pdf

Eric

PS: I recommend DOS for running DOS games and for certain embedded
system tasks. And for running DOS programs in general, without the
overhead of running Windows or Linux or ReactOS. And in DOSEMU...



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] re: Microsoft=92s patents

2006-01-14 Thread Derek Newhall
--- Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Eli,
 
  James Tabor is probably right.  To do this right,
 we need a simple,
  stable DOS (or MS-DOS emulator), with drivers for
 hard disks, USB flash
  disks, USB hard disks, LANs, etc., which can read
 and write all
  varieties of FAT and NTFS without damaging long
 file names and other
  metadata.
 
 You want Linux

No, we want DOS.

A Microsoft server admin would be much more
comfortable using a DOS-based rescue disk than
anything *nix based since they all know the DOS
commands. A person managing a *nix server will know
*nix and therefore use Knoppix or FreeSBIE but give a
Windows user a Knoppix CD and they'll be lost. Also,
DOS has a smaller footprint (in both memory/CPU usage
and disk space) than *nix or Windows which could be
quite usefull.

I think a FreeDOS distro for rescue/maintenance work
would be a really good idea and if started I would
almost certainly try and help.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] re: Microsoft=92s patents

2006-01-14 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi!

14-Янв-2006 22:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:

EA http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/hwdev/download/hardware/fatgen103.pdf

 This link doesn't work.





---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] re: Microsoft=92s patents

2006-01-14 Thread Brolin Empey

Derek Newhall wrote:

--- Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Hi Eli,



James Tabor is probably right.  To do this right,


we need a simple,


stable DOS (or MS-DOS emulator), with drivers for


hard disks, USB flash


disks, USB hard disks, LANs, etc., which can read


and write all


varieties of FAT and NTFS without damaging long


file names and other


metadata.


You want Linux



No, we want DOS.

A Microsoft server admin would be much more
comfortable using a DOS-based rescue disk than
anything *nix based since they all know the DOS
commands.


That is an issue of the user applications and shell, not the OS.  Just 
because you use a DOS kernel does not mean that you have to use a 
COMMAND.COM-style shell or clones of the external commands shipped with 
MS-DOS.  You could use e.g. bash on Linux with aliases to map the MS-DOS 
commands to the GNU Coreutils equivalents.  I believe that there are 
also packages of executables (compiled executables or interpreted 
scripts) that allow you to use the MS-DOS commands and their syntax on *nix.


It is of course also not hard to *learn* to use coreutils.  Simply run 
command --help instead of command /? and read the man page if you 
need further information.  Messy-DOS is a clone of CP/M with elements 
from *nix.  It does not have something as useful as an organised, 
central manual for documentation of user commands.



A person managing a *nix server will know
*nix and therefore use Knoppix or FreeSBIE but give a
Windows user a Knoppix CD and they'll be lost.


Not if they are doing simple tasks with KDE.


Also,
DOS has a smaller footprint (in both memory/CPU usage
and disk space) than *nix or Windows which could be
quite usefull.


You can create small-footprint Linux distributions also with e.g. 
busybox and uClibc.




I think a FreeDOS distro for rescue/maintenance work
would be a really good idea and if started I would
almost certainly try and help.



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user